Categories
a woman is always to blame advocacy of violence atlas shrugged crackpottery evil sexy ladies evil women grandiosity I'm totally being sarcastic men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny MRA not-quite-explicit threats only men pay taxes apparently oppressed men patriarchy playing the victim PUA pussy pass reactionary bullshit the spearhead your time will come

Misogyny as Activism: The Spearhead “On the Urgent Necessity of Criticizing Women.”

It's all Carole Lombard's fault.
It’s all Carole Lombard’s fault.

There are many, many, many reasons why the Men’s Rights movement is not now, and I suspect never will be, ready for prime time. One of these reasons is that even when MRAs are doing their best to wax eloquent, in the fanciest language they can muster, about the urgent need for men to save civilization from the degradations of feminism and cultural Marxism and whatever by saying even more bad things about women, they just can’t  keep themselves from using phrases like “pussy pass.”

Case in point, this little mini-manifesto, taken from a recent post by “BC Dad” on The Spearhead with the almost Maoist title “On The Urgent Necessity of Criticizing Women.”  (As usual, I have edited out some of the redundancies because, holy crap, these guys are long-winded.) Take it away, Daddy-o:

Accurate, pointed and realistic public criticism of female behavior is thus long overdue; co-operation with the pussy pass, cultural Marxism and the politically correct goal of equal outcomes renders the female of our species free to continue and escalate her destructive, irrational and abusive behavior without hindrance.

Well, even aside from “pussy pass,” THAT was quite an exhausting sentence now, wasn’t it. Let’s catch our breath for a moment before continuing.

Rather than obligating women to raise their intellectual, ethical and behavioral standards, society has chosen instead to embrace, with all the religious fervor of an Inquisition, a false image of reality – shiny happy victims holding hands with government – which in the long term can benefit no one. This allegiance  to the false idols of feminism has led directly, since the 1970’s in particular, to the loss of basic human rights and freedoms … a loss which impacts men most profoundly.

Are you sitting down? Good. Because Dad here is about to use the phrase “evolutionary value of the pussy pass.” No, really:

Looking past the obvious evolutionary value of the pussy pass, there is little purpose in cooperating with and maintaining the fraud, and to do so will lead inexorably, in this era of virtually omnipotent governance and bureaucracy (the ‘new patriarchy,’ created, just like the old one, for women at their own behest), to the ever-escalating abuse of men and children, up to and including the potential for societal collapse.

Yes, he did just say that the “old patriarchy” was set up by women and for the benefit of women. And that there’s a new woman-centric-patriarchy that’s been set up in the same way. Apparently on The Spearhead, these delusions are so widely shared that BC Dad feels comfortable referring to them in a parenthetical aside, assuming that none of his readers will stop short and say,”woah, daddy-o, what the hell are you talking about there? I mean, I hate the ladies too but I’m pretty sure they’re not the ones making sure all the popes are dudes.”

This path will undoubtedly see the regression of society into a quasi-Victorian state, one in which the bulk of men are so heavily constrained and alienated that they lose all desire to participate in the social venture. Signs of such a zeitgeist can be seen in many countries already.

Absolutely. Take a look at this photolithograph of some quasi-Victorian ruffians in contemporary, er, Switzerland, clearly alienated from society and taking refuge in silly hats and walking sticks and the growing of oversized sideburns.

1868-6

BC Dad continues:

As well, if the escalation of destructive female behavior continues, blowback from young men in particular will be increasingly prevalent, whereby outright disdain for females becomes both a descriptor of and a motivator for the new generation of men: there are numerous blogs out there which speak clearly to this possibility, as many people are aware.

And now we come to the predictable “you ladies better watch out before you get what’s coming to you” portion of the manifesto.

The obvious contempt towards women displayed by certain commentators would seem to be well-earned, and it does not bode well for females.

Humanity will undoubtedly survive, though with much unnecessary suffering, but it is incumbent upon rational men (and women) to speak truth, to expose the great gender lie. In addition to refusing compliance with a false reality, this most definitely includes pointing the accusatory fingers of reason and culpability directly at women, a task which can no longer be shirked.

Yeah, I’m pretty sure the accusatory fingers of blaminess have been pointed directly at women pretty much since cave dudes figured out how to point their fingers in the first place.

Naturally, the Spearhead’s commenters lapped this all up happily — and took the argument a few steps further.

“IMO, ensuring the extinction of this warped and rotting society is THE most mature and responsible action today’s western male can take,” GT66 argued.

TFH, for his part, seemed to suggest that some sort of authoritarian “solution” was the inevitable next step:

Extreme feminism is inseparable from democracy.

Women use the right to vote to warp entire societies to make everything secondary to the whims of women, and to divert all resources to women and all costs to men and children.

Democracy ends as a result, one way or the other.

Ulick McGee, meanwhile, delivered up a manifesto of his own, which included such highlights as:

The most basic problem is the sexual free market. Male Demand for casual sex is unlimited and women control Supply. ….

We can’t beat the current pro-female, anti-male system through logical argument or political action, just like Communists could not get the “exploited” worker to rise up in the West. Thirsty Simps will never stop pedestalings sluts. The Elites won’t stop the party. Young women won’t start lusting over nice guys. Human Nature in the absence of nuclear incentives to the contrary will continue the current trend of Dykeland Uber Alles.

There’s a bunch more to Mr. McGee’s manifesto. Most of it makes even less sense than that.

Darryl X, not to be outdone in the manifestoing department, delivered up a 29-point program, which included the following news updates from Planet MRA:

FEMINISM IS THE PRIMARY MECHANISM BY WHICH WORKING MEN ARE ENSLAVED, RESPONSIBLE MEN ARE IMPOVERISHED, INNOCENT MEN ARE IMPRISONED, INFIRM MEN ARE DENIED HEALTH CARE, POTENTIAL SCHOLARS ARE DENIED EDUCATIONS, PERSECUTED MEN ARE DENIED PASSPORTS AND FREE MEN ARE KILLED

1/29 States, family courts and their officers, representatives of the Divorce Industry, feminists and others encourage mothers and other women to make false allegations of domestic violence, rape and child abuse against men and then divorce them …

17/29 Because of child support and Title IX and other developments, men have no incentive to pursue and are precluded from educations and the ratio of men to women at university presently approximates 2:3 …

21/29 Women get paid more and consume approximately 85% of resources as concluded by many marketing and government studies and men are sent to die in endless wars to satisfy that excessive consumption

22/29 The government wants women fighting in combat because it knows they can be more easily manipulated than men to kill their own citizens and even men in their own ranks (just look at how good the government has been at destroying families and fathers and children by paying mothers, other women and feminists to do it) …

24/29 The feminist police state metastasizes, men are without incentive to work and are actually punished for it, women don’t work despite excessive entitlements, our infrastructure falls apart, and the economy collapses

25/29 Our government doesn’t just fail to compensate men for their labor but actively punishes them while it doesn’t just fail to punish women for egregious criminal behavior but actively rewards them

26/29 Any economic recovery is nothing but the involuntary sacrifice of the lives of men and the transfer of their wealth to women and feminists in exchange for absolute power and control which corrupts absolutely …

28/29 Women have always been the most privileged population in the US

29/29 Feminism is a hate movement which can be stopped only by force

Huh. So I guess some Spearheaders have a little trouble telling the difference between “criticizing” women and “threatening” them.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

206 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cloudiah
8 years ago

It is not the first time that Darryl X has posted his 29-point manifesto into the comments there. He is evidently quite proud of it, though perhaps a bit hurt that WTF Price hasn’t seen fit to make a guest post out of it.

hellkell
hellkell
8 years ago

Urgent necessity of criticizing women? It’s ALL THEY DO.

I tried, really I did, to read BC Dad’s screed, but my eyes glazed over like I was reading a poorly translated appliance manual. Someone needs to take his thesaurus away from him.

DarrylX just needs to STFU.

bahumbugi
bahumbugi
8 years ago

misandry alert: No. 1 deadbeat PARENT sent to jail!

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Deadbeat-Parent-Long-Island-Child-Support-Jail-208459711.html

I am just waiting to see responses over this. He’s been divorced twice, and has kids from both marriages. He was making 500-600k+, FYI, which is why he owed like 75k a year.

tarnishedsophia
8 years ago

“Women use the right to vote to warp entire societies to make everything secondary to the whims of women…”

I’ve never understood this. Men have the right to vote also. In fact, men have had this right longer than women, at least in America. So why don’t they *use* their suffrage rights to endorse the kinds of politicians they want, rather than just complaining that women go out and vote more often?

It’s like a 5 year old who has a cookie crying because another 5 year old has been given a cookie also, and appears to be enjoying it more…

Ms Getta Lode
Ms Getta Lode
8 years ago

” [..] the urgent need for men to save civilization from the degradations of feminism and cultural Marxism and whatever [..]”

You forgot postmodernism 😀

Medea
Medea
8 years ago

RE That last guy…women don’t work, and yet are paid more?

Governments want to “send” men to die, and yet also want to put women in the army, and both of these are terrible bad things that should stop? So who should be in the army?

Men don’t have incentives to get educated because of child support?!?!? What, so every man about to go into college has a kid now?

This is the definition of nonsense.

Yellaine
Yellaine
8 years ago

Even after your edditing, David, it’s still way too long winded and boring to read. Women are bad, women control everything. Though after reading that, I’m still unsure on how and why I am so evil, except that it’s related to vaginas.

(do women without pussy still get a pussy pass?)

Smudge
8 years ago

@Tarnished

They seem to forget that the vast majority of men simply don’t vote. God forbid MRAs tell MEN to do something! That would be misandry!

BabyLawyer
BabyLawyer
8 years ago

I’ve been reading this blog awhile, and I have to say I think this is some of the craziest shit I’ve read on here– the last two excerpts in particular.

1/29 States, family courts and their officers, representatives of the Divorce Industry, feminists and others encourage mothers and other women to make false allegations of domestic violence, rape and child abuse against men and then divorce them …

Duh, the Divorce Industry (TM) was never going to be efficient until we achieved economies of scale.

28/29 Women have always been the most privileged population in the US

OH, so that’s why we couldn’t vote until 1920.

29/29 Feminism is a hate movement which can be stopped only by force

Good luck with that.

My response manifesto:

LOLOLOL.

and as always,

(Citations needed.)

Chie Satonaka
Chie Satonaka
8 years ago

Women use the right to vote to warp entire societies to make everything secondary to the whims of women

Totally, dude. That’s why we’re still arguing about the morality of motherfucking birth control in 2013, and states have passed HUNDREDS of anti-choice bills in the past four years, and two women in Virginia are facing criminal charges for inducing an herbal abortion. Because the chicks are totally in charge.

Fuck off.

Chie Satonaka
Chie Satonaka
8 years ago

Also, you guys explained this before, but what the fuck is a pussy pass? Women get away with everything because they have them? Is that the “philosophy?”

augochlorella
augochlorella
8 years ago

…men are sent to die in endless wars to satisfy that excessive consumption…

22/29 The government wants women fighting in combat because it knows they can be more easily manipulated than men to kill their own citizens and even men in their own ranks (just look at how good the government has been at destroying families and fathers and children by paying mothers, other women and feminists to do it) …

women not fighting wars = bad
women fighting in wars = also bad

Got it.

Amnesia
Amnesia
8 years ago

Somebody tell these guys not to use a thesaurus while playing mad libs. That’s cheating.

thebionicmommy
thebionicmommy
8 years ago

Women use the right to vote to warp entire societies to make everything secondary to the whims of women, and to divert all resources to women and all costs to men and children.

If the MRA’s actually gave a shit about children, then they wouldn’t be advocates for deadbeat dads. They also wouldn’t complain about tax money going to schools, daycares, and food programs for needy families.

24/29 The feminist police state metastasizes, men are without incentive to work and are actually punished for it, women don’t work despite excessive entitlements, our infrastructure falls apart, and the economy collapses

I could only imagine what a society would look like if MRA’s were the ones building and maintaining infrastructure. They wouldn’t accomplish much because they’d be sitting around and whining about how feminists won’t do the work for them.

BabyLawyer
BabyLawyer
8 years ago

@augochlorella

There is absolutely no satisfying these people short of becoming a human blow up doll, and even that likely would not be good enough. Gurlz hav cootiez.

thebionicmommy
thebionicmommy
8 years ago

Oh yeah, and if some crybaby MRA wants to say the term deadbeat dad is “shaming language”, then watch this.

DEADBEAT DAD DEADBEAT DAD DEADBEAT DAD DEADBEAT DAD

Now go cry about that.

emilybites
emilybites
8 years ago

It’s easier to get female soldiers to kill men in their own ranks?? What?? Since when do women do that? All the other misogyny I get, but this is just weird.

Shiraz
Shiraz
8 years ago

Not ready for prime time, yes…in a nutshell.

“Accurate, pointed and realistic public criticism of female behavior is thus long overdue;”

Hello, I’d like you to meet the internet — that cyberspace thingy where women are cursed for existing if they don’t satisfy the peen.

“Young women won’t start lusting over nice guys. Human Nature in the absence of nuclear incentives to the contrary will continue the current trend of Dykeland Uber Alles.”

Man, “Nice Guys” ™ never understand they are their own worst enemies. You’re hateful, sexist pigs — you are not nice. If women flocked to you, that would be strange. And “nuclear incentives?” Is he daydreaming about the apocalypse, and how woman will throw themselves at any man just to survive?

They couldn’t debate in mixed company in any mainstream format because someone would demand they provide citations to claims like this:

“Women get paid more and consume approximately 85% of resources as concluded by many marketing and government studies and men are sent to die in endless wars to satisfy that excessive consumption…”

…and they would be publically shunned after the hypothetical debate took place.

I mean, look:

“22/29 The government wants women fighting in combat because it knows they can be more easily manipulated than men to kill their own citizens and even men in their own ranks (just look at how good the government has been at destroying families and fathers and children by paying mothers, other women and feminists to do it) …”

Women are “more easily manipulated into killing…” — ohhhhhhhhh for fuck sake. The government destroys families by paying mothers and other women and feminists to do it???
I don’t think Charlie Rose would return their phone calls. What’s sad is I think these guys are incredibly lonely, but there’s no remedy for them. They can only count on their bitterness and hate to be there for them — like a security blanket.

Andrew Johnston
8 years ago

Man, these guys are weird.

One question pops to mind, which applies to about half of what’s posted here: How insulated would someone have to be to believe that women never get criticized? Do these guys just never go outside? It might explain why so many of them have dating problems.

Falconer
8 years ago

Also, you guys explained this before, but what the fuck is a pussy pass? Women get away with everything because they have them? Is that the “philosophy?”

Pretty much, although I always thought it wasn’t so much the pussy itself as the ownership of said collection of organs.

Like, some angry guy says, “What’s she got that I don’t have? It’s because of her reproductive organs, isn’t it?”

Critical Dragon1177
8 years ago

David Futrelle

I hope you’re right and I hope the “Men’s Rights Movement” is never “ready for prime time” as you put it.

Zanana the Pegging Queen
Zanana the Pegging Queen
8 years ago

I like how freedoms are super important when it’s your Man-freedoms that are being threatened, but the solution is stopping feminism by force, and policing “the sexual free market”, and nuclear incentives!

thebionicmommy
thebionicmommy
8 years ago

21/29 Women get paid more and consume approximately 85% of resources as concluded by many marketing and government studies and men are sent to die in endless wars to satisfy that excessive consumption

Just in case anyone hasn’t read this post, David has already addressed the MRA claim that women spend more money and are therefore consuming more than men.

Save the Dude Planet

The main points were that just because women do more of the shopping does not mean they are spending all of that money only on themselves. They are spending the money for themselves, and their friends and family. In hetero couples, both people decide what they money is spent on, even if it’s the woman who does the work of going out to buy it.

This whole thing is an example of male privilege, that women are doing more of the work of buying groceries and clothes for their families. But MRA’s always twist things to make themselves feel like victims of an evil femtatorship.

grumpycatisagirl
grumpycatisagirl
8 years ago

That’s why men are sent off to wars? So I can spend money? Well, they can stop. Money’s not that important to me.

Since my whim is for there to be no war, that means that now there will be no more war, right? I’m a woman and I say so.

Andrew Johnston
8 years ago

Is he daydreaming about the apocalypse, and how woman will throw themselves at any man just to survive?

Sadly, that does seem to be what he’s talking about. I read the whole thing (because I don’t hate myself nearly enough) and it’s the usual MGTOW crap, starting with “I don’t get laid, therefore no other men get laid” and proceeding from there. And then comes the conspiracy theory:

To generalise, 20% of men (older, popular, wealthy or attractive) benefit from the current SFM as do 80% of young and attractive women. These two groups have influence over everyone else and can easily win the argument against a group of average joes looking for equal rights whether or not they string together a coherent argument. They win by turning up.

Ulick McGee never gets to have sex because the power elites are plotting with all the women he knows.

It’s also a little racist, because why not? Hey, if you’re going to be an asshole, go all the way.

Dvärghundspossen
8 years ago

Maybe they think there isn’t enough of “accurate, pointed and realistic” criticism of female behaviour? I mean, I totally agree that most of the shaming of women going on, on the internet as well as irl, is NOT “accurate, pointed and realistic”, but rather inaccurate, sweeping and unrealistic. I have no problem with EITHER gender being criticized for things they do as long as it’s “accurate, pointed and realistic”.

(Sometimes it’s just fun to take an MRA quote out of context in order to make it seem reasonable.)

La Strega
8 years ago

is it just my imagination / paranoia, or does it seem like there has been an uptick in the violence of their rhetoric? It seems like almost every post of this nature ends with advocating force to subdue women. Maybe I’m just starting to notice it more?

Aaliyah
Aaliyah
8 years ago

“cultural Marxism”

-________________-

It’s no surprise that an MRA dipshit used one of the dumbest terms coined by social conservatives.

mellowness
8 years ago

is it just my imagination / paranoia, or does it seem like there has been an uptick in the violence of their rhetoric? It seems like almost every post of this nature ends with advocating force to subdue women. Maybe I’m just starting to notice it more?

IMO, they’ve always been violent assholes. They’re just more visible now.

elyrayldin
elyrayldin
8 years ago

La Strega, I’ve noticed that too, though I haven’t been following the ManBlogHumanRightsExceptForTheGirlsBecauseWeHateThemosphere for as long as some, it could just be that I’m more aware of it now than I was a year ago.

Recently someone who was a good friend (one of the groomsmen at my wedding, in fact), posted a bizarre screed on facebook about the evils of feminism and women in general. He was always a bit of an odd duck who was given to paranoia and conspiracy theories, but I think his wife leaving him (for OMG good reasons, it turns out) pushed him right off the deep end. Now he seems to be spending his time working out, hating Feminists, and plotting the day that only the Good Women (ones without university educations, his ex-wife is a highly educated scientist with a pair of PhDs) are left to serve the needs of Men. I realise that doesn’t have a whole lot to do with this post…I guess I’m just saying that I’m noticing the hate a whole lot more, and in places where I don’t really expect it.

opium4themasses
opium4themasses
8 years ago

Just yesterday I attempted to go out and hang out with some atheists at a meetup. One of the guys there was arguing against women’s suffrage because apparently government always gets bigger afterwards. He defined moral decay as a bigger government. Yes, the libertarian was arguing against suffrage.

My brother and I argued with him until we finally got tired of it. Same guy also seemed to believe he always had to prove how macho he was. Later he felt the need to punctuate a point by stabbing the table with his knife.

I was happy to show my brother proof such people really do exist.

thecategoricalhousewife

It’s because feminism is female supremacy of amazonian lesbians. (Dun Dun Dun).

seraph4377
8 years ago

CriticalDragon – Chances are very much against it. None of them want to do the actual work involved with activism. I mean, look at the OP: his idea of activism is to criticize women more.

Every time they hold a rally, no one shows up. Every time someone points out some issue that really does affect men more than women and suggests something they could do about it, they find some reason not to (usually while whining “if feminists were really for equal rights, they’d take care of it for us). You can’t be a “movement” if you don’t want to move.

Another part of their problem is that they’re pathetic not just by our standards, but by those of the old-school patriarchy. There are a lot of people willing to join in a nice, rousing chant of “women suck”, but that doesn’t mean they’re going to agree with the MRA’s stated goals. Take child support payments: MRA’s consider them to be either a trap set by baby-hungry sperm-burgling women, or a particularly misandrist aspect of the misandrist divorce industry. They believe that if a man doesn’t want, or doesn’t have custody of, any children he may have sired, he shouldn’t have to pay for them. Of course, that still leaves a child to feed, and most mainstream right-wingers would rather that money came from the child’s father than the government.

ellex24
ellex24
8 years ago

Hi all, been a while since I popped in. Life got busy, you know how it is. And frankly, reading here gets a bit overwhelmingly depressing at times. Today’s post is no different, but I’m in a better frame of mind.

I see in this post that BC Dad knows nothing about the Victorians, who were not really as repressed as they seemed on the surface, nor had they lost “all desire to participate in the social venture”. I’m really not sure what BC Dad means by “social venture”, but I’ll guess he means men and women getting together to have sex and make babies. The Victorians managed that quite well, actually.

TFH clearly knows nothing about democracy or it’s history. Or, indeed, quite how democracy actually works. Or, indeed, how recent women’s right to vote actually is. In Ancient Rome, women could own property but could not vote or hold political office. In Ancient Greece, women in some areas could own property, but nowhere could women vote or hold political office. I seem to recall that Ancient Rome and Greece are the birthplace of what we currently call democracy, but hey. I’m just a woman, what do I know?

McGee derails back to the classic “Why doesn’t anyone want to fuck me?!” whining and of course, this is the fault of an entire half of the world’s population which, clearly, owes him sex. Clearly my choice to be currently celibate is depriving many deserving men of the sex they should be getting. Funny, my male co-workers haven’t been complaining and I can’t remember the last time someone actually hit on me. Oh no, wait…I am slightly overweight and therefore either don’t actually qualify as female or I’m letting down my entire gender by not striving to be either a Donna Reed-esque fucktoy or a supermodel-esque fucktoy. My bad.

DarrylX…I don’t know where he gets his figures and info, but I’m guessing he pulls them right out of his own overheated, paranoiac imagination.

On other, happier, subjects: Hey Kitteh, did you ever get those Hand-Eze gloves? Am I right in remembering that you were going to order a pair?

BritterSweet
BritterSweet
8 years ago

THIS is a pussy pass:

I just had to find that because the stupidity is almost painful.

Sideliner
Sideliner
8 years ago

@Aaliyah – I don’t know WTF their definition of cultural marxism is, but I find it hysterical that they can criticize it and then go ranting on about how the “sexual marketplace” is unfair because (supposedly) a few of the men get most of the women. So redistribution of money is bad but forcefully redistributing women would be good?

I know their ideas are crap, sometimes I just wish it was at least consistent crap.

leftwingfox
8 years ago

Yes, the libertarian was arguing against suffrage.

That doesn’t surprise me at all. There seem to be a few strains of libertarianism which are highly authoritarian, and many seem to prefer a do-nothing dictator over any sort of collectivist or inclusive democracy.

Howard Bannister
8 years ago

Okay, wait, let me sum up.

1) Women shouldn’t vote!

2) We should take the right to vote back from them by force!

3) … feminism is so violent, and tramples our rights.

I’m all like, if you were writing a text-book example of Projection, would you make it this flimsy and paper-thin? Or would you try to make it more subtle?

Kittehserf
8 years ago

G’day Ellex, how ya been (apart from busy)? 🙂

Yup, I got a Hand-Eze (just one, it’s only my left hand gives me gyp occasionally). I like it a lot. Might be wearing it today – between knitting and spending about four hours doing this pic last night, my hand’s a bit achey. If I were an MRA I’d probably blame 3.5 billion people for that, somehow. 😛

Speaking of whom, what the heck is “the SFM”? I read it and thought Slying Fpaghetti Monster.

Maude LL
Maude LL
8 years ago

I wonder if “BC Dad” is the (ex-)car dealership dude? Speculations.

To generalise, 20% of men (older, popular, wealthy or attractive) benefit from the current SFM as do 80% of young and attractive women.

At last someone lays out the “cock carousel” coherently (although I don’t think he would realize what his quote means if you actually put it into numbers.

-He’s talking about 20% of *all men,* roughly 20% of 50% of the population (minus children)
-Against 80% of young and attractive women (usually a very small portion of the population, depending on the MRA, probably about 25% of women 16-25 – I’m being generous to extend it to 25, and to take a quarter of women, when they keep saying about how fat and ugly women are).
OK, 80% of 25% of 11.3% (women aged 16-25 according to census) of 50%

Let’s calculate this!

On a population of 2 million:

Men who get laid in MRA land (I removed 23.7% to account for men under 18): 152,600
Women who get laid in MRA land: 22,600

That makes almost 7 men for each woman! What??? That means men are pussy carouselling alpha women!

In the real world of course, pussy carousel and cock carousel is not a thing, but this guy’s statement is a pretty clear that when they say “80% of women” they mean “80% of women I fancy.”

Maude LL
Maude LL
8 years ago

oops, didn’t end my blockquote I guess (I thought I did).
It ends after the first paragraph, the rest is me (starting with “At last”)!

princessbonbon
8 years ago

I am going to indulge in a fantasy where a giant (and I do mean GIANT) cheese wheel rolls over all of these whiners because after all, you eat cheese with whine right?

Because otherwise I would get really depressed at being so hated for having the nerve to do things like exist. And annoyed that there is this “escalation of destructive female behavior continues…” with zero proof other than Assfax.

thebionicmommy
thebionicmommy
8 years ago

Speaking of whom, what the heck is “the SFM”? I read it and thought Slying Fpaghetti Monster.

I read it that way, too. But it’s actually a PUA acronym for “sexual free market”. It’s like mixing some Thomas Paine with Roosh, and getting total crap (but what would you expect, since anything + Roosh=crap).

Howard Bannister
8 years ago

This may be relevant to folks’ interests.

Why do men keep putting me in the girlfriend zone?

Aaliyah
Aaliyah
8 years ago

This may be relevant to folks’ interests.

*link*

Holy fuck those comments are stupid. Apparently most people there think that someone pretending to be a friend in order to be in a relationship/have sex with another person is totally okay.

Tulgey Logger
Tulgey Logger
8 years ago

This is actually kind of refreshing. Everyone talks about the apocalypse like it’s going to be Mad Max, with leather fetish gear and motorcycles. BC Dad, on the other hand, has the vision to forecast a dandy fop apocalypse in which men are very concerned about their top hats and the Queen. It’s charming, really.

Anyways, I’ve noticed that, according to these guys, women are irrational and whimsical but are also adept at setting up massive and endurig social institutions. Maybe that’s why the MRM is so irrational and emotional: they’re just trying to copy what they see as the enormous success of women in the field of organizational management.

Something to think about while getting one’s top hat shined, old sport.

Bob Goblin
Bob Goblin
8 years ago

Filing “evolutionary value of the pussy pass” under “Potential Dissertation Subjects.”

GreySky
GreySky
8 years ago

“The most basic problem is the sexual free market. Male Demand for casual sex is unlimited and women control Supply.”

I don’t think I want to know how he intends to fix this >.<

And yes, some dudes not getting laid as much as they would like, is surely the most basic problem the world is facing today.

Maude LL
Maude LL
8 years ago

Also – am I the only one finding a contradiction between “obvious evolutionary value of the pussy pass” and “young women won’t start lusting over nice guys”?
(TW – rape)
One would assume that the pussy pass is possible because of “nice guys”. So if nice guys pussy passing young attractive women are at an advantage to pass on their genes, how the hell can that equate “young women won’t start lusting over nice guys”? Maybe they mean with a “nice, respectful and polite rape”? Seriously. I know (or hope, anyway) they don’t actually mean that, but cognitive dissonance is a f*cker.

Maude LL
Maude LL
8 years ago

The “women control supply” thing – it’s really telling of their mentality that they believe sex is a thing women have and men “buy”.

I was in a relationship where I wanted more sex that the guy did. What did I do to fuck up quantity demanded? I even reduced the price from “free” to “I cooked you a wonderful supper, would you like to have sex? No? Ok, I’m happy to eat this amazing food with you and love you.” And quantity demanded did not rise! He just kept the interest rate really low. Maybe a change in technology could have increased the sexual equilibrium. What about the nice-unemployment rate? Maybe I could have maximized my input factors?

What? The sex economics have nothing to do with real actual human interaction? Giddoutaheah!

1 2 3 5