NOTE: Today is Day Two of the Man Boobz Pledge Drive. If you haven’t already, please consider clicking the little button below and sending some bucks my way.
Thanks! (And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.) Now back to our regularly scheduled programming:
So what sorts of things make some men so furious that they feel the need to send women they’ve never met literal death and rape threats on the internet? It doesn’t take much, apparently. A woman suggesting that it’s not such a good idea to hit on women in elevators at 4 AM. A woman making videos suggesting that there’s sexism in video games. A woman captured on video telling some men to shut the fuck up. A woman complaining about sexist jokes at a tech conference.
Add to this: a woman campaigning successfully to have Jane Austen’s face put on the Bank of England’s ten pound notes.
Over the past week, writer and activist Caroline Criado-Perez, who organized the campaign to get Austen memorialized on the bank note, has been harassed relentlessly on Twitter by assholes and misogynists and trolls for her efforts. Some of this harassment has taken the form of literal rape and death threats. One 21-year-old Manchester man was arrested and questioned in connection with the threats.
Similar threats and harassment were directed at noted British classics professor Mary Beard and female Members of Parliament.
Here’s a sadly typical example of one of the threatening comments sent to Criado-Perez from an account that Twitter temporarily banned — then reinstated.
https://twitter.com/CCriadoPerez/status/362499703285358592
And a more graphic example:
https://twitter.com/ianmcqui/status/361587787511779328
And some even more graphic threats directed at female MPs.
https://twitter.com/JonathanHaynes/status/361967658087890945
https://twitter.com/JonathanHaynes/status/361964227516309504
For many more examples of messages sent to Criado-Perez and others, see Catalina Hernández’ blog I Will Not Put Up With This: here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
And if you had any doubt about how little in the way of repercussion most of these harassers expected to get for their threatening tweets, some tweeted using what are presumably their real names. Here are some comments from one Ivan Garcia of San Diego, as collected by Hernández.
And here is his blog, where this fan of jazz, video games and threatening rape shares his poetry with the world.
The harassment obviously raises a lot of issues,most notably: Why the fuck does this keep happening? And: What’s the best way to deal with this sort of harassment — and these sorts of harassers?
Twitter has promised to add a “report abuse” button; some activists see this as a step in the right direction, while others worry that the “report abuse” button will be itself abused to shut down critics of harassment. Twitter’s record in dealing with harassers has not exactly been a great one; just ask Anita Sarkeesian.
British journalists and assorted bloggers have been trying to sort through some of these issues over the past few days. Here are some links to some of the more interesting pieces, from a variety of perspectives. (Well, I’m not including the pro-rape threat perspective.) Links aren’t necessarily endorsements.
First, for a little more background, see:
Twitter under fire after bank note campaigner is target of rape threats
Caroline Criado-Perez Twitter abuse case leads to arrest
And here are some posts and pieces looking at the issues:
A ‘report abuse’ button on Twitter will create more problems than it solves, by Sharon O’Dea
A button will not, alone, rid Twitter (or the wider world) of mysogyny and abuse. These are complex issues that will take more than a button to resolve. But ‘report abuse’ buttons have been known to be widely abused on other networks. ….
Introduction of a similar mechanism on Twitter ironically creates a whole new means by which trolls can abuse those they disagree with. The report abuse button could be used to silence campaigners, like Criado-Perez, by taking advantage of the automatic blocking and account closure such a feature typically offers. In that way, it could end up putting greater power in the trolls’ hands.
Why does it always come back to rape? by Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett and Holly Baxter of the Vagenda Magazine, in the New Statesman
Rape is the popular choice when women become more visible than they apparently should be, and that’s because it’s easy. …. Whatever their opinion, however they conducted their arguments, however well-researched and nuanced their replies to criticism are, they’re women and male trolls could rape them and that’s what really matters. …
[Academic] Mary Beard got called a “dirty old slut” with a “disgusting vagina” just as [Member of Parliament] Stella Creasy was being tweeted “YOU BETTER WATCH YOUR BACK… I’M GONNA RAPE YOU AT 8PM AND PUT THE VIDEO ALL OVER THE INTERNET”. …
The message is that women’s vaginas are, literally, always up for grabs. If they’re young, the rape threats will come thick and fast; if they’re older, maybe the trolls will settle for insulting their vaginas and telling them that they were “sluts” in the past.
If Every Male Troll Took a Walk in Women’s Shoes, Would He Finally Feel Our Outrage? by Elizabeth Plank
Withstanding rape threats has become a right of passage for female writers or personalities, just as making them as become a right of passage for cowardly and anonymous misogynist trolls. If you’re a woman who happens to possess opinions, and write about feminist issues (god forbid!), chances are you will be violently trolled. … the issue is not that women receive more criticism than men, but rather that it comes in more violent and vitriolic forms. Men will be attacked for their opinion, whereas women will be threatened because they have opinions.
[O]ne study showed that female usernames in chat forums received 25 times more abuse than male ones. In an experiment conducted by the University of Maryland, researchers found that “Female usernames, on average, received 163 malicious private messages a day.” So all else equal, if you’re a woman online, you’re going to be on the receiving end of more hate.
I believe it. I get a lot of shit from misogynists for running this blog — and the occasional threat — but what I get is nothing compared to the harassment similarly controversial feminist bloggers who happen to be women have gotten.
What women-hating trolls really believe, by Emma Barnett
First troll up was Peter from Whitechapel. …
“She was asking for it,” he told me. According to this nitwit, if you campaign about issues such as keeping a woman on English banknotes, you should “expect to receive rape threats”. I delved further.
“If you put your head above the parapet, like she has, then you deserve this type of abuse. It’s what you get when you are a woman shouting about something,” Peter told me, starting to get a little irate. …
Then Gary from Birmingham decided to call in [and] told me in no uncertain terms that “feminists like Caroline were undermining what it is to be a man” and needed “sorting out”.
“Men are predators,” he explained calmly. “And this [rape threats] is what we do.”
And here, after all this awfulness, is a piece that manages to be funny about it all: How to use the internet without being a total loser.
@ Argenti – not sure what you are talking about. But I just don’t see the point in wasting time with silly commentary on such a serious subject.
i need something to get this out of my mind…
http://static.mellbimbo.eu/files/2013/07/31/tumblr_mqsrgxYyra1qf4h5oo1_500.jpg CAPS LOCKNESS MONSTER!
@ titian – I’m female, actually.
Am I being presumptious in assuming male pronous for Quark?
I stand corrected and I apologise. I should not have presumed.
@ titian – yes. Quark: “Any of a number of subatomic particles carrying a fractional electric charge, postulated as building blocks of the hadrons.”
Thanks for the apology – accepted 🙂
Quark, I’m gonna politely suggest that you stop commenting and just read for a while. You’re kinda taking over the comment thread, and it might do you good to get a sense of the culture of this place before barging in and telling people they shouldn’t be silly or sarcastic.
That Barnett piece, wowza.
No, it really doesn’t. It’s probably going Godwin to point out that there are people who actually believe that the Holocaust didn’t happen, but I’m going to do it anyway. No, we are NOT required to show courtesy to every genuine opinion. Some genuine opinions are quite shitty, and deserve no courtesy and no respect.
@Quark
What you say on the internet is a part of real life. It’s not like these comments are coming from spambots that gained sentience. On the other end of just about every pseudonym and anonymous comment is a human being. A human being that goes on to interact with other human beings. I sure wouldn’t feel safe around an acquaintance that threatened to rape someone else, even if it was ‘only on the internet.’
@ Cludiah, as I stated previously I have read at least 50 articles and threads on here – probably more. People keep responding to me, so I respond back. That is my right.
Hey, geese are fucking mean, I’m surprised these assholes have the good sense to leave them alone.
And this is exactly the line of thinking that allows them to continue abusing people without consequences.
@quark it is your right but is it wise?
@ titian – are all your comments wise? I would say not, but you might feel differently. We are entitled to disagree – that is the beauty of debate.
I know what’s making me uneasy about this thread – and, I’m sorry to say, Quark’s posts. It’s all too rape culture.
TW:
Hey, so you’ve been raped/threatened with rape. Here’s how you should react as a good victim.. Here’s what you did to put yourself in the position, in the first place. Here’s what society expects you to do now, as a good girl. Let’s all look at you, the victim, and ignore the rapist/threatener. ‘Cos hey, we all know they’re a monster, nothing to do with us, nothing to talk about there.
Am I just burbling or does that make sense?
@titianblue
No, it’s how I’ve been feeling. I couldn’t put into words what was making me queasy, but that sums it up perfectly.
As in no, you’re not just burbling.
@quark: in fact, there was a very active internet troll up here in Montreal who made endless threats to members of the atheist /skeptical community and was in fact arrested I think last year. He was mentally unbalanced, unmedicated/untreated and dangerous. He had shown up at a conference & was photographed in proximity to people he’d harassed. That is an escalation, and it does happen.
No. See, that’s you trying to shut me up.
Your opinion is heavily invested in preserving the status quo and deserves to be roundly mocked. It’s not shaming language or denying you your freeze peach or whatever the fuck to do it.
Yeah, you should probably sit down and read for a while like cloudiah said.
If what you say online isn’t real or somehow doesn’t count, then why utter your idiocy in the first place?
This is where you are childishly wrong, and it’s a sign of sloppy thinking/impending doom–not every opinion deserves airtime, or careful consideration.
Wow, there’s a lot of projection going on here. How on earth am I saying rape or rape culture is okay when I have repeatedly stated people who make such threats should be exposed and punished?
My only point is people shouldn’t live in unnecessary fear. It is counterproductive, and what the trolls want.
Quark: titianblue’s not wrong. I keep expecting you to whip out a handy list of how to stay safe on the internet.
They mostly come out at night… Mostly.
I’ve got an earth shatteringly simple solution to twitter trolls. If you don’t like twitter’s anti-harrassment policies……DON’T USE TWITTER!!!! That’s it . That is all that needs to be done. If you don’t want to see display bins full of dildo’s, don’t walk into a porn store. If you don’t want to see childish bickering and bad GIF’s, don’t go to 4chan. If there is something you don’t like the first option is always DON”T GO THERE. It’s not like twitter feeds are unavoidable like billboards and grocery stores.