NOTE: Today is Day Two of the Man Boobz Pledge Drive. If you haven’t already, please consider clicking the little button below and sending some bucks my way.
Thanks! (And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.) Now back to our regularly scheduled programming:
So what sorts of things make some men so furious that they feel the need to send women they’ve never met literal death and rape threats on the internet? It doesn’t take much, apparently. A woman suggesting that it’s not such a good idea to hit on women in elevators at 4 AM. A woman making videos suggesting that there’s sexism in video games. A woman captured on video telling some men to shut the fuck up. A woman complaining about sexist jokes at a tech conference.
Add to this: a woman campaigning successfully to have Jane Austen’s face put on the Bank of England’s ten pound notes.
Over the past week, writer and activist Caroline Criado-Perez, who organized the campaign to get Austen memorialized on the bank note, has been harassed relentlessly on Twitter by assholes and misogynists and trolls for her efforts. Some of this harassment has taken the form of literal rape and death threats. One 21-year-old Manchester man was arrested and questioned in connection with the threats.
Similar threats and harassment were directed at noted British classics professor Mary Beard and female Members of Parliament.
Here’s a sadly typical example of one of the threatening comments sent to Criado-Perez from an account that Twitter temporarily banned — then reinstated.
https://twitter.com/CCriadoPerez/status/362499703285358592
And a more graphic example:
https://twitter.com/ianmcqui/status/361587787511779328
And some even more graphic threats directed at female MPs.
https://twitter.com/JonathanHaynes/status/361967658087890945
https://twitter.com/JonathanHaynes/status/361964227516309504
For many more examples of messages sent to Criado-Perez and others, see Catalina Hernández’ blog I Will Not Put Up With This: here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
And if you had any doubt about how little in the way of repercussion most of these harassers expected to get for their threatening tweets, some tweeted using what are presumably their real names. Here are some comments from one Ivan Garcia of San Diego, as collected by Hernández.
And here is his blog, where this fan of jazz, video games and threatening rape shares his poetry with the world.
The harassment obviously raises a lot of issues,most notably: Why the fuck does this keep happening? And: What’s the best way to deal with this sort of harassment — and these sorts of harassers?
Twitter has promised to add a “report abuse” button; some activists see this as a step in the right direction, while others worry that the “report abuse” button will be itself abused to shut down critics of harassment. Twitter’s record in dealing with harassers has not exactly been a great one; just ask Anita Sarkeesian.
British journalists and assorted bloggers have been trying to sort through some of these issues over the past few days. Here are some links to some of the more interesting pieces, from a variety of perspectives. (Well, I’m not including the pro-rape threat perspective.) Links aren’t necessarily endorsements.
First, for a little more background, see:
Twitter under fire after bank note campaigner is target of rape threats
Caroline Criado-Perez Twitter abuse case leads to arrest
And here are some posts and pieces looking at the issues:
A ‘report abuse’ button on Twitter will create more problems than it solves, by Sharon O’Dea
A button will not, alone, rid Twitter (or the wider world) of mysogyny and abuse. These are complex issues that will take more than a button to resolve. But ‘report abuse’ buttons have been known to be widely abused on other networks. ….
Introduction of a similar mechanism on Twitter ironically creates a whole new means by which trolls can abuse those they disagree with. The report abuse button could be used to silence campaigners, like Criado-Perez, by taking advantage of the automatic blocking and account closure such a feature typically offers. In that way, it could end up putting greater power in the trolls’ hands.
Why does it always come back to rape? by Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett and Holly Baxter of the Vagenda Magazine, in the New Statesman
Rape is the popular choice when women become more visible than they apparently should be, and that’s because it’s easy. …. Whatever their opinion, however they conducted their arguments, however well-researched and nuanced their replies to criticism are, they’re women and male trolls could rape them and that’s what really matters. …
[Academic] Mary Beard got called a “dirty old slut” with a “disgusting vagina” just as [Member of Parliament] Stella Creasy was being tweeted “YOU BETTER WATCH YOUR BACK… I’M GONNA RAPE YOU AT 8PM AND PUT THE VIDEO ALL OVER THE INTERNET”. …
The message is that women’s vaginas are, literally, always up for grabs. If they’re young, the rape threats will come thick and fast; if they’re older, maybe the trolls will settle for insulting their vaginas and telling them that they were “sluts” in the past.
If Every Male Troll Took a Walk in Women’s Shoes, Would He Finally Feel Our Outrage? by Elizabeth Plank
Withstanding rape threats has become a right of passage for female writers or personalities, just as making them as become a right of passage for cowardly and anonymous misogynist trolls. If you’re a woman who happens to possess opinions, and write about feminist issues (god forbid!), chances are you will be violently trolled. … the issue is not that women receive more criticism than men, but rather that it comes in more violent and vitriolic forms. Men will be attacked for their opinion, whereas women will be threatened because they have opinions.
[O]ne study showed that female usernames in chat forums received 25 times more abuse than male ones. In an experiment conducted by the University of Maryland, researchers found that “Female usernames, on average, received 163 malicious private messages a day.” So all else equal, if you’re a woman online, you’re going to be on the receiving end of more hate.
I believe it. I get a lot of shit from misogynists for running this blog — and the occasional threat — but what I get is nothing compared to the harassment similarly controversial feminist bloggers who happen to be women have gotten.
What women-hating trolls really believe, by Emma Barnett
First troll up was Peter from Whitechapel. …
“She was asking for it,” he told me. According to this nitwit, if you campaign about issues such as keeping a woman on English banknotes, you should “expect to receive rape threats”. I delved further.
“If you put your head above the parapet, like she has, then you deserve this type of abuse. It’s what you get when you are a woman shouting about something,” Peter told me, starting to get a little irate. …
Then Gary from Birmingham decided to call in [and] told me in no uncertain terms that “feminists like Caroline were undermining what it is to be a man” and needed “sorting out”.
“Men are predators,” he explained calmly. “And this [rape threats] is what we do.”
And here, after all this awfulness, is a piece that manages to be funny about it all: How to use the internet without being a total loser.
cloudiah: we can try on lipsticks, I’ll even bring nail polish and we can make it a slumber party.
I think I see what Quark’s problem is, she’s a Chill Girl. Death threats don’t upset her, so why all the fuss? Someday she’ll realize being Chill is a lot of effort for little payoff.
But her “you’re mean” tantrums are cute.
Trigger warning!
Everyone knows that people who make threats never carry them out.
That’s why you should just ignore threats.
Quark, regardless of your gender, you are doing a wicked job of mansplaining why we need not worry our pretty little heads about online threats. Please stop. You being told you were missing the point was not sarcasm, and it was not an attack. It was the truth. You have missed the point of the discussion trying to be had here. Furthermore, I don’t care what you choose to feel. I care that you are telling me what to feel. When threatened, I not only feel in danger, I AM in danger. That shit is DANGEROUS to my mental health, my sense of self, my ability to participate equally etc. Please stop saying online threats are not dangerous. At least stop saying it here because you are invalidating the lived experiences of many, many people. You have made your point, and many of us disagree. And that’s real.
tooimpureangel: you’re more than welcome to join us in shame and lipsticks.
@tooimpureangel, Absolutely, come on along!
I haven’t “stomped into a thread”, I’ve just stated my opinion, which you disagree with, which is fine.
You all object to aggressive, horrible, nasty comments on the internet? Why don’t you all take a long, hard look at yourselves?
I’m not intentionally trying to offend anyone, yet many of you are intentionally trying to insult and attack me and openly state you wish to intimidate and attack me until I “fuck off”.
Really. Take a look at yourselves.
hellkell, Let’s start a blog called Shame and Lipstick.
Cloudiah & hellkell, can I come to the slumber party too? My favorite lipstick just broke off at the base and I am in need of makeup-based solace.
cloudiah: that’s not a bad idea.
I can’t help but compare my reception as a newbie to Quark’s…
@CL – uh-huh, and what about the effect on me of all the unpleasantness I’m getting in this thread? Do people’s feelings only matter when they agree with you?
dustydeste: please join us!
I’m really sorry VA Tech did nothing for you–you’re right about thinking that that school would be hypervigilant about student safety.
Quark: I can only speak for myself, but I don’t give a rat’s tiny ass about your feelings right now. Fuck off.
@ hellkell – Wow. You don’t see even the tiniest bit of rank hypocrisy in that statement?
@quark – my comments were directly targetted at your earlier statement that you had the right to reply to people. Sure you do, but not necessarily here. This is Mr. Futrelle’s virtual livingroom, not yours.
Go rant somewhere else, it seems to have escaped your notice that people would rather have a different conversation today.
Yeah, I’m not seeing the distance here. Not all sarcasm is satirical, but satire relies heavily on sarcasm. Straight-faced statements or question to ironically highlight the absurd or immoral is sarcasm.
I simply don’t see rudeness or dismissiveness by itself as harassment or discrimination, even though it can be used in such a way.
IMO: The host sets the rules of engagement.
If I go to your house, you can be as rude, sarcastic, mocking and dismissive as you want; you’re not harassing me. If you tell me to leave, but I stay, then no matter how polite I am, I’M the harasser. The flip side, if you come into my zone, I’m under no obligation to be polite. If you disengage and I continue to follow you with rudeness, then I become the harasser.
Elsewhere, the host sets the rules for tone. Unless Twitter wants to be the sole domain of unaccountable shitlords, they’ll make these changes.
Christ, I don’t even have words for how completely stupid what you’re saying is. We object to death and rape threats on the internet. I highly doubt you’ll find anyone here who objects to calling people things like wrong, poorly-informed asshats, which is what you are, btw.
If you think that being told to fuck off is the same as being threatened with murder or rape, you need to sit down and have a good long think about your life. Also you should go fuck off.
Quark: please stop with the pearl-clutching and boo-hooing and just admit you came to start shit. Didn’t quite work the way you planned–you say you’ve read this place, but you didn’t read the room–too bad, so sad.
@ Kate – I’m not ranting, I am expressing an opinion and have at no point intended to offend or upset anyone with it. And as Mr Futrelle hasn’t banned me, I clearly have just as much right to reply here as you do.
I know I’m not a regular, but I have an awesome nail-polish stamping kit and gel polishes… can I join the slumber party too? (I even have thermodynamic gel polishes… they change based on the temperature! I love them sooo much!)
@ Hellkell, what nonsense. Just read my first comment (first on the thread), and it is abundantly obvious I did not come here just to “start shit”.
Quark: there’s no hypocrisy. You’re not getting death threats here.
Even if you were, they don’t bother you, remember? I guess it’s just that we’re not falling all over you and telling you how right you are that bothers you.
hellkell: Yay slumberparty! I’ll bring the sparkly pink girly wine 😀
Oooh, Kate, those polishes sound so cool! I had some at one point that changed color in sunlight, but it was yeeeeaaaarrrrs ago now…
Kate: please join! Those nail things sound awesome.