I‘m beginning to wonder if every single complaint from manosphere misogynists comes back to their rage at the fact that women get to decide who can have sex with them. Take the following comment from MGTOWforums.com. The ostensible topic of conversation? A study reporting that women tend to feel more stressed than men at work. Watch how deftly MGTOWforums “senior member” 7 Deadly Sins turns the topic from “women in the workplace” to “my sad penis.”
They wanted to work so now they’re working. Oh work is too hard and stressing you out? Too bad. You wanted to be career whores, right ? Enjoy. If you give women what they ask for, they still want more. Who cares if they’re stressed out? They can always get dicked down and take some of the edge off. Men can’t get sex whenever they “feel” like it. Nobody cares what you whores think or feel any more.
Damn. That’s some pretty intense boner rage there, dude.
I didn’t even see him, either.
Not missing anything.
Wow. That Jaro stuff was fucked up.
This garbled mess alone:
“What I meant was when you question homophobia or whatever bigotry, you use rational reasoning. But at some point suddenly reason isn’t allowed anymore, it’s just emotions, intuitions nothing else. So what’s so bad if somebody starts with using emotions at a different level, I wonder? That seems to be the only disagreement, the so-called sociopath, uses it later than you, the so-called bigot uses it earlier than you.”
What the fuck? “…using emotions at different level…” I would need a decoder ring to decipher that shit. I hope any women in his vicinity stay the hell away from him. Or playing the fucked-up, poser-philiosopher helps him wank.
*Sigh*
Well, just finished The Walking Dead…time for Game of Thrones.
@penicium, thanks. My wife and I go to the Pasadena HS farmers market as well. It’s amazingly complete. I think it is as large as the more well known Santa Monica and Hollywood farmers markets.
Wasn’t it though? I am ambivalent as to whether or not I should feel sorry for him. It’s obvious he reads a lot, but doesn’t balance that by discussing his ideas with other people to learn which ideas in his head have merit and which don’t. On the other hand, he has said some stupidly hateful shit, so fuck him. (I said I was ambivalent.)
Anyone saying “What’s so terrible about rape?” has put themselves beyond the pale … hopefully out in the snow where some not-domly-dom wolves might be prowlilng.
Can’t recall which thread it was on now, but that whole “not wolves, sheepdogs!” stuff about the domly doms had me nearly wetting myself laughing. Only sheepdog of my acquaintance is Louis’s dog Q, and the idea of the Skating Disaster Dog and Destroyer of Garden Beds being anyone’s idea of dominant cracks me up. 😀
Well, he may read a lot, Jo, but it’s not helping any. A small child can understand that hurting someone in a non-consenual act of violence is bad. The muddled, pseudo-intellectual facade is actually a lack of empathy.
Or, like others have said before, the poster is playing this part to get himself off. If it’s the former….well, *shudder*
Why is it obvious he reads a lot? It’s only obvious that he’s capable of using Wikipedia to look up random factoids.
I put Jaro on moderation. He can continue his pseudo-philosophical wankery about rape elsewhere, if anyone else on the internet can put up with him.
Merci beaucoup, m’sieur!
/french vocabulary
Thanks David, treating “well how bad are various types of rape” as an intellectual exercise grates on my nerves.
Very nice. Thank you, David.
Perhaps you are correct katz. That may have been just me projecting a little of my younger self on to him.
::looks around Manboobz Warehouse::
::calls out::
Hey Argenti, have we any welcome packs ready? We’ve a new member delurking on the Easter thread!
And now I am glad I didn’t read very much of Jaro’s spewings. But where was the wolf/sheepdog discussion, because that sound interesting? 😀
Marie, those penguins… SO ADORABLE.
Found it! Opium4themasses introduced the sheepdog thing here. It’s in the “Free Ride” thread.
Jaro: Here’s the mask: I’m still amused about the burek thing, funny… first move Cassandra makes is always
What do you mean, “always”, and why do you cast it as if it were something you were intimately acquainted with?
So… do you even know what that “W” means in the S = k*log(W)
Yep, but even if I didn’t it’s immaterial. I didn’t set up as a master of thermodynamics and micro-macro states (and won’t pretend to be. I am familiar with the concepts, not an expert). You tried to set up as some sort of over the top super-skilled cook, and you are still trying to, what with the, “has anyone but pecunium ever made Napoleon’s from scratch.”
It doesn’t matter if they did. It’s not about the cooking, it’s about you being an asshole.
Does your troll know advanced physics or math? That would be a way to distinguish him from me. Ask me something, preferably applied math like advanced numerical analysis or probability theory. But pure math is ok, too, preferably Galois theory.
Ok… how many are in a carton? Which is the best blend? Where can I get some?
This one, I’ll never forgive you!
Oh, get over it. It’s not the fault of anyone here, and it’s not the fault of any woman (no more than the death of Pushkin was). He was too tied up in the ego of, “manly honor” and social pressure caused him to do what tens of thousands of other french fools were doing.
His choice, his fault.
A good friend of my mother’s had two English sheepdogs, and I just remember that she used little pink barrettes to keep the hair out of their eyes. I’m not sure how this fits into that discussion, but those were two adorable, slobbery dogs.
I’m low on the whiskey and still have plenty of sewing! Pecunium, want to make a field trip up here? I’ll totally share if you deliver 🙂 (*is joking, mostly*)
Jaro: It would be difficult to completely justify it, but the more problematic question is not if it’s wrong, but how bad it is… which would make a difference, like if you send somebody to prison for ten years or punish him like you would do for a minor traffic violation. Not all coercion is equally bad, for sure, so if there’s no bodily harm, only psychological harm can make the difference (quite a lot of sexual assaults don’t do any bodily harm).
Like I said, your inner asshole is showing.
Are you seriously arguing that psychological coercion is non-harmful? That if one doesn’t use force rape is more like speeding than anything else?
Dude, your inner asshole could swallow goatse.
Another suspicion… but wrong again, because I’m not a sock. Also, was Diogenes a math major?
Wow… you don’t know who any of these people are, but you have a deep knowledge of what Cassandra “always does”. One of the sides of this equation is unbalananced.
I’ll go away by myself, I won’t get any answers here.
Liar. You get answers, then you change the questions, and pretend they were never answered. And you won’t go either. You will probably be banned (esp. as the indica are strongly to your being a piece of, overworn, footwear), but you will lurk, and the pain of being excluded will gnaw at you; a self-inflicted wound, as with Galois, and you will have to take another bite at the apple, and spew the bile which is eating at you.
Better to stay away, and you know it, but you are too weak-willed to do what you know is best, rather you choose to wallow in your folly, and; again, wreak your own destruction; someone who can’t help himself, and is unsalvageable.
And pecunium is posting as he reads! Jaro’s been modded.
“Are you seriously arguing that psychological coercion is non-harmful?”
So non-harmful that I’m up an Ativan for the day and into the whiskey (Jaro’s a minor factor there, but nonetheless, March, I hate it)
Argenti, internet hugs if you want ’em. Plus all the cutest fishies!
Thanks kitteh, working on a cover for my iPad cover, so I’m well distracted at least (think dust jacket for a book, since cover for a cover makes no sense)
It makes sense when you say dustjacket!
Are you doing a design or actually physically making it?
A tourist in the Royal Arcade, Melbourne. 😉