So the Man Boobz survey results are in, and Argenti Aertheri, who ran the survey, has taken the time and effort to make an impressive set of interactive charts to display the data in all of its gory details. You can find that chart below — thanks again, Argenti! — but I thought I’d highlight a few of the results first.
Let’s start with the white elephant in the room. I know I’ve made some somewhat rude remarks in the past about the high percentage of white people in the Men’s Rights subreddit.
Well, it turns out that the Man Boobz readership is even whiter than that. Yep. Using the same somewhat limited set of choices used by the dude who did the Men’s Rights subreddit survey, the MB survey found that the readership of this blog is nearly 92% white, and less than 2% each Asian, Hispanic and Black, with the remainder answering “Other.”
There is also a more complicated breakdown of ethnicities, based on a more nuanced set of questions, that I’m not even going to try to summarize; you can look through the charts yourself.
But, basically, yeah, this blog’s readership, like me, is pretty darn white. I take these results as an indication that I need to do a better job dealing with issues of race and racism. While this blog is primarily about misogyny, there is plenty of racism in the manosphere — from the white-supremacism-lite of Heartiste to the fetishization of Asian women as submissive — and it’s worth pointing this out on a more regular basis, as well as addressing some of the more subtle ways misogyny intersects with other forms of oppression. As well as the ways in which the standard (non) issues of the Men’s Rights movement can actually serve to obscure the very real issues faced by men of color. (See yesterday’s post for a perfect example of that.)
So what are some of the other notable results?
You’re all younger than me. Well, not literally ALL of you. In fact, there are a whole 4% of you older than me.
But the fact is that if you’re reading this, the chances are really, really, really good that you’re in your twenties or early thirties. Still, I feel fairly confident in saying that eventually you will be as old as I am now.
Also, it’s pretty likely that you’re a lady. Most of the readers of the blog — 59% — are cis women, with 30% cis men. The remaining 11 percent are made up of trans* women (2.2%), trans* men (0.9%), intersex (o.2%), “non-binary” (5.2%) and “other” (2.5%).
See the interactive charts below for a much more detailed breakdown of the data on gender and sexuality.
We’re a bunch of pinkos. More Man Boobzers identified themselves with Democratic Socialism than with any other political label. The second and third place winners in this category? “Other US Liberalism” and “Social Democratism.”
The sun never sets on the Man Boobz empire. Predictably, most Man Boobz readers — roughly 58% — live in the United States. And there are lots of Man Boobzers in other English-speaking countries around the world, particularly the UK, Canada, and Australia.
But Man Boobz attracts readers in a lot of places where English speakers are in a minority. I was a little surprised to find that there are twice as many Boobzers in Germany, for example, than in New Zealand, and that there are nearly as many in Iceland as in Ireland. There are readers in countries ranging from Argentina to El Salvador, from Jordan to Japan.
There are all sorts of other intriguing factoids to be found in the survey results, from a rather complicated slicing-and-dicing of religious beliefs to answers to the critical question: how many of you are actually me?
If you don’t have Flash, go here to see the charts in all their glory. See here for the footnotes and survey questions and raw data.
If you’re not a regular commenter here, this will help you to make sense of some of the silly in-jokes at the end of the survey.
One last note: The survey doesn’t tell us what percentage of Man Boobz readers consider themselves feminists or, ick, Men’s Rightsers. I’m going to do a quick followup survey on that in an upcoming post.
[gigya src=”http://cdn.tagul.com/cloud.swf” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always” width=”600″ height=”600″ flashvars=”id=173603@1&name=iFrame%20Test”]
Thank you Argenti! This is incredible. XD
No one has said MRAs are stupid because they’re white. They only seem to give a rat’s ass about MOC when it’s a convenient beatstick against women.
I’m really not sure what you mean by your second comment. I have yet to see a trans* or WOC person as virulently misogynistic as say, GWW. They might well be out there, but I’m not gonna go looking.
Am I the only Latina here?
But I would love, love, love to see more about manosphere and racism.
Also include the fetishization of Latin women that Roosh V and several other manospherians have. It’s profoundly creepy.
It almost feels like if you’re Latina you’re expected to be hyper feminine and hyper sexual. While Asian women are fetishized for the submissiveness and lack of sexual experience.
Both stereotypes are awful.
@auggz
The thing is, we don’t make fun of the MRM for being White. We make fun of them for being overwhelmingly white, while appropriating things that happen to MOC as a reason why Men qua Men are oppressed.
@hellkell
I think auggz meant misogyny against WOC and Trans women. i.e. she feels that feminism is not doing enough when it comes to intersectionality
Shadow: could be, wasn’t clear.
Wow, that was an impressive amount of graphs. Great work, Argenti.
Until we get much older…..then we’re dragon ladies.
I’ve recently had the “pleasure” of reading a couple of manosphere sites (can’t recall which ones, offhand) where they are now advising young men to NOT seek out potential submissive and subservient mates from China, as with the ratio of young men to young women getting to be so out of balance, the young women are now becoming very demanding of men who seek to be potential suitors, and oh, how HORRIBLE that is……..nary a word, of course, about how horrible the why regarding the ratio imbalance.
Yes, they are
@hellkell
Oh, no doubt. I’m giving her some benefit of the doubt considering her history here.
OT, but is anyone feeling particularly cold today. I’d be happy to ship out some heat.
Shadow: got plenty heat here. But now we’re getting a thunderstorm, and it’s excellent! We really need the rain. Send that.
@hellkell
This whole week is high 30s feels like 40s (celcius), I wouldn’t give my own mother rain. She’s lucky we live together 😛 Although, not so much with the heatwave
Shadow: Oh, that’s TX style heat, I’m sorry. Do you have AC at least?
The weather here in San Jose is lovely these days. We just got over a hellish heat wave during which the average temperature was at least 95F or so. Now we get those typical SF Bay cloudy mornings and mild temperatures.
@hellkell
We do, thankfully. I can’t help wondering how the homeless out here are going to survive this heatwave though. Lord knows, we probably won’t even hear about those who don’t.
@Ally
My friend’s doing her Masters out in SF right now, and laughing her ass off at us.
I remember the religion question had every single obscure tribal religion ever recorded, and many that I hadn’t even heard of. Yet it missed out Zen. For shame!!
Isn’t zen a school of Buddhism?
Before I read the rest of the comments, all I wanna know is:
WHO IS THE OTHER CAJUN??
There are two of us and I can account for one …
I apologize, I meant Mahayana Buddhism
Also: hats off to Argenti and assistants, that infographic is a thing of humorous and informative wonder.
Someone claims to be a Shaker. That would be pretty impressive, considering that I’m pretty sure there are fewer than ten shakers left in the entire world. *side eye*
“Quick question, I couldn’t find hinduism on the charts even though I know you had it in the survey. Dunno, if I just missed it or it was filed under other or something.”
It’s not in the chart(s) on change in beliefs because there was no-one person who was raised Hindu (that’s in the footnotes). And it’s only listed as a top level religions (the non-detailed set) because I found fuck all on subsects. And the handful of people who’re currently Hindus checked other top level religions such that they all ended up in the “checked by <4 people, see footnotes" category.
Which means I need to make a note about this somewhere in that section.
"Am I the only Latina here?"
Six people checked Latin@, of them 4 are cis women, one's a trans* woman, one's of a non-binary gender. So nope, you're in good company 🙂
"Yet it missed out Zen. For shame!!"
Well shit, so I did. Sorry!
And I'll run the numbers on David v female WHORE penguins now! (Then add the various notes)
Assistants? You mean guinea pigs! I had testers and picked pecunium’s brain for wording, but other than that…yeah, I am very glad to be done!
Speaking of which, the wording on the chart about changing religion? You have pecunium to thank for that making sense.
jrockford — yeah, I gave that the side eye too, but they didn’t ring any other troll bells and I didn’t want to just pick trolls based in what looked wrong. Mathematically, their survey results are valid.
36.38% of David is a female WHORE penguin.
“Someone claims to be a Shaker. That would be pretty impressive, considering that I’m pretty sure there are fewer than ten shakers left in the entire world. *side eye*”
Shaker? By that do you mean someone from Shakesville?
Sorry, 36.25%, I forgot to subtract the header row.