A veritable anthem for average looking guys with nothing particularly interesting about them who are pissed off they can’t date women much more conventionally attractive than they are.
Categories
A veritable anthem for average looking guys with nothing particularly interesting about them who are pissed off they can’t date women much more conventionally attractive than they are.
I do love the argument that nobody should comment on stuff that people who are clearly striving to be internet famous post on YouTube, though. Petulant boy needs to learn to internet.
@CassandraSays
It was meant for MRA eyes only and that’s real.
Deoridhe. So you think it is cultural based? I don’t. If I had the opportunity to date or sleep with supermodels, I would take it regardless of what the mainstream media said. What you find attractive is inate within you, not something the media can control. That’s like saying gay men only like to have sex with other men because of Glee. And that just sounds like something a stupid republican would say.
Meanwhile, Lena Dunham dares to screw “much more conventionally attractive” Patrick Wilson on the show she makes, and there is OUTRAGE.
Thanks Ultimate Nice Guy for confirming yet again that while average dudes are entitled to fk beautiful women, average women (like those in your video in the valley) deserve no-one.
Put this video in context, NNY, and it’s glaringly obvious it’s not “neutral”.
And that’s real.
Troll entering meltdown phase, Godwin approaching some time soon.
Why are we giving NNY and his beyond tired argument any airtime? He smells of socks and failure.
NNY: have preferences, make crap videos, knock yourself out. Just stop acting like the world owes your boner a goddamn thing. It doesn’t, whiny baby.
So you think it is cultural based? I don’t.
Culturally reinforced. Especially the weird bit where the focus is on super models, the claim is they are “more fertile” and most supermodels are too thin to have menses. Most ideas of attractiveness change based on culture, though; an intro course to Anthropology would teach you that, but I know education is difficult for you.
@NNY- Culture doesn’t influence what we find attractive? Seriously? This is what you eblieve with no trace of irony? Just clarify now and set your goalposts in the turf.
Things he says in the videos:
Women only want to date rich men or famous. 0:48
He creepily shows up to some womans (very nice looking house) standing outside with flowers (clearly uninvited).1:08
Women are too sober to sleep with him because bars shut down to early (sounds kinda rapey: the whole too intoxicated to give consent thing) 1:13
Women of LA are into coke. 1:40
I get a taste of transphobia at 1:46
Women apparently get paid to be thin. 1:50
A taste of fat-shaming at 1:56
Because women wear yoga pants they all look the same (as it looks only at their butts and no their faces) 2:05
All the women get their rent paid for by their daddies 2:19
Doesn’t like hairy women? 2:24
527 dollars to get laid. 3:25 (If getting laid is all you want I’m sure there are sex workers who would do it for less than 500)
Women don’t drink on dates because they don’t want a DUI and this is a bad thing. 3:29
Using wine to get women drunk enough to have sex (again kinda rapey) 3:36
There is a conspiracy among women to not have sex with these men. 3:45
If over 500 women have rejected you then there is problem with your choices or with you.This video say if 500 women aren’t interested then obviously the problem is with them not me.
Frankly, there is a lot of offensive things in this video.
This isn’t a matter of standards: this man feels entitled to these women.
Women aren’t obligated to have sex with men. They aren’t obligated to put out to men they don’t find attractive.
This video pretends they are. That is the problem with this video.
I’m not going through the other versions.
@Tulgey – “Does anyone else feel like their forehead is being continually pressed into a palm or a desk?”
Totally.
Cassandra: You know who had preferences? Hitler, that’s who.
Sure this isn’t a satire playing on the Nice Guys? It just seems way OTT to me to be serious.
(Awaits mansplanation about symmetry in response to Deoridhe’s comment.)
@melody
You are awesome. Thanks for doing that. (It’ll be nice for anyone who didn’t watch and also nice so I don’t have to ever watch it again.)
Ironically, symmetry actually has less to do with supermodels. What really gets them the job is having an unusual head:body aspect ratio (most supermodels are 1:8 instead of the more usual 1:7).
@eline
I’ve seen far more OTT and earnest nice guy whines. Nothing in this indicates satire. Nothing.
Aw, did the chew toy run away? The group nomming was kind of fun.
@Some Gal
I saw that some folks were confused as to the reason this video is a problem. And I figured I’d torture myself a little and break it down. NYY seems very stubborn on insisting there isn’t a problem with this video and I wanted them to know why I think there is.
During the Renaissance (I hope I have the time period right), fat women were preferable to thin women. During the 50’s/60’s (again time period thing) curves were all the rage. Around the 90’s stick thin was in fashion. Now we’re kind of gone back to the curvy thing kind of sort of but not really… See? Culture!
@NNY
As people have repeated, it’s not the standards that are the problem, it’s the whinging instead of just doing something about it.
So. Much. Fail.
First: sexuality and what is considered beautiful in any given culture are not the same thing. Try looking at the women considered beautiful in very different times and cultures and see if they’re the same as your supermodels. (Protip: they’re not.) Seventeenth-century European women who fit the beauty standard of their time would be dismissed by the supermodel-hankering types now, just as supermodels would be dismissed as starved and ghastly by the men of that time (or much more recently, for that matter).
The media shapes and is shaped by the broader culture and it does indeed influence what people find attractive. No, it’s not 100%, but neither are people generally completely free of it, however much they might think they are. And without the media, there wouldn’t BE supermodels. You’d never have seen or heard of these women, and they’d probably just be the extreme genetic rarities they are. If the beauty standard were something very different, they’d remain obscure and possibly derided.
It has to do with scarcity, is the running theory I’ve seen. “More attractive” people are the rare ones.
This is obviously why a man with a well tied cravat or in a three piece suit makes me weak in the knees. You just don’t SEE that anymore!
Dude, I missed he called me a Republican.
HAA HAA HAA HAA HAA omg, that is one of the funniest things I’ve read tonight. Last time I got called a Republican was because I disapproved of Democrats jerrymandering, during the first year of Bush II’s tenure.
“This is obviously why a man with a well tied cravat or in a three piece suit makes me weak in the knees.”
It’s sort of why I’m insanely attracted to Moriarty of the BBC Sherlock series.