Oh, Heartiste, sometimes I can’t help but wonder if you’ve been trolling us all along. I mean, what kind of master pickup guru is this squicked out by vaginas?
Eating a girl out anytime during the first few weeks of dating is beta. When you eat a girl out, you telegraph your incredible horniness for her. Men normally do not want to go down on women and bury their mouths in that fetid, humid mess unless they find her so overwhelmingly hot that they can’t help themselves.
“Fetid, humid mess?” Seriously, dude, if you hate vaginas so much, why do you devote your entire life to trying to gain access to as many of them as possible?
Women instinctively know this, so they correctly gauge that a man who goes down on them on the first date must feel he’s with one of the best he’s ever had. This, in turn, will sour a woman’s attraction for a man, since no woman in the history of the universe has ever felt raging lust for a man she believed lower than herself in value.
And you know this how? Somehow I doubt that Heartiste and his followers are getting a lot of return engagements from their unfortunate dates.
Cunnilingus later in the relationship is absolved from this rule, because you have already demonstrated your manly ability to use her strictly for the piledriving hole she is.
But isn’t her, er, piledriving hole just as icky as ever? Wouldn’t this still be a beta thing? Does any of this make any kind of sense, even if you buy into Heartiste’s Alpha-Beta claptrap?
If I didn’t already know that Heartiste was a dude in his 40s, I would have assumed he was actually a 15-year-old naif with a chip on his shoulder and a vivid imagination.
Thanks to Wrecksomething on r/againstmensrights for pointing out this Heartiste classic.
Smooches!
LOLLLLLLLLLLLL
Or a mouth.
Or an anus.
Or the clothed body of whoever’s next to you on the subway.
Or a Fleshlight™.
Or a Real Doll™.
Or…you get the picture.
RE: cassandrakitty
If in doubt, jackhammer it! This seems to be the standard dudebro approach to all sexual problems.
I know, right? Thank god I’m with hubby now, who has common decency and doesn’t make me share the bed with his ego. I’m a monogamous man, you see.
There’s room in this bed for either me or your weird dysfunctional ideas about sex, dudebro. Both is not an option.
If nature only wants sexual pleasure to come (no pun intended) via p in v, why does the clitoris exist? Please explain Paul-ass.
…Why’s the prostate so heavily enervated, for that matter…Butt anyway…
MRA: Er, what’s a clitoris? Is that like, oh, another hole? Please let it be another hole.
It would be kind of funny to try to explain the, um, let’s just say recreational uses that can be found for the prostate to someone like Paulus.
LBT: *goes to hubby, squishes brain against his head*
WHY ISN’T IT WORKING?
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=7ukka077bg4qktnwwcr7j8uh&page=102#2529
I read that as “shake the bed with his ego” and went WAT?
No, thank goodness! He was on about the War Machine thread. I just posted this in the wrong spot this morning.
Paulus: Ladies and gentlemen, I didn´t want to be rude with anyone. I just follow the laws of Nature. Penis was made to enter inside vaginas. Not tongue. May I have permission to have my opinion?
The laws of nature?
So you think we ought to be naked, and living off of raw fruits, roots, bugs, frogs, and such other things we can catch with our bare hands?
No. So you can shut your gob about how the “laws of nature” mean squat, since you have not a clue in your miserable little brain about how they work, or what they mean.
It’s not as if going down on each other is new. Look at statues in India, or the latin language. Heck, even “dumb beasts” like horses and dogs go down on their partners (oddly, while it’s not uncommon for males to lick their female partners it’s very rare for a female animal to provide oral pleasure to a male. They have to do that for themselves… so chalk up auto-fellatio to those, “laws of nature” things you believe in).
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion; no matter how factually incorrect and fractally wrong it happens to be. We are, of course, also entitled to point out the folly of your ways, the idiocy of your arguments and the stupidity of your words.
It’s right there in the header.
As to the “real men” argument it’s bullshit. We are what we are, and if a male does it, then it’s manly, and a “real man” is doing it.
Real men spin yarn, cook, knap flints, cuddle kittens, puppies and babies. They knit, they do dishes, wash the laundry, pick up after their partners, and after children.
I know, because I am a man, and I do these things.
Oh my this is too funny for words. This is the closest evidence that I have come across to support my suspicions that the manosphere is filled with grumpy virgin boys. Is that misandry?
I have just remembered! When I was at Uni back in the day, many other women friends telling me that they refused to have sex unless there was oral sex first. Anecdotal. But I think these man childs might be scuppering their chances.
@ mythagos
” I dunno about “self-hating”, but isn’t it amazing how much of PUA culture is about bonding with other men and talking about sex with other men, with the actual having of sex with women being sort of an icky intermediate step?”
Yes. It’s almost as if the PUA culture is sort of self-defeating on purpose. As if the ultimate aim is to keep these males separate from normal society and healthy relationships. Cuz then they wouldn’ t need PUA right?
I’d guess that depends on what type your car is. Is it a sensible petite Japanese car, or is it a massive ManlyManTruck with huge upward-pointing diesel exhaust pipes?
Tools with a hydraulic mechanism are not known for their versatility.
“She offered to do this thing called ‘prostitute massage’, but when she explained it, I didn’t quite understand if you’re supposed to massage the prostitute or the other way round. I think she said I was a male prostitute on the inside. Anyway, it involved putting fingers in butt and I didn’t want shit on my fingers so i said no.”
Katie: Oh my this is too funny for words. This is the closest evidence that I have come across to support my suspicions that the manosphere is filled with grumpy virgin boys. Is that misandry?
No, but it is virgin shaming. I’d say the Manosphere is filled with insecure man-children; and the sex (or lack) they are having is pretty much irrelevant (now, when it comes to “incels” and PUAs, it’s different. Some MGTOWS are also risible, because they are married/in relationship; In those cases however, it’s the hypocrisy which merits mockery).
That only works if you’re one of the magical, enlightened forest creatures from a movie like FernGully. 😆
Being a virgin is okay.
Being scared shitless of sex before you’ve had any is okay.
What’s NOT okay is turning into a hatemonger just because you’ve never had sex and are scared shitless.
Today I learned…heh heh heh.
Paul doesn’t seem to know that many many women can’t climax with just PIV sex alone. Probably why Paul here spends time posting on hella old posts because he is lonely lonely lonely.
Paul probably also believes that married/dating people never have sex.
Poor Paul.
Paulie needs to do a fun experiment: Put your fingers on your scrotum, just below the root of your penis and above the anus. Push or rub gently. Feels interesting, right? Now imagine there’s a hole there, and you can insert things in it. That squishy, full, kind of generically pleasurable feeling is what sex is like without any clitoral stimulation. It feels nice, but you can’t come from it (it’ll turn you on, but not much else).
“But porn actresses act like they love it!” Yeah, but porn actresses are also paid to fake it. It’s less “OH YES YES YES” and more “mmm mmm mmm oh hey you’re done? damn”.
Actresses act? I am shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YOU!
Hehehehe. I really wonder if Paulie can tell the difference. Or if he’s even here still…just asking him to explore his body may have scared him off.