Categories
creepy douchebaggery harassment men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny PUA YouTube

George Godley: Terrible Pickup Artist, Worse Human Being

Woman fleeing encounter with Godley (on left, in white).
Woman fleeing encounter with Godley (on left, in white).

Well, I have to give the terrible, terrible fellows at PUAhate credit for one thing: it was thanks to a post there that I ran across the videos of the exceedingly creepy pickup “artist” and minor Youtube celebrity that I’d like to bring to your attention today.

Meet George Godley, possibly the world’s worst pickup artist. Actually, I’m being a bit generous in my description here, because there is no artistry at all to what he does, just a gimmick: he carries a small video camera with him as he wanders the streets of London, apparently thinking that this gives him an excuse to waylay every attractive young woman who’s unfortunate enough to wander into his field of vision.

Godley apparently wants us to believe he’s “flirting” with the women he so awkwardly approaches, but flirting, like the Tango, takes two, and all but a few of the women in his videos make it abundantly clear from the get-go that they want nothing to do with him. This doesn’t seem to faze him much, and he plunges ahead, trying his best to keep up with them as they endeavor to escape his presence as quickly as possible.

Take the unfortunate woman who catches his eye at the start of this video, and who finally manages to make her escape a little short of the one-minute mark.

In this next video – skip ahead to about 50 seconds in to avoid some rather pointless wandering about — we see two failed “flirts.” His first attempt, if we can call it that, consists of nothing more than him standing in the vicinity of an attractive woman while surreptitiously filming her. After giving up on her without saying a word he runs smack into the “beauty” of the video’s title, and pesters her for about a minute until she manages to get away.

After a brief and awkward attempt at conversation punctuated by her nervous laughter, Godley gamely tries to convince “Beauty” that he’s “doing a movie for the festivals.” When she asks which festivals he’s talking about he unconvincingly stammers something about “Cannes, Sund – the usual circuit.” Even though she clearly wants to put as much distance between herself and him as she possibly can, he tries to force his card on her and plaintively asks “do you want to meet again?” The answer, a nervous “no.”

This next encounter – in which our hero barges into a restaurant to pester a woman who apparently looked briefly in his direction as he walked by outside — even Godley recognizes is a flat-out failure.

Godley has posted literally hundreds, maybe even thousands, of these “flirt” videos. None of the ones I’ve seen have gone well. Once in a while an exceptionally tolerant woman will chat with him briefly without actively trying to flee; that seems to be about as good as it gets. The rest document what is essentially serial street harassment, with Godley approaching woman after woman, none of whom give him any indication that they want to talk to him, and “flirting” with them until they can get away from him. It’s the same story, again and again and again.

Why does he do this, making video after video of these so-called “flirtations” and posting them on Youtube? Is he simply a masochist, approaching women he surely knows have no interest in talking to him, much less “flirting,” and posting evidence of his humiliating failures to Youtube for all the world to see?

Perhaps. But even more disturbing than the masochism is Godley’s obvious sadism. Despite his social awkwardness, it’s clear from the videos that Godley knows full well that the overwhelming majority of the women he “flirts” with just want to be left alone; it’s clear from their body language before he approaches them, and from everything they say and do after he starts talking to them. If a woman literally flees from you, that generally means she’s not into your shit.

But Godley doesn’t really need to be reminded of this. He’s well aware that he makes women uncomfortable — in this video he asks a woman if she’s really talking on her phone or just trying to get rid of him. But that doesn’t stop him.

He’s not missing the social cues; he’s deliberately ignoring the clear “noes” these women either tell him outright or telegraph with their facial expressions and body language as clearly as if they were shouting “no” to his face. Were he to approach random men on the street in a similar way, he would almost certainly get himself punched on a regular basis.

Luckily for him, he’s approaching women, and they’re much smaller than he is. It’s telling that he almost always approaches individual women, not the “sets” of two or more favored by most pickup artists, and that he seems to prefer approaching the supposedly more pliable Eastern European women also favored by so many manosphere assholes and creepy pickup artists.

Godley’s not-so-well-hidden hostility towards the women he approaches comes to the surface at the end of this video, in which he attempts to “flirt” with a woman photographing a tree and then then asks for her phone number as she tries to get away, an all-too-common ending to his videos. SPOILER ALERT: She doesn’t give it to him. SPOILER ALERT NUMBER TWO: He pretends he didn’t really want it anyway.

Even if Godley has managed to collect a few genuine phone numbers or email addresses along the way – and I’ve seen nothing to indicate that this is a regular or even an irregular occurrence – his alleged “success” in this endeavor comes at a steep cost. Not just to his pride – I don’t actually give a shit about that – but to the hundreds if not thousands of women he’s harassed along the way.

George Godley, a terrible pickup artist and an even worse human being.

528 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

=>INITIATE GRANDMOTHER MODE

Marie, you are not rambling, young lady! You are thinking about stuff and throwing ideas around and making perfect sense! ::wags finger::

=>DISENGAGE GRANDMOTHER MODE

Hey, I hadn’t thought of a tee shirt with that on it, that’s a much better idea! 😀

Creative Writing Student
Creative Writing Student
11 years ago

Um, OK. You’re aiming for creepy/sexy, but your attempt is kind of remedial. Stop studying “50 Shades of Grey,” it’s crap.

I’m planning on doing a textual intervention on 50SoG for my dissertation! I just need to find a way of writing ‘take 50SoG, and make it less shitty’ that’s more academic-y.

Shiraz
Shiraz
11 years ago

Hmm. Maybe he’s more like the stories of Springheel Jack, Cassandra. You know, something slighty more goofy, or whatever.

Baroncognito
11 years ago

I like root beer floats. (as a dessert item, I have no idea what type of sex the term “root beer float” would imply)

Baroncognito
11 years ago

Creative Writing Student: Are you familiar with Reading with a Vengeance? http://readingwithavengeance.tumblr.com/

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@kittehs

=>INITIATE GRANDMOTHER MODE

Marie, you are not rambling, young lady! You are thinking about stuff and throwing ideas around and making perfect sense! ::wags finger::

=>DISENGAGE GRANDMOTHER MODE

D’aww, I got grandma mode Thank you 😀

@Baroncognito

I like root beer floats. (as a dessert item, I have no idea what type of sex the term “root beer float” would imply)

I…I really have no idea. *shrugs*

Shiraz
Shiraz
11 years ago

That’s interesting, creativewritingstudent. You’re basically doing a re-write of 50SofG so it doesn’t read so ridiculous? Is that right? Christ, it would be easier to red ink the damn thing and call it, “Shit That Should Never Be Published.”

The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

Root beer float for sex sounds like trying to do it on one of those floating bed thingies in a swimming pool, with a tray of beer floating nearby … not a good idea.

Argenti Aertheri
Argenti Aertheri
11 years ago

Wait, can we back up a page to where Hank asked if it hurt me that I can use whatever pronouns I like but ze may or may not answer?

Cuz I haz a confused. Maybe ze’s just missed that I prefer gender neutral pronouns and don’t generally give a shit if someone uses gendered ones? I mean Hank, seriously now, if you have a pronoun preference it’s just plain polite to answer when asked what it is. Yep, you’re quite entitled to annoyance, anger, frustration, etc, at being misgendered, but multiple people here have asked what pronouns you prefer and you reply with snark?

As for naming our troll toys, Children of Brandon is pretty hilarious. Honestly though, chew toy usually amuses me, it’s just that this one’s total BDSM failure makes me mildly ashamed to be remotely associated with zir.

Hank, unless you decide to express a pronoun preference, I’m using ze/zir. I am curious though…you object to male ones, or at least question why we’d use them when the answer is obvious — Hank is a male name; you then say to use what I like, but you may ignore me, presumably based on what pronouns I use, and snark about whether that hurts…now, either you’re going to ignore gender neutral pronouns, which seems rather unlikely, or you just implied that you’ll take offense if female pronouns are applied to you.

So, you want female pronouns, gender neutral ones, male ones despite your initial snark, or just to be a dick? Because there are more than a couple people around here don’t find preferred pronouns to be a game.

“Say, does “breaking in a new pullover by wearing it for sexytimes” count as a kink?”

Umm…a variety of masochism? Sounds way too sweaty for me, but maybe you mean something besides a pullover sweater? Cultural meanings and all that.

Argenti Aertheri
Argenti Aertheri
11 years ago

“I’m planning on doing a textual intervention on 50SoG for my dissertation! I just need to find a way of writing ‘take 50SoG, and make it less shitty’ that’s more academic-y.”

You already solved that. Just call it a textual intervention, run intervention through a thesaurus if you want something more professional?

Creative Writing Student
Creative Writing Student
11 years ago

@shiraz

It’s basically taking the original concept – “young, naive woman meets charming, wealthy man who introduces her to the world of BDSM” with the problematic stuff taken out, and using more original characters and plot (admittedly 50SoG is a case of plot, what plot?)

So my ‘Ana’ will be curious about but otherwise unfamiliar with BDSM, ‘Christian’ will be actually charming and sweet, and a caring Dom, there wont be any ‘submissive contract’ crap, there’ll actually be a community they’re in contact with, and I’ll improve the timeline (EL James wrote something like a 10-week May). Basically modelling what a responsible kinky romance looks like.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

I’m allergic to wool and having it against my bare skin itches like crazy, so that would definitely be kinky for me, but not in a fun way.

The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

“Say, does “breaking in a new pullover by wearing it for sexytimes” count as a kink?”

Umm…a variety of masochism? Sounds way too sweaty for me, but maybe you mean something besides a pullover sweater? Cultural meanings and all that.

No, that’s just what I meant – sweater, jumper, pullover, cardigan, knitwear-in-general. The sweatiness doesn’t prove to be a problem. ::skates nervously over thin ice of TMI:: 😉

Baroncognito
11 years ago

And I’ll write a version that’s “young, naive man meets socially awkward, middle-class woman who introduces him to the world of BDSM,” except neither of them will be familiar with BDSM and there will be a huge contract, and they’ll never engage in any sexual activities at all. It’ll just be 110 pages of set-up and 200 pages of the two of them going over the contract and going “eww, I don’t want to do that.” at various places.

The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

Cassandra – ditto to wool on skin on this side, I never wear it, but over There it isn’t a problem.

The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

Baroncognito – sounds like kinky novel for contract lawyers! 😀

Shiraz
Shiraz
11 years ago

Oh! So actually, creativewritingstudent, you’re also getting the chance to represent BDSM accurately (especially the part were interested parties are willing participants). You have a ton of resources to back you up. You can also do mini-interviews and cite them.

Baroncognito
11 years ago

“At which point the second party (which you should recall is your designation Jim) is required to eat a cracker (as defined in paragraph six of subsection three of section T in the end notes) and attempt to whistle (as defined in paragraph sixteen of of subsection two of section A in the end notes). If the second party fails to whistle, zie must pay a forfeit (see the accompanying document “Forfeits and you: losing has never been so fun” published by Mortimer Comb Corp. 3rd edition. (this document not valid with the 2nd edition)”

Deoridhe
11 years ago

creativewritingstudent – that sounds awesome!

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

CWS: Jenny Trout is doing something similar over at her blog, called “The Boss.”

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@Argenti Aertheri

Hope you don’t mind if I ask you a question about pronouns (if you do just don’t answer :))

Is there a difference between zie/zir and xie/xir besides spelling? Idk that questions sounds really…uninformed, but I guess I kind of am. :/ Anyhow…uh, question asked! 😀

@Baroncognito

How do you actually write in lawyer speak and know what your saying? XD My brain just read that and was like, ‘tl,dr’ but I actually did read most, so it was more of a ‘too confusing, didn’t understand’. And, uh, I’m rambling again. (as always XD)

Baroncognito
11 years ago

I have no idea how to write in lawyer. That was just “Well, if you’re going to have a contract, you have to be able to define the terms of the agreement, because if the contract is at all ambiguous then it could lead to one person thinking they’re following all the rules and the other person believing that the first person is in breech of contract.”

The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

It worked as lawyerspeak for me. 🙂

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

The funny thing is that it was still sexier than anything in 50 Shades.

1 6 7 8 9 10 22