Well, I have to give the terrible, terrible fellows at PUAhate credit for one thing: it was thanks to a post there that I ran across the videos of the exceedingly creepy pickup “artist” and minor Youtube celebrity that I’d like to bring to your attention today.
Meet George Godley, possibly the world’s worst pickup artist. Actually, I’m being a bit generous in my description here, because there is no artistry at all to what he does, just a gimmick: he carries a small video camera with him as he wanders the streets of London, apparently thinking that this gives him an excuse to waylay every attractive young woman who’s unfortunate enough to wander into his field of vision.
Godley apparently wants us to believe he’s “flirting” with the women he so awkwardly approaches, but flirting, like the Tango, takes two, and all but a few of the women in his videos make it abundantly clear from the get-go that they want nothing to do with him. This doesn’t seem to faze him much, and he plunges ahead, trying his best to keep up with them as they endeavor to escape his presence as quickly as possible.
Take the unfortunate woman who catches his eye at the start of this video, and who finally manages to make her escape a little short of the one-minute mark.
In this next video – skip ahead to about 50 seconds in to avoid some rather pointless wandering about — we see two failed “flirts.” His first attempt, if we can call it that, consists of nothing more than him standing in the vicinity of an attractive woman while surreptitiously filming her. After giving up on her without saying a word he runs smack into the “beauty” of the video’s title, and pesters her for about a minute until she manages to get away.
After a brief and awkward attempt at conversation punctuated by her nervous laughter, Godley gamely tries to convince “Beauty” that he’s “doing a movie for the festivals.” When she asks which festivals he’s talking about he unconvincingly stammers something about “Cannes, Sund – the usual circuit.” Even though she clearly wants to put as much distance between herself and him as she possibly can, he tries to force his card on her and plaintively asks “do you want to meet again?” The answer, a nervous “no.”
This next encounter – in which our hero barges into a restaurant to pester a woman who apparently looked briefly in his direction as he walked by outside — even Godley recognizes is a flat-out failure.
Godley has posted literally hundreds, maybe even thousands, of these “flirt” videos. None of the ones I’ve seen have gone well. Once in a while an exceptionally tolerant woman will chat with him briefly without actively trying to flee; that seems to be about as good as it gets. The rest document what is essentially serial street harassment, with Godley approaching woman after woman, none of whom give him any indication that they want to talk to him, and “flirting” with them until they can get away from him. It’s the same story, again and again and again.
Why does he do this, making video after video of these so-called “flirtations” and posting them on Youtube? Is he simply a masochist, approaching women he surely knows have no interest in talking to him, much less “flirting,” and posting evidence of his humiliating failures to Youtube for all the world to see?
Perhaps. But even more disturbing than the masochism is Godley’s obvious sadism. Despite his social awkwardness, it’s clear from the videos that Godley knows full well that the overwhelming majority of the women he “flirts” with just want to be left alone; it’s clear from their body language before he approaches them, and from everything they say and do after he starts talking to them. If a woman literally flees from you, that generally means she’s not into your shit.
But Godley doesn’t really need to be reminded of this. He’s well aware that he makes women uncomfortable — in this video he asks a woman if she’s really talking on her phone or just trying to get rid of him. But that doesn’t stop him.
He’s not missing the social cues; he’s deliberately ignoring the clear “noes” these women either tell him outright or telegraph with their facial expressions and body language as clearly as if they were shouting “no” to his face. Were he to approach random men on the street in a similar way, he would almost certainly get himself punched on a regular basis.
Luckily for him, he’s approaching women, and they’re much smaller than he is. It’s telling that he almost always approaches individual women, not the “sets” of two or more favored by most pickup artists, and that he seems to prefer approaching the supposedly more pliable Eastern European women also favored by so many manosphere assholes and creepy pickup artists.
Godley’s not-so-well-hidden hostility towards the women he approaches comes to the surface at the end of this video, in which he attempts to “flirt” with a woman photographing a tree and then then asks for her phone number as she tries to get away, an all-too-common ending to his videos. SPOILER ALERT: She doesn’t give it to him. SPOILER ALERT NUMBER TWO: He pretends he didn’t really want it anyway.
Even if Godley has managed to collect a few genuine phone numbers or email addresses along the way – and I’ve seen nothing to indicate that this is a regular or even an irregular occurrence – his alleged “success” in this endeavor comes at a steep cost. Not just to his pride – I don’t actually give a shit about that – but to the hundreds if not thousands of women he’s harassed along the way.
George Godley, a terrible pickup artist and an even worse human being.
I’m not going to watch any of those videos, but I just want to say that the thumbnail for the last video David posted is a woman with a camera and a very tight smile that does not reach her eyes at all.
I’m talking DEATH GLARE.
Jesus, this Godfrey wanker’s entitled.
You know, this is almost hilarious. Almost. Too bad the amusement is ruined by the street harassment and the fact that he most likely has posted all of these videos without the permission of the women they feature.
Which reminds me – is his face visible in any of his videos ? I really don’t want to watch them myself, this shit creeps me out enough as it is.
Is G.G. even his real name ?
I got to the 1 minute mark of the first vid and had to stop *cringes*
Redcap: I have to agree with Cthulhu’s Intern; he actually makes a point of filming himself in some of the videos, so I imagine he’d be quite pleased to be filmed by one of these women.
Which I suppose answers Catfish’s question. He films himself in the mirror in the “fail” video (although why the others aren’t also considered fails totally eludes me), and he turns the camera on himself in another of the videos (not sure which one, and I’m certainly not going to watch them again to figure it out). He apparently seems to feel no shame about what he is doing.
Yeah, he includes shots of himself in a lot of his videos, though by no means all. The picture of him at the top of the post is a screencap from one of his videos.
Never before has: “I’ve seen some shit” been more appropriated.
Jesus Christ.
@Kakanian:
It took me embarrassingly long to figure out that was a typo. I was all like, ‘wait, how is that appropriation? What don’t I know? Should I ask? I feel stupid for not knowing.’
The phone number shtick reminds me of strangers who’d occasionally call me a whore for declining their classy proposition for sex. I found that so weird. Now it’s clearer that their little precious ego was bruised that a woman less than half his age (for some reason, the fifty somethings are big into that) dares to actively be attractive to him on purpose and then reject him. *shudder*
He conflicted about his masochism. I reckon he’d be happier/more confortable if he accepted it and moved on to where others would be accepting of it too.
Having posted that, maybe he’s a switch who switches too often in appropriate venues.
Pish, I meant inappropriate.
Is he the same Geo Godley who flashed everyone on X-factor?
One last time, he’s an exhibitionist too.
Yep, Internet says yes. (I’m a bit slow this morning here).
Masochist, sadist, top, bottom, Dom, switch, I don’t give a fuck, getting unwilling people in on your kink isn’t cool.
Not that I’d wish this guy on responsible kinksters, but yeah, trying to dominate people who aren’t consenting to that it, at best, abusive behavior. And provoking people into fulfilling your masochism isn’t any better.
So no, that behavior is still harassment and not fucking cool.
The sadist side of a switch wants unwilling people – it makes the sadism more sadistic. Their masochistic side likes it too. What a world of fulfillment.
I’m always baffled by this kind of stuff. Why? I’ve been talked to, by men, in the streets (and in bars and restaurants and cafeterias and airports and buses and trains) and had lovely conversations that ended with me declining to give out my personal info, and they continued the conversation with interest, and it came to a natural conclusion when someone’s bus came/food arrived/lunch break was over/whatever happened.
Like… it’s not hard. It’s not thousands of times hard.
@ Historaphilia
Unfortunately I think I may be his type. This is the first valid reason I’ve had to be glad I’m not in London any more other than missing the whole Olympic mess.
I watched the one where he’s in Tesco and wow, other than the street harrassment this guy is the most boring video blogger of all time. Though he manages to creep out the cashier and some random young women in line behind him, so hey, can’t say he’s not consistent.
Hank, I can’t speak to the sadist side, but hi *waves* masochist here. And to avoid TMI’ing up this thread, I’m just going to say that it’s a whole lot better when your top does what you ask for. Masochist =/= I like any and all pain so just abuse me please (gods do I hate the stereotype, it’s used to say that masochists can’t be victims of domestic victim because hey, you like being hit, right? *bangs head on wall*)
There’s also the fact that “sadist” in a BSDM sense isn’t a synonym for “asshole”, or at least it shouldn’t be.
Public displays of dominance using a video camera as an excuse to prolong the harassment. He calls it flirt because that is the excuse street harassers use to justify their behavior. He does not seem to be able to pass a mirror without filming himself in it. Creepy d00d.
Argenti – masochist/sadist – both think they’ve got the power. Good luck to them both for being so monomaniacal.
When my hair was longer, yes.
I’ll stick to the descriptions. This guy is a Grade-A creepy asshole.
Hank: as has been said, you don’t get to get your kink all over the unwilling. If you do, you’re an asshole.
Hank: I’m guessing you don’t know much about kink, but please keep digging. Watching some of the kinky regulars bury you will be a delight.
Also, not convinced that this guy is setting out to make women uncomfortable, he seems more like a combination of clueless, entitled, and selfish. I think he’d love for his approaches to be both smooth and well received, but he doesn’t have the personality to pull that off, and doesn’t care that failing to do so means that he’s making women annoyed and/or scared.
Example! Woman with the rictus grin in the last clip. A smart person with decent social skills would have used the fact that she was holding a nice camera as a conversation starter. A smart person would have also realized that filming someone without their permission while interrogating them about why they’re taking photos of something else is going to raise all kinds of red flags. But this guy is both clueless and entitled, so you get, well, these videos.