Today is an auspicious day. For the Men’s Rights Subreddit, which we often write about here on Man Boobz, has won the prestigious World’s Greatest Shitlord Award. Oh, sorry, I mean it won the Subreddit of the Day award on Reddit. Which is, in this case, pretty much the same thing.
Here are some highlights from the official announcement , which I am totally not making up. No, really, you can go look. Someone – that being XavierMendel, one of the mods of r/subredditoftheday — actually wrote these things. And meant them. I AM NOT BEING SARCASTIC THIS IS REAL HOLY SHIT.
The topic at hand today takes a generous turn from our amusing and lighthearted articles of the month. On this, the last day of January, we look at something a bit more worthy to be called an article. /r/MensRights comes up a lot across reddit and, indeed, across the world as being one of the few centers for men’s help. It’s often attacked, and is always the center of one controversy or the other. My questions reflect that. MensRights is, undoubtedly, the home of great activists.
Again. I am not making this up.
There were some people close to me that suggested I not run this article. That the repercussions of doing so would be unreasonably bad. Well, here you go, people. This is my way of saying that a good reporter doesn’t care. A good reporter reports. It’s not in my job to care about consequences.
I’m not sure that Mr. Mendel quite understands the difference between “reporting” and “asskissing.”
/r/MensRights. Never in our society could the uninitiated imagine such a place. A place where feminism is questioned, and our culture is deconstructed to find what it’s really up to.
Hahaha, what? I was not aware that feminism wasn’t ever questioned on the internet, or anywhere else in “our society.” I mean, it’s not like I run a blog that features nearly 500 posts detailing people attacking feminism on the internet, most of them nastily and ignorantly and sometimes using the word “cunt,” and the vast majority of them not on Reddit. And it’s not like this only barely scratches the surface of the subject.
/r/MensRights is one of the last fortifications of free thought to exist on Reddit.
Yeah, that’s why I was banned – not for trolling or harassing or calling anyone names, but for politely if persistently disagreeing with the denizens until then-moderator ignatiusloyola threw a fit.
“Surely you jest,” one might tell me, “when you mean they’re alone in this regard?” No, hypothetical 19th century British gentleman, I do not. I truly mean it when I say that. What other subreddit openly questions feminism? None spring to mind, and I make it my duty to catalog various subreddits. Most end up banned or run down within a month. Only /r/MensRights remains.
Reddit: Bastion of Internet Feminism.
Nobody can say for sure whether or not they’re correct in any single regard. It’s certain that, due to the laws of probability, they’re not correct in every regard. However, it’s also certain that they’re correct in most of them. Occasionally a wackjob or two will suggest that feminism is behind Cinnamon Toast Crunch (The taste you can see!™). The accuser latches onto those wackjobs to denounce the whole movement.
Yeah, it’s not as if comments suggesting that a man allegedly wronged in divorce court should turn to murder got literally dozens of upvotes in r/mensrights, or anything.
Oh wait, they did.
Yeah, it’s not as if Men’s Rights Redditors gave literally hundreds of upvotes to a post about a t-shirt suggesting that men could be convicted of rape simply for being in a room alone with a woman.
Oh wait, they did.
It’s not as if Men’s Rights Redditors regularly give dozens if not hundreds of upvotes to posts from unhinged hate sites like A Voice for Men or Angry Harry,or fall all over themselves praising an internet-famous female MRA who thinks that many abused women “demand” their abuse.
It’s not as if they think “spermjacking” is a real thing in the world that should make all men think twice about ejaculating in the general vicinity of women.
It’s not like … oh, you can find many, many more examples for yourself.
After claiming that “people have died” after being called misogynists, while “nobody ever dies after being called a misandrist,” Mr. Mendel winds up his speech with this stirring conclusion:
I support the struggles of people who are in bad positions. I respect it, in a way, for I have also seen great struggle. My struggle is not over, nor will it end until my death. For I struggle with something that will not go away through legislation or social change. The Men’s Rights Movement, however, struggles with something very changeable. Very malleable, able to be fixed within a generation if so desired. So I will support them, for they have a fighting chance. …
/r/MensRights is controversial for a reason. In the same sense as Jews of the 1890s, Irish of the 1850s, Hispanics of the 1350s, and many more. Each generation has their controversial improvement in society. We’ve gotten off easy so far, but we have to make it happen eventually. As far back as anyone living can remember, the table has been imbalanced in one way or another, favoring men or women. It’s time the table stays level for once. We need equality.
And that’s what /r/MensRights is trying to do.
Oy yoy yoy. There’s so much ridiculousness to unpack there that it makes me tired. I think I’ll go take a nap.
Mr. Mendel followed his stirring introduction with some questions for the denizens of r/mensrights. And there was some discussion. I can’t even. Not right now. I’ll get to all that in a future post.
In the meantime, Skepchick’s Rebecca Watson – who has been on the receiving end of r/menrights’ heroic activism more than once — has her own reaction to the Men’s Rights is the Subreddit of the Day announcement.
…
So, funny experiment, try typing “feminist has” into Google and see what the auto-complete suggests. This is what I got:
http://i.imgur.com/y0phLhw.png
Shhhh, Myoo, don’t spoil it, the little boys are playing at being superheroes.
Ugh, you’re right, Katz- boring troll is boring.
DL isn’t even a troll, she’s just stupid.
dang
all that virtual popcorn gone to waste …
No…just no:
“This is my way of saying that a good reporter doesn’t care. A good reporter reports. It’s not in my job to care about consequences.”
You’re not a reporter, junior. Just because you type on a keyboard and post doesn’t make you a reporter. You didn’t write an article, you wrote a stupid opinion piece. Articles have actual research and citations and quotes from real people. And anyhoo, that sentence triggered my gag reflex — especially after reading your, um, stuff.
This DL person is comming here to get material for her weak-ass blog. Now that I think about it, it makes sense; people here are interesting, while her blog is a lot of meh.
Yeah, every time I remember to read, I remember why I like it. (And Canadian politics is inherently funny, so it does make their job easier.)
@Some Gal! SURE!
I am happy to share virtual popcorn. I have to cook fancy foods for my World’s Most Civilized Football Party this Sunday, so I should share my virtual junkfood.
@Shiraz
As a former reporter AND opinion piece writer, that drivel was an offense to both.
I quite like the “Bad Reviews of Good Books” blog on the basis of it strikes the perfect blend of laughing at misogynists and anti-intellectuals while eliciting sympathy–for who hasn’t read a book for high school English that they absolutely hated. (I hated Anthem. Everything else was fine but I. Hated. Anthem.)
But I think this:
is just too funny.
Not the first time this has happened, too bad we can’t monetize it.
I’m not sure why we should write DLs blog posts for her. Normally I expect to be paid for that kind of thing.
@WordSpinner — is that a review of Flowers in the Attic?
I was going to guess Jane Eyre.
Jane Eyre, yes. It also seems to be quite accurate. That does not make the book bad, though.
Hehe, that’s a good site!
Still somewhat baffled about what links Germainr Greer to Steve Irwin…
They’re both Aussie? Other than that I go nothing. I can’t really see Greer wrestling a croc.
Totally off topic but kinda kewel.
http://tweetping.net/
Apparently she was responsible for his death…
*baffled*
And the fans will have their revenge. It’s kinda badly spelt, grammar’d, and logic’d…
“As a former reporter AND opinion piece writer, that drivel was an offense to both.”
Wow, there’s three of us in the house right now — Cassandra and me. Hmm. This calls for wine.
(Thinks)
Germaine Greer hated Steve Irwin as a symbol of rugged Aussie masculinity so much that she trained a stingray to kill him?
@CassandraSays
If so, I gotta say, it isn’t an okay thing to do, but go Germaine Greer!
Cassandra, I think you’re onto something with that Greer-Irwin murder plot.
Next up – training sharks to bring us pearls instead of trying to eat the pearl divers!
So how many reporters/editorial/op-ed writers do we have here (I did all three).