In a post ostensibly about the imminent arrival of female Viagra, our dear friend JudgyBitch weighs in on yet another subject about which she knows shit: the reasons that women who are not her might not want to have sex with their husbands:
Loss of libido in women, excepting rare medical conditions, in my opinion, is a direct result of not seeing men as emotionally complex beings. If you’re married, at some point, your husband probably stood in front of you and promised to love you forever. Rejecting him physically is a very wounding thing to do. It hurts. Sex is one of the most important, intimate ways married couples show that they love one another. Refusing to have sex with your husband is telling him, in a very painful way, that you don’t love him. That you don’t care for him or about him.
Huh. If I hadn’t seen her on video, thus confirming her status as an adult human female, I would have a hard time believing that it was an actual woman saying this and not some horny, creepy teenage boy in the process of trying to manipulate his girlfriend into “going all the way.”
Oh, but she’s got more:
I guess the only way to justify that is to think of men as emotionless. It doesn’t hurt men to be rejected because they don’t feel anything to begin with.
Really? The only way to justify saying “no” to your husband when you don’t want to have sex with him is if you convince yourself he’s emotionless? But women should just force themselves to say “yes” to sex when they don’t want to and simply endure what follows?
That’s the ugly little reality behind female viagara. Will it actually boost women’s libido? Who knows. What difference will it make, though, if women are going to continue to see men as less than completely human? That’s the real problem.
Does anyone know where to get irony meters at a reasonable price? Mine just leapt off the table, ran around the room screaming, and exploded.
David M. Green, thanks for the latest transmission from Uranus. What are they thinking on Mars?
Turns out women in quicksand is a thing for him. He’s even got a tag for it with dozens of posts.
So that’s… good…
Indeed sociopath is just another descriptive term for feminists who promote feminism: an ideology that promotes the “Financial Rape” of the male gender.
There is no such thing as “Financial Rape.”
Signed a dood.
Is anyone else thinking of one of those Christmas CDs they used to advertise on TV back in ye olde days? Our friend David looks like he stepped right out of one. Twinkle Twinkle Little Misogynist.
Hahaha what a bonehead
@ David M. Green.
Whoa, whoa. Slow down there, Einstein. This is a lot to take in all at once.
1. write multiple stories relishing the deaths of women
2. accuse others of being sociopaths
3. ?????
4. profit
It looks like monsieur Green is joining the fight for equal pay for women and genderqueer people! Financial independence for all will be epic.
augochlorella –
#3 is “a miracle occurs”
http://terryrhill.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/miracle_cartoon.jpg
The problem is that Green Christmas is stuck in an infinite regression vortex with double gyratory convection, think about it:
4-profit
5-feminist comes in to exchange sex for money
6-financial rape following marriage
7-whoriarchy
8-write multiple stories relishing women’s deaths…
He’s stuck in an eternal loop here.
THIS!
Promoting equality of pay, the end of rape culture=SOCIOPATH
Fantasize about murdering women=one of the good old boys
Ignoring that there is in fact a definition for a sociopath and that definition is not feminists.
” People with antisocial personality disorder typically have no regard for right and wrong and often disregard the rights, wishes and feelings of others.”
hmmm…interesting.
@ Maude LL
I see. Suddenly the quicksand obsession makes sense. It’s a metaphor for how he’s stuck in this cycle.
I may have thrown off the cycle with my
boyfriendmoney slave, though. I accidentally bought him a game he was pining for as a surprise. It wasn’t even his birthday! Help me hivemind. What do I do?David, get help. Those stories are not only badly written; they are disturbing. Fantasizing about the death of women is never good.
Sure there are some issues with the current divorce system, and lots of dishonest women out there. The trend of women abandoning their families in record numbers is not good. But men also play a part in causing this.
Marry him right away, then stop having sex with him to punish him for accepting your present. Women don’t enjoy sex, so it’s obviously not a problem for you.
[brain trying to fit cock carousel in here]
Is this a fucking joke?
Re: Ignoring that there is in fact a definition for a sociopath and that definition is not feminists.
” People with antisocial personality disorder typically have no regard for right and wrong and often disregard the rights, wishes and feelings of others.”
____________________
Which of course just happens to describe the average feminist to a tee.
On what fucking planet????
In economic terms it takes both a buyer and a seller to create a marketplace which cannot exist without one or the other. This of course is what pisses feminists off because as more men become enlightened in regards to how women operate; they are finding other things – such as computers and video games – to spend their time with and money on instead of being shackled for life to an ill tempered female sociopath.
“Which of course just happens to describe the average feminist to a tee.”
Still doesn’t fit. Sorry.
Totes not a misogynist. Also, we play video games and use computers, too – just as much as men do.
Feminists indeed have no regard for the feelings of unborn children, anti-feminist women, children and men affected by the no-fault divorce system, and others effected by our post-Christian paradigm shift. Additionally, many feminists have discriminatory feelings toward transsexuals, such as Mary Daley and Factcheckme, although I say this not as a criticism of them. We could also point to the racism of Margaret Sanger and some other past feminists, and the agreement of feminists to support President Wilson bringing the US into WWI in exchange for voting rights. The question then becomes what could be described as the average feminist. However, I disagree with David that psychopathy is the diagnosis; rather it is a lack of faith seeking understanding, as St Augustine would say.
neurotic beagle –
I think he’s using PTT’s ‘postmaterialist inquiry’ to come up to his conclusion.
David, lots of women decide not to be with a man either, because of the high number of abusive men out there.
That’s so nice of you. Such a warm and fuzzy feeling.
RE: On what fucking planet????
______________________
The planet – world – feminists are so intent on creating on the ashes of the world they are so intent on destroying.
Feminism defined:
An ideology that intentionally promotes such intense hatred for the male gender…That once lodged within the average female’s brain like an incurable virus it causes: Irrational and delusional thinking, emotional instability and intellectual insanity along with extremely low birthrates incapable of sustaining a viable population…That eventually leads its adherents to consciously, intentionally and deliberately with malice and forethought to either commit the ghastly crimes of murdering their own children (both born and unborn) as well as their husbands and/or to support those who do so by excusing their crimes against humanity…