Categories
creepy douchebaggery harassment men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny PUA YouTube

George Godley: Terrible Pickup Artist, Worse Human Being

Woman fleeing encounter with Godley (on left, in white).
Woman fleeing encounter with Godley (on left, in white).

Well, I have to give the terrible, terrible fellows at PUAhate credit for one thing: it was thanks to a post there that I ran across the videos of the exceedingly creepy pickup “artist” and minor Youtube celebrity that I’d like to bring to your attention today.

Meet George Godley, possibly the world’s worst pickup artist. Actually, I’m being a bit generous in my description here, because there is no artistry at all to what he does, just a gimmick: he carries a small video camera with him as he wanders the streets of London, apparently thinking that this gives him an excuse to waylay every attractive young woman who’s unfortunate enough to wander into his field of vision.

Godley apparently wants us to believe he’s “flirting” with the women he so awkwardly approaches, but flirting, like the Tango, takes two, and all but a few of the women in his videos make it abundantly clear from the get-go that they want nothing to do with him. This doesn’t seem to faze him much, and he plunges ahead, trying his best to keep up with them as they endeavor to escape his presence as quickly as possible.

Take the unfortunate woman who catches his eye at the start of this video, and who finally manages to make her escape a little short of the one-minute mark.

In this next video – skip ahead to about 50 seconds in to avoid some rather pointless wandering about — we see two failed “flirts.” His first attempt, if we can call it that, consists of nothing more than him standing in the vicinity of an attractive woman while surreptitiously filming her. After giving up on her without saying a word he runs smack into the “beauty” of the video’s title, and pesters her for about a minute until she manages to get away.

After a brief and awkward attempt at conversation punctuated by her nervous laughter, Godley gamely tries to convince “Beauty” that he’s “doing a movie for the festivals.” When she asks which festivals he’s talking about he unconvincingly stammers something about “Cannes, Sund – the usual circuit.” Even though she clearly wants to put as much distance between herself and him as she possibly can, he tries to force his card on her and plaintively asks “do you want to meet again?” The answer, a nervous “no.”

This next encounter – in which our hero barges into a restaurant to pester a woman who apparently looked briefly in his direction as he walked by outside — even Godley recognizes is a flat-out failure.

Godley has posted literally hundreds, maybe even thousands, of these “flirt” videos. None of the ones I’ve seen have gone well. Once in a while an exceptionally tolerant woman will chat with him briefly without actively trying to flee; that seems to be about as good as it gets. The rest document what is essentially serial street harassment, with Godley approaching woman after woman, none of whom give him any indication that they want to talk to him, and “flirting” with them until they can get away from him. It’s the same story, again and again and again.

Why does he do this, making video after video of these so-called “flirtations” and posting them on Youtube? Is he simply a masochist, approaching women he surely knows have no interest in talking to him, much less “flirting,” and posting evidence of his humiliating failures to Youtube for all the world to see?

Perhaps. But even more disturbing than the masochism is Godley’s obvious sadism. Despite his social awkwardness, it’s clear from the videos that Godley knows full well that the overwhelming majority of the women he “flirts” with just want to be left alone; it’s clear from their body language before he approaches them, and from everything they say and do after he starts talking to them. If a woman literally flees from you, that generally means she’s not into your shit.

But Godley doesn’t really need to be reminded of this. He’s well aware that he makes women uncomfortable — in this video he asks a woman if she’s really talking on her phone or just trying to get rid of him. But that doesn’t stop him.

He’s not missing the social cues; he’s deliberately ignoring the clear “noes” these women either tell him outright or telegraph with their facial expressions and body language as clearly as if they were shouting “no” to his face. Were he to approach random men on the street in a similar way, he would almost certainly get himself punched on a regular basis.

Luckily for him, he’s approaching women, and they’re much smaller than he is. It’s telling that he almost always approaches individual women, not the “sets” of two or more favored by most pickup artists, and that he seems to prefer approaching the supposedly more pliable Eastern European women also favored by so many manosphere assholes and creepy pickup artists.

Godley’s not-so-well-hidden hostility towards the women he approaches comes to the surface at the end of this video, in which he attempts to “flirt” with a woman photographing a tree and then then asks for her phone number as she tries to get away, an all-too-common ending to his videos. SPOILER ALERT: She doesn’t give it to him. SPOILER ALERT NUMBER TWO: He pretends he didn’t really want it anyway.

Even if Godley has managed to collect a few genuine phone numbers or email addresses along the way – and I’ve seen nothing to indicate that this is a regular or even an irregular occurrence – his alleged “success” in this endeavor comes at a steep cost. Not just to his pride – I don’t actually give a shit about that – but to the hundreds if not thousands of women he’s harassed along the way.

George Godley, a terrible pickup artist and an even worse human being.

528 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Deoridhe
11 years ago

Marie: I be of the sheeeee~ variety.

Deoridhe
11 years ago

*xenonic. Damn elements.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

No criticizing misogyny unless it achieves I’m-going-to-blow-up-Alderan levels of badness from now on. I’m sure we will all agree to make that the new standard.

(Nope.)

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@ Deoridhe

Then I shall call you she 😀 (when referring to you in third person) I’m just trying to get everyone’s down. *blushes*

Also, I love the way you talk to people being jerks in this: “I am but a rank amateur next to …” comment. It sounds so eloquent XD

…(I’m weird)

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

And yeah, I wouldn’t always encourage people to angrily confront someone who’s harassing them. Do it if you want to and you feel safe doing so, sure, and I’m happy to have your back if/when you do, but there are lots of valid reasons why someone might not want to or feel safe doing so.

timetravellingfool
timetravellingfool
11 years ago

@ Marie, assume blockquote of my blockquote and then an additional blockquote over your quote “react….harasses”. I would bloody well hope so! A storm trooper is still a pain in the ass even if they can’t shoot straight. Yes, the feelings of these women take precedence over the person harassing them. Tah doesn’t excuse the person’s behavior. Neither does it explain it. And I would suggest plain maliciousness doesn’t explain it either.

The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

Xenonic? Mr Google is not helping!

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@cassandrasays

Yeah, I agree that you (general) shouldn’t have to be angry. I’m just annoyed because to me it seemed like ttf was implying that we should feel bad for the guy that women might react w/ anger. Idk I’m rambling.

timetravellingfool
timetravellingfool
11 years ago

@ marie- Malicious, by definition, requires intent.

Fade
11 years ago

@Timetravelling fool:

Harmful, however does not. And his behavior is harmful and harrasing.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

@ Marie

Oh, trust me, I’m not agreeing with TTF at all about any of this. Nor do I feel bad for the guy, or see any reason why anyone else should.

If someone does feel bad for him then fair enough, but there’s no good reason why any of the rest of us have to.

Deoridhe
11 years ago

One of my hobbies is insults without splattar damage. I find them really fun! Also, it takes me out of “grrr arg mad smash” into “how can I convey this trope without being cliche…”

All of the women in the video I saw are alone, and most of them are effectively isolated when he approaches them. At least a couple headed rapidfire to the nearest large crowd of people, which would have been my impulse if someone approached me the way he was recorded. I had a nasty example of similar behavior when I was a teenager, where he demanded my phone number and went onto the same bus I did. I had full plans for getting off in the populated store area, so if necessary I could duck into a store for my own safety, but there was no way I was confronting him.

Xenonic is a pun off of the element of Xenon, one of the heavier of the noble gasses. The noble gasses form bonds easily only with themselves (the implication being of insularity and lack of imagination/knowledge) and Xenon is particularly dense.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@ttf

I have no idea what you were trying to say with that last comment :/

timetravellingfool
timetravellingfool
11 years ago

@ Derodie- Well jeese, I was just going to call you a meanie, but now I guess I am going to have to write an epic poem about it. What rhymes with genital wart?

timetravellingfool
timetravellingfool
11 years ago

@ marie- I suggest he doesn’t mean to be hurtful.

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

TAtF: Are you fucking high? What the shit is this shit?

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

Heading for the safety of a crowd/using other people as a buffer is often the best way available to deal with a harasser. It would be awesome if everyone could always give the person doing the harassing a piece of their mind, but it’s often not clear if it’s safe to do so, and not everyone is going to be composed enough to do that anyway.

The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

Y’know, I don’t particularly care what explains this creep’s behaviour. I don’t give that many fucks about him. It’s pretty obvious he knows what he’s doing is wrong, he’s bullying and harassing, he’s been reported to the police, and he needs to stop. I have no sympathy to spare for shites like him. For that matter, I’ve precious little sympathy for the “poor guy sucked in by PUA” variety in general*. We’ve seen over and over again that PUA is based on hatred of women.

*Not including those who have recognised how toxic it is and spat that particular Kool Aid out.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@ttf

@ marie- Malicious, by definition, requires intent.

whatever. I don’t give a crap about language I guess. My point was that it’s harmful.

Deoridhe
11 years ago

What rhymes with genital wart?

“I have so little imagination I’m going to sexual slurs now.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@ttf

Didn’t understand this one

@ Marie, assume blockquote of my blockquote and then an additional blockquote over your quote “react….harasses”. I would bloody well hope so! A storm trooper is still a pain in the ass even if they can’t shoot straight. Yes, the feelings of these women take precedence over the person harassing them. Tah doesn’t excuse the person’s behavior. Neither does it explain it. And I would suggest plain maliciousness doesn’t explain it either.

Just didn’t see you made another.

timetravellingfool
timetravellingfool
11 years ago

@ Kitteh- Not a psychic, but I guess he would escalate. it was the walking away muttering that struck me- he kind of seems like he is learning entitlement from the PUA manual.

The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

“@ marie- Malicious, by definition, requires intent.”

Intent, it’s fucking magic! I can’t believe you’re actually saying this stuff.

timetravellingfool
timetravellingfool
11 years ago

Deohdre- Ha!! That doesn’t rhyme at all!! Think you’re so smart now, fancy college grade?

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

Is there a blog equivalent to a full moon where regulars start acting like trolls for some inexplicable reason?

1 10 11 12 13 14 22