I’ve found my new favorite Men’s Rights Redditor. Brand new, really, as gonemgtow’s account is only two days old. This comment, his very first, is so loopy — yet also so true to manosphere ideology — that I can’t help but suspect that it’s an inspired hoax — and possibly even the work of one of the old banned trolls here. (I have one in particular in mind.) If not, wow.
I’ve taken the liberty of breaking his wall o’ text into readable paragraphs. Enjoy. Oh, if you’re at work, don’t read this out loud, as it starts off with a bang, NSFW-wise.
Dude, three girlfriends made me fuck them when they had another man’s cum deep in them and there was an unmistakable cum frothing going around the girth of my penis. Confronted with it they told me a bunch of lies, I know cum when I see it for fuck’s sake, and got hysterical that I could even suggest such a thing. I mean it wasn’t just paranoia. I stalked them and found out.
I go to the gym and lift, play poker and generally engage in alpha male activities, but still get cheated on. Right before I went MGTOW I was doing one night stands and every single one I found out were in a relationship or even married. So they basically forced me to wrong a lot of other men the way I’d been wronged myself. I could feel dirtied by the moral corruption of sluts. Basically made me swear off women.
What gets me is that there’s probably a man out there raising my son or daughter and the slut knows and is snickering and laughing at the con she has pulled. The percentage of women doing these things is not negligible and it’s sick and deplorable. Made me cry too when my illusions about women were shattered.
Makes sense when you think about the erotic fiction they read. Go watch the sales numbers. It’s stories about adultery and rape. A lot of stuff you couldn’t think up in your wildest dreams when it comes to moral corruption.
Just stop. Don’t even masturbate. It’s a highway drug to women so to speak. A moment of weakness is all it takes and you’re pounding a slut from behind and actually she’s in a relationship or even married. It’s better to just take the moral high ground.
All religion kinda makes sense to me now, when it comes to women. Ancient men must have know about the problems of letting women run rampant and wrote up some rules to curb the behavior. It was probably easier to just say it was an all powerful being’s will than to explain the true nature of women and why the rules must be followed.
Now that atheism is taking hold, which is rationality, we’re being forced into a state of moral decay as we’ve lost justification to uphold ancient tradition curtailing women’s sexuality and need to go get as much cum as possible from as many men as possible.
Time to take the penis away and go our own way. Cut the flow at the source so to speak and starve them until they realize this feminism shit is bullshit and that we need to basically have some say in how they behave. That their behavior is wrong. Just saying what everyone knows deep down inside. Fuck political correctness.
Gonemgtow didn’t get much love in r/mensrights for this gem, earning 6 downvotes for all his efforts. He should probably head over to MGTOWforums.com, where he’d fit in just fine.
Previous subreddits of the day:
/r/EatCheapAndHealthy/
/r/Knitting/
/r/shiba/
/r/eatsandwiches
/r/WinterPorn
/r/CAKEWIN
/r/hyenas
/r/Goldenretriever
/r/Sloths
Because it’s Reddit, I’m going to assume that at least some of those contain abhorrence.
…
…
r/eatsandwiches/?
@Argenti, it was not the fish’s fault. He was just being a fish. He just creeped li’l Viscaria out, is all.
Sloths, it’s really about the seven deadly sins.
Viscaria — can I attempt aversion therapy then? Start you on clown loach videos, they don’t eat anything big than a snail and are perfectly happy nomming on veggies.
@CWS, I’m frankly afraid to look. My visits to Reddit are strictly hit and run.
I did find this “controversial” image in /r/Sloths: http://imgur.com/Ybt15zI (It’s cute! Last supper with a sloth Jesus.)
And this desktop wallpaper, also from /r/Sloths: http://i.imgur.com/g7bkC1l.jpg
That list of other subreddits could well be a list of things more important than men’s rights.
I am almost tempted to make that my wallpaper. It is really cool.
(I have the Warehouse 13 warehouse right now and all the Windows profile icons are characters from the show. So, I don’t really want to switch. Maybe I’ll stick it on the guest account.)
LOL at the intro bit to the Reddit promo:
The rest of the intro is also completely out of touch with reality, but hilarious in its self-justification tone. Other wonderful bon mots include:
– [the subreddit? comes up] “across the world as being one of the few centers for men’s help.
– “/r/MensRights is one of the last fortifications of free thought to exist on Reddit.”
– “Nobody can say for sure whether or not they’re correct in any single regard. It’s certain that, due to the laws of probability, they’re not correct in every regard. However, it’s also certain that they’re correct in most of them. ”
Activism, free thought, being factually correct: MRAs, you’re doing it wrong!
…Who wrote the promo? Because nobody who wasn’t already an MRA could possibly look at r/mensrights and come to those conclusions. If you know nothing about it at all, you might find a place like Spearhead that actually has, you know, articles and shit mildly persuasive, but nobody could look at r/mensrights and not just go “What a bunch of whiners!”
Ha ha ha, you guyz have to read this:
http://skepchick.org/2013/01/the-five-best-excerpts-from-rmensrights-subreddit-of-the-day-announcement/
It was written by XavierMendel: http://www.reddit.com/user/XavierMendel
This bit is so cute in the comments underneath (author is SharkSpider):
And that body of research would be a rectum of bumplucks?
Did we decide the collective noun? I hope there is a soft chair upon which to place that rectum of no-ledge.
MRAs: Research, you’re interpreting it wrong! (I would have said that they were doing it wrong, but I don’t think they are doing anything that could remotely be called “research”.)
“What if the Jews were behind 9/11?”
“What if Kenyans are actually a race of puppy-eating aliens and Obama is fattening Bo up for the slaughter?”
“What if Iraq didn’t happen and all the soldiers who were killed are just pretending to be dead to get government benefits?”
“Hey, people are getting mad at me! I must be asking the right questions!”
Forms of sociological research as performed by MRAs:
Interviews: hold Dictaphone* to butt
Covert observation: staring at women in public spaces (the women in question feel this is called being creepy as fuck)
Overt observation: PUA
Media Survey: getting angry at the Disney Channel/Sitcoms
Peer review: going on MRA forums and engaging in ARGLEBARGLE. If enough MRAs agree with you your work is approved.
* I couldn’t remember the word and nearly called it a dictator…
Statistics: pick a percentage between 90 and 100 and apply in a positive connotation to males or a negative connotation to females.
Lazy statistics: just use “all”, whether implied or stated.
Just posted on The Frisky re republicans and their anti-female messages:
http://bcove.me/3vstldc4
Peer review: going on MRA forums and engaging in ARGLEBARGLE. If enough MRAs agree with you your work is approved.
I’ve heard that ARGLEBARGLE is a highly esteemed editorial board!
RE: MKlein and Some Gal
Yeah, I’ve never seen someone sofa-diagnosing someone on the autism spectrum doing anything good. At best, they’re patronizing and pretending they know more about someone than that person themself.
Also, regarding animals, I’m fine with skunk at a distance, but have NEVER been able to stand the smell of pot. HAAAAAAATE. I’m also reading more James Herriot, which is very good for a critter discussion!
@LBT
So like a psychiatrist/therapist does? 🙂
No offense meant to people who have had better experiences than I have.
I get the reverse of this. Many people, when I tell them I’m an Aspie, give me disbelieving looks followed by “Wow, you must be really high functioning because I had no idea!” Like this is a compliment. Like the effort and energy I have to pour into passing for a normie most of the time is nothing remarkable, or I should be flattered that I’ve wasted so much of my limited store of energy convincing these people that I’m meeting their NT societal expectations SO WELL, nevermind the cost to myself or the fact that if people were just a little more fucking open minded I wouldn’t have to work so hard. I always want to scream “YES THAT’S THE FUCKING POINT OF COPING STRATEGIES.”
Sorry, rant over.
“I may have something to report on that sort of thing after this afternoon’s appointment,” she muttered darkly.
RE: drst
Urgh, I have sympathy for that. I spend a lot of time doing education and crap, and as one of the co-founders of healthymultiplicity.com, it was actually a bit of a personal blow to succumb to mental illness and turn to Uncle Sam. I felt like a fraud, fighting so hard to show multi as something not necessarily bad, only to fall. (Even if it wasn’t multi that brought me down.) I keep getting told not to conceal my issues, for the sake of getting disability but it’s really fucking hard undoing years and years of conditioning! Especially around STRANGERS.
RE: Some Gal
That’s why I said ‘sofa-diagnose.’ But then again, I seem to have mostly eluded diagnoses in general, somehow.
@drst
I’ve gotten both “I never would have guessed” and “Well, that makes a lot of sense.” Considering how little most people really know about bipolar disorder, they both suck. One means that I’m supposed to be flattered at being some sort of special snowflake and that (in some cases) I must not have to struggle with symptoms and the other means that I fit some stereotype of bipolar disorder in their heads and whatever it is they don’t like about me has now been lumped in the “mental illness symptom” pile whether it belongs there or not. Or, as my mother charmingly put it, “I just thought you were a bitch.”