NOTE: Today is Day Two of the Man Boobz Pledge Drive. If you haven’t already, please consider clicking the little button below and sending some bucks my way.
Thanks! (And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.) Now back to our regularly scheduled programming:
So what sorts of things make some men so furious that they feel the need to send women they’ve never met literal death and rape threats on the internet? It doesn’t take much, apparently. A woman suggesting that it’s not such a good idea to hit on women in elevators at 4 AM. A woman making videos suggesting that there’s sexism in video games. A woman captured on video telling some men to shut the fuck up. A woman complaining about sexist jokes at a tech conference.
Add to this: a woman campaigning successfully to have Jane Austen’s face put on the Bank of England’s ten pound notes.
Over the past week, writer and activist Caroline Criado-Perez, who organized the campaign to get Austen memorialized on the bank note, has been harassed relentlessly on Twitter by assholes and misogynists and trolls for her efforts. Some of this harassment has taken the form of literal rape and death threats. One 21-year-old Manchester man was arrested and questioned in connection with the threats.
Similar threats and harassment were directed at noted British classics professor Mary Beard and female Members of Parliament.
Here’s a sadly typical example of one of the threatening comments sent to Criado-Perez from an account that Twitter temporarily banned — then reinstated.
https://twitter.com/CCriadoPerez/status/362499703285358592
And a more graphic example:
https://twitter.com/ianmcqui/status/361587787511779328
And some even more graphic threats directed at female MPs.
https://twitter.com/JonathanHaynes/status/361967658087890945
https://twitter.com/JonathanHaynes/status/361964227516309504
For many more examples of messages sent to Criado-Perez and others, see Catalina Hernández’ blog I Will Not Put Up With This: here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
And if you had any doubt about how little in the way of repercussion most of these harassers expected to get for their threatening tweets, some tweeted using what are presumably their real names. Here are some comments from one Ivan Garcia of San Diego, as collected by Hernández.
And here is his blog, where this fan of jazz, video games and threatening rape shares his poetry with the world.
The harassment obviously raises a lot of issues,most notably: Why the fuck does this keep happening? And: What’s the best way to deal with this sort of harassment — and these sorts of harassers?
Twitter has promised to add a “report abuse” button; some activists see this as a step in the right direction, while others worry that the “report abuse” button will be itself abused to shut down critics of harassment. Twitter’s record in dealing with harassers has not exactly been a great one; just ask Anita Sarkeesian.
British journalists and assorted bloggers have been trying to sort through some of these issues over the past few days. Here are some links to some of the more interesting pieces, from a variety of perspectives. (Well, I’m not including the pro-rape threat perspective.) Links aren’t necessarily endorsements.
First, for a little more background, see:
Twitter under fire after bank note campaigner is target of rape threats
Caroline Criado-Perez Twitter abuse case leads to arrest
And here are some posts and pieces looking at the issues:
A ‘report abuse’ button on Twitter will create more problems than it solves, by Sharon O’Dea
A button will not, alone, rid Twitter (or the wider world) of mysogyny and abuse. These are complex issues that will take more than a button to resolve. But ‘report abuse’ buttons have been known to be widely abused on other networks. ….
Introduction of a similar mechanism on Twitter ironically creates a whole new means by which trolls can abuse those they disagree with. The report abuse button could be used to silence campaigners, like Criado-Perez, by taking advantage of the automatic blocking and account closure such a feature typically offers. In that way, it could end up putting greater power in the trolls’ hands.
Why does it always come back to rape? by Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett and Holly Baxter of the Vagenda Magazine, in the New Statesman
Rape is the popular choice when women become more visible than they apparently should be, and that’s because it’s easy. …. Whatever their opinion, however they conducted their arguments, however well-researched and nuanced their replies to criticism are, they’re women and male trolls could rape them and that’s what really matters. …
[Academic] Mary Beard got called a “dirty old slut” with a “disgusting vagina” just as [Member of Parliament] Stella Creasy was being tweeted “YOU BETTER WATCH YOUR BACK… I’M GONNA RAPE YOU AT 8PM AND PUT THE VIDEO ALL OVER THE INTERNET”. …
The message is that women’s vaginas are, literally, always up for grabs. If they’re young, the rape threats will come thick and fast; if they’re older, maybe the trolls will settle for insulting their vaginas and telling them that they were “sluts” in the past.
If Every Male Troll Took a Walk in Women’s Shoes, Would He Finally Feel Our Outrage? by Elizabeth Plank
Withstanding rape threats has become a right of passage for female writers or personalities, just as making them as become a right of passage for cowardly and anonymous misogynist trolls. If you’re a woman who happens to possess opinions, and write about feminist issues (god forbid!), chances are you will be violently trolled. … the issue is not that women receive more criticism than men, but rather that it comes in more violent and vitriolic forms. Men will be attacked for their opinion, whereas women will be threatened because they have opinions.
[O]ne study showed that female usernames in chat forums received 25 times more abuse than male ones. In an experiment conducted by the University of Maryland, researchers found that “Female usernames, on average, received 163 malicious private messages a day.” So all else equal, if you’re a woman online, you’re going to be on the receiving end of more hate.
I believe it. I get a lot of shit from misogynists for running this blog — and the occasional threat — but what I get is nothing compared to the harassment similarly controversial feminist bloggers who happen to be women have gotten.
What women-hating trolls really believe, by Emma Barnett
First troll up was Peter from Whitechapel. …
“She was asking for it,” he told me. According to this nitwit, if you campaign about issues such as keeping a woman on English banknotes, you should “expect to receive rape threats”. I delved further.
“If you put your head above the parapet, like she has, then you deserve this type of abuse. It’s what you get when you are a woman shouting about something,” Peter told me, starting to get a little irate. …
Then Gary from Birmingham decided to call in [and] told me in no uncertain terms that “feminists like Caroline were undermining what it is to be a man” and needed “sorting out”.
“Men are predators,” he explained calmly. “And this [rape threats] is what we do.”
And here, after all this awfulness, is a piece that manages to be funny about it all: How to use the internet without being a total loser.
@Kristineedscats
I like S&S as well. Though for some reason I can’t stand Emma, that said the modern remakes of Emma generally seem to work well which may say something.
I adore Pride and Prejudice. It’s really weird, but every time I read it I discover something I hadn’t noticed previously that helps me appreciate it on a deeper level.
Lemme see here, no all I see is a fauxpology:
Tell me, what do you think you did wrong that you need to apologize for?
@Quark, can you repost your apology? I must have missed it. Not being sarcastic, this thread is moving quickly and I’m checking it while working.
I was one of the people that was threatened by Markuz/Mabus (the Canadian guy who was arrested for threatening atheists and skeptics) and while I didn’t receive anywhere near the volume of threats some people got from him and he sent the same threats to many other people it was still really distressing. I have a pretty thick skin but being told he wanted to cut my head off shook me up. I’ve received other threats online as well and honestly I’m not sure how anyone can handle the torrent of abuse they get, just the trickle I get is hard enough.
@AK: Here’s the apology, such as it is: http://manboobz.com/2013/07/31/jane-austen-and-the-rape-threatening-men/comment-page-5/#comment-335491
I actually don’t care for Jane Austen at all. Hey, what are people reading now? I’m reading Watership Down, which I never read before. I’m interspersing it with the Oxford History of Ancient Egypt, which so far has been very dry — mostly about pottery shards. I think it’s about to get better. Then it’s on to John McPhee.
@AK – I did engage with you – I said I agreed with your argument, as well as your criticism of mine.
However, whether you see it or not, people are dehumanising me, by complaining I have hurt them, but not caring at all if they hurt or upset me – actively wanting to, in fact, and telling me they want to.
It is jarring and horrible. They are doing the very thing they claim to despise. They think their feelings matter but mine don’t – this has been openly stated.
I have apologised for hurting anyone’s feelings which I genuinely did not want to do.
People want to hurt mine and then mock me for daring to object.
@tooimpurenangel
That’s the thing about really good books, every time you read them you find something new.
@cloudiah
I’ve been trying to get around reading Sexing the Body by Anne Fausto-Sterling, but…I dunno, I’m just too tired to read long books after work. V_V
hellkell, I’m not a librarian, but I’m totally with you on not being able to get into Austen’s stuff. Just never really struck a chord with me, I guess.
@ hellkell
I had the same problem with Emma, then I read Pride and Prejudice and there was no comparison. I haven’t read Sense and Sensibility, but P&P seems like a good bet.
@chibigodzilla, OK, I give up. If that’s what Quark considers an apology, I’ve definitely been wasting my time.
@cloudiah:
Watership down? I love that book, it’s about the best “talking animal” book ever. Right now I’m reading Sodomy and the Pirate Tradition, amazing book.
I really didn’t care for Emma at all.
Problem is, that is precisely the impression everyone else got from your comment, and when we tried to point that out to you, instead of apologizing, you doubled down on your assertions and started telling everyone what we were allowed to say and how we were allowed to say it.
I’m reading Wanted by Sara Shepard right now =)
All snark aside, where did you apologize? I have yet to see it in this thread. The bit I quoted was weasly and self-justifying and was not an apology. An apology contains an expression of regret without mitigation or self-justification. If you did that, please point it out to me?
It was not “self-justifying”. You are just determined to be unpleasant to me at any cost.
@Hyena Girl
Emma was the last that I read and I enjoyed it because it was *different*. But I’ve heard that is why some people don’t like it.
As far as S&S goes, like I said, it’s not my thing, but the husbutt’s into it and is currently planning a bit of a vlogpost on how, in fact, it is not the case that all women secretly want to be Emma. I love my husband <3
I am currently reading a manual called Grammatically Correct in an effort to learn the actual rules of grammar, as I've mostly learned it by rote, rather than by rule. I'm super amused by the clear fact that it was written by a Canadian, which makes it perfect in my eyes.
Just so someone says it: I like Emma.
I like Watership Down too. When I was a kid my hamsters were named Hazel and Fiver even though they weren’t rabbits.
And I am also a librarian.
Love, love, love Watership Down!! As far as talking animals go, I was a fan of the Redwall series when I was younger, but I haven’t read them again after growin up so I dnt knw how well they’ll hold up now.
I have a collection of Jane Austen’s works, but the only books I ever enjoyed were S&S and P&P. Although, I dnt knw if it’s just me, but sometimes it feels like I’m reading the same book with different names when I read those two.
Watership Down is such a great book. cloudiah, make sure you have plenty of Kleenex on hand.
I’m reading Stephen King’s Dance Macabre right now. It’s outdated in some ways, but his analysis of horror is pretty solid overall.
Another librarian! Our takeover continues apace.