Hey, do you need an instant karma boost on Reddit? Here’s how to get yourself hundreds of upvotes in four easy steps!
1) Make or find a misogynistic meme graphic that suggests women are terrible and makes light of domestic violence
2) Post it to the AdviceAnimals subreddit with the headline “I know I’m going to get downvoted into oblivion, but its true….”
3) There is no step 3
4) Enjoy your hundreds of upvotes!
Huh. I guess that’s really only two steps.
Graphic after the jump because — trigger warning — it makes light of domestic violence, as do several of the other comments I’m going to quote.
It’s funny because it’s true!
(Note: That last statement is completely false.)
In the comments, one clever fella piggybacked off of the OP’s misogyny to win a couple hundred upvotes of his own with this hilarious comment:
And this guy won himself a couple dozen upvotes with a nice little list about how awful women are — and got his comment linked to in r/mensrights for allegedly providing great insight into “how Women are set on a pedestal in today’s society.”
Oh, but don’t worry, some brave Redditors stood up to defend women from these not-so-nice generalizations. Like this guy:
Huh. I guess that isn’t much of a defense after all, considering that it blames domestic violence on “immature bitch[es].”
Reddit: Where “chivalry” means suggesting that not all women are “immature bitches” who deserve to get punched. Just some of them.
The Advice Animals subreddit: amazingly, often worse than r/mensrights. It’s not clear if this is because the denizens of r/adviceanimals are actually more baldly misogynistic than the r/mensrights regulars, or if it’s just that the folks in r/mensrights know that really obvious outbursts of misogyny tend to make them look bad.
WE HAVE TO GET THIS COUNTRY BACK ON THE COPPER STANDARD!!
They are really (kind of) giving up pennies. But they will remain legal tender for the foreseeable future.
Also, today would have been Rosa Parks birthday.
Yep, as of today (Feb 4) they are officially withdrawn from circulation. Stores and banks will no longer be giving them as change, and the Royal Canadian Mint has apparently started melting them down. The will remain legal tender indefinitely, and electronic transactions continue to count cents, but businesses giving change round off to the nearest nickel from here on out.
Google doodle for Canada: http://www.google.ca/
Oh gawd, pennies, noooo!
PGTOW… *sniffle*
I kid, of course. Hopefully this means at some point that my wallet will be a little lighter. I’m just going to keep a couple to show my grandkids someday and besides that, good riddance. =)
We lost our one and two cent coins here years ago. Stupid thing is, prices are still $9.99 to make it look better than $10, even though you’re never going to get change.
Polymer notes, yeah, we’ve had them for years too. Good in that they last longer and are (I think) harder to forge than paper notes, but they are pains in the arse for ordinary handling. They don’t fold; they spring back, so when you get handed change, it’s likely to fall on the floor (yes, in the time it takes to close your hand over it).
damn you blockquote! I blame you people who were taunting it earlier.
Economical, yes, but it seems like it’d be rubbing salt in the wound to know your third-place medal was made from unwanted pennies.
That stormfront thing is so terrible I am suspicious. I mean…
…has to be a joke, right?
I wouldn’t expect you’d have much luck with the Stormfront people. Article 2 of the CAG includes as genocide “(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;” and forced population transfers are increasingly being understood to count as genocide.
So, if you assume the same facts the stormfront peple do, then their legal case for genocide is not so shabby.
It’s just that you’d have to be an insane white nationalist to think immigration and people of different ethnic and racial backgrounds intermarrying are conditions that trigger the application of CAG § 2(d)-(e) or ICC Art 7’s prohibition on Crimes Against Humanity which expressly includes forced population transfers and persecution.
Well, I was thinking more of how metal that had been used for years by the Australian people was more meaningful than metal fresh out of the ground. I know it’s a superstitious thing that people leave thier essence on things they touch, like the serial killer’s sweater, but still. Does anyone know what that effect is called btw? I have googled but I can’t pin down the right search terms.
I think the only real response to outright bigots like Stormfront is to say, “You are a bigot and you suck.” You can’t argue. They live in such a twisted world.
@Drew: er, yes, they are shabby. Immigration (of non-whites) and intermarriage =/= forced transfer of whites. I don’t see how they could convince anyone with that argument who wasn’t already convinced.
And please don’t use words like insane to refer to people like that. We have lots of perfectly lovely neuroatypical people here who aren’t white supremacist shitweasles.
Moonz, yeah, it’s hard to imagine that they could say that seriously. Lots of stupid people misuse logical fallacies or make up new ones for things their opponents do that they don’t like (“code pink!”), but virtually everyone at least pays lip service to them and doesn’t actively encourage people to commit fallacies.
@Deordhe: that’s true, but if they show up where you hang out, it would be worth showing them up as ridiculous in case there was anyone watching who hadn’t thought through their opinions. There are plenty of people in this world who are casually bigoted because they have never really thought about it.
Heck, I still crave a smoke now and then, and I officially quit (for the second or third time) three years ago. But I’ve gone from 1 or 2 cigs a day to 1 or 2 a year, so I call that a win! The key, at least for me, is not to let the occasional slip be an excuse to take up the habit again.
Oh man, I don’t know how I’d have gotten through college without those smoke breaks. A short walk, some fresh air, and come back to studying feeling fresh and invigorated…yeah. I often have the urge at conventions, too, when I realize I haven’t been outside in two days and a smoke would be the perfect excuse, AND a chance to socialize.
Hey, has anyone got a phone and/or plan that they really like? My phone is broken and it’s a pay-as-you-go and my husband wants us to switch to an actual plan because he finds ours troublesome, but I really don’t want a contract.
That was an interesting if rather creepy article, Kim. No, I’ve no idea what the leaving-your-essence idea is called.
I think the recoil from West’s cardigan (fake as it turned out to be) is simply not wanting to be so intimately associated with him; to be in the exact same space as him. It’s like the mirror of being in a place Louis knew during his earthly time, or even handling the jumper I knitted for him. No “rational” reason for that, sure, though I’m a bit iffy on the way this instinctive/intuitive reaction is called superstition. If it’s hard-wired, it seems … I dunno, like there’s going to be an “oh you religious types!” swipe somewhere, even though the researchers point out that it isnt’ the case.
The most interesting part of the article for me was “For believers, there’s a hidden dimension to reality. There are passions out there, there are energies operating in the world controlled by invisible forces. Believers recognize this as the basis for a lot of their supernatural beliefs about the world.” I’d be classed as a believer as long as we’re not talking organised religion. I’m not big on their phrasing of “invisible forces” because it makes it sound like some sort of malevolence is involved. To me “invisible” is no more weird or sinister than saying I can’t see X because they’re in another room, or across town, or across an ocean. I’m a tad pissed off with being labelled supersititious because I don’t dismiss everything that’s not oh-so-rational and purely physical in the earthly sense. It seems rather hypocritical, apart from anything else, given (as the article makes clear) everyone has this element in their thinking. It’s a matter not of kind but of degree … or possibly of recognition, I don’t know.
(this stream of consciousness brought to you by Anything’sBetterThanWorking.com)
Anyone need a puppy/kitten/hedgehog fix?
I don’t think there needs to be a superstitious aspect to it. Can’t it just be an item you dislike? One can like or dislike something for any reason, after all, and not liking where it came from seems as reasonable as any other factor. For instance, I might dislike a present given to me by a person I don’t like or under circumstances I didn’t like and it’s not because I think they left cooties on it or any sort of woo like that.
I might not be around for a couple days.
We’re moving into a house (it’s our house! We bought it! It’s our mortgage!) and Comcast has promised me that I can plug-and-play with the modem.
I will see if that is actually so, or if I’m going to need to pay $50 for a service call.
I think the association with the person or circumstances is ample reason. I mean, they picked an utterly abhorrent person (Fred West) as the object of their test – wouldn’t it be more surprising if people didn’t react strongly to his name? There’s the whole thing of ownership, too, which is so strong in our society. Things become associated with their owners.
Congrats, Falconer, hope the move goes smoothly!
@kitteh: I actualyl find it kind of comforting. I don’t believe in the supernatural at all. Conciously I know there is no way someone leaves an imprint or whatever on an object, but I still have the feeling anyway. One of the reasons I like hand-made things, and one of the reasons why it’s so hard to define hand-made – because it does rely on this concept-we-don’t-have-the-name-for. But it is almost like they are saying even if you don’t believe it, your feelings are still valid, and you can enjoy them. You know what I mean?