So when I was poking around on Roosh’s Return of Kings blog the other day I ran across a guest post from someone calling himself Samseau accusing feminists of using racism to exploit men – that is, of expertly manipulating men of different races to fight one another instead of standing firm against the evil feminists and their evil agenda.
The post, while purporting to be somehow “above” the issue of race, is a muddled mess full of “white men have it worst” nonsense like this:
[R]acial infighting between American men wouldn’t be so bad if it weren’t for the political consequences.
Women, if you haven’t noticed, do not fight with each other over racial conflicts. They might get angry over the past, but they are able to resolve all issues by agreeing on a scapegoat: the white man. Colored women will gladly forgive their white sisters, since, after all, it was the white man who oppressed women and minorities.
White men are the big, bad, evil masters, and as such, all females of different colors can agree to put aside their differences in order to bring the white man down.
Yes, he did indeed use the term “colored women.” Oh, but there’s more.
The election results show that decades of brainwashing young American boys has been an unqualified success. Rather than have boys be loyal to their gender, boys have instead been trained to be loyal to their race.
Little non-white boys at the tender age of 9 years are fed lies about how white male oppressors created their poor living conditions, while white boys are taught that they need to correct the injustices of their forefathers lest they be guilty with the indelible sin of white privilege. Female teachers use the appropriate shaming tactics on these young minds to imprint the intended desire for conflict.
All according to plan.
And more:
Men are pawns in the race game. Thus while American women feed themselves government largesse, jobs, university degrees, their husband’s money, and child support money, American men fight each other over table scraps.
But my favorite thing about this article is the little graph that Mr. Samseau made up to illustrate the REAL issues men face today.
Yep. Race is the least important issue, while “getting laid” is number one.
It’s a pretty revealing little chart, huh?
The comment section for the article – wade into this swamp at your own peril – is (predictably enough) filled with angry racists trying to explain why race really does matter. Others, meanwhile, seem upset that all this racism is getting in the way of the regular woman-bashing. Still others suggest that men of all races needed to understand the “root cause” of all our “multicultural problems.” That being … teh Jews.
My favorite comment of the bunch, though, has to be this, from Caliente, combining an astounding ignorance of history with some half-digested evo psych:
Btw the reason why there are practically no racist women is simple.
Males of mammals are territorial.
They naturally base they identity from bottom up: family,tribe,nation,race.And naturally react negative to males of different “tribe”.
Females at the same time are receptive to have sex with any males as long as they are alpha enough.
In 19 century whites fucked all the black women because they were alpha and they had recourses,just look at Brasil.Nowadays a feminist will be cheating on her white beta herbling with some black fitness coach because that is how her brain assumes alphaness.
Wow.
Glad we got that all settled!
Looks like Mr Al/Steele’s latest posts were brought to you by the letter Y.
Argenti – don’t forget, always precede “movement” with “bowel” when referring to the MRM. It clarifies the meaning.
David, are you around? I think it’s time to check DeMRALcq’s IP address and then throw this sock in the laundry basket with all the other ones.
Seconding that.
Although now that I see the Sir Mixalot comment it could possibly be OmNom. Either way, the sock is stinky and it needs to be washed ASAP.
BAWWWWWWW
So who is this Mr Al/Steele anyway?
Does baby need his rattle and a nice little nap?
Demarcq: you aren’t smart, funny, or original. Go away, little sock monkey, go away.
Cassandra: he needs his binky and a time out. Poor thing’s over tired.
IDK Cassandra…….perhaps you should attend to your motherly duties instead of prattling on the internets.
Now he expects us to change his diaper too? Kids these days, so demanding.
I didn’t know you still wear diapers, Cassandra….Kinda gross.
I know, right? MRAs and their mommy issues are so exhausting.
I don’t give a fuck for your “truth”.
No, menstruation isn’t caused, in persons of any gender, by social conditioning. Irrelevant, moving on.
You are gender essentialist. You think a person is defined by their sex. You think that it is reasonable and obvious to have more in common with someone from a completely foreign context who happens to be the same sex as you, than someone from your own context who happens not to be.
You’ve not mentioned trans people, but if you don’t think that having breasts and menstruating makes me a woman – and that I therefore have more in common with people who live half a world a way than with the man in the next room – then I will be deeply shocked.
You think all people with the same dangly bits are alike. You are gender essentialist.
Now hurry up and fuck off.
Hmm, the fixation on Cassandra, the use of “y” in words that don’t need them… the sock is strong in this one.
“Um, gender may be a social construct but biological sex is not. Women don’t menstruate because of their societal conditioning for example. I am not going to pretend that men and women are physically indistinguishable from one another because the reality is that they are. Be mad at me all you want but that won’t silence the truth.”
Way to miss, again, that trans men and non-binaries with uterī sometimes menstruate.
As for which sock, idfk, NWO, ABNOY, Steele…they all pull this shit.
Behold, the power of the sock! A stench like that can knock a person out from miles away.
“You think all people with the same dangly bits are alike. You are gender essentialist”
Other people say dangly bits!
Back on topic, you have kids Cassandra? This is news to me, and makes me question whether socky here had mommy issues, or is your stalker troll (my apologies if the latter)
Socky here has mommy issues.
Ewww! Stinky sock.
I think this fantastic, ass-kicking comment of dagrabbit’s got caught in moderation and I am worried that not everyone got to see how much it wins everything.
Now that is a strawman if I ever saw one!
I did not mention trans people because in fact, I was talk about cissexuals. A person is not defined entirely by their sex but it is a part of who they are. Transsexuals are an exception to this. Keep in mind that *sex* of the brain is sometimes not in agreement with the sex of the body.
Dagrabbit kicks all the ass with that comment. Demarcq could learn something from it, but the words are more than one syllable.
I bet he’s got a lot of trans* friends, too.
Yet more failure.
Thanks for that link, Viscaria! Dagrabbit totally wins with that comment.
Demarq, do everyone a favour and go fuck yourself with Legos.
Demarcq, you would have more staying power if you at least pretended to give a shit about the arguments you pretend to have with people. Remember that next time.