Regular readers of this blog, for better or worse, know one thing that makes “Men’s Human Rights Activist” Paul Elam’s penis happy: The prospect of harassing feminists. He is, after all, the man who wrote of one feminist that “that the idea of fucking your shit up gives me an erection.”
Now Mr. Elam has given us a rather more complete account of what it is that pleases his penis. I’m not sure there was any great demand for this information, but he has chosen to release it, and so here we are.
In a post with the tasteful title “on tits, ass and fucktards,” Elam informs the world that he is in fact a fan of the first two items in this list – that is, tits and ass. He is also, he goes on to explain, a lover of
Sorry, I have to stop for a moment to remind you that you are about to read about things that give Paul Elam — yes THAT Paul Elam — a boner.
I will not think any less of you if you stop reading right here.
If you are ready and willing to continue, here we go:
I like well-formed thighs that lead up to the promise land, and smooth knees above shapely calves. Of course, all that combined with a woman’s pretty face is a crowning glory; full lips that promise supple kisses and great blow jobs, clear eyes and unblemished skin. All this combines to make a woman utterly fuckable, and visually that is what I like most of all. I like to look at women that are little fuckmuffins.
Yes, he actually wrote all that, attached his name to it, and posted it for other people to see.
But as much as Elam likes to look at “little fuckmuffins” he does not actually seem to like most of them very much.
After roughly 150 words devoted mostly to cataloguing his favorite female body parts, Elam evidently runs out of nice things to say about women, and so he returns again to his favorite pastime, devoting the bulk of the post to a rant explaining how much he hates “feminist fucktards,” traditionalist women, and women with Facebook accounts.
While happy enough with “fuckmuffins [who] are sexually liberated and adventurous” and who “like to please and be pleased,” Elam informs the world that he feels no such love for all those awful “fuckmuffins” who “liv[e] life with prudish sticks up their asses made from the same wood that forms the chips on their shoulders.”
He’s also mighty pissed at all those who aren’t interested in hearing him expound at length on what his penis likes.
Of the now almost endless list of things that have grown annoyingly stupid and sanctimonious about feminism is the Victorianesque shaming of my sexual programming as a man. Even with the so called “sex positive” feminists, the most hypocritical assholes of them all, the only positive sexuality they embrace is that of women. To them, male sexuality, in all its glory, is something to be buried, controlled and allowed to surface only when it serves the sexual needs of some narcissistic, horny, self-absorbed little “sex positive” princess.
Unfortunately, more traditional-minded women aren’t much interested in hearing about his penis either. And for some reason they, like feminists, think that there might be some sort of connection between men and rape.
Who are those traditionalists? You will know them by their obsequious silence while feminists shame men for committing the scurrilous act of looking at women sexually. Or better yet, as they join in with their “men can stop rape” bedfellows to twist and distort the natural inclinations of young men with Puritan sexual guilt that marches in lockstep with the feminist hatred of male sexuality.
Elam stops for a moment to reassure his readers that despite all that stuff about “well-formed thighs” and blow-job lips he prefers Good Women to mere “fuckmuffins.”
Now, all that being said, is woman-as-fuckmuffin all I care about? Hardly. As a matter of fact, I would throw fuckmuffin to the curb faster than you can say “patriarchy” to spend time with a woman of good character and intelligence. I have learned in life that my dick has a healthy agenda for humanity, but not necessarily for me. So as my values have matured, so has my taste in women.
Heck, it turns out he actually sort of hates “fuckmuffin.” After all, he tells us,
fuckmuffin … is prone to act indignant when she feels sexualized (by the wrong guy). She can become so angry at being “objectified” that you can see her tits shake right through that tight sweater with the neckline that plunges to the vicinity of her toes.
And then he compares her to a bug:
Time and experience will lead [men] to understand that fuckmuffin should be regarded with same respect as you would afford a stinging insect.
Basically, he explains, the only problem with lustful young men who ogle women is that they haven’t learned to hate women enough quite yet. And so women shouldn’t complain when young guys stare at them. Or when they don’t. As far as I can figure it, he thinks women shouldn’t ever complain about anything.
Leave [young men] the fuck alone. There is nothing wrong with them. Nothing needs to be fixed. If you want to help a young man like that, just start encouraging him to connect the dots between fuckmuffin’s propensity to take her own picture and post it to Facebook four times a day and her ultimate tendency to make him miserable. Eventually he will get the connection. And if he doesn’t, maybe that makes him happy. Either way, it is none of your fucking business.
And so ends what’s probably the strangest work of erotica I think I’ve ever read.
Does he think this is edgy, or something?
I don’t know, but I feel like they are quickly moving towards a phase where every AVfM post looks like this:
Feminists = Stalinists = climate destroyers = women = poop = that’s right, I said poop = POOP POOPY POOP = butts = snot = POOP = YOU CAN’T MAKE ME STOP SAYING POOP = why doesn’t anyone love me
“Smooth knees” is a very specific thing to like.
My next Google search after reading that was “How can I make my knees bumpy?”
Can’t say I’ve ever seen anyone get that into knees before. I always thought of them as one of those body parts that’s more functional than pretty. Presumably “smooth” is supposed to mean “young”.
Can’t talk, I’m too busy abrading my knees with sandpaper.
Maybe I’ll apply some little pyramid studs, so my knees will be both bumpy and totally metal.
I think “smooth” is also meant to imply she shaves her legs.
Huh. So Elam fantasizes about a woman who’s body is designed specifically to cater to his sexual needs… And then whines about women who feel objectified? Isn’t cataloguing a list of body parts Elam wants on his “fuckmuffin” the very definition of objectification? It’s practically a Mr. Potato Head, only a human being.
Oh, I see. Elam would give all that up in an instant if he could get a “good” woman who caters to his intellectual desires instead. Yup. Totally not objectification at all.
Or smooth as in “not messed up from giving too many blowjobs on the Alpha Cock Carousel.”
My only question now is where the heck did this:
come from? Seriously, where did it come from? Not only have I never even heard of a radical sex-positive position like this, but Elam is saying that this attitude is bad, but the desire to have a “fuckmuffin” explicitely constructed to please his penis, and presumably only his penis, is good.
I may be sharp, but I just can’t keep up with this level of mental gymnastics.
kirby: It’s not that Elam is complaining about objectifiation, he’s unhappy that women don’t like being objectified.
Maybe by smooth he means the eschergirls-esque plasticine legs that comic book heroines have. “Oh yeah, I can’t distinguish a knee-cap there at all!”
@pecunium:
Well, he’s unhappy that women don’t like being objectified when he feels they are asking for it by wearing flattering clothing. And he feels that objectification is essentially equal to male sexuality, which he feels is also under attack.
Still terrible.
I’m confused, is this better or worse if you read it in Sir Mix-a-Lot’s voice?
So he hates feminist women, anti-feminist women, women who want to have sex with him, women who don’t want to have sex with him, attractive women, unattractive women, and all the women on Facebook. I’m sensing a common factor here.
I like that he even hates the imaginary perfect woman he constructed in his head.
Funny how he complains about male sexuality being oppressed unless it serves women, considering that in the reality I’ve grown in, everything seems to cater to the male gaze.
It makes perfect sense if you think it has to be one or the other. Either men have to be enslaved to serve women, or women have to be enslaved to serve men. There is no third option where nobody is enslaved and everybody has a good time.
I can’t believe all the MRAs who complain about not being able to get laid haven’t connected the dots and figured out that the mysogynistic attitudes are the source of their sexual problems.
But maybe Im just a bitter non-fuckmuffin who takes out my frustration at mans sexuality and shames it…riiiight…
Notice that he’s wicked mad if they dare to have any sexual desire of their own, for people who aren’t him.
Then he yells at feminists for daring to ‘shame’ men for their sexuality.
Yeah, somebody is shaming people for having sexuality.
…
Him. He’s the one doing it.
/Captain Hammer
Very much this.
Shorter Elam: “I love it when a woman is gorgeous enough for me to call her a ‘fuckmuffin,’ but I hate when she knows she is. I love policing women’s preferences, but don’t you dare criticize any man’s misogynistic sexual programming.”
Logick
Reaszonz
Acccccountability
You ever wonder how guys like Elam act in real life? Specifically at parties or other social events? My guess is that they can cover up those attitudes for a little while, but eventually something slips out (say, an unironic use of the word “fuckmuffin”) that kills any hope of intimacy.
It’s a terrible shame for guys like Elam that sex isn’t mutually enjoyable. What, you’re saying it is mutually enjoyable? Crazy talk. If both people like it, how do we decide who’s winning?
If both people like it, how do we decide who’s winning?
My boyfriend and I seem to think that whoever makes the other person have more fun is winning. I suspect we usually tie but I’m not a sore loser. 😀
So an attack on coercive sexuality is an attack on male sexuality itself? Hmmmm…. I wonder who the real misandrist is here.
I’d rather have a root canal with no novocaine than sex with PaulE. And that’s real.
That would be true even if he didn’t look like Colonel Sanders.
(Am I the only person who sees it? It’s disconcerting – I may not love KFC, but I expect it to be dull rather than malignant.)
The hatred for both “traditional” women and feminists really lays it out on the table:
They don’t want women to have any agency or preferences and want an obedient slave but they also don’t have to have to deal with holding up their end of the bargain, so they hate women who try to hold up their traditional prerogatives when it comes to relationship. So basically women don’t get kinds of protections.
@hellkell, at least the dentist would feel bad about it being unenjoyable! :p