Categories
creepy irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny narcissism playing the victim PUA rape rape culture rhymes with roosh victim blaming

Dating guru Alex Matlock: Sex with women who fear you and push you away might not be much fun

sayingno
Protip: This does not mean “yes.”

So “dating” guru Roosh has a post up on his Return of Kings blog by another self-professed dating guru, Alex Matlock, who rates various types of “bad sex” according to the type of female partner who’s involved in them, including such charmingly named types as “The one that tries too much (aka The Disaster)” and “The one that doesn’t move (aka The Starfish or The Doll).”

I expected a good deal of standard-issue manosphere misogyny in Matlock’s list, but I honestly couldn’t make it past his description of what he regards as the second-worst type of female sex partner: “The one that’s scared (aka The Virgin).” Because what he’s describing doesn’t sound so much like “bad sex” as “date rape.”

[TRIGGER WARNING for what follows; emphasis mine.]
.
.
.
.

This girl doesn’t necessarily have to be a virgin because she can still act the part many years after she’s popped that priceless cherry. She will usually look at you with fear in her eyes as if she has no idea about what’s going to happen. She gently pushes you away as if she’s not ready for the event and when it does happen she continues to act like it’s the first time. She usually sits in some extremely awkward positions that make you give up and just go missionary. This girl will eventually bust your nut but she’ll surely leave you with a sense of disappointment and/or guilt.

Uh, Mr. Matlock, I’m hoping for everyone’s sake that this is a hypothetical “humorous” scenario you’ve come up with for the sake of this article and not something you’ve been a part of in the actual real world on a regular basis, because, unless you’ve left out that portion of the hypothetical events in which the woman in question clearly and unequivocally consents to having sex with your hypothetical protagonist here, what you’ve just described as “bad sex” (for the hypothetical dude) is actually a description of, well, rape from the point of view of the rapist.

In which case that twinge of guilt your hypothetical protagonist hypothetically feels is probably just the tiny part of his hypothetical self that’s still human reacting to the fact that he JUST (hypothetically) FUCKING RAPED SOMEONE.

MRAs and PUAs and manospherean assholes generally like to pretend that consent is some weird and mysterious thing, but it’s really not. Here’s a hint: if a women looks at you with fear in her eyes and pushes you away all while sitting in a position that makes sex difficult …. all that means NO.

The fact that Matlock — despite those twinges of guilt — still doesn’t regard this as the worst kind of “bad sex” (for the guy) but merely the second-worst adds a certain level of absurdity to the horror.

Given Roosh’s publication of this piece by Matlock, and the fact that he himself has already confessed to committing what would be considered date rape by American standards by having sex with at woman too inebriated to give consent, perhaps it’s time to stop referring to Roosh as a dating guru and to start referring to him as a date rape guru.

I don’t really have anything else to say.

Here, as brain bleach, are some cats with smaller versions of themselves:

df956eb3acbafb1eb405c55b6bfa4946

851 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
augochlorella
augochlorella
11 years ago

To my intense regret, I read the comments. No one is calling out the sex as rape, but there is a commenter saying that any girl doing the “virgin act” is lying because women are whores and Cosmo magazine exists.

Our friend Marksworth Minter is there but I glazed over his comment. I swear I’ve read ingredient lists more interesting than his stuff.

And then there’s someone who links to here, or, as he called it, “the male feminist f***** den known as manboobz” (censorship mine). Not too interesting, but I totally dibs The Male Feminist F***** Den as my band name.

snore
snore
11 years ago

Please take down that ad calling Melanie Griffith and several other women (and a few men) ugly.

I find misogyny very distressing. In addition the ad is misandric and ageist.

clarified here: http://i.imgur.com/tqvFLUU.jpg

GreySky
GreySky
11 years ago

I really should stop reading feminist blogs; they make me want to get a cat, which isn’t terribly compatible with my living situation or lifestyle. And yeah, I’m just going to focus on the cats too, because good lord….

Ashley
11 years ago

Wait, are virgins good or bad then? I am so confuuuuzed, manosphere!

I doubt anyone is having sex with this loser anyway. Just ew.

Weston Renoud
11 years ago

I really appreciated the cat pictures on this one.

La Strega
11 years ago

re/ holding doors open

Yesterday I was exiting a crowded elevator. A guy in front of me moved aside and said “Ladies first.” Normally I would simply say “Thanks” and go. But this guy was on crutches (not a permanent disability, he is recovering from an injury) so I said, “No, please, crutches first.” Then he scowled at me. Did I do wrong?

shigekuni
shigekuni
11 years ago

Well, unlike Typhoon Blue (ughh, Cloudiah, that was horrible), this dood is feeling “guilty”, so that’s something? (trying to see the best in people)

La Strega
11 years ago

Yeah, but he blames the girl for his guilt.

La Strega
11 years ago

Why do I find the commentators more distressing to read than the OP? Not just this topic, all of them. I can read the OPs and laugh, but the commentators chiming in make me want to throw up. The way they try to outdo each other is just pathetic. I hope Minty does come back so we can tell him his wife was here and had a few words to say.

Nepenthe
Nepenthe
11 years ago

Well, unlike Typhoon Blue (ughh, Cloudiah, that was horrible), this dood is feeling “guilty”, so that’s something? (trying to see the best in people)

Yeah, but he blames the girl for his guilt.

It’s kinda like this: which would you rather have, a ton of pig shit or two tons of pig shit?

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

La Strega: I brought that to his attention on the thread he shat in this morning.

La Strega
11 years ago

The OP Alex Matlock has his own website “The Bro Bible.” It’s all the same old / same old. Does the world really need another PUA guru?

http://www.brobible.com/profile/375666

La Strega
11 years ago

@hellkell:

“La Strega: I brought that to his attention on the thread he shat in this morning.”

Oh, I’m glad you told me. Had to go back and catch up. So happy for Minty he’s got a new imaginary girlfriend.

Maude LL
11 years ago

augochlorella

Thanks for reading comments so I don’t get tempted to check myself.

Fear in a girl’s eyes, her pushing you away = virgin act. Bleah.

(Of course, girl into it = filthy slutwhore)

That guy is one sad dude who’s beyond self-consistency I guess.

@snore
I could be wrong (I’m tone deaf sometimes), but you sound to me like a person who thinks feminists are offended at everything, trying to imitate one.

Marie
11 years ago

@Augochlorella

To my intense regret, I read the comments. No one is calling out the sex as rape, but there is a commenter saying that any girl doing the “virgin act” is lying because women are whores and Cosmo magazine exists.

But…like everyone starts out as a virgin. I may not be well versed in the ‘art’ of mra logic, but I fail to see how every women would be lying about being virigins.

BritterSweet
11 years ago

Must add to the brain bleach because holy fuck!

http://windylou.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83455133a69e20133ee26dc5a970b-800wi

augochlorella
augochlorella
11 years ago

@ Marie

Because women are liars. Even when they tell the truth, they do it in a lying way. Duh.

This isn’t quite brain bleach, but it made me happy, so I’ll just leave this here.

BigMomma
BigMomma
11 years ago

@cloudiah, I went and read some of that r/mr thread. I looked at the letter too and thought nah, this stinks like rotten fish. A couple of commenters did actually query its authenticity but were told it didn’t matter because shit like that happens OK? Proof, who needs it? Actual real things happening in real life? Nah, let’s just bloviate.

snore
snore
11 years ago

“snore, thank you for your phony outrage over the ads on my site, the content of which I have no control over.”

Someone forces you to run ads? To run these ads?

Your ad network that you chose provides you no way to flag certain ads or ways to better target your audience?

All of that seems unlikely.

I can’t imagine any person more responsible for the ads that appear on your website than you, David.

If they are misogynistic (misandric and ageist) and you let them through after is has been pointed out, I think the only logical conclusion is that you approve of their content, or value the advertising dollars more than the abusive messaging.

augochlorella
augochlorella
11 years ago

My understanding was that these ads differ depending on the google history of the user. So the ads I see will be different than the ads that other people see. I’m certainly not seeing any Melanie Griffith ad.

BigMomma
BigMomma
11 years ago

Yeah, I got ads for articles on ham recipes, free running, left handedness and bond girls

Aaliyah
11 years ago

Someone forces you to run ads? To run these ads?

Your ad network that you chose provides you no way to flag certain ads or ways to better target your audience?

All of that seems unlikely.

I can’t imagine any person more responsible for the ads that appear on your website than you, David.

If they are misogynistic (misandric and ageist) and you let them through after is has been pointed out, I think the only logical conclusion is that you approve of their content, or value the advertising dollars more than the abusive messaging.

Is this another abysmal attempt at a “gotcha?” If so, you’re terrible. Sorry.

snore
snore
11 years ago

@augoclorella
I can see them in incognito mode (no cookies or history)
http://i.imgur.com/Q3YPbXd.jpg

Julie Gillis (@JulesAboutTown)

I don’t have any ads, but yeah, most ads pop up based on YOUR google history and searches…