Today is an auspicious day. For the Men’s Rights Subreddit, which we often write about here on Man Boobz, has won the prestigious World’s Greatest Shitlord Award. Oh, sorry, I mean it won the Subreddit of the Day award on Reddit. Which is, in this case, pretty much the same thing.
Here are some highlights from the official announcement , which I am totally not making up. No, really, you can go look. Someone – that being XavierMendel, one of the mods of r/subredditoftheday — actually wrote these things. And meant them. I AM NOT BEING SARCASTIC THIS IS REAL HOLY SHIT.
The topic at hand today takes a generous turn from our amusing and lighthearted articles of the month. On this, the last day of January, we look at something a bit more worthy to be called an article. /r/MensRights comes up a lot across reddit and, indeed, across the world as being one of the few centers for men’s help. It’s often attacked, and is always the center of one controversy or the other. My questions reflect that. MensRights is, undoubtedly, the home of great activists.
Again. I am not making this up.
There were some people close to me that suggested I not run this article. That the repercussions of doing so would be unreasonably bad. Well, here you go, people. This is my way of saying that a good reporter doesn’t care. A good reporter reports. It’s not in my job to care about consequences.
I’m not sure that Mr. Mendel quite understands the difference between “reporting” and “asskissing.”
/r/MensRights. Never in our society could the uninitiated imagine such a place. A place where feminism is questioned, and our culture is deconstructed to find what it’s really up to.
Hahaha, what? I was not aware that feminism wasn’t ever questioned on the internet, or anywhere else in “our society.” I mean, it’s not like I run a blog that features nearly 500 posts detailing people attacking feminism on the internet, most of them nastily and ignorantly and sometimes using the word “cunt,” and the vast majority of them not on Reddit. And it’s not like this only barely scratches the surface of the subject.
/r/MensRights is one of the last fortifications of free thought to exist on Reddit.
Yeah, that’s why I was banned – not for trolling or harassing or calling anyone names, but for politely if persistently disagreeing with the denizens until then-moderator ignatiusloyola threw a fit.
“Surely you jest,” one might tell me, “when you mean they’re alone in this regard?” No, hypothetical 19th century British gentleman, I do not. I truly mean it when I say that. What other subreddit openly questions feminism? None spring to mind, and I make it my duty to catalog various subreddits. Most end up banned or run down within a month. Only /r/MensRights remains.
Reddit: Bastion of Internet Feminism.
Nobody can say for sure whether or not they’re correct in any single regard. It’s certain that, due to the laws of probability, they’re not correct in every regard. However, it’s also certain that they’re correct in most of them. Occasionally a wackjob or two will suggest that feminism is behind Cinnamon Toast Crunch (The taste you can see!™). The accuser latches onto those wackjobs to denounce the whole movement.
Yeah, it’s not as if comments suggesting that a man allegedly wronged in divorce court should turn to murder got literally dozens of upvotes in r/mensrights, or anything.
Oh wait, they did.
Yeah, it’s not as if Men’s Rights Redditors gave literally hundreds of upvotes to a post about a t-shirt suggesting that men could be convicted of rape simply for being in a room alone with a woman.
Oh wait, they did.
It’s not as if Men’s Rights Redditors regularly give dozens if not hundreds of upvotes to posts from unhinged hate sites like A Voice for Men or Angry Harry,or fall all over themselves praising an internet-famous female MRA who thinks that many abused women “demand” their abuse.
It’s not as if they think “spermjacking” is a real thing in the world that should make all men think twice about ejaculating in the general vicinity of women.
It’s not like … oh, you can find many, many more examples for yourself.
After claiming that “people have died” after being called misogynists, while “nobody ever dies after being called a misandrist,” Mr. Mendel winds up his speech with this stirring conclusion:
I support the struggles of people who are in bad positions. I respect it, in a way, for I have also seen great struggle. My struggle is not over, nor will it end until my death. For I struggle with something that will not go away through legislation or social change. The Men’s Rights Movement, however, struggles with something very changeable. Very malleable, able to be fixed within a generation if so desired. So I will support them, for they have a fighting chance. …
/r/MensRights is controversial for a reason. In the same sense as Jews of the 1890s, Irish of the 1850s, Hispanics of the 1350s, and many more. Each generation has their controversial improvement in society. We’ve gotten off easy so far, but we have to make it happen eventually. As far back as anyone living can remember, the table has been imbalanced in one way or another, favoring men or women. It’s time the table stays level for once. We need equality.
And that’s what /r/MensRights is trying to do.
Oy yoy yoy. There’s so much ridiculousness to unpack there that it makes me tired. I think I’ll go take a nap.
Mr. Mendel followed his stirring introduction with some questions for the denizens of r/mensrights. And there was some discussion. I can’t even. Not right now. I’ll get to all that in a future post.
In the meantime, Skepchick’s Rebecca Watson – who has been on the receiving end of r/menrights’ heroic activism more than once — has her own reaction to the Men’s Rights is the Subreddit of the Day announcement.
I really liked Monstrous Regiment. I may have been predisposed to like it because I like stories about jbzra qerffvat hc nf zra naq ehaavat bss naq ratntvat va tragyrznayl guvatf but some people don’t like it which I don’t get…
http://youtu.be/Nf90EcOOnHo
” If they don’t id as MRAs, you don’t get to assert they are part of the movement.”
I’m saying that don’t just identify as MRAs in topic about MRAs
You know, there’s almost something refreshing about trolls who just out-and-out admit that they have absolutely no evidence for their assertions.
clairedammit: ovarian cysts suck, had one removed about seven years ago. Are they doing it laproscopically? If so, watch out for the painful gas afterwards.
This is the most tiresome, but he’s in the running.
I don’t want the kind of socks we get here on my feet, they might give me toe fungus or something gross like that.
@katz
I did once… it kind of good destroyed when Mum took it to a music festival though. 🙁
/hugs to clairedammit
Cassie was the most recent tedious troll.
“I’m saying that don’t just identify as MRAs in topic about MRAs”
katz, you still have that owl handy? I just did the human version of that pose.
“with added claims that you’d have to be “a psycho” to have proof”
So you keep those kind of records of people you know online. Great. Show them to me.
I would watch the fuck out of that reality TV show. Who can we pitch this to? XD
Best of luck with the surgery and a very speedy recovery, clairedammit.
Thanks, Argenti!
Troll, if you’re having trouble remembering exactly where you saw those discussions, maybe a balanced breakfast would help.
I quite liked that, although the effects could have been better. Had some really fun acting and I was totally going “LORD VETINARI IS TYWIN LANNISTER!”
Hey, fathertime! Since you aren’t an MRA and just want to fight about how NA_ALT, I found someone claiming there are no moderate feminists. How bout you go play over there?
(I’m not going to link though because that would imply I make note of my internet browsing like some “psycho”)
@clairedammit
Thanks, I needed reminding that I should eat something… [/sincerity]
Let’s talk about bras for a while.
Dude, if you know them, then you would remember more about them. Either you know them, in which case your statement
is incorrect as it implies that you know the MRA(s).
Or this statement of yours earlier:
is incorrect.
Do you think you could manage consistency in your posting content within the one commenting period?
In the comment section of the The Raw story, they are discussing the plural of octopus.
Jus’ saying.
“(I’m not going to link though because that would imply I make note of my internet browsing like some “psycho”)”
I love how psycho is in quotes. Like the obsessiveness required to keep track of every person you’ve spoken to on the internet is normal. Actually that kind of thinking would explain some of the people here.
Or yeast infections? I don’t think we’ve done yeast infections recently.
Lol, no, I have a functional memory, eg that katz posted the head tilting owl, that Pecunium is really going to have fun toying with you, Zimbardo blew the Stanford prison study by acting more like e warden than the researcher (one of his assistants had to point this out to him).
Any other random facts you’d like? Maybe that psycho is neither a clinical nor legal term? If you’d like to pick a legit diagnosis though, I’ll be happy to provide a rough definition from memory, and an exact one from 2 min of remembering where to find those.
Sorry, the owl is asleep right now. Have some pugs instead.
Bras! To underwire or not to underwire? I find bras with them more comfortable, but I know others often disagree.
Or back to food — I need a recipe for scalloped potatoes. For Easter. Preferably something I can make the night before and then pop in the oven on the day. Any ideas?
“Dude, if you know them, then you would remember more about them.”
I remember the conversations but I don’t remember the usernames. Why would I? They aren’t their real names and on websites that huge I probably won’t encounter them again.