Today I’m feeling lazy, so I’m just going to pass along some thoughts from Mark Minter, a fellow best known, insofar as he is known, for leaving melodramatic manospherian manifestos – look, three “m’s” in a row! — in other people’s comments sections. I’ve written about him before — twice! — and he’s recently returned to his old habit of leaving his droppings in the comments here.
This little masterpiece of purplish prose, however, was left in the comments section of Roosh V’s Return of Kings blog (and brought to my attention by a commenter here), where he gets a much friendlier reception than he gets in these parts. His topic: Returning to the United States after spending time abroad. (I’ve cut out big chunks of his comments, as Minty is a tad long-winded.)
I have been back 3 years and I do not seek to engage America in any way. I stay home, on the internet. I shop in the middle of the night for food. When I must be out in the day, I move quickly, efficiently. I interact little with this society that I am no longer a part of. Some of that is age but a lot of is that I have killed my American self and I feel no affection for it, no loyalty to it, and I shall discard it forever, soon. The only connection is feel to it is you, you band of renegade rebels to whom I feel a kindred spirit.
We few, we happy few, we band of douchebags!
Despite the claims of feminists, America is the Matriarchy, the land owned and dominated by women and their mangina menservants, their guards, their infrastructure that so caters to them, their laws.
Yes, it’s true. Along with its mangina manservants — hi, everybody! — America has a Matriarchal Infrastructure. For example, this power plant, located just outside Dacron, Ohio, is devoted entirely to providing electricity for women’s Hitachi Magic Wands.
Anyway, back to Mark’s riveting ruminations:
You see it when upon landing in America. In other places, immigration is almost a “lip service”, a gang of sorts to get money from you when you arrive and when you leave. The security you must pass, when entering. is almost a joke compared to what you encounter when you arrive in America. And it is far greater when you leave, those airlines and airport security forces have a procedure that is not so much that the idea of the country you are leaving, but rather the dictates of America, and its women.
Clearly, only women want border security. If it were up to men, anyone could just waltz in no questions asked, carrying bombs, heroin, large snakes, strange insects, bootleg t.A.T.u. CDs, what have you.
And here you are not a man, but a functionary, a manservant, a slave to women. You see it when you arrive, you feel it, you know it, that stripping of your masculine dignity that begins the moment you leave the plane and enter an American terminal, that herding, that loss of the you that is you. And you see it as you come out on these clean, lit streets, this great giant boring shopping mall, all designed for women, all policed for women, all at the behest of women and those manginas that have bought in … .
Damn you, America and your good lighting! Fuck you and your infernal lack of litter!
It is more than merely cultural, more than social, it is even biological. This matriarchy has dominated even nature here, controlled every last aspect, even the dirt, even the germs, all of the animals, and certainly, all of the men.
It’s true. ALL OF THE ANIMALS. Even my cats are women. Spoiled, pampered women who expect everything handed to them on a silver platter!
Well, not so much a silver platter as little paper plates. Also, I make them poop in a box. But you get the idea.
If you stay, you will remain in angst, a slave to women.
When I close my eyes the image I see is elsewhere.
Weird. I see the completely unilluminated inside of my eyelids, which is not a terribly interesting view.
And when I die, the fact I got to live elsewhere for a time, will dwarf what I feel about here. It is the basis of my rants about marriage and this American life as a married man being insipid, stupid, and a waste of the life of man. Because it ties you to here, it chains you, it removes your option, your hope, that you might leave, and seals your fate as a slave.
So, I guess … don’t get married then? Problem solved!
I don’t think the women of Matriarchal America are going to miss out greatly from you removing yourself from the marriage market. So, seriously, go right ahead.
NOTE: There is no Dacron, Ohio.
Confession here, kitteh, when I happen to catch a glimpse of my cat taking a dump outside, I laugh my ass off. The expression, the way she positions her tail. I’m not proud, but there ya go. When she pees, she simply sits, lowers her head and closes her eyes. Funny too, but not as much as the dumping.
I have to get some sleep. Enjoy making fun of me… after all, I am just a subhuman white man.
No. I have not. I am FibiBotV27.231, I am incapable of commiting logical fallacies. And that is real.
You see, “Groups” are composed of individuals. If individuals engage in behaviour, that behaviour forms the basis of the group. Any other claim would be social functionalism and that needs underlying causes you can readily define.
That is how groups are defined and formed.
Friends and family and lovers of white men cannot also hate white men as a group, because they are being, actively, friends, family and lovers of white men as individiduals, the people in their lives. Your friends, lovers and family probably love, revere and like you for the joy you bring them.
If you assume they still hate “White men”; but make some kind of special rule for you ala “Normally, we hate white men, but you, Pro-Equinox, you’re okay!” you are assuming they like you despite your “White-ness”.
You are calling all your friends racist. And you are stating that their ability to like several white people is somehow insubstantial compared to some “social” concept of “hating white men”.
That is the logical fallacy.
One cannot hate something one also loves. The two emotions are contrast.
Attributes of society cannot be derived from the study of groups if those groups engage in special rituals that influence other groups, because no coherent, congent analysis will be arrived at.
Your friends like you for you. You are also white. Clearly, your friends like you and are not racists who would disparage some larger group of “White men” and only “White men”.
Do you wish to play again? Y/N?
Corporate CEOs and Wall Street honchos, mostly white men, and pretty widely despised. I’m sure they weep themselves to sleep every night, on their mattresses stuffed with money, and would gladly trade it all to come back as a disabled woman of color.
You’re a turd, irrelevant of your ethnicity or gender.
PEMRA This “monsters of society”, I know where it’s coming from. It’s an immature response to valid sociological observations. Someone talks about rape culture – “Stop calling me a monster!”. Someone talks about inequitable wealth distribution – “Stop calling me a monster!” And so on. It all comes from an unhealthy obsession with yourself as the centre of the universe. Instead of putting your mind to addressing these problems, you’re whimpering in a corner thinking everyone’s being mean to you. And that’s all i’ve got to say to you. You’re worse than a monster – you’re boring.
*waits patiently to see whether pro-equality mra is actually getting to sleep or just poorly flouncing*
There should be a verb in there instead of a conjunction. Shit.
Enjoy making fun of me. I am just a subhuman old lady.
@opheliamonarch, yes, I have seen that article before. It seems to me another justification as to why it’s okay to mock and belittle the monsterous horrible white men (or, even worse I guess, straight white men).
I love lots of white men. White, straight, cis men. They are great people, and they are extremely privileged. Just like I’m extremely privileged. The trick is to not be an enormous douche about it.
*yessss, called it*
You’re still missing the bit about being a boob, irrelevant of ethnicity, orientation or gender. Derp-a-doo.
Like I said, wanker!
Pizza with thin cornmeal crust is amazing. And eggplant on pizza is awesome, if it’s cooked right.
I’m sort of meh about deep dish pizza, though. I prefer my dough to sauce and toppings ratio to lean in the other direction.
I almost exclusively date white, straight, cis men, just not the ones who equate their woes with those of the significantly more oppressed. I mock those ones with the ones I date.
Fibinachi, your assumptions are incorrect. It is of course possible to like an individual member of a group while disliking that group as a whole. In fact, this is pretty common. So, the rest of your post is built of a basis of stupid, and can be disregarded.
Sorry, that was aimed at wanky wanker.
@fade
http://www.google.dk/imgres?imgurl=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-xSrbCDC2bP8/T-iuQrQdPsI/AAAAAAAAEao/z4Bxcu0dHXw/s1600/a_winner_is_you_1024.jpg&imgrefurl=http://thewackytacky.blogspot.com/2012/06/winner-is-you.html&h=768&w=1024&sz=24&tbnid=ZYPOTtKfbKAU8M:&tbnh=94&tbnw=125&zoom=1&usg=__8p6ozMvhNMs1Nu8cLrwxu9RSJe0=&docid=xMM0AzrgCoDBoM&sa=X&ei=pJV4Ucb5KIT3sgad94GgBQ&ved=0CDsQ9QEwAQ&dur=522
Not tired, huh?
… How do I encapsulate links nicely?
Oh, on the note of eggplant
I tried an eggplant recipe (cooking it for the first time) earlier, and my family actually liked it! I mean, I liked it, too, but it’s good my family liked it b/c I made way more than one serving.
I just have to try more recipies (I think earlier we were talking about baba ganoush?) to see if I like eggplant, or just that one recipe.
In case PEMRA is poorly flouncing, NARS has come out with a really great new lip pencil.
http://www.sephora.com/satin-lip-pencil-P378859?skuId=1478510
Yay, I’m a winner!
Do this for links [a href=”www.link.com”] text you want the link to say [/a]
but with < pointy brackets
I’m getting to know zucchini. Historically the texture has been too much for me to take. If I can embrace zucchini, I can get over the texture of aubergine too.
PEMRA: poor flounce. Go to bed.