So we learned the other day from that Man Going His Own Way that male violence was, like, totally the fault of evil sexy ladies. Now, from this Men’s Rights Redditor, we learn that homophobia — or at least homophobia directed at gay men — is all the fault of straight women and their desire for macho dudes. Because straight men don’t ever express any sort of hostility towards gay or effeminate men — it’s just those darn ladies!
But, huh, what about all those straight dudes who are always calling other dudes “gay” and, you know, that other word that starts with an “f?”
Well, apparently that’s just playful joshing. No harm, no foul! If anything, it shows how wonderfully tolerant of gayness these guys are. I mean, come on, if you can’t see this, you must be stupid, or something. Or so says this other Men’s Rights Redditor:
They’re just having a little fun. You’re not against fun, are you?
Thanks to the AgainstMen’sRights subreddit for pointing me to these quotes.
Last sighting was cloudiah in aisle five of the yarn store.
@neuroticbeagle – yup, the furry overlords wrote the book on world domination.
Fedora, I want valid examples. Not just “straight white men are treated as less than human”. Please answer why. I really want to know.
I mean, answer how.
It’d be more productive to go back to ignoring Motheaten Headwear. He’s admitted he’s trolling for its own sake and he’s more boring than watching cement* dry.
And good lord, tonight it’s me sitting up way late (after midnight here) and it’s bright morning in the States! So after a night of telly and knitting I think it’s really time for me to go to bed. Niters!
*it’s a hell of a lot thicker than paint
YOU ARE PROJECTING.
‘Projecting’ (even in caps) doesn’t do it justice. On a clear day you could read his hang-ups off the surface of the fucking sun.
“Unfortunately because you have taken the feminist toxin you cannot consider that men have the same internal lives as women. We are all supposed to be a bit less human I suppose.
Actually men hurt too.”
Actually, it just sounds like you’e bucking for minority status. Feminists have a saying that patriarchy hurts men too. So, I guess you agree with feminists, yes?
Right, right. I mean, it’s not like guys ever talk about what happens in their lives to womenfolk, or post in public forums where everybody can read what’s going on, or hang out in public areas where anybody can hear them if they really care to, or create media based on their own perceptions of said groups that dominate the airwaves. Nope, guys are a totally mysterious entity, shrouded in mystery, the likes of which our frail lady-brains could not possibly fathom.
/sarcasm
Also, as a white woman with an education and a job, I’m pretty privileged too. Doesn’t make me subhuman – just means I’m privileged compared to a lot of other people in this world, and I recognize that.
I didn’t say “being privileged”, (whatever that means in today’s arbitrary feminist climate) made you subhuman. Specifically, white men as a group are generally considered subhuman by modern feminists… for some reason those two traits have become paramount, not wealth or religion or whatever else. I have a few theories why feminists consider specifically white men subhuman, but that’s a comment for another day.
Clyde, you’re here! I’d appreciate if you’d answer my question.
Damn, I have to leave now. I hope I’ll be getting some answers when I come back.
Two lying trolls active at the same time in the same thread. Good morning Man Boobz! (Or afternoon, or evening, or whatever.)
We got our article submitted! We = three humans (i.e. women), and one subhuman white man that we used as a drone. XD
Actually, I’m fairly certain no one here has suggested that they don’t.
Citations needed. Since, as you say, it’s apparent, it should be easy to find examples of feminists specifically talking about how subhuman white men are, right? Put up or shut up. Vaguely alluding to “theories” you have is not proof of anything.
*insert joke about feminism causing global warming*
Nice ableism thrown in there too, implying that women who are feminists are “unhealthy”.
Calling women you don’t like “crazy bitches”. Well gee, guess I’m stumped. No one’s ever done THAT before (lots of people have done it before).
“Specifically, white men as a group are generally considered subhuman by modern feminists…”
And your citation for that is…?
“…for some reason those two traits have become paramount, not wealth or religion or whatever else. I have a few theories why feminists consider specifically white men…”
Do tell! What are your theories? List them or something.
Also, this is very lazy/cowardly of you:
“…but that’s a comment for another day.”
Why wait another day, you’re here now. Why not just get it over with and and regal us with your theories.
Rats, regale not regal.
Prediction: neither Clyde nor Black-hat will ever deal with my post, except to lie about what I said. They are unable to deal with anything remotely real.
Expect lies, lies, and more lies.
Lord-a-lies-be-damned, they’re boring.
(not that I was the only one posting real things to their skewed unreality, just as an example)
Good morning, cloudiah! (It is morning here, as a matter of fact)
Congrats on the article! I am not working on anything publish-worthy at the moment, just unpacking my stuff and making my new place suitable for when my furry feline overlord arrives.
Like others here I’m mystified as to what your argument for that claim would be.
And please remember, you and the other troll do not represent white men collectively. (Is anyone else tempted to start quoting White Man’s Burden?) And I don’t even think *you’re* subhuman. I just think you’re a twit. A whiny, entitled twit.
Must be too constipated to share anymore theories at the moment. Might I recommend a diet of more fiber and more thinking?
Given my venerable but not terribly dignified age, perhaps I don’t count as a modern feminist. It’d be handy to know what my generation of feminists is supposed to have thought of men – more, or less, human than these modern newcomers to this world of thought?
I’d sort of thought that third wave feminists regarded us old second wave types as a bit rough around the edges – does that mean we did or we didn’t have these newfangled men-are-subhuman attitudes? It would be good to know.
Well, it wouldn’t be *good* to know any more than we already do about the workings of Clyde’s overtaxed thinking gizmo, but we’re always up for a laugh or a derail about sloths or kitties.
Sadly Aruba, I don’t think we’ll be getting any specifics.
That’s how you can tell that MRAs are a real filosofikal movement. When feminists note how women are oppressed, they give specific examples, but MRAs just traffic in pure Ideals of Oppression and Misandry and Scented Fucking Candles.
Trolls elude difficult questions way to often. They are so full of shit.
*too often