Manosphere misogynists: Perpetually angry that women can say no?

He said he knew how I must feel, for he too had dated beautiful lesbians in his time

Not quite sure what that had to do with your plans for your top surgery…

@joanimal

Bye! 😀 Have fun with…that thing you’re doing XD I assume it’s a videogame or something. /lack of knowledge.

I’m starting to think that yaoi is rule 34b.

LBT — that’s good at least! Not the nipples part, the one creep and then banned part.

WeeBoy — still alive is a start (full disclosure here, I’ve tried, more than once, and sometimes still alive is at good as it gets…hang in there, both of you).

Wtf about legal names and refusing to use them? Fuck, I’m used to transphobia being insistence on an unchanged legal name, not refusing to use the one on the ID. That’s a whole new level of fucked up! Not that it matters, but wtf did they call him then? Some previous name they found out in some creepy manner? Sorry, I’m prying, I just want to take a clue-by-4 to all involved cops, that’s fucked up. And the last thing a suicidal person needs, fucked up and potentially dangerous. (Sorry if my guess that your friend is trans* is wrong or inappropriate!)

joanimal — you’ve got a couple years on my parents then, but never mind that, good luck with your game!

Cassandra — rule 34b is slash, 34b.1 is yaoi.

Clifford: Let’s boil this down.
From my reading, your fundamental argument seems to reduce to something like:

P1: Men desperately require sex with the person they want to have sex with,
P2: Men being denied sex is a fundamental violation of their rights and dignity, therefore
C1: It follows that a man must be permitted to have sex with whomsoever we wishes;

P3: Women will enjoy the sex/comfort/closeness, therefore
C2: No harm is done to the woman and the man is materially benefited;

P4: Women are deliberately denying men the opportunity for sex at no cost to themselves, therefore
C3: Women must be compelled by social force to comply with your desires.

Is this a mischaracterization of your argument? If so, please amplify and correct.

If this is a fundamentally correct representation, then we must conclude that,

1. You are willing to diminish women. Effectively reducing women from persons to tools to provide personal satisfaction – at worst the role of slaves, at best body servants, and in either case a less than fully human beings.

2. You are willing to diminish men by dehumanizing them as well. You deprive men of the opportunities for meaningful relationships with women (and no, you cannot have a meaningful relationship with tools).

3. That you accept these outcomes because you are too young/naive or too angry/bitter to explore the possibilities of anything else.

4. Either way, however, your position degrades the human dignity of women and men and is, rightfully, considered both hateful and abhorrent

*applauds DataWeasel’s commitment to translating the untranslatable*

WeeBoy — on one hand, bitch is sexist, on the other, fuck her! By any insult, she can go walk on Legos to escape a field of cactī.

Okay I was supposed to go to sleep, but I am wandering the threads to see how various manboobzers are doing. WeeBoy, I am so glad your friend is doing a bit better, and I hate that the police were so terrible. He’s lucky to have friends like you!

Late to the party… 🙁 still, here we go again, instead of acknowledging the obvious, only denial. Why, oh why, just can’t we admit that the libido disparity might be the cause for his rage boner and not the rage boner causing him to imagine this disparity? Only cultures mentally preparing for Armageddon, like early modern Europe and now partially contemporary Western culture are in denial about something so fundamental.

I’m also skeptical that acceptable-looking women can’t practically get sex whenever they want with a wide range of possible partners (ok, lesbians excluded, I feel for them). Sure, stated that way, the claim is vulnerable to be refuted by personal stories or the odd verifiable counterexample… well I don’t care, as a rule of thumb it remains true. And since it’s derailing to argue with research studies, I’m keeping it anecdotal, too.

Google Image search “Bethany McKee”. Even this nasty, obese cow (I really would like to slip in some ableist slurs here… something with chromosomes…) managed to lure two beautiful black boys to her house by the promise of sex. Now the two beautiful black boys are dead. Is there a more powerful image to illustrate the hard reality?

Weeboy: ARHHHHHH. Also FUCK YOU NZ cops. :'(

Also, hi everybody. I so want to be more a part of this community but I utterly fail at keeping up, ever.

And Nerdypants, figured easier to reply here: totally don’t think NO ONE should have Huskies. I like to assume cool people I meet on the internet will be some of the people who will be totally OK. 😛 Just had to put it out there. Good luck with your Husky having, when you can!

As a rule, I ignore trolls, as it’s not worth the effort. But I accidentally read Jaro’s spew so here we go:

Jaro | March 26, 2013 at 1:43 am
Late to the party… still, here we go again, instead of acknowledging the obvious, only denial. Why, oh why, just can’t we admit that the libido disparity might be the cause for his rage boner and not the rage boner causing him to imagine this disparity? Only cultures mentally preparing for Armageddon, like early modern Europe and now partially contemporary Western culture are in denial about something so fundamental.

How is libido disparity relevant here? Even ignoring that libidos are overlapping bell curves, and wanting something does not entitle to you it even when “it” is not a human being, do you actually think that “Nobody cares what you whores think or feel any more.” has a goddamn thing to do with any facts? It’s to do with hating women: it doesn’t matter why.

I’m also skeptical that acceptable-looking women can’t practically get sex whenever they want with a wide range of possible partners (ok, lesbians excluded, I feel for them). Sure, stated that way, the claim is vulnerable to be refuted by personal stories or the odd verifiable counterexample… well I don’t care, as a rule of thumb it remains true. And since it’s derailing to argue with research studies, I’m keeping it anecdotal, too.

You. Are. An. Idiot. I will absolutely guarantee you that any woman in the world, if you actually talked to them, has personal stories of not being able to have sex with people they’re attracted to. Saying it repetitively doesn’t make it true.

Google Image search “Bethany McKee”. Even this nasty, obese cow (I really would like to slip in some ableist slurs here… something with chromosomes…) managed to lure two beautiful black boys to her house by the promise of sex. Now the two beautiful black boys are dead. Is there a more powerful image to illustrate the hard reality?

Aaaaand this proves the kind of despicable person you are. If she was a rock sold “10”, it would be equally disgusting what she did, and this proves absolutely nothing whatsoever about how easy it is for women to attract men. Nothing.

::high fives hrovitnir::

When you do a troll takedown, it’s a mighty one!