Categories
a voice for men antifeminism domestic violence facepalm imaginary backwards land imaginary oppression lying liars misogyny MRA shit that never happened the c-word

Reno calls a domestic violence hotline: The MRA Reality Distortion Field in action [UPDATED with transcript]

phoneman

Today, a fascinating – and infuriating – case study in how Men’s Rights Activists twist reality around in order to fit their peculiar ideology. Obviously, they do this all the time, but it’s hard to find a clearer example of the MRA Reality Distortion field in action than the video I’ve pasted in below from A Voice for Men.

The video features a recording of one of AVFM’s regular commenters calling a domestic violence hotline, pretending to be a man named “Reno” who has been abused by his wife. In reality, Reno is Ian Williams, a puckish Australian who has made himself AVFM’s go-to guy for prank calls; you can find several other prank calls from him on his AVFM contributor page.

Here’s what Williams, who also goes by the pseudonym Dr. F,  has to say about the call:

If you’re a man and you are a victim of violence from your partner you may face difficulties finding help. Don’t listen to me, here’s the guy himself who called. His name is Reno.

Reno calls a battered women’s shelter and is denied help.

He is denied help, even though he tells the person on the other end of the phone that he is worried his wife will return with a cricket bat.

That sounds pretty damning, and, in the comments, the regulars at AVFM responded with predictable outrage.

“No concern for a beaten man or a boy that could also be a victim and, only able to help(willing) women,” wrote Raven01. “It makes the hate filled ideology apparent to all.”

“[Go] feminism- the humanitarian justice movement brought to you by the modern KKK!” Perseus added. “Sieg Heil, cunts!”

Not one of them seemed to care that everything Williams says about the phone call is false. “Reno” was offered help many times. He was the one who refused it.

If you listen to the call, here’s what you’ll find:

Williams, pretending to be “Reno,” called a Domestic Violence counseling line, not a battered women’s shelter. He told the counselor he’d been attacked by his wife and that he needed a place to go. The counselor explained to him that he’d called a counseling line and that she personally couldn’t arrange for shelter, but that if he called the men’s help line, they could arrange for him and his 6-year-old son to get free hotel accommodations at a location unknown to his wife. The counselor offered several times to connect him directly to the men’s help line.

Williams also told the counselor that he was thinking of calling the police. She told him she could connect him directly to the police, and would be happy to explain his situation to them and to make sure he reached an officer who specializes in domestic violence.

Ignoring  all her offers to assist him in getting shelter and further help, Williams insisted that he wanted to be housed in a battered woman’s shelter instead. The counselor, naturally, was puzzled by this strange insistence on his part, and explained to him again that he could get free shelter at a local hotel for as long as he needed. She again offered to connect him directly to someone who could get him immediate help.

Having refused all of her offers of assistance, Reno abruptly ended the call — to the obvious distress of the counselor, who despite the patent weirdness of  his behavior on the call had been patiently trying her best to get “Reno” the help he claimed he needed. (I suspect she sensed that his story was phony, but tried to help anyway in case it was true.)

Listen to the call yourself. It’s utterly surreal. What’s even more surreal is that Williams would make the bald claim that he had been “denied help” — and then put up a recording that clearly reveals that this claim is complete and utter bullshit. And I can’t tell if he’s lying or delusional.

That’s always the question with MRAs, isn’t it?

EDITED TO ADD: A commenter here has prepared a rough transcript of the call. There are a few moments where it was impossible to figure out a word or two, but otherwise this seems to pretty accurately match my memory of the call, which I’ve listened to several times. Let me know if I need to make any corrections.

Recorded message:
Family Violence Counseling Line. Please note for training and quality improvement purposes only, your call may be monitored. If you do not want your call to be monitored, please let the counselor know. If you wish to listen to ? regarding our privacy policy if you are already speaking to a counselor press one now, otherwise hold on the line for next available counselor.

[Ringing sound]

Counselor: Hello, this is *redacted* speaking, how can I help you?

“Reno”: Oh, hello. I um, was speaking to someone a short while ago called Maria,

Counselor: Uh huh…

“Reno”: And, and my name is Reno. And, um…

Counselor: Uh huh…

“Reno”: I was explaining, I was explaining to her that my, my wife, uh, is violent towards me with a cricket bat and other things.

Counselor: Mmhmm…

“Reno”: And, uh, she gave me a phone number to call, and uh…

Counselor: Mmhmm…

“Reno”: I called them and um…

Counselor: A phone number for what?

“Reno”: Uh… Uh, it was to help, it was a, um… Pardon me, it was 1-800-015-188. It was a…

Counselor: I don’t know what that number is, so what is it for?

“Reno”: Uh, it’s a helpli-, it’s a possible, it’s a place where they might be able to tell me where I can get some shelter for the night. But there’s none of the… DV places ? are gonna help me, because I’m a man, you see.

Counselor: Have you called the men’s line? ‘Cause they’re the ones who specialize in, because in Australia unfortunately most of the, um… Services. Well not unfortunately, fortunately though, most of the services are for women, because 95% of domestic violence is perpetrated by men. So that’s why they don’t really have um… They don’t really have… So many refuges for wom-, for men. They do have places where men can go, but they’re normally um, like overnight men’s, um, places, like… Which state are you in?

“Reno”: Victoria.

Counselor: Victoria. I don’t know the ones in Victoria but there’s quite a few, for example, in Sydney um, that provide um, overnight accommodation but they don’t call them refuges as such because um… It’s the different situation only for women ’cause often they’re, well normally they’re fleeing with children. So um, normally the men’s ones aren’t, they’re not called refuges, they’re called like, a men’s hostel or an overnight, um, men’s overnight um, shelter, or they’ll call them different names but they don’t call them refuges. So, um, if you’re looking for men’s refuge that’s probably not in existence, but there are a lot of men’s shelters.

“Reno”: Will they take me and my boy?

Counselor: If you’ve got a child, um, they’ll probably prioritize you, I would say. Um, have you rung men’s line? Because they’re the ones who really have this type of information, um because they specialize in helping men. While general lines, like, we’re a counseling line, so we don’t actually have access to phone numbers for, um, directly for refuges. We can connect you to the refuge line. How old’s your, how old’s your son?

“Reno”: Six.

Counselor: How old?

“Reno”: He’s six.

Counselor: He’s six. And where is he right now?

“Reno”: He’s with me. My wife’s gonna be coming home in about three hours, and she’s gonna, she’s gonna beat me.

Counselor: And he, and your son’s not asleep now?

“Reno”: No, he’s with me now.

Counselor: Why isn’t he in bed at 8.40, 8.48 in the-… Sorry Reno, but why is he awake at this time of night?

“Reno”: Because we’re about to just go somewhere, anywhere, out of the house because we just… We’re terrifed. He, we’re ready to go, so. We, we’re ready to go.

Counselor: Reno, this is really concerning me. Is he listening to you as you’re speaking on the phone?

“Reno”: No.

Counselor: Where is he right now?

“Reno”: He’s got some headphones on. He’s watching…

Counselor: What’s he doing?

“Reno”: He’s watching television now, he can’t hear any talk. I made sure of that.

Counselor: Yeah, I’m really concerned that he’s um, awake at this time of night. Um, the other organization that could most likely help you find accommodation and probably would be your best option would be ? Community Services, because they deal especially with children and families in crisis, and so they would definitely keep you together, they would probably actually put you in, normally they pay for a hotel or motel. A men’s shelter wouldn’t be the appropriate place to go with a child, definitely not. So, um, ? they give you, they have a lot of motels and hotels that they deal with, and put they in those instead of accommodation until they can find you permanent accommodation.

“Reno”: Okay.

Counselor: Like, normally they’d pay for a flat or something instead, they wouldnt, they don’t continue to keep you in a, you know, holding pattern in a hotel. Sometimes they make you stay for, like, two weeks in a hotel.

“Reno”: Mm.

Counselor: That would be a good option for you, wouldn’t it?

“Reno”: Yeah. And they wouldn’t let my wife know that, where I’m living? Staying?

Counselor: No, they wouldn’t do that.

“Reno”: ‘Cause she’s really violent. Really violent.

Counselor: They definitely wouldn’t. Um, they definitely wouldn’t let your wife know where you’re staying. I can help you with the phone call. I can introduce you, explain the situation, and see what they can do for you, if you’d like.

“Reno”: Hmm… Possibly, tha-, thank you. I think I might, actually what I might do is call the police now and then see how it goes in there.

Counselor: But your best option is calling the police and then asking to speak to a domestic violence officer.

“Reno”: Okay.

Counselor: They’re the ones that are the most specialized in this, so they deal with this day in and day out, and that’s probably stationed… Are you in area, in an open area? Are you in Melbourne, or are you in a town, or…?

“Reno”: Uh, I’m in Melbourne.

Counselor: Well, if you’re in Melbourne, most Melbourne police stations will have a domestic violence officer, and they specialize in domestic violence, and um, what you can get is to get a detective to come over, or a domestic violence officer, and say that you’d like to um, that you have um, fear of, um, harm of your wife who’s been abusing you. And what they’ll do is, they might um, even try and get an AVO so that she has to move out of the house and you guys can stay in the house.

“Reno”: Mm.

Counselor: They’ll try probably to do that so that you and the child can stay there. Or um, if you move, they’ll um, it would be, that she can’t actually have legal contact with you.

“Reno”: Yeah… No, we have to actually get away from her, we can’t stay here. So there’s nowh-, there’s no um, women’s shelter I could stay in, we could stay in tonight?

Counselor: Well, women’s, women’s shelter’s don’t take men.

“Reno”: They don’t take men.

Counselor: Why don’t you ring men’s lines? They would be able to tell you where you can go. Why don’t you ring the men’s line? Do you want me to connect you through to the men’s line? They deal with men. Men and women’s shelters are two totally different issues. Why do you want to go [to] a women’s shelter?

“Reno”: I just need somewhere where I can just get away from her, somewhere whe-

Counselor: Yeah, but why wouldn’t you, why wouldn’t you wanna go? Why aren’t you accepting this offer that ? will pay for hotel accommodations for you and your son?

“Reno”: Oh, because I…

Counselor: Why do you…

“Reno: Because I need to get out now.

Counselor: Yeah, but they would organize it now, they’ll probably organize someone to come and get you now. People work 24/7.

“Reno”: Oh, okay. I didn’t know what. Okay.

Counselor: ? Services work 24/7, or do you want me to put you through to your local um, police station and explain it to the domestic violence officer so that I can introduce you and explain your situation and see how they can help you?

“Reno”: No, I’ll, I’ll give them a call myself. Okay, thanks.

Counselor: Are you sure?

“Reno”: Absolutely.

Counselor: I’m happy to do it, Reno. I’m very concerned about your son.

“Reno”: No, that, that’s okay. I, I’ll go now.

1.2K Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fade
Fade
11 years ago

Octopi? I think you mean octopodes!

/though this feels like bait. /// for a “gotcha” /// it really is feeling like that.

Marie
11 years ago

@Qocheedy

Octopi.

What? I don’t even follow this.

@cassandrasays

Well, actually, atheists rather than agnostics do tend to believe that thinking there is a god is factually wrong. It just doesn’t necessarily follow from there that you have to be condescending to people who disagree.

Good point.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

Like, I think my MIL is wrong that there are angels that look like adorable little cherubs who watch over her. That doesn’t mean that I mock her when she puts pictures of adorable cherubs on her walls, and if I did so I’d be being an asshole.

Fade
Fade
11 years ago

I am unsure whether I believe in angels, but if they existed I’d like to think they’d have awesome fire-swords.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

I don’t believe in angels, but if anything was going to watch over me I’d rather it be armed. She finds the cherubs comforting, though, so (shrugs).

Kittehserf
11 years ago

And I think atheists are factually wrong in not believing the stuff I do, but I’m not going to go round telling ’em that, much less doing so condescendingly. 🙂

I really hope there aren’t any fat-baby cherubs around, though. They squick me out.

Marie
11 years ago

@cassandrasays

This is weird, (OT, btw) cuz when I was more christian-y I used to have some belief in angels (currently atm of ‘maybe maybe not’) and my dad gave me an icon of a guardian angel when I was in second grade and having trouble sleeping, which gave me small happies, and if I keep any of my old icons that would be it.

But if I thought they were adorable little cherubs I would have been so much more creeped out cuz I’m weird like that XD

/rambles.

Qocheedy
Qocheedy
11 years ago

@Marie:

. . . What I’m trying to say is, yeah, I’ve been an asshole in this thread, and I don’t expect you to welcome me with open arms. But I have reason to believe (see above) that even non-assholes can succumb to a fit of “someone is wrong on the internet” when the issue at hand is totally unrelated to social justice.

Fade
Fade
11 years ago

Whatever works for her. 😉

I remember when our dad got us guardian angel icons in grade school, I was disappointed my guardian angel was not armed.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

I think the cherubim were meant to be fierce creatures originally, weren’t they? Dunno when the Cupid-like version took over, but it was certainly in place by the Renaissance.

Fade
Fade
11 years ago

Wait, was that as a see above about me? Because I responded mostly jokingly

Dangit, I knew I should’ve used the “XD” face

and does that mean it was bait?

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

Please let’s not have another thread about how atheists are the most oppressed ever, and I say that as an atheist.

Marie
11 years ago

I don’t remember all my weird opinions about angels when I was younger, but the one in the aforementioned icons was human looking w/ wings, and I also thought (think?) there are the six winged and many eyed ones who’s names I’ve forgotten, it just got repeated all the time in church.

And to follow the other posts, I’m agnostic and don’t really think/ know if anyone’s factually wrong 😉 (yes, even dragon girl, though it seems less likely).

Fade
Fade
11 years ago

seraphim. I think. All I remember is that chant they kept singing in church, which gets stuck in my head years after I stopped going

“the cherubim and the seraphim, six winged many eyed”

Oh wait, that means both of them. Maybe. You know, it was really unclear?

Kittehserf
11 years ago

For some reason I’m now seeing an icon of an armed angel looking like Xena, Warrior Princess … and I never even watched that show.

Fade
Fade
11 years ago

I would want that to be my guardian angel!

Except her sword is also on fire.

Marie
11 years ago

@Qocheedy

. . . What I’m trying to say is, yeah, I’ve been an asshole in this thread, and I don’t expect you to welcome me with open arms. But I have reason to believe (see above) that even non-assholes can succumb to a fit of “someone is wrong on the internet” when the issue at hand is totally unrelated to social justice.

Ok, you have a point. Just need to calm down, this has not been a happy thread for me.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

Many eyed?

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH that’s too scary, they sound like spiders!

Marie
11 years ago

Now I’m tempted to draw a pic of the angel in that icon 😉 I’m weird…but it’s the only icon I have with happy feelings attached, instead of apathy.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

I think MIL is just too much of a hippie to enjoy the giant flaming sword sort of iconography. She also has a Buddhist altar, right under some of the cherubs. Remember what I said before about people picking and choosing the bits of religions that appeal to them? Tibetan Buddhism has some scary looking iconography too, but she doesn’t like that stuff, she just has a statue of Kuan Yin.

Kittehserf
11 years ago

Send chocolate-or-sweets-of-choice to Marie, stat!

Marie
11 years ago

@kittehs

Yay 😀 I actually did have some cookies, but they weren’t very chocolatey 🙁 This place is all chocolate deprived 🙁

Kittehserf
11 years ago

It’s just as well I’m at work, ‘cos when I’m at home and we talk chocolate I end up heading to the fridge! (Monte biscuits, mmmm)

Qocheedy
Qocheedy
11 years ago

@Marie:

A while back, there was a bit of a (friendly, I think) kerfluffle on Manboobz over the correct plural of “octopus.”

@Kittehserf:

And I think atheists are factually wrong in not believing the stuff I do, but I’m not going to go round telling ‘em that, much less doing so condescendingly.

(a) Thank you for the awesome welcome!

(b) This is a personality flaw of mine (one that’s easier to control IRL than on the internet) but I kind of love debating. And even though there’s a reasonable part of my brain that says “Hey! Religion! Sensitive topic! Feelings will be hurt! Not a good thing to debate!” there’s also a greedy, immature part that says “OOOOOHHH WE DISAGREE ON THIS IMPORTANT TOPIC AND I’VE GIVEN A LOT OF CONSIDERATION TO MY POSITION SO I HAVE PLENTY TO SAY ABOUT IT LET’S DEBATE FOREVER IT WILL BE FUUUUUUN.” Which is admittedly akin to a five-year-old assuming that just because she wants to play “Candyland” for five hours straight so does everybody else.

Fade
Fade
11 years ago

Eh, debating’s awesome if everyone wants to debate.