Categories
a woman is always to blame alpha males antifeminism are these guys 12 years old? bad boys boner rage evil sexy ladies evil women men invented everything men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny not-quite-explicit threats oppressed men playing the victim PUA straw feminists taking pleasure in women's pain thug-lovers we hunted the mammoth

Men Violent Because of Women, Says Man Who Hates Women

I blame women.

Over on This is Why MGTOW, the blogger who calls himself Cerberus Alpha (dude, seriously?) attempts to answer the question: Why are men more violent?

Rather than attempting to engage with the extensive scholarly literature on the subject, or even making a token effort to do any research on the subject whatsoever, Mr. Alpha instead spins a few familiar manosphere fairy tales into “evidence” that it’s all the fault of those evil sexy ladies and their evil sexy and/or feminist ways.

Young women train violence and criminality into young men. The thug with the shaved head who communicates in grunts is sexually rewarded. The empathetic bookworm is denied if not publicly humiliated if he approaches a girl. So the bookworm puts down the book, gets contacts and a tattoo, bulks up in the gym, and generally acts like an asshole. (Why would he be nice to women any more?) Suddenly, he finds himself showered in pussy. This is how it works. Women’s sexual desires are dark and pathological, and this encourages men to become violent criminals if they want to get laid.

His evidence for this?

Just look at all the Game blogs out there, which teach men how to mimic the frame of the uncaring, alpha criminal without actually breaking the law.

That’s right. Misogynist dude pontificating about ladies cites as evidence … other misogynist dudes pontificating about ladies. THAT’S SCIENCE!

Oh, but the perfidy of the evil violence-causing ladies gets worse! Because they also force men to commit evil violence by, apparently, telling them to do it in sweet sexy voices:

Women’s own violence is committed via proxy (i.e. they get men to do the difficult work of physical coercion), and thus is incorporated into men’s overall violence. That’s pretty smart of women, in a devious and manipulative sort of way. A woman who has a problem with a man (or just wants to see a guy get beaten up, because that kind of sadism makes her tingle) sidles up to her boyfriend and asks so-sweetly if he will ‘do something’ about that guy who’s bothering her. But when the fun is over and the cops show up because someone is leaving the party in an ambulance, it was all his fault, see. She didn’t do a thing. She’s sugar and spice and all things nice.

I think Mr. Alpha here is confusing real life with the TV show Cheaters.

But wait!  We haven’t even gotten to the even eviller evils of … FEMINISM.

Since the 1960s, normal male behavior has been increasingly criminalized while criminal female behavior has been increasingly normalized. This process is known as ‘feminism,’ and includes legal restrictions on politically incorrect speech, redefinitions of ‘harassment,’ and so on. This ground has been covered over and over again in the sphere and we don’t need to retread how feminism makes it illegal simply to exist as a man.

Uh, maybe you do need to go over that once more because, well, here’s the thing, I’m a dude, and I’ve never been arrested for being a man. Or even given a warning. And I’m pretty sure there are literally billions of other men on planet earth in the same situation as I am. Are there warrants out for us all?

The flip side is that crimes like abortion and infanticide, for which women were typically held responsible, have been made legal and normalized by feminists.

Really? Could you remind me again when Congress passed the Actual Live Human Baby Killing Is A-OK With Us Act, because I’m pretty sure infanticide isn’t legal or “normalized” in the US or anywhere on this planet. And in the US, at least, abortion rights (not to mention abortion providers) are under pretty much constant attack.

Mr. Alpha also suggests that male violence is just a sort of side effect of men being such hard workers and deep thinkers and shit:

Men commit more crime because men do more of anything, that is apart from self-obsessed complaining. This is the Y-chromosome explanation that radfems are so fond of, except they miss out the part that if there’s no Jack the Ripper then there’s no Einstein either, and it’s kind of hard to be a career grrl if men haven’t invented corporations and desks yet. Men are proactive as women are reactive, which in laymen’s terms means we get shit done.

Also, mammoths, we hunted them to feed you, etc.

Not content to blame male violence on women, Mr. Alpha ends by suggesting that he won’t really mind if some men — wink, wink — wise up and start directing some of this violence at the ladies who made them all violent in the first place.

The majority of violence committed by men, which is encouraged or outright instructed by women, as described above, is committed against other men. Thus for the most part, it can be described as female violence against men, delivered via proxy. …

If, however, these machinations happen to backfire, and a man who has been trained into criminal violence turns on his trainers, who am I to care?

Gosh, men in the “sphere” sure do love to fantasize about ladies getting beaten up by men, don’t they?

Dude, please, go your own fucking way already. The farther you go, the better.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

348 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ugh
Ugh
7 years ago

Haha clearly anyone opposed to violently deposing a secular socialist government in the Middle East is COLLUDING with radical Islamists!

Howard Bannister
7 years ago

I sense that you once got involved with feminism to do good- not because you intend to destroy other people.

“Fibinaci, there is still good in you—I can sense it!”

For realz?

Ugh
Ugh
7 years ago

I’m personally curious about exactly what part of radical Islam Black Fedora actually disagrees with.

Under some radical Islamic regimes, women CAN’T say no to “nice guys.” Isn’t that what you all are pushing for?

katz
7 years ago

I sense that

I’ve found his problem! He doesn’t actually listen. He just tries to use some vague telepathy to “sense” what people think.

Howard Bannister
7 years ago

Also, yes, the only reason ever to oppose war is because you want the other side to prosper. There are no circumstances in history where going to war has been a huge mistake.

And Afghanistan is not a quagmire.

Argenti Aertheri
Argenti Aertheri
7 years ago

*bangs head on wall*

Yep, that’s it exactly. Any and all opposition to the US invading countries on the premise of “bring democracy” was because feminists love the taliban. Couldn’t possibly be the US’s habit of going to war for war’s sake, couldn’t possibly be that there were non-war solutions, couldn’t even remotely be that spreading democracy through war is like spreading abstinence through fucking.

/sarcasm

I cannot WAIT for pecunium to play whack a troll on this shit. Not like we’ve been discussing the war(s) over email all week /not-sarcasm

Alex
7 years ago

I really wish these was no truth in the radical Islam/ feminist alliance.

Well, at least this troll manages to be funny now and then. Keep dancing, lemur!

katz
7 years ago

This is yet another great example of the us-vs-them attitude leading to lumping together everything that isn’t you.

Briznecko
Briznecko
7 years ago

I just…how the hell do you go from protesting war to shaming Nice Guys?

We all know logic isn’t Grey Hat’s strong suit, but damn, his ability to shove his head deeper and deeper into his own ass is truly remarkable.

Brz
Brz
7 years ago

Funny that as evidence of this supposed universal situation of women only dating violent criminals…

I’ve never said that it was a universal situation because it’s not, but what seems to be universal in the other hand, is groups of women trying to enforce social norms by shaming male sexuality (“if you don’t do as we say, we’ll paint you as a bad potential sex partner”), the social norms depend on the environment, but the shaming tactics, the way these social norms are enforced are the same.

It is always safe to judge someone first, among all things, by his ability to disregard every tentative of bullying coming from a bunch of women because it’s what will determine the rest of his personality as his way to behave in society, it’s what will determine where he’ll stand where a bunch of people lynch someone : with the lynchers because he’s afraid to be excluded from the group, or supporting the lynched one because justice is more important than being called a “pussy” or a “creep”.
That is indeed what is healthy and one can see by reading what Pecunium, Howard Bannister, Bob Goblin and the others feminist allies write, the way they always need to attack other men in order to prove that they’re not creepy, to be accepted by female feminists, to please them, the way they react passively when the female feminists accuse them of not being non-threatening enough, of still having not removed completely in them the noxious influence of their original sin of being a male, the way they, finally, appear to have more violence and neurotic issues than other guys, one can see how your kind of healthy masculinity is harmful for the people who try to adopt it and will be, at the end, harmful for everyone.

Briznecko
Briznecko
7 years ago

…it’s what will determine where he’ll stand where a bunch of people lynch someone : with the lynchers because he’s afraid to be excluded from the group, or supporting the lynched one because justice is more important than being called a “pussy” or a “creep”.

Wow. Now we can add horribly racist to fauxfrench, because obviously getting horribly breaten and hung by cheering racist crowds is exactly the same thing as being called a “creep.” Fucking racist asshole.

Aaliyah
7 years ago

Brz, please go share your straw men, your disigenuousness, your absurd psychoanalyzing, and your bigotry with your anti-feminist buddies. You’re insufferable. Go away.

Nobinayamu
Nobinayamu
7 years ago

That is indeed what is healthy and one can see by reading what Pecunium, Howard Bannister, Bob Goblin and the others feminist allies write, the way they always need to attack other men in order to prove that they’re not creepy, to be accepted by female feminists, to please them,

See, right here? Where you’re insisting that if Pecunium, Howard Bannister, Bob Goblin, et. al, attack and/or don’t agree with you it’s because they’re trying to impress and be accepted by feminists?

That’s the exact same thing that other assholes do when they insist that any man women find attractive is a “bad boy”. It’s the exact same shallow, self-serving, tautological bullshit.

Is there any chance that they attack your ideas because they find them offensive?

And why am I even bothering to explain this to someone so hell bent on impressing others that they created a fake, foreign exchange student background to explain away a few errors in grammar.

Shorter? You’re a fucking moron too.

pecunium
7 years ago

I’ve never said that it was a universal situation because it’s not, but what seems to be universal in the other hand, is groups of women trying to enforce social norms by shaming male sexuality

What seems to be universal is groups of women trying…

Which is it, universal, or groups?

Because yeah, there are women who do that. Now got find me some citations to show they are feminists.

That is indeed what is healthy and one can see by reading what Pecunium, Howard Bannister, Bob Goblin and the others feminist allies write, the way they always need to attack other men in order to prove that they’re not creepy,

Typical. It’s not that I believe what I say… no. It’s not that some dudes are sexist assholes, abusive fucks, manipulative bastards or just plain creepy; and that offends me.

Nope, I have to be doing it to impress women; and defensively show that I’m not creepy.

It’s all about me/us being castrated wimps to you, isn’t it? Stupid (male bashing) reductionism.

pecunium
7 years ago

Dark Chapeau: I really wish these was no truth in the radical Islam/ feminist alliance.

Your wish has been granted.

It was very evident during the ‘stop the war’ marches which were jointly organised. The psychology of these marches seemed to be based upon a form of Nice Guy shaming. The basic concept was that the coalition forces must have some evil intent because nobody wants to bring democracy and prosperity to a nation.

Or it might have been people didn’t believe the putative rationale for the war (you could check out Scott Ritter, Army Col, Weapons Inspector, dude who said the “Saddam is getting nukes/VX/Biological Weapons/Long Range Drones” was all bullshit. Dude who was, yanno, right).

Heck, you could ask me. I was in Military Intel at the time. I was telling people the reasons were bullshit.

You could ask Sen. Robert Byrd, who spent a couple of hours on the floor of the Senate arguing against the AUMF.

You could, you know, look at the facts, instead of the fairy tale of, “Feminist like man-hating religious fanatics” you are spouting here.

(facts like Condoleeza Rice lying abot, “Hussein hasn’t accounted for the yellowcake”, when; in fact, his 12,000 pages of documentation of his weapons systems was fundamentally accurate; and there was no way he could account for the yellowcake; because he didn’t have any: and we fucking knew it.

So saying opposition to the war was all because feminists argglebargle worked with the Taliban (who favored the US invading, because Iraq was damned unfriendly to them, and working against them, but hey, what are facts when you bash feminism?] is… damn, the word is escaping me.

Ah, got it.

Bullshit

Brz
Brz
7 years ago

Wow. Now we can add horribly racist to fauxfrench, because obviously getting horribly breaten and hung by cheering racist crowds is exactly the same thing as being called a “creep.” Fucking racist asshole.

I used “lynch” in a metaphorical sense but I think you should learn a little bit of the history of your own country, I know history is not your favorite hobby but sometimes it can give you a little bit of sense of perspective : the first people who were lynched in the US weren’t blacks, lynching wasn’t invented because of black people, it was just a part of the Puritan/Calvinist tools your fanatical ancestors used to punish transgressions of the social norms.
It’s safe to say that you guys have a lynching mentality as it is safe to call bullshit on you when you try to use the race card when there’s no real reason to use it.

pecunium
7 years ago

it’s what will determine where he’ll stand where a bunch of people lynch someone

Funny, I’ve never seen anyone lynched for being anti-feminist. I’ve never seen anyone lynched for being “too masculine”.

You can try (good luck) to say that “women got men lynched because they were men”, but you will be wrong. Men were lynched (and some women too) because that was one of the tools used to keep blacks, “in their place”. The easiest way to get lynched was to be, “uppity” (which included being successful at business, even if you were were selling/dealing with an exclusively black clientele; because being, “better” than a white was a capital offense).

But you are going to compare someone calling a PUA a creep with someone being killed, tortured, and their corpse mocked; with postcards of “the strange fruit which grows around here” being sold as mementoes.

And oddly, they very american thing (both historically, and idiomatically) is the image you reach for.

Again, you are failing at verismilitude.

pecunium
7 years ago

Brz: I used “lynch” in a metaphorical sense but I think you should learn a little bit of the history of your own country,

More fail. See my comment above as to why.

Pop quiz: When were lynching postcards outlawed in the mail?

For extra credit, when was it enforced?

For double points how do we know about the actual enforcement?

Fuckhead.

Briznecko
Briznecko
7 years ago

…I think you should learn a little bit of the history of your own country, I know history is not your favorite hobby but sometimes it can give you a little bit of sense of perspective : the first people who were lynched in the US weren’t blacks, lynching wasn’t invented because of black people, it was just a part of the Puritan/Calvinist tools your fanatical ancestors used to punish transgressions of the social norms.

Yeah, no. The fact that you know this history, choose to compare lynching to being called creepy simply confirms you’re a fucking racist asshole. But please, do continue to twist yourself into into these knots. Hopefully you’ll get a charlie horse and go the fuck away.

Fucking Racist Asshole FauxFrench.

Nepenthe
Nepenthe
7 years ago

Since you’re not American *snicker*, let me inform you that when you pull out the word “lynch” among Americans, you’ve already pulled out the race card.

pecunium
7 years ago

Briznecko: Brzzzt! is pretty much putting paid to the, “French” thing.

The bit about lynching is his way of saying that women are actually in charge; and the shaming, etc. of men is “just like lynching” a way to keep the oppressed men in their place by making public examples of those who step out of line by presuming to act as if they were fully human (by being sexist asshats; because that’s just how men are).

So, by siding with feminists (for the sex, or the head pats, or something) we are taking part in the “metaphoric” lynching of men.

No way in hell is he french. Not with that style of argument about lynching. That’s purely American, and requires cultural knowledge to use in that sort of insinuational method. It’s not something someone who isn’t culturally attuned (which he has assured us he is not) can pull off. It’s polished too, he’s used it before; which means he’s not so lacking in interaction with Americans as he pretends.

Which surprises no one.

Briznecko
Briznecko
7 years ago

…yeah, I know precunium. No explanation needed.

Graham
Graham
7 years ago

They’re not attacking men for being men, though. They’re attacking men who happen to be assholes for being assholes.

Graham
Graham
7 years ago

Oops, guess I was replying to a comment a few pages back. Sorry.

Briznecko
Briznecko
7 years ago

Damn. Sorry precunium, I didn’t read what you wrote closely and kinda knee-jerked a response. Ignore my previous comment.

ProPatria Truthteller
ProPatria Truthteller
7 years ago

I don’t have time to post a lot lately, but The Black Fedora’s comment “ideology destroys empathy”; that whole comment is one of the most brilliant comments I’ve ever read on any blog. Please get help though and don’t give up on life.

BRZ, I would be careful with complaining about pro-feminist men. If you say that pro-feminist men are brainwashed or just trying to get pats on the head from women, than what about anti-feminist women? Anti-feminist women bring a lot of balance to civilization and they are constantly shamed by pro-feminists, including supposedly feminist men. Feminists admit that a lot of men pretending to be feminists are fake; look at the Mansplaining Tumblr account. The fake feminism of men comes out especially when they shame anti-feminist women or moderate women. When moderate women point out that abortion is one of the most mysogenistic practices in world history because half of fetuses are female, meaning that millions of females are murdered, they are constantly shamed.
The world is not controlled by either feminists or MRA. There can be in fact aliances of convenience between them, such as what the Black Fedora talked about with feminism and radical Islam by the way. Overall this alliance was for the good; it was a necessary balance for materialism after 9/11. More recently though the Pope has talked about making an alliance with Muslims against secularim. To get back from my digression, neither feminism nor MRA control the world; they often work together though in a conspiratorial manner. It is the responsibility of moderately pro-feminist men and moderately anti-feminist women to develop a concordat for the preservation of civilization.

People accuse myself, BRZ and The Black Fedora of posting without sources, wanting free therapy, and tell us to go away. Yet you continue to read every single line of our postings and write long responses to us. If you want us to go away, you must encourage the site owner to ban us. You continue to read us because you are on a search for truth and understand in your hearts that you don’t have all the answers.

Aaliyah
7 years ago

The Black Fedora’s comment “ideology destroys empathy”; that whole comment is one of the most brilliant comments I’ve ever read on any blog.

lol wow

Briznecko
Briznecko
7 years ago

Dude, do you have a problem with reading comprehension? Misogyny, we mock it. We’re making fun of you, you silly little mansplaining, stawfeminist fighting, person.

Nepenthe
Nepenthe
7 years ago

You continue to read us because you are on a search for truth and understand in your hearts that you don’t have all the answers.

Can’t you morons read the label on the tin. It says “Misogyny. I mock it.” That’s you. You, to us, are a joke, a side show. This is the place where I come to blow off steam after a day of being nice to people.

When moderate women point out that abortion is one of the most mysogenistic practices in world history because half of fetuses are female, meaning that millions of females are murdered, they are constantly shamed.

By that reckoning, banning abortion is far more misogynistic, since 100% of people forced to give birth or die trying have been female bodied. But I suppose they don’t count because they’ve sinned or some such bullshit.

Argenti Aertheri
Argenti Aertheri
7 years ago

Feminists, aligning themselves with radical Islam since 2001! *barfs*

Feminism, in a nutshell: women should be allowed the same freedom to make choices as men.
Radical Islam, in a nutshell: women must be subservient to men.

In what world do those mix?!

And the problem with the US’s response to 9/11 was materialism! Not warmongering, nope, materialism!

Molly Moon
Molly Moon
7 years ago

This thread is making me think nwo spawned and now his young are returning to ancestral breeding grounds by instinct.

cloudiah
7 years ago

Great. Supporters of the forced childbirth movement are out in force. /vomit

ProPatria Truthteller
ProPatria Truthteller
7 years ago

We’re not saying the alliance makes logical sense or is going to last forever.

I’ve read some of the archived threads with NWO’s post. He had the right idea in general but was too mysogenistic. What happened to him; did he leave or get banned?

Your need to mock mysogeny, and the need of the mysogenists to mock feminism, is part of a psychological parodigm shift and protomaterialist existentialism in the minds of all of us posting here. Both sides cannot understand me because I am posting straight from the heart, blurring lines of usual discourse, like the Prophet Isaiah and other classic writers.

cloudiah
7 years ago

Pregnancy and childbirth are the #1 killers of girls aged 15-19. Since up to half of young women in developing nations become mothers before they are 18, clearly those of us who think they shouldn’t be forced to assume that risk against their will are the real problem here.

Sigh.

Nepenthe
Nepenthe
7 years ago

When moderate women point out that abortion is one of the most mysogenistic practices in world history because half of fetuses are female, meaning that millions of females are murdered, they are constantly shamed.

Actually, now that I think about it, chicken farming is the most misogynistic enterprise in world history. Approximately 50 billion (with a b) females per year are confined to cramped cages, slaughtered without any attempt to ease suffering, and eaten. (Males die too, but don’t get to enjoy a life of torment first.) And ever more each year.

Oh, wait, did you mean women? People? Should have said something to indicate that.

Aaliyah
7 years ago

I’ve read some of the archived threads with NWO’s post. He had the right idea in general but was too mysogenistic. What happened to him; did he leave or get banned?

Oh wow. That’s…ok then.

protomaterialist existentialism

LOL what

cloudiah
7 years ago

We understand you dude. We’ve met your ilk many times before. We don’t agree with you, and have complete contempt for you, and no amount of mealy-mouthed platitudes on your part will wave that away.

Alex
7 years ago

abortion is one of the most mysogenistic practices in world history because half of fetuses are female, meaning that millions of females are murdered

Funny, that. Especially since the vast majority of abortions take place before sex of the foetus (embryo?) can be determined. But I’m just a person with firsthand and secondhand experience of abortion. What would I know?

(Sorry if this double/triple posts. Having some internet problems here.)

Tracy
Tracy
7 years ago

Ok just in general – MRA’s, THIS is a good example of activism that… well, is actually activism in that it affects change. I give you Sir Patrick Stewart. From this article:

Sir Patrick told us about how he couldn’t protect his mother from abuse in his household growing up and so in her name works with an organization called Refuge for safe houses for women and children to escape from abusive house holds. Sir Patrick Stewart learned only last year that his father had actually been suffering from PTSD after he returned from the military and was never properly treated. In his father’s name he works with an organization called Combat Stress to help those soldiers who are suffering from PTSD.

So… he helps both women and men. Wow. MRA’s c’mon, you could manage to do half that and actually do something, like a real thing you go and do, to help men who are suffering from something other than sadlonelybonerpants or rageagainstmadeupstuff-ismitis.

Briznecko
Briznecko
7 years ago

Pseudo! Aesthetic! Neo-Freudian! Frankfurt School inspired anit-kitsch! Abstruse! Nonsensical! Lacanian Mirror Stage!

See! I can string together super dooper smart words and phrases together too. Mine is random and fun with thesaurus.com, but it certainly makes more sense than your word salad. Go elsewhere and work on you editing skills.

talacaris
talacaris
7 years ago

Contempt is respectful

Platitudes are funny

Disingenousness is a noble virtue

Alex
7 years ago

Nah, suggesting MRAs should do actual, constructive activism? Misandry!

Bob Goblin
Bob Goblin
7 years ago

That is indeed what is healthy and one can see by reading what Pecunium, Howard Bannister, Bob Goblin and the others feminist allies write, the way they always need to attack other men in order to prove that they’re not creepy, to be accepted by female feminists, to please them,

Got it.

By MRA/PUA logic, this makes us beta, or nice guys ™. By default, this makes you an alpha, or an “asshole,” I suppose. After all, those are the only two possible categories, and you’re the one displaying alpha behavior by coming here and bravely negging the wimmin folk.

So, why are these nice-guy-shaming feminists bashing you instead of us? Seems to me that if your underlying logic is true, all the feminist wimminz here should want you, and be kicking us to the curb.

LBT
LBT
7 years ago

Oh, talacaris. Keep trying, baby.

Also, regarding everybody talking about the troll I mentioned, actually, it was someone who I dearly hope was shit-stirring, because they coached it in very… Baby’s First Consent Gone Wrong way. Pretty much, they believed a woman should know whether she is banging a virgin or not, because otherwise, they are being deceived, can not give informed consent, and are therefore being raped. (Yes. I know. It made my brain hurt like pain too.)

Shock of all shocks: the comm flayed them alive before the mod descended and froze everything.

RE: ProPatria Truthteller

You know, comparing yourself to a prophet is generally not going to make you look any less self-important.

LBT
LBT
7 years ago

RE: Bob Goblin

Seeing as I’m a gay man, I keep wondering what they think I feel the need to appease feminists (who are of course all women). Do they think my husband just isn’t putting out enough or what?

thekidwiththereplaceablehead

We may mock misogyny, but we are helpless before mysogeny. You win this round, sir.

Gametime
7 years ago

I don’t have time to post a lot lately, but The Black Fedora’s comment “ideology destroys empathy”; that whole comment is one of the most brilliant comments I’ve ever read on any blog.

hahahahaha omg no stop my sides hahahahahaha

There can be in fact aliances of convenience between them, such as what the Black Fedora talked about with feminism and radical Islam by the way. Overall this alliance was for the good; it was a necessary balance for materialism after 9/11.

Did you miss the part where that was completely made up? Like, seriously?

People accuse myself, BRZ and The Black Fedora of posting without sources, wanting free therapy, and tell us to go away. Yet you continue to read every single line of our postings and write long responses to us. If you want us to go away, you must encourage the site owner to ban us. You continue to read us because you are on a search for truth and understand in your hearts that you don’t have all the answers.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha okay duder

Bob Goblin
Bob Goblin
7 years ago

@LBT:

Well, see, you ain’t really gay. You’re just pretending because none of the wimminz will sex you up. If one of the under-25 HBs here gave you a real shot, you’d ditch your hubby in a heartbeat for the chance to donate your sperm. It’s your biological imperative, and you’d have no choice.

Gametime
7 years ago

I’ve read some of the archived threads with NWO’s post. He had the right idea in general but was too mysogenistic.

– Russian = Spanish
– Evolution = superdogs
– Animal sexuality = sexy miniskirts

“yeah sounds about right,” says ProPatria Maurie

Both sides cannot understand me because I am posting straight from the heart, blurring lines of usual discourse, like the Prophet Isaiah and other classic writers.

You have somehow managed to type up all your posts while tripping balls on salvia, right? That is literally the only explanation I can imagine for this level of whackery.

cloudiah
7 years ago

“Straight from the heart?” I apologize for this, but …