Categories
a voice for men antifeminism boner rage creep-shaming creepy evil sexy ladies facebook makes women all stuck up incoherent rage mansplaining men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA patronizing as heck paul elam penises playing the victim princesses self-congratulation sex the sound of his own voice unsolicited penis updates

An Unsolicited Update from Paul Elam’s P*nis

askmeaboutweiner

Regular readers of this blog, for better or worse, know one thing that makes “Men’s Human Rights Activist” Paul Elam’s penis happy: The prospect of harassing feminists. He is, after all, the man who wrote of one feminist that “that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection.”

Now Mr. Elam has given us a rather more complete account of what it is that pleases his penis. I’m not sure there was any great demand for this information, but he has chosen to release it, and so here we are.

In a post with the tasteful title “on tits, ass and fucktards,” Elam informs the world that he is in fact a fan of the first two items in this list – that is, tits and ass. He is also, he goes on to explain, a lover of

Sorry, I have to stop for a moment to remind you that you are about to read about things that give Paul Elam — yes THAT Paul Elam — a boner.

I will not think any less of you if you stop reading right here.

If you are ready and willing to continue, here we go:

I like well-formed thighs that lead up to the promise land, and smooth knees above shapely calves. Of course, all that combined with a woman’s pretty face is a crowning glory; full lips that promise supple kisses and great blow jobs, clear eyes and unblemished skin. All this combines to make a woman utterly fuckable, and visually that is what I like most of all. I like to look at women that are little fuckmuffins.

Yes, he actually wrote all that, attached his name to it, and posted it for other people to see.

But as much as Elam likes to look at “little fuckmuffins” he does not actually seem to like most of them very much.

After roughly 150  words devoted mostly to cataloguing his favorite female body parts, Elam evidently runs out of nice things to say about women, and so he returns again to his favorite pastime, devoting the bulk of the post to a rant explaining how much he hates “feminist fucktards,” traditionalist women, and women with Facebook accounts.

While happy enough with “fuckmuffins [who] are sexually liberated and adventurous” and who “like to please and be pleased,” Elam informs the world that he feels no such love for all those awful “fuckmuffins” who “liv[e] life with prudish sticks up their asses made from the same wood that forms the chips on their shoulders.”

He’s also mighty pissed at all those who aren’t interested in hearing him expound at length on what his penis likes.

Of the now almost endless list of things that have grown annoyingly stupid and sanctimonious about feminism is the Victorianesque shaming of my sexual programming as a man. Even with the so called “sex positive” feminists, the most hypocritical assholes of them all, the only positive sexuality they embrace is that of women. To them, male sexuality, in all its glory, is something to be buried, controlled and allowed to surface only when it serves the sexual needs of some narcissistic, horny, self-absorbed little “sex positive” princess.

Unfortunately, more traditional-minded women aren’t much interested in hearing about his penis either. And for some reason they, like feminists, think that there might be some sort of connection between men and rape.

Who are those traditionalists? You will know them by their obsequious silence while feminists shame men for committing the scurrilous act of looking at women sexually. Or better yet, as they join in with their “men can stop rape” bedfellows to twist and distort the natural inclinations of young men with Puritan sexual guilt that marches in lockstep with the feminist hatred of male sexuality.

Elam stops for a moment to reassure his readers that despite all that stuff about “well-formed thighs” and blow-job lips he prefers Good Women to mere “fuckmuffins.”

Now, all that being said, is woman-as-fuckmuffin all I care about? Hardly. As a matter of fact, I would throw fuckmuffin to the curb faster than you can say “patriarchy” to spend time with a woman of good character and intelligence. I have learned in life that my dick has a healthy agenda for humanity, but not necessarily for me. So as my values have matured, so has my taste in women.

Heck, it turns out he actually sort of hates “fuckmuffin.” After all, he tells us,

fuckmuffin … is prone to act indignant when she feels sexualized (by the wrong guy). She can become so angry at being “objectified” that you can see her tits shake right through that tight sweater with the neckline that plunges to the vicinity of her toes.

And then he compares her to a bug:

Time and experience will lead [men] to understand that fuckmuffin should be regarded with same respect as you would afford a stinging insect.

Basically, he explains, the only problem with lustful young men who ogle women is that they haven’t learned to hate women enough quite yet. And so women shouldn’t complain when young guys stare at them. Or when they don’t. As far as I can figure it, he thinks women shouldn’t ever complain about anything.

Leave [young men] the fuck alone. There is nothing wrong with them. Nothing needs to be fixed. If you want to help a young man like that, just start encouraging him to connect the dots between fuckmuffin’s propensity to take her own picture and post it to Facebook four times a day and her ultimate tendency to make him miserable. Eventually he will get the connection. And if he doesn’t, maybe that makes him happy. Either way, it is none of your fucking business.

And so ends what’s probably the strangest work of erotica I think I’ve ever read.

723 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kittehserf
11 years ago

“It’s a little too close to virgin shaming for me… Who or what Paulie has had sex with, or whether he’s had sex at all is irrelevant; the fact that he’s a Grade A misogynist, cheerleader for anti-woman violence, and an all-around asshat? Totally relevant.”

For this virgin-by-earthly-standards it’s about the causation vs correlation: if Pauly hadn’t had sex it’d be because he’s a Grade A misogynist who doesn’t deserve to have sex with baked goods, let alone humans. (Though given he’s been married and divorced, he presumably has anyway.) It’s more “hateful filth: gee, who’d be surprised if everyone’s avoided him?” than “hahahahahaha you’ve never had sex cos you’re ugly” sort of thing.

tl:dr – it didn’t read as possible virgin shaming to me, just as Elam shaming – if that were possible for a man who seems as lacking a sense of shame as any other decent emotions.

cloudiah
11 years ago

Could be, Kittehserf (you changed your name!), could be — I was thinking more of other people reading that statement and how they might interpret it. And definitely, Paulie has no shame!

Kittehserf
11 years ago

Good point about other people reading it, cloudiah, I hadn’t considered that.

Yep, went for the shorter version (hope mildlymagnificent doesn’t demand royalties* for it). Easier for newcomers who don’t call me Kittehs! 🙂 Now I just have to remember to updated it on my laptop, ‘cos it’ll be all over the place otherwise.

*I’m not even going there …

Kittehserf
11 years ago

“remember to update”

gah

LaightTempest
LaightTempest
11 years ago

@Kittehs Ayup. Hoisted by my own petard.
@Argenti Aertheri Thank you for correcting and calling me out on my linked studies. I feel strangely happy about it.
@cloudiah I’d say it has a lot to do w/ the stereotype that women are “inherently good,” along w/ society’s perception that they pose less of a risk in public. But onward to the citations!

A paper on the sentencing differences conducted by Randa Embry and Phillip M. Lyons, Jr.: http://fcx.sagepub.com/content/7/2/146.full.pdf Particularly, the section titled “Gender Differences in Sentencing” shows that these differences lie primarily in how people view women’s risk and rehabilitation chances, along w/ their general perception of women as potentially violent offenders.
This study by Sonja Starr: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002 and the HuffPost article that follows: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/11/men-women-prison-sentence-length-gender-gap_n_1874742.html
A debate raised on this issue by Parliament member Philip Davies: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2012-10-16a.32.1
A statistical analysis on race and gender disparities on incarceration rates: http://permutationofninjas.tumblr.com/post/21544144182/on-why-most-convicts-are-men-and-it-probably-has
Judges have been told to be more lenient toward female offenders: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7995844/Judges-told-be-more-lenient-to-women-criminals.html, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311004/Judges-ordered-mercy-women-criminals-deciding-sentences.html

LaightTempest
LaightTempest
11 years ago

@cloudiah (con’t) This is certainly the case over in the Ozarks: http://articles.kspr.com/2012-10-05/alison-peck_34285158
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2008782782_courtstudy25m.html
Two different juries convicted two different people of the murder of Etta Ann Urdiales. Both juries believed there was only one murderer. One convicted Bobbie Hogan, a woman who got 10 years in prison. The other convicted Jess Jacobs, a man who was put to death: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,163510,00.html
And a comparison of two statutory rape cases: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/03/19/the-teen-rape-double-standard.html
Yet another comparison: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2173885/Cindy-Clifton-trial-Teacher-sentenced-years-jail-having-sex-11-students.html, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2173531/Boy-12-detained-years-raping-girls-aged-seven-11.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Continuing w/ Portraying female offenders more sympathetically than men
Studies on the special treatment of female offenders on the news: http://www.academia.edu/1634110/_Coming_Clean_on_Duty_of_Care_Australian_Print_Medias_Representation_of_Male_Versus_Female_Sex_Offenders_in_Institutional_Contexts, http://www.academia.edu/474451/Gurian_EA._2011_._Media_portrayals_of_female_homicide_offenders._Prison_Service_Journal._194_14-20
“An Evil Monster and a Poor Thing: Female Violence in the Media”: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/140438502762467209#preview
And “Laws Overlook Female Offenders”: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/02/20/too-many-restrictions-on-sex-offenders-or-too-few/female-sex-offenders-are-often-overlooked

LaightTempest
LaightTempest
11 years ago

@pecunium http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheUnfairSex
OK, just gonna put this here one more time. Whether you like it or not, this trope exists. There are enough examples on that page alone that easily drown out anything in the reverse. For anyone to claim otherwise is to ignore the brunt of popular media.
Specific examples: these Cosmopolitan articles that range from plainly ridiculous (http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/relationship-advice/how-to-tell-if-a-guy-is-cheating), to borderline destructive (http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/relationship-advice/revenge-ideas-ex-boyfriend-1108, http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/relationship-advice/revenge-ideas-ex-boyfriend-1108) Just imagine the backlash these would get if the genders were swapped.
Female teacher-on-male student cases like Letourneau and La Fave. After Mary Kay Letourneau slept w/ 12-year-old Vili Fualaau twice, carried his child, and barely served her 7 year prison term, she was then invited on Larry King Live where the child molestation was openly referred to as a “love affair” by Larry. (http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/05/lkl.01.html) If this happened to a man, not only would his “love affair” be called child rape, his reputation and livelihood would be totaled and he’d probably lose his freedom for the better part of 20-30 years.
Maury Povich’s own program constantly caters to this. The women featured who were proven to have been cheating are all shown weeping and fleeing backstage, acting as if they had been tricked into cheating. The men are treated as vile, horrible bastards for even thinking the child isn’t theirs, even when the woman’s been on the show with five other guys. Seriously. They get booed for questioning whether or not they are the father, even when it’s shown they have EVERY REASON to think they aren’t.
Also, I don’t know if this should be shelved in the same category, but normalizing domestic violence? There’s an app for that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uCzRmfO2swk

Kittehserf
11 years ago

Laight, you are Raven, aren’t you?

katz
11 years ago

So our sources this time are TVTropes again, Cosmo, Larry King, and Youtube. High quality research being done here.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

I’ve lost whatever track I had of this conversation long since. Is it “men are treated worse than women for cheating, boo hoo” or “male characters in television and films are treated worse than female characters for cheating, boo hoo”?

Not that I care that much, since it’s a cock-and-bull story either way.

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

Laight/Raven/whothefuckever: please just go the fuck away. You’re here with your sad little MRA talking points and dubious shit to back those “points” up with. We don’t care. You, on the other hand, seem to have a vested interest in what? Changing our minds? Us saying how brilliant you are? Not. Going. To. Happen.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

Thought so. Laight answering points directed at Raven as if directed at Laight: very amateurish sockpuppeting, that! 😀

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

This is the one case where it’s smarter to stop and make sure that your socks don’t match.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

The elastic in those socks gave out really quickly. 😀

cloudiah
11 years ago

Weird… Why sock when you haven’t been banned? Is it a variation of “the lurkers support me on email?” Anyway, I don’t think Raven/Laight really understood why I asked the question I did about sentencing. Hint: It’s not because women are powerful or highly regarded. And it just may have something to do with men committing the majority of crimes (e.g. ~85% of homicides).

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

I think stupidity was the reason Laight socked.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

::shakes head sadly:: Even the sockpuppets aren’t what they were when I was young!

LaightTempest
LaightTempest
11 years ago

I just came back that time for the sole intention to answer the questions a couple of you directed to me. Cloudia asked for citations, I brought them. Pecunium asked me to show my work, I did my best. That is all.

katz
11 years ago

Right, but the question is, why didn’t you come back as your original identity? And why didn’t you just say “Hey guys, I’m Raven, this is my other handle?”

Shiraz
Shiraz
11 years ago

Maury Povich, not a great window into actual reality.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

katz – not only no acknowlegement, but no answering when asked (I’ve asked twice, maybe three times if Laight and Raven are the same person).

cloudiah
11 years ago

Hey, sockie, as others have pointed out your “citations” weren’t exactly credible. But I guess that is my fault for not specifically asking for credible citations. 0_o

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

I don’t think I’ve ever even seen Maury Povich. Sorry, socky, I guess you’re going to have to go find a board where people share your taste in entertainment.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

::googles Maury Povich to find out who the heck this person is::

1 22 23 24 25 26 29