In a case of spectacularly bad timing, Fox News happened to choose the day before the Zimmerman verdict was handed down to publish an op-ed proclaiming “the White American Male” to be the most oppressed creature on Planet Earth. In a piece entitled “Men — The New Second Class Citizens,” professional antifeminist Suzanne Venker declared that
From boyhood through adulthood, the White American Male must fight his way through a litany of taunts, assumptions and grievances about his very existence. His oppression is unlike anything American women have faced.
What is revealing about this quote, besides its complete disconnection from reality, is that Venker makes no other references to race in the rest of her piece, which runs through a number of tiresome and oh-so-familiar MRA talking points about the alleged oppression of men.
Venker complains about schools being biased towards girls, from grade schools that force students to sit still to colleges with their infernal Title IX. She whines about “sit coms and commercials that portray dad as an idiot.”
Quoting antifeminist psychologist Helen Smith, a friend of and sometime contributor to A Voice for Men, she suggests that women can get their boyfriends or husbands locked up on a whim just by claiming abuse.
I’m surprised she didn’t talk about the evils of “friend zoning.”
But when Venker refers to “men” in all of these complaints, she is evidently thinking only of white men — why else would she switch so seamlessly from talking about the alleged oppression of “men” to proclaiming “the White American Male” the ultimate victim?
There’s really no other word for this than, well, racist.
The day after Fox published Venker’s nonsense, we were of course reminded (as if any of us really needed to be reminded) of the very real oppression faced by “the Black American Male.”
Trayvon Martin didn’t die because he happened to see a show featuring a bumbling sitcom dad. He died because George Zimmerman saw a young black man in a hoodie walking home from the store and assumed, apparently because Martin was young and black and wearing a hoodie, that he was up to something sinister.
Trayvon Martin didn’t die because he was male; he died because he was a black male. His killer walked free not because his victim was male, but because his victim was a black male.
Suzanne Venker did us all a favor by revealing the unconscious racism underlying so many Men’s Rights complaints. The Men’s Rights movement is not only a movement that is overwhelmingly made up of white men; it’s a movement that’s almost exclusively about white men, and their largely imaginary oppressions, as well. We might as well call it the White Men’s Rights Movement.
Watch out, before the evil penis carrying man-beast gets you >:)
“Hey, I’m terribly sorry to hear that. It must suck. But the fact is, throughout history it’s been men who were expected to die in wars, not women. That’s been a male cross to bear, up to this century.”
Are you saying that it’s no longer an issue now? Wouldn’t that be another walk back?
Trust us. We know.
Ah, yes, even good ol’ Manboobz had to struggle to take Farrell out of context.
Goodbye Jason.
Pecunium, would it be crass of me to ask you to threaten him? Probably huh? So can you just email the dark lord again (I would, but I’m a touch afraid that he’ll panic if he sees my nym in his inbox, the survey presentation broke COMPLETELY earlier)
It’s still men than women. And it still falls into a greater societal expectation – that men should die to protect women.
OT but I’ve been working my way through my Mum’s old recipe book (ie the one she made herself with little slot-in cards) and damn, talk about nostalgia. I’m still too intimidated to try any of the cakes, though.My mum was one of those people who’s pastry turns out perfect every time, and who never understood why other people thought souffles were challenging. I’ve still never had meringue better than she made.
@Argenti
If you don’t mind my asking what does the survey cover?
Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system…
HELP HELP I’M BEING REPRESSED!
Because only when he’s out of context can someone not agree with, or be a fan of, Warren Farrell.
And only when the bible is out of context can you not be Christian.
“It’s still men than women. ”
What are you saying here? Please clarify.
Jason: I’m sorry, I set you up, like a bowling pin:
Women get equal pay for equal work. Women just don’t work as hard in the workplace. Sorry if you don’t like that.
There a wage gap.
There really is.
Really, there is
No, Really there is
Boring dude is leaving?
To be, or not to be….
Oh sorry, I thought we were monologing around here.
Adios, losers…
God, thank goodness.
I really hope he doesn’t come back like most trolls.
What a charmer. I can’t think why more women don’t want to support his movement.
Now I want a cupcake. And to sleep.
I have to make a phone call early in the morning too.
“If you’d read any Warren Farrell, you’d be an MRA. So yeah.”
Actually, it was by hearing about Warren Farrell and similar anti-feminist MRAs that I became permanently repulsed by the entire movement. So yeah.
…Because women are seen as weak morons who can’t protect anything but a child (if that). Yes Jason, that is true.
It’s also true that, for a long time, if a woman wanted to fight in a war she had to pretend to be a man. Also, if women were allowed to fight as women, they did not recieve any respect for it, and were often ignored in history.
Link is coming, need to find one very imporant one…
Makes me think of Bart Simpson.
Bye Jason! Don’t be a stranger, now!
sarahlizhousespouse —here are th questions and potentional answers.
And my sleeping pill is kicking in, I’ll be out shortly.