Over on PUAhate.com, a fellow named Virgil challenges the widely held manosphere notion that women start losing their appeal once they hit their early 20s. According to him, the real turning point comes at the ripe old age of 25 or so. Why? Let’s let him explain — and in the process demonstrate how to use the word “c*ntathlon” in a sentence.
Behaviour has to count for something.
Any between ages 18-21 is in her Looks/reproductive Prime but The behaviour in these ages stinks.
Its like a competition to see who can out-cunt the other.
From simple things like skipping lines, to humiliating people in public, to ostracising people.
Its a damn cuntathlon.
We have to have some quality control here okes.
I fully agree that age 24-25 is the tip of the iceberg here folk.
Walk with me.
-she still looks attractive
-She’s starting work and therefore is in a controlled environment where validation is far less.Thus cooling the cunty behaviour
-she’s at the perfect equilibriu$ of grown up behaviour and youthful Looks.
Virgil gets some challenges from the regulars.
JackOfJokers argues that 25-year-olds are still as badly behaved as 18-21-year-olds, and not as good-looking:
Sounds nice in theory Virgil, but the truth is they still get validated fuckloads by desperate office guys, they’re super stuck up, and they definitely look much worse; fat, cellulite, wrinkles, shitty diet, etc.
Mechanical Animals agrees:
If you think girls act much different from 18-21 to 24-25 you are fucking deluded.
Life after high school is exactly that, a continuation after high school.
What does this mean is exactly that, the good looking people keeps living in a bubble of validation way past their academical period.
Life of the sub 8 is a dead end, a merciless damnation. Think about all these beautiful, fucking females. You will never touch them.
The “sub-8” bit is a reference to the notion, seemingly held by 90% of the denizens of PUAhate, that only “male models” ever get to have sex with women.
Genetically Inferior, meanwhile, makes the case for “jailbait.”
15-18 is prime for a female but nobody will admit it
This arouses much ire from the regulars, not so much because Genetically Inferior is being a crepy pedo, but because “at 15 most chicks barely even have any tits developed,” as the similarly named Genetics puts it. “Wake up to reality incel,” Genetics continues in a second comment,
stop comparing tumblr feeds and “jailbait” associated websites of the top percent of teens to the average titless whore. At fifteen you’re merely in grade 10, most chicks have little tits and ass to show for.
Doesn’t start getting good untill 17-18 then peak at 21
I gave up reading the thread at this point as it seemed to have degenerated into little more than a collection of “jailbait” pictures.
Speaking of perceptions, isn’t Hemsworth taller than 6ft? He seems huge, but that might just be a result of the fact that most people in Hollywood are teeny.
And yep, he does nothing for me either, so clearly neither the height nor the magic lust-creating pixie dust are working.
OMG WOMEN ARE SO PICKY AND ENTITLED, WE SHOULD ALL BE PUNISHED.
@shadow and cassandrasays
whoops. I was only thinking of america, and forgot to clarify that *blushes* I don’t know the average height for other places
Okay, I finally decided I had to Google ‘birkins’ to find out what the hell Virgil was so exercised about. I’ll admit that, in my superfast skim of his whines, I got the idea he was talking about merkins.
You know, Virgil, it’s 2013. If you want an ugly purse, you shouldn’t let anyone tell you otherwise. You don’t need to be jealous, just go get one and wear it with pride, dearie!
@Gillian
While flouncing yourself, basically. (Or at least flouncing like our trolls do: complain about women, threaten to flounce, say you’ve flounced, stick around.)
@emilygoddess
I like Chris Hemsworth, but he’s a little too pretty to really get me going. I don’t really remember his voice. I’ll have to listen for it the next time I watch one if his movies.
Also! If he got himself a Birkin he could carry all of his schoolbooks, his laptop, and his whine generating device everywhere he went. Those things are enormous.
(Which is one of the reasons I find it so funny that they’re so popular with celebrities – tiny woman + giant bag = very odd look, proportionally speaking.)
@emily goddess
I can totally empathize. I have a crush on Suraj Sharma, and I’m a lesbian. 😀
Slightly relevant, but my top two voice crushes are Jeniffer Hale and Maria Canals.
Hemsworth isn’t bad, I guess, but pretty boys don’t do much for me. I’ve got a serious Gary Oldman thing, had it ever since Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, and he just keeps getting better and better. I used to carry a bit of a candle for Vincent D’Onofrio, but lately every time I see him I’m reminded of Rush Limbaugh, so now his work is completely wasted for me, which is a shame because he’s an immensely talented actor.
@Cassandra Tiny woman, massive, recognizably super-expensive bag. It is LA, after all. Conspicuous consumption and all that.
I love Jeffrey Donovan in Burn Notice. And his voice is awesome!
I have a voice crush on Gina Torres. I also have an everything else crush on Gina Torres.
I just feel like if you could fit in your own handbag then it’s probably too big for you in terms of visual scale.
@viscaria
Gina Torres is pretty. Sadly, it’s been too long since I’ve seen her in something to remember her voice. 🙁
@Viscaria I get that, I really do.
@Some Gal Jeffrey Donovan’s voice is pretty good, but I have to say that (despite Evil Dead and Bubbahotep and the rest of it) I prefer Bruce Campbell. Gerard Butler’s got an amazing voice as well, helped along by the accent, of course. He himself is looking better to me too, now that he seems to be past the oiled side of beef phase of his career. He has more talent and range than he usually is hired to use…
@Gillian
I love Bruce Campbell, too, but not as much. I think he looks too happy? I like my men a little more angsty-looking. (I think this is also why I like Jensen Ackles so much. He would normally be a bit too pretty, but so. much. angst.)
@Marie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYS9wPWv0EQ
For me, she’ll always be Zoe.
And if my politics don’t cement me as an angry, bitter, man-hating feminist, that attraction will. LOL.
(I really, really loved Dylan McDermott and David Duchovny during my teen years. I think their collective angst must have warped me.)
I have a voice crush on the guy who hosts Wait Wait…Don’t Tell Me!, which is a radio show, so I had no idea what he looked like for a while. I was kinda disappointed when I finally saw a photo and he looked nothing like the Peter Sagal in my head (he’s much older than I pictured, for one thing).
Speaking of people who I’m way more attracted to their voices than their faces: Carlo Rota.
@gillian
thanks 😀 She does have a nice voice.
My Hollywood girlcrush is Michelle Rodriguez.
Ah… People keep telling me I should try Supernatural. I sorta enjoyed Warehouse 13 (more for Joanne Kelly than for Eddie McClintock who is also too pretty for my tastes). For me, I’d say a bit of grunge helps, and I’m very drawn to the suggestion of complexity. Jeremy Renner ca Hurt Locker/28 Weeks Later. Jason Momoa or late-series Joe Flanigan. Lost-era Dominic Monaghan. Too pretty/too perfect = too plastic for me. I lived in LA for longer than I care to remember and I quickly lost any youthful taste I may have had for plastic.
@Some Gal Before there was The X-Files, there was David Duchovny in Twin Peaks which forever changed my impression of him. The frequent allusions to his potential perversions only reinforced that for me, in a totally good way. I’m a sucker for a bit of kink. Of course the Lit Crit background helped (I go all kinds of mushy for anyone who can talk books) even if it was Yale.
@emilygoddess My dark, secret NPR crush is definitely Ira Glass.
There is no such thing as too pretty for my tastes. You’d think that my preference for sweet, friendly, affectionate men who American society tends to look down as too skinny and totally unmanly would be seen as a positive in that there are some men who a lot of women here ignore who have more of a chance, right? But no, I have been informed that I am stealing men’s manly essence as part of an evil feminist plot to undermine manhood itself by liking those kinds of guys.
And also that I like them because I’m bisexual. Which, well, I can see why someone would assume that, but it’s kind of crap in that it’s not like a pretty face cancels out the dangly bits.
Oh, and I’m 5’4″ and I’m perfectly happy with shorter guys. I like being able to look into someone’s eyes without having to stand on a box.
Silly Cassandra. Thinking you have the right to like who you like for your own reasons. What, do you think you’re male or something?!?! 😉