Categories
creepy incel misogyny pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles PUA

Men Who Hate Women Debate How Quickly Women Go Bad

94a

Over on PUAhate.com, a fellow named Virgil challenges the widely held manosphere notion that women start losing their appeal once they hit their early 20s. According to him, the real turning point comes at the ripe old age of 25 or so. Why? Let’s let him explain — and in the process demonstrate how to use the word “c*ntathlon” in a sentence.

Behaviour has to count for something.

Any between ages 18-21 is in her Looks/reproductive Prime but The behaviour in these ages stinks.

Its like a competition to see who can out-cunt the other.

From simple things like skipping lines, to humiliating people in public, to ostracising people.

Its a damn cuntathlon.

We have to have some quality control here okes.

I fully agree that age 24-25 is the tip of the iceberg here folk.

Walk with me.

-she still looks attractive

-She’s starting work and therefore is in a controlled environment where validation is far less.Thus cooling the cunty behaviour

-she’s at the perfect equilibriu$ of grown up behaviour and youthful Looks.

Virgil gets some challenges from the regulars.

JackOfJokers argues that 25-year-olds are still as badly behaved  as 18-21-year-olds, and not as good-looking:

Sounds nice in theory Virgil, but the truth is they still get validated fuckloads by desperate office guys, they’re super stuck up, and they definitely look much worse; fat, cellulite, wrinkles, shitty diet, etc.

Mechanical Animals agrees:

If you think girls act much different from 18-21 to 24-25 you are fucking deluded.

Life after high school is exactly that, a continuation after high school.

What does this mean is exactly that, the good looking people keeps living in a bubble of validation way past their academical period.

Life of the sub 8 is a dead end, a merciless damnation. Think about all these beautiful, fucking females. You will never touch them.

The “sub-8” bit is a reference to the notion, seemingly held by 90% of the denizens of PUAhate, that only “male models” ever get to have sex with women.

Genetically Inferior, meanwhile, makes the case for “jailbait.”

15-18 is prime for a female but nobody will admit it

This arouses much ire from the regulars, not so much because Genetically Inferior is being a crepy pedo, but because “at 15 most chicks barely even have any tits developed,” as the similarly named Genetics puts it. “Wake up to reality incel,” Genetics continues in a second comment,

stop comparing tumblr feeds and “jailbait” associated websites of the top percent of teens to the average titless whore. At fifteen you’re merely in grade 10, most chicks have little tits and ass to show for.

Doesn’t start getting good untill 17-18 then peak at 21

I gave up reading the thread at this point as it seemed to have degenerated into little more than a collection of “jailbait” pictures.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

769 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sparky
sparky
6 years ago

Many people argue, succesfully, that female peak is really 16-20

Wow, no. 1. Who? 2. How? 3. Define “successfully.” 4. Cite your sources.

I mean, this is just Comp. 101 shit. It’s not that difficult.

vaiyt
6 years ago

“Many people argue, succesfully, that female peak is really 16-20”

A pedophile might say it all goes downhill from 10. What’s the point of this shit?

Viscaria
Viscaria
6 years ago

Many creepy predatory assholes do in fact argue that men in their 30s and beyond should sleep with teenagers. Is there a reason we should care what creepy predatory assholes think?

kittehserf
6 years ago

Only in the sense of “know thine enemy”.

Argenti Aertheri
Argenti Aertheri
6 years ago

Two sentences, he’s said TWO SENTENCES and they contradict each other!

“Wut? Women peak somewhere in their twenties for external attractiveness.”

“Many people argue, succesfully, that female peak is really 16-20”

I don’t think this one is going to be any fun.

pecunium
6 years ago

They make the argument. It is completed. They have successfully made it.

It’s not right. It’s not provable. It’s not defensible, but one can make it.

Argenti Aertheri
Argenti Aertheri
6 years ago

Much like I can mak the argument that mangos are delicious? 🙂

Or that the tea party puppet masters are democrats? (I slept the ride home to avoid another round of that stupidity)

pecunium
6 years ago

Much as you can make the argument that everyone finds the taste of mangos delicious.

(and it’s nice to have context for the tea party stuff).

Chazz Reinhold
6 years ago

If a man is sub 8 he is invisible to women 6 and higher.

Case closed

emilygoddess
emilygoddess
6 years ago

And that’s real!

brooked
brooked
6 years ago

It’s science math!

mildlymagnificent
6 years ago

Good to know.

Thanks for telling us.

/notreally

weirwoodtreehugger
6 years ago

Didn’t you ladiez know that if a man says something it is automatically true and logical?

sparky
sparky
6 years ago

Shorter Chazz: Only looks matter and I’m entitled to a supermodel!!!!!
Waaah!!!!!

titianblue
titianblue
6 years ago

If a man is sub 8 he is invisible to women 6 and higher.

Case closed

Oooh. Is that how the invisibility cloak works? Harry Potter puts it on & it reduces his attractiveness, making him automatically invisible?

katz
6 years ago

So THAT’S why Elan doesn’t turn invisible when he runs around naked. It’s because he has charisma 18!

Shiraz
Shiraz
6 years ago

We get it, your scared of experienced women. Maybe a younger one will be dumber and except your bullshit at face value, eh misters?

brooked
brooked
6 years ago

If a man is sub 8 he is invisible to women 6 and higher.

Case closed

Encyclypedia Brown in “The Case of the Missing Anti-Cuckoldry Beta Male Mate Retention”

hellkell
hellkell
6 years ago

Chazz waited over a year to drop that nugget?

1 14 15 16