The gaming enthusiast known as seanmalstrom seems to be on a personal crusade to challenge the stereotype of men as the “logical sex.” He does this mostly by 1) being a dude and 2) writing things that make no sense at all.
In a recent post on his blog Malstrom’s Articles News – no, that’s really what it’s called – Mr. Malstrom attempts to rebut a piece by John Walker of the gaming site Rock Paper Shotgun that challenged misogyny in the gaming world.
It’s not much of a rebuttal, but Mr. Malstrom makes a couple of, er, “arguments” that grabbed my attention. At one point he suggests that if game developers stop populating their games with sexy lady characters with giant boobs and long legs, American men will have no way to exercise their God-given right to ogle sexy ladies with giant boobs and long legs.
There is a great question I have yet to hear anyone in the Game Industry answer. If women cannot be depicted fantastical (big boobs, long legs, slaughters armies single-handedly) in fantasy entertainment, where can men go to see fantasy women? Women have their fantasy men from endless soap-operas, romance novels, chick flicks, and such. Are men not allowed to have fantasies in entertainment?
True, that is a question I’ve yet to see anyone in the game industry answer, largely because most of the people in the game industry, whatever their flaws, live in the real world, and in the real world images of sexy ladies with big boobs are not exactly difficult to come by.
Mr. Malstrom goes on to argue that men in the English-speaking world have the greatest need for sexy lady video game characters, because the women they run into on a regular basis in the real world are all fatties. In the Cold War era, politicians warned about a “Missile Gap” with the Russians. Today, apparently, we and the Russians have a Fatty Gap.
In Russia, it is stunning to see alcoholic bums of Russian men with model quality looks Russian women. In the same way, in the United States it is stunning to see wealthy, hardworking, handsome American men with an American woman who looks like a Troglodyte. Of course, this is just a generalization. The point is that the typical American male has a better worldwide value if they stop thinking the local obese women around them are ‘the normal’. They aren’t the normal worldwide.
If anyone needs fantasy depictions, it would be English speaking men who don’t have access to the worldwide standard.
Mr. Malstrom is also bothered by the suggestion that video game makers should try to make female characters more interesting. You know, with personalities and motivations of their own, and stuff like that. To Mr. Malstrom, there’s nothing more interesting about a women than her body.
What makes a woman interesting to men?
The truth is that interesting women needs youth, big boobs, long legs, long hair, and an hourglass figure to be interesting to men. The more women go away from this, the less interesting they become to men. This is why women when inevitably age, they become more and more invisible to men. It is just Nature at work. Ironically, for men the older they get, the more interesting they can become to women as their earning potential goes up. This balances out how most young men are invisible to women when they are younger. After the age of 25, men tend to become the more interesting ones compared to a woman of equal age. This is why mothers always advised their daughters to ‘snag him when he and she are both young’.
Indeed, Mr. Malstrom argues, men who insist that women be depicted as sex objects are doing women a giant favor.
And we should only hope that women wish to be depicted as sex objects for that is how they become love objects as well. No man wants to marry a women they aren’t attracted to. Last I checked, marriage rates were plummeting in the West. Perhaps journalists should strive for ‘positive change’ by suggesting to women to be depicted more as sex objects so they can attract a man for marriage before they get too old. That would truly help women and make men happier as well.
Mr. Malstrom concludes with a stirring call for women to stop being such fat fatties.
It IS tasteless for using women as sex objects to sell games. Why? It is because real life women should be sex objects to begin with. If that were the case, putting them on a game cover wouldn’t be selling the game. This used to be the case decades ago. Since obesity in women have skyrocketed and attractive women have diminished, putting attractive women on game covers definitely attracts men more than it should.
It IS sad that women can’t find themselves sensibly portrayed in the games they play. It is not because the women in the games are ‘too attractive’, it is because the women playing them tend to be ‘too fat’. It is sad for women that they are fat. It is also sad for men. What John Walker should do is to advise women to get in shape and try to look like the depictions of women that men are attracted to. This would be ‘positive change’ we could all get behind.
I hate to burst your bubble, Mr. Malstrom, but I don’t think there was any era of history in which women looked like this.
It’s probably just as well, as Lara here doesn’t seem to have eyelids and her head isn’t properly connected to her neck.
Note: Thanks to Tatjna for pointing me to Mr. Malstrom’s post!
I like the way the other kittens are all, nope, too big, but Snowball decides to investigate. 🙂
A Golden Retriever bigger than a Dane! That’s a lot of dog.
For every unattractive woman there is an unattractive man. Nature is kind that way.
Off topic. See if you can parse the cognitive dissonance this will cause your indoctrinated brains:
http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2013/04/femen-stages-a-topless-jihad/100487/
Half-naked feminists protest against the oppression of women and one woman in particular….. by Muslims. Including,and particularly Tunisian Muslims.
You only have to scroll down into the comments to instantly see that these women stand accused of racism for doing this. Of course.
So: Which thread of dogma will you cling to here, Manboobzers??
Hamsters ready?
Aaaand… GO!
Do you really believe Femen exists, Joe? Don’t you realize those are simply photoshopped images of lizard people that the 1llumina7i are spreading? On behalf of the Rockefellers?
Oh yeah, you really got us there!
Not.
In sum, I stand with neither group because I condemn the denial of agency of Muslim women coming from Femen activists, and I condemn the assumption from MWAF that Islam isn’t oppressive to women and that Muslim women are doing just fine in the Middle East. I am an ex-Muslim, and I personally have great hatred for Islam.
Better luck next time!
Smug MRA dipshits never fail to amuse (and disgust) me.
Shut up, Joe.
Joe still can’t fathom the idea of feminists (or women in general) having different opinions about anything or taking different courses of action.
Colour me surprised.
Wow, Aaliyah, you just declared – on manboobz no less, that you hate Islam.
*gets popcorn*
*awaits backlash & cries of “Islamophobia”*
but of course, you are “one of the Manboobzers” … will clannish loyalties allow Manboobzers to give you a pass on your hatred of Islam??
The smart money is that Manboobzers will quietly ignore your declaration of hatred, in favour of the usual soft option: ad hominem attacks on the designated easy-target – me.
Place your bets, folks and watch the hamster wheels spin! XD
You have really created an interesting alternate universe inside your head, Joe. It bears no relation to reality, but you seem to find it entertaining so have fun with that?
And Joe demonstrates his ignorance that a person criticising a religion from the inside – from personal experience of bigotry – is a very different matter from people on the outside, who know nothing from personal experience, making sweeping claims about it.
I’d say Joe’s alternative universe is pretty weak, he keeps having to come here to prop it up.
Joe–I know you can’t read for comprehension at all, but did you read about WHY Aaliyah hates Islam? It’s her right to, and she wasn’t being Islamaphobic, so suck it, you ginornous jackass.
And it’s not ad hom to say you’re a dipshit. You’ve proven that time and again. Go play with your tinfoil.
Yep, avoid the issue – make ad hominem attacks it is! Hah.
Ii is my sincere hope that one day the inherent conflicts of your dogmatic beliefs confront you inescapably in the real world, where ad hominems will serve you not at all.
I’m thinking Ol’ Reynolds Wrap over there is drunk posting again.
Joe, there is no issue but the one in your alternate reality. Have fun with that.
Joe isn’t very good at that sowing dissent among your opponents thing, is he?
What, “and I personally have great hatred for Islam”?
I personally bear great hatred for Catholicism. I don’t like the system. I hate the things it preaches, when you look at the core books. I personally bear great hatred for Friedman / Chicago School economics. I don’t like the system. I hate the things it preaches, when you look at the actual books.
I personally bear great hatred for Islam. I don’t like the system. I hate the things it preaches, when you look at the core books.
You’re still welcome to believe in any and all of those things, and none of them are really inherently wrong as belief systems. I just don’t like ’em, and I have had vast, bad experiences with them.
Have I made your head explode yet, Joe?
—
Or is this some… nega trap, wherein things are arranged on an ascending scale of importance, and any lower scale problem cannot co-exist at the same time as a higher scale? Women cannot both be feminists and muslims? Women cannot both protest naked, be feminists and muslims? Other women cannot both disagree with all the previous actions, NOT protest, and be muslims? I cannot both dislike racism and Islamophobia, but be none too fond of Islam? Nor can anyone both dislike one religion, one thoughtset and one cognitive model? Because… Well, because you say so. And we feminists have to be inclusive? So when you put us on the line and force us to admit that… OH GOD NO, PEOPLE HAVE OPINIONS! It shatters our foundations and proves you right?
… Right. That sounds rational, Joe. Real rational.
Hey JoeFuckwit, you deliberately missing the very first thing hellkell said in her comment? Or my comment, for that matter? Aaliyah has excellent reasons to dislike Islam and they have nothing to do with Islamophobia.
You’re worse than ignorant, you’re willfully ignorant. Fantasise all you want, but we do very nicely in the real world, thank you. Not that you’d ever know, because you don’t seem to inhabit it.
Funny, Shiraz just asked on the other thread which troll it was who came here because he’s too cheap to pay for a dom, and I said that describes most of ’em. It sure fits Joe.
How’s this one for you Joe: I respect Aaliyah’s experience as an ex-Muslim woman and her right to talk about her experiences, and I do not respect Femen’s attempts to speak for Muslim women, particularly Muslim WOC. The Man Boobz Commentariat has spoken!!
Except no, they haven’t. I have spoken. We are a group of different people with different opinions and many here might disagree with me. Luckily you’ve covered your bases by declaring any possible response she might receive as ridiculous in advance, so you can condemn all of our various positions.
Joe can only handle but one thought in that tiny, conspiracy-addled mind of his, Fibinachi.
@hellkell and kittsherf – so you’re saying that: “people who have personal experience of bigotry from X group have a right to hate X group, but people who do not have personal experience do not.”
Really. Fascinating. So, according to you: the victims of the London 7/7 bombing according to you would have a right to hate Islamists / Salafists?
How about the relatives and friends of those victims?
How about the witnesses to that terrible carnage?
How far does this “Oh, that’s not Islamophobia pass” that you are granting extend?
Or is it just to your fellow Manboobzers?
Let’s face it, you don’t really have principles – you have in-group loyalties.
Aaliyah is part of your in-group and there’s no way you’d throw her under the bus for anything as abstract as a principle.
Typical dishonest Joe.
Joe, clearly you can’t read, because if someone’s fucking up around here, they get called.
Like Viscaria said, you’ve already set it up so any response from us will be discounted, so who’s the dishonest fuckface here? YOU.
Pretty much the only people who have denounced me for expressing my hatred for Islam, in the feminist blogs I frequent, are Muslim feminists themselves. I don’t know many Muslim feminists here.
What the people here don’t like is what they call “Islamophobia” (a very unfortunate term given that it’s often used as a silencing tactic from many Islam apologists), which in most contexts refers to the hatred of Muslims, not Islam. I’m against it, too. I suppose some also might take offense to the fact that I think “Islamic extremism” and Islam itself share a lot in common, but hopefully they aren’t common.
Thankfully, I have yet to receive any negative responses here for denouncing Islam. Just look at the recent comments on this thread.
I partially agree. But the other reason I detest Islam is that I have concluded, through pretty rigorous research (which involved a rigorous interpretation of Islamic scripture), that orthodox Islam is extremely reprehensible. Check out the journal entry I posted for a little snippet of how vile Islam is. Judge for yourself.