Over on PUAhate.com, a fellow named Virgil challenges the widely held manosphere notion that women start losing their appeal once they hit their early 20s. According to him, the real turning point comes at the ripe old age of 25 or so. Why? Let’s let him explain — and in the process demonstrate how to use the word “c*ntathlon” in a sentence.
Behaviour has to count for something.
Any between ages 18-21 is in her Looks/reproductive Prime but The behaviour in these ages stinks.
Its like a competition to see who can out-cunt the other.
From simple things like skipping lines, to humiliating people in public, to ostracising people.
Its a damn cuntathlon.
We have to have some quality control here okes.
I fully agree that age 24-25 is the tip of the iceberg here folk.
Walk with me.
-she still looks attractive
-She’s starting work and therefore is in a controlled environment where validation is far less.Thus cooling the cunty behaviour
-she’s at the perfect equilibriu$ of grown up behaviour and youthful Looks.
Virgil gets some challenges from the regulars.
JackOfJokers argues that 25-year-olds are still as badly behaved as 18-21-year-olds, and not as good-looking:
Sounds nice in theory Virgil, but the truth is they still get validated fuckloads by desperate office guys, they’re super stuck up, and they definitely look much worse; fat, cellulite, wrinkles, shitty diet, etc.
Mechanical Animals agrees:
If you think girls act much different from 18-21 to 24-25 you are fucking deluded.
Life after high school is exactly that, a continuation after high school.
What does this mean is exactly that, the good looking people keeps living in a bubble of validation way past their academical period.
Life of the sub 8 is a dead end, a merciless damnation. Think about all these beautiful, fucking females. You will never touch them.
The “sub-8” bit is a reference to the notion, seemingly held by 90% of the denizens of PUAhate, that only “male models” ever get to have sex with women.
Genetically Inferior, meanwhile, makes the case for “jailbait.”
15-18 is prime for a female but nobody will admit it
This arouses much ire from the regulars, not so much because Genetically Inferior is being a crepy pedo, but because “at 15 most chicks barely even have any tits developed,” as the similarly named Genetics puts it. “Wake up to reality incel,” Genetics continues in a second comment,
stop comparing tumblr feeds and “jailbait” associated websites of the top percent of teens to the average titless whore. At fifteen you’re merely in grade 10, most chicks have little tits and ass to show for.
Doesn’t start getting good untill 17-18 then peak at 21
I gave up reading the thread at this point as it seemed to have degenerated into little more than a collection of “jailbait” pictures.
@Historophilia
That would be the best cake ever! *wants*
Also, good luck with your college group 🙂 I forgot to say that earlier.
GlenP: no one hear wants your gross thoughts, so fuck off.
That’s not a neg, that’s a direct order.
why do I suspect, that if we used the hexadecimal system, this magical limit would be 0x20 = 32 years?
Hear? No, here.
Arrrgh.
@Marie, I believe it shall be a sponge cake with jam in it and pink icing!
And thanks 🙂 fingers crossed we get ratified, i don’t want to have to fight our student Union all the way, but I will if I have to!
Glenn P – You disgrace our sex. Go crawl back under your rock.
@historophilia
Sounds yummy! I love jam in cakes.
Isn’t the problem that no one wants to fuck the patriarchy? That’s how I hear it from the PUAs… :p
Regarding that cat picture, I can’t help but think that most of those oh-so-worldly PUAs would try to bring a red marker to bed in the unlikely event they get near a naked lady. “Tits too saggy, seem to obey laws of gravity… face exists under makeup, turnoff… vagina is not visible? I thought that was external…”
Whenever I read these things, I really wonder: Why do they think that all guys think women lose all their attractiveness in their 20s? Did they miss the whole “MILF” thing that started in, at the latest, the 90s and never really died out? (I don’t really like that term, but I feel it’s the best I can use to describe the phenomenon.)
Aww, somegal, next he’s going to pull your pigtails!
OMG I negged someone. Icky icky ick.
Seriously, eww.
Hi Marie.
Yeah, this, I know:
“I think it’s more like they think men still stay attractive as they age, but women are only attractive young :/ that’s just my guess on it though.”
It’s one of those sexists tropes that’s survived the old times it was spawned in because it’s a convenient ego buffer for men with low self-esteem.
OMG, PUAs think their technique works because it works on them! Whoa.
OMG, PUAs think their technique works because it works on them!
“‘Fuck off’? Guys, I think she likes me!”
Some Gal, wanna borrow some 90% ethanol for that “drink”? Then when you throw it on him you can also light him on fire. 😀
@Glenn P
Fuck off means exactly that. Nice to know that you consider someone’s established boundaries to be something to fuck with rather than respect. That makes it even easier to tell that you are someone we do not want here. I am even less than not interested. Fuck off.
@some gal…
You are obviously a very angry person. I am sure that you have legit reasons. But remember it was you who attacked me and my comment which was actually in favor of not assuming that a woman reaches her high-point of her desirability from men at the age of 25. If I might ask, how old are you?
I love a great debate and only have respect for the opinions of others but the reaction of the people here does you and your cause no justice and only furthers the assumptions of anti-femminists which is in direct conflict with what you are trying so hard to change!
All in all, this is really quite the pack mentality and is truly fun to watch unfold.
And, my offer to go for a drink still stands!
It’s WONDERFUL to know I’ve been dead to these losers for a quarter-century at least* – and even better to know I (like so many) have a man who is a real man**: that is, a loving, lovely, individual, caring and fun person. These tossers are just fail x fail with added fail. Gollum would scorn to be seen in their company.
*assuming I was ever alive, not being a supermodel (even better)
**phrased to dig at them, not to go all gender-essentialist, and to emphasise that whatever the material state, Mr K’s a better human being than they’ll ever be
I find it hilaritragic how frequently they openly talk about how women who have self-esteem won’t fuck them.
@glenn, go away, nobody wants you hear. You’re a huge creep, pro tip, women normally don’t want to get drinks with guys who are trying to get everyone riled up. And also are assholes.
Glenn is freaking me out.
Are you as good at picking up women as you are reading comprehension?
Top of the site. Scroll up.
We’re here to mock misogyny. Nobody gives a shit about changing your or any other anti-feminist’s opinion.
“The “sub-8” bit is a reference to the notion, seemingly held by 90% of the denizens of PUAhate, that only “male models” ever get to have sex with women”
It sounds more like they feel only attractive men (or ‘male models’) will get to have sex with worthwhile women. Which, I guess, could be true depending on exactly what your definition of worthwhile is…
I don’t think they really consider the ugly, fat, average, boring, or otherwise unattractive women they don’t even look at as options for such fine upstanding people such as themselves.
It’s like he doesn’t realize he’s the butt of the joke…