Today I’m feeling lazy, so I’m just going to pass along some thoughts from Mark Minter, a fellow best known, insofar as he is known, for leaving melodramatic manospherian manifestos – look, three “m’s” in a row! — in other people’s comments sections. I’ve written about him before — twice! — and he’s recently returned to his old habit of leaving his droppings in the comments here.
This little masterpiece of purplish prose, however, was left in the comments section of Roosh V’s Return of Kings blog (and brought to my attention by a commenter here), where he gets a much friendlier reception than he gets in these parts. His topic: Returning to the United States after spending time abroad. (I’ve cut out big chunks of his comments, as Minty is a tad long-winded.)
I have been back 3 years and I do not seek to engage America in any way. I stay home, on the internet. I shop in the middle of the night for food. When I must be out in the day, I move quickly, efficiently. I interact little with this society that I am no longer a part of. Some of that is age but a lot of is that I have killed my American self and I feel no affection for it, no loyalty to it, and I shall discard it forever, soon. The only connection is feel to it is you, you band of renegade rebels to whom I feel a kindred spirit.
We few, we happy few, we band of douchebags!
Despite the claims of feminists, America is the Matriarchy, the land owned and dominated by women and their mangina menservants, their guards, their infrastructure that so caters to them, their laws.
Yes, it’s true. Along with its mangina manservants — hi, everybody! — America has a Matriarchal Infrastructure. For example, this power plant, located just outside Dacron, Ohio, is devoted entirely to providing electricity for women’s Hitachi Magic Wands.
Anyway, back to Mark’s riveting ruminations:
You see it when upon landing in America. In other places, immigration is almost a “lip service”, a gang of sorts to get money from you when you arrive and when you leave. The security you must pass, when entering. is almost a joke compared to what you encounter when you arrive in America. And it is far greater when you leave, those airlines and airport security forces have a procedure that is not so much that the idea of the country you are leaving, but rather the dictates of America, and its women.
Clearly, only women want border security. If it were up to men, anyone could just waltz in no questions asked, carrying bombs, heroin, large snakes, strange insects, bootleg t.A.T.u. CDs, what have you.
And here you are not a man, but a functionary, a manservant, a slave to women. You see it when you arrive, you feel it, you know it, that stripping of your masculine dignity that begins the moment you leave the plane and enter an American terminal, that herding, that loss of the you that is you. And you see it as you come out on these clean, lit streets, this great giant boring shopping mall, all designed for women, all policed for women, all at the behest of women and those manginas that have bought in … .
Damn you, America and your good lighting! Fuck you and your infernal lack of litter!
It is more than merely cultural, more than social, it is even biological. This matriarchy has dominated even nature here, controlled every last aspect, even the dirt, even the germs, all of the animals, and certainly, all of the men.
It’s true. ALL OF THE ANIMALS. Even my cats are women. Spoiled, pampered women who expect everything handed to them on a silver platter!
Well, not so much a silver platter as little paper plates. Also, I make them poop in a box. But you get the idea.
If you stay, you will remain in angst, a slave to women.
When I close my eyes the image I see is elsewhere.
Weird. I see the completely unilluminated inside of my eyelids, which is not a terribly interesting view.
And when I die, the fact I got to live elsewhere for a time, will dwarf what I feel about here. It is the basis of my rants about marriage and this American life as a married man being insipid, stupid, and a waste of the life of man. Because it ties you to here, it chains you, it removes your option, your hope, that you might leave, and seals your fate as a slave.
So, I guess … don’t get married then? Problem solved!
I don’t think the women of Matriarchal America are going to miss out greatly from you removing yourself from the marriage market. So, seriously, go right ahead.
NOTE: There is no Dacron, Ohio.
Actually, he did it to counter that you could live as you do without the inventions of women. Because you couldn’t.
…why do you have a GIF of a woman peeing? Aren’t baby whale more your thing?
Pemmy, it’s true that listing female inventors doesn’t prove women are just as inventive as men.
It does put the lie to the claim that women CAN’T invent or innovate.
And, of course, you claimed to understand that women had been discriminated against in the past and not allowed into fields where they could take credit for discoveries. And if you were paying close attention to his list you’d have noted that most of them had to work hard to break through barriers to get where they got.
One might conclude that it is your logic that needs work.
“Hitting women is fun, but I’m not a misogynist!”
Tom, that gif pretty sums you up, you piece of shit.
No, Pecunium listed women inventors to counter the claim that there aren’t women inventors, and that women haven’t made any contributions to the sciences, culture, etc.
As for Remedial Logic, I recommend it to those “thoughtful” MRA’s who like to tout the claim that the majority of innovators have been men without realizing that the majority of men aren’t, and have never been, innovators.
I’m sure beating women is your specialty.
Marmaduke here couldn’t innovate his way out of a paper bag. Which he seems to have talked himself into, if the half-coherent mutterings are any indication.
“It does put the lie to the claim that women CAN’T invent or innovate.”
Who claimed this? Direct quotes, please.
Sigh.
Pemmy. Go back and quote Pecunium, would you be a dear please?
And while you’re at it, ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION ABOUT AVFM YOU LITTLE SHIT-WEASEL PRETENDING TO BE A MODERATE.
There’s your direct quote. Happy?
You can’t give yes/no answer but we have to go back and provide quotes? Lol.
Right there in his post with the list, you disingenous little weasel.
Gonna claim that isn’t thoroughly refutable by a list of women who’ve innovated?
They aren’t built for it. THEY CAN’T DO IT. Words have meanings.
If men are “build” to lead and innovate, then how come such a tiny fraction of men actually do?
From this comment here, lest you think I’ve misquoted.
So you keep right on with the lies and disingenous bullshit, Pemmy.
Its pretty hilarious the lengths that Joe and PeM will go to in order to derail and avoid talking about which MRAs they actually support.
Dudes, if your movement was worth a damn, you would actually be able to talk about other members of your movement whom you actually like.
White Knight, why would I hate women because they are not fit to lead and innovate ?
I don’t know, Marmaduke, why do you?
@Ugh- I like Reddit Men’s Rights, Glenn Sacks, and Omega Virgin Revolt.
Happy now?
Tom, what the fuck is wrong with you? I know you think upsetting women is fun times, but you’ve officially crossed the line into hurting people, and hurting people for your own amusement is fucking sick. I know you’ll probably just laugh at this, too, since getting a reaction is all you care about, but it needed to be said. Fuck you, you piece of shit. Just fuck you.
Pleeeeeeeeeease, tell me how I can be real woman!
Tommy, I know that it must be hard for you to read for comprehension, but you do not have to say “I hate women” to be a misogynist. Every word you type contributes to the idea that you think that women are less than men. That is enough.
This Glenn Sacks?
Because you are a total fucking failure who hasn’t accomplished a single fucking thing in your miserable life, and you feel inadequate, so you blame it on women? Sounds plausible to me.
Here is a lesson in Remedial Logic for our misogynistic so-called “innovators” here:
The definition of misogynist is “one who hates women,” not “one who acknowledges he hates women.”