So the Man Boobz survey results are in, and Argenti Aertheri, who ran the survey, has taken the time and effort to make an impressive set of interactive charts to display the data in all of its gory details. You can find that chart below — thanks again, Argenti! — but I thought I’d highlight a few of the results first.
Let’s start with the white elephant in the room. I know I’ve made some somewhat rude remarks in the past about the high percentage of white people in the Men’s Rights subreddit.
Well, it turns out that the Man Boobz readership is even whiter than that. Yep. Using the same somewhat limited set of choices used by the dude who did the Men’s Rights subreddit survey, the MB survey found that the readership of this blog is nearly 92% white, and less than 2% each Asian, Hispanic and Black, with the remainder answering “Other.”
There is also a more complicated breakdown of ethnicities, based on a more nuanced set of questions, that I’m not even going to try to summarize; you can look through the charts yourself.
But, basically, yeah, this blog’s readership, like me, is pretty darn white. I take these results as an indication that I need to do a better job dealing with issues of race and racism. While this blog is primarily about misogyny, there is plenty of racism in the manosphere — from the white-supremacism-lite of Heartiste to the fetishization of Asian women as submissive — and it’s worth pointing this out on a more regular basis, as well as addressing some of the more subtle ways misogyny intersects with other forms of oppression. As well as the ways in which the standard (non) issues of the Men’s Rights movement can actually serve to obscure the very real issues faced by men of color. (See yesterday’s post for a perfect example of that.)
So what are some of the other notable results?
You’re all younger than me. Well, not literally ALL of you. In fact, there are a whole 4% of you older than me.
But the fact is that if you’re reading this, the chances are really, really, really good that you’re in your twenties or early thirties. Still, I feel fairly confident in saying that eventually you will be as old as I am now.
Also, it’s pretty likely that you’re a lady. Most of the readers of the blog — 59% — are cis women, with 30% cis men. The remaining 11 percent are made up of trans* women (2.2%), trans* men (0.9%), intersex (o.2%), “non-binary” (5.2%) and “other” (2.5%).
See the interactive charts below for a much more detailed breakdown of the data on gender and sexuality.
We’re a bunch of pinkos. More Man Boobzers identified themselves with Democratic Socialism than with any other political label. The second and third place winners in this category? “Other US Liberalism” and “Social Democratism.”
The sun never sets on the Man Boobz empire. Predictably, most Man Boobz readers — roughly 58% — live in the United States. And there are lots of Man Boobzers in other English-speaking countries around the world, particularly the UK, Canada, and Australia.
But Man Boobz attracts readers in a lot of places where English speakers are in a minority. I was a little surprised to find that there are twice as many Boobzers in Germany, for example, than in New Zealand, and that there are nearly as many in Iceland as in Ireland. There are readers in countries ranging from Argentina to El Salvador, from Jordan to Japan.
There are all sorts of other intriguing factoids to be found in the survey results, from a rather complicated slicing-and-dicing of religious beliefs to answers to the critical question: how many of you are actually me?
If you don’t have Flash, go here to see the charts in all their glory. See here for the footnotes and survey questions and raw data.
If you’re not a regular commenter here, this will help you to make sense of some of the silly in-jokes at the end of the survey.
One last note: The survey doesn’t tell us what percentage of Man Boobz readers consider themselves feminists or, ick, Men’s Rightsers. I’m going to do a quick followup survey on that in an upcoming post.
[gigya src=”http://cdn.tagul.com/cloud.swf” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always” width=”600″ height=”600″ flashvars=”id=173603@1&name=iFrame%20Test”]
Reblogged this on dariancase.
Wow. I’m late. (and the infogr.am website doesn’t… well… display the graphs for me. Oooooold computer, I’m used to it.) But this still looks like a lot of work. Also: FREE HUG PENGUIN! ❤.❤
I’m not surprised there are other UUs, but apparently eight other people ticked the Hellenic Recon box? Even allowing for the people who ticked everything, that’s still half a dozen of y’all. *waves*
More thoughts:
Who let all these heteros in here? I seriously thought we were mostly queer.
@Argenti
Church of Satan?
(I’m not being flippant; Satanism is a legit religion)
No, that was listed as Satanism. I meant Church of Scientology.
CoS could also stand for Church of Scientology. I don’t remember if the survey was that fine-grained as to differentiate between different Satanists (Church of Satan vs Temple of Set vs idiosyncratic self-enlightnement ;)).
@Argenti Aertheri,
You wrote,
——————————————————————————————————————–
Speaking of the penguin, I figured it out. She’s a whore because she’s just giving it away!
Because remember now, women who “give it up” too easy are whores. Women who want dinner or such paid for first, whether they demand Tim just expect it, or go along when our witless MRA gets out his wallet, are also whores. Women who do sex work are whores. Women “saving themselves” for marriage are withholding the sexytimes from men and thus no better than whores…
Basically, if you’re possessed of a feminine identity, you’re a whore.
——————————————————————————————————————–
That Penguin is easy! LOL!
^^^^^^!!!!!
✿◕ ‿ ◕✿
… That’s some tangent.
Falconer — Banjo the Clown –> Order of the Stick –> V is being a fool
Really, not that much of a tangent 🙂
Argenti Aetheri —
Beautiful work. Thank you so much.
So long as we’re talking about PoC, I’ll just drop this here.
@augochlorella, So UVA is crowdsourcing funding for scientific research? Interesting approach. That seems like a good project to fund.
Sorry, failed to follow you through the chain of associations.
I seriously did the same thing to people all the time when I was younger. I’ve been working on laying out my chain of thought more clearly for years now.
Great job Argenti, thank you for pulling this all together! Also I would like to thank the whore penguin for the much-needed hug.
I was right, Falconer IS Cary Grant.
I’m afraid I don’t have much to contribute to the conversation, just wanted to thank Argenti Aetheri for putting this all together. And introduce myself as one of the mentally ill genderqueers who feels accepted here. 🙂 I haven’t found too many sites where stigmatizing the mentally ill is so reliably called out. Always refreshing.
[blockquote]”Its like you think of blacks as something you have to have more then the enemy to be the better feminist.. instead of.. JUST DOING IT IN THE FIRST PLACE BECAUSE YOU ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT BLACKS! But No, its just competition for you albino pinkers.” [/blockquote]
um, i think what the author meant by his statement actually, was that he was under the impression he was being inclusive, but seeing the survey results made him aware that he was not, and so now he wants to change things because he wanted to be inclusive – for its own sake – all along…
ugh, blockquote failure.
He didn’t say anything about being a better feminist. In fact, he specifically said that it’s an indication that he needs to be better when it comes to race and racism.
Falconer — “I’ve been working on laying out my chain of thought more clearly for years now.” — only skippy one step is an improvement for me XD
toujoursgai — “And introduce myself as one of the mentally ill genderqueers…” High five! *is also a mentally ill genderqueer*
Ashley — it’s <blockquote> not [blockquote]
And yeah, I’m not David (well, other than being David since we’re all David…) but I’m guessing you hit the nail on the head there
toujoursgai & Ashley — You both get Welcome Packages? They’re up in the OP if not, the last link.
And thanks everyone, glad you all like it 🙂
Also, there’s a reason I spent far too long tracking down racial breakdowns for all the countries we got responses to — I wanted to compare our data to the population at large not the r/mr results. But any sort of “are we whiter than you’d expect given where we are” type question requires limited categories.
And if I never try and figure out what percent of Spanish people consider themselves non-white again (just as an example) it will be far too soon.
Like, I’d have expected the UK to be fairly diverse, given the amount of press immigrants get, but nope, y’all are very white up there.
Welcome, toujoursgai (love your nym, no surprise)!
Depends where, exactly. Small Scottish fishing village? Whiter than Casper. London? Not so much.
Ditto Manchester, Croyden, I think Birmingham as well