Over on PUAhate.com, a fellow named Virgil challenges the widely held manosphere notion that women start losing their appeal once they hit their early 20s. According to him, the real turning point comes at the ripe old age of 25 or so. Why? Let’s let him explain — and in the process demonstrate how to use the word “c*ntathlon” in a sentence.
Behaviour has to count for something.
Any between ages 18-21 is in her Looks/reproductive Prime but The behaviour in these ages stinks.
Its like a competition to see who can out-cunt the other.
From simple things like skipping lines, to humiliating people in public, to ostracising people.
Its a damn cuntathlon.
We have to have some quality control here okes.
I fully agree that age 24-25 is the tip of the iceberg here folk.
Walk with me.
-she still looks attractive
-She’s starting work and therefore is in a controlled environment where validation is far less.Thus cooling the cunty behaviour
-she’s at the perfect equilibriu$ of grown up behaviour and youthful Looks.
Virgil gets some challenges from the regulars.
JackOfJokers argues that 25-year-olds are still as badly behaved as 18-21-year-olds, and not as good-looking:
Sounds nice in theory Virgil, but the truth is they still get validated fuckloads by desperate office guys, they’re super stuck up, and they definitely look much worse; fat, cellulite, wrinkles, shitty diet, etc.
Mechanical Animals agrees:
If you think girls act much different from 18-21 to 24-25 you are fucking deluded.
Life after high school is exactly that, a continuation after high school.
What does this mean is exactly that, the good looking people keeps living in a bubble of validation way past their academical period.
Life of the sub 8 is a dead end, a merciless damnation. Think about all these beautiful, fucking females. You will never touch them.
The “sub-8” bit is a reference to the notion, seemingly held by 90% of the denizens of PUAhate, that only “male models” ever get to have sex with women.
Genetically Inferior, meanwhile, makes the case for “jailbait.”
15-18 is prime for a female but nobody will admit it
This arouses much ire from the regulars, not so much because Genetically Inferior is being a crepy pedo, but because “at 15 most chicks barely even have any tits developed,” as the similarly named Genetics puts it. “Wake up to reality incel,” Genetics continues in a second comment,
stop comparing tumblr feeds and “jailbait” associated websites of the top percent of teens to the average titless whore. At fifteen you’re merely in grade 10, most chicks have little tits and ass to show for.
Doesn’t start getting good untill 17-18 then peak at 21
I gave up reading the thread at this point as it seemed to have degenerated into little more than a collection of “jailbait” pictures.
Wow, you dudes are really sad.
Hypergamy isn’t a thing.
Bitch is what we call a woman. (I was going to put in qualifiers, but in the end, they were all redundant, so I’m leaving it like that)
You are a mess of shitty misogyny.
You hate women so much it’s literally making me sick to my stomach.
Congrats, you’re terrible and you should feel bad about yourself.
People actually think women start losing their appeal once they hit their early 20s??
I find that very hard to believe.
Because you know, men NEVER sleep around! Nope! They’re all innocent little angels.
I’m so glad I stumbled upon this site. Finally someone has the guts and sense and logic to expose this frighteningly large number of maladjusted men who have deluded notions about women. To add to the discussion: there are many sites made by such men who berate women over 30, “advising” them on what kinds of men to date (basically, narrows it down to next to no one). I always had a feeling these creatures were closet pedophiles, so it does not surprise me to read that instead of praising women in their 20s, more are now turning to bloody CHILDREN IN THEIR TEENS! Because these creatures are failures as far as being men goes. They lack confidence, they’re hate-filled, insecure and controlling. Therefore, the younger the female, the better – she is easily manipulated.
The problem is, that backfires. I have dated older men, and in the end I rebelled against their insecure, controlling ways. They always tried to clamp down on my self esteem, in a misguided effort to keep me bound to them. It always failed.
Yet these pedophiles insist that young women should go after men in their age brackets (30s, 40s). Some even made up fake statistics about how men get “better” as they get older! Yes, because men don’t age – only women do! What kind of idiots come up with these notions? THE SAME IDIOTS WHOSE BAD ATTITUDES PRECLUDE THEM FROM THE DATING WORLD. Period.
Keep exposing these creatures for what they are. I fortunately have never met any in the real world – they seem to exist exclusively online. May they continue to be banished to the bowels of the Internet.
I know this is an old article but I have to say this: The image just makes me want to pet that cat anyway.
Cats are always an acceptable topic around here! I’d forgotten about that cutie, so your necromancy is appreciated by me at least 🙂
Yes, I had not seen this post or the image before and it’s awesome. I must go pet my own cat whose head is too small for his body now. Your necromancy is a good deed. 🙂
I’m also glad to be reintroduced to this adorable kitty, who I would give ALL THE PETS to.
Perhaps because I am not too thrilled with my own cats right now. Hazel got scared by something and decided to try to climb my leg. This is cute when it’s a tiny kitten and you’re wearing jeans, but I was still in my pajamas and her back leg clawed the hell out of my right foot from ankle to heel. I’ve finally finished cleaning and bandaging, and I don’t think I need stitches but OUCH HAZEL WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?
oooh, ouch, Hazel. The things we put ourselves through for love . . .
“…The widely held manosphere notion that women start losing their appeal once they hit their early .”
Wut? Women peak somewhere in their twenties for external attractiveness.
That’s nice, dear.
Yes, because all women are identical, and all men are arrrested-development eternal adolescents* who have no individual tastes or appreciation of individual people.
*the eternal adolescents are the more mature MRAs.
Yes, and men peak in their late teens for sexual potency. So, what’s your point?
“Women peak somewhere in their twenties for external attractiveness.”
Why do people keep thinking their standards of attractiveness are valid for everyone? Christ! That’s just yout goddamn opinion!
When you’re so vile you’re repelling women left and right, you can make it easier on your ego by pretending you didn’t want most of those women anyway: they’re too old, too ugly, too feminist, too “modern”. It’s basically sour grapes.
MRAs and PUAs don’t ever peak. It’s valleys all the way from childhood to death.
Aargh now I’ve got to mop tea off my monitor!
Many people argue, succesfully, that female peak is really 16-20
You are not one of them.
Many people here have argued, far more successfully, that miosgynists peak when they just stop talking.
(Not that they become any less awful, it’s just easier for them to hide their awfulness if they STFU.)
Well, ChickenShit, if you really want to identify with the creepily-close-to-paedophile brigade, don’t let us stop you. It’ll warn decent people what you’re like.
Thank you for pointing this out! I hadn’t really thought about it, but if a huge chunk of MRAs are in their early twenties, this makes them… well, I’d like to say less creepy, but the drooling hatred still isn’t pretty.
Not least since the main danger to women is men – and not strangers, but intimates, friends, family, colleagues … the so-called protectors. It’s been said before that patriarchy is a protection racket.
I have never seen this argued successfully. Got any examples?
Also, what’s with the name change? You know your gravatar is still the same, right?