So when I was poking around on Roosh’s Return of Kings blog the other day I ran across a guest post from someone calling himself Samseau accusing feminists of using racism to exploit men – that is, of expertly manipulating men of different races to fight one another instead of standing firm against the evil feminists and their evil agenda.
The post, while purporting to be somehow “above” the issue of race, is a muddled mess full of “white men have it worst” nonsense like this:
[R]acial infighting between American men wouldn’t be so bad if it weren’t for the political consequences.
Women, if you haven’t noticed, do not fight with each other over racial conflicts. They might get angry over the past, but they are able to resolve all issues by agreeing on a scapegoat: the white man. Colored women will gladly forgive their white sisters, since, after all, it was the white man who oppressed women and minorities.
White men are the big, bad, evil masters, and as such, all females of different colors can agree to put aside their differences in order to bring the white man down.
Yes, he did indeed use the term “colored women.” Oh, but there’s more.
The election results show that decades of brainwashing young American boys has been an unqualified success. Rather than have boys be loyal to their gender, boys have instead been trained to be loyal to their race.
Little non-white boys at the tender age of 9 years are fed lies about how white male oppressors created their poor living conditions, while white boys are taught that they need to correct the injustices of their forefathers lest they be guilty with the indelible sin of white privilege. Female teachers use the appropriate shaming tactics on these young minds to imprint the intended desire for conflict.
All according to plan.
And more:
Men are pawns in the race game. Thus while American women feed themselves government largesse, jobs, university degrees, their husband’s money, and child support money, American men fight each other over table scraps.
But my favorite thing about this article is the little graph that Mr. Samseau made up to illustrate the REAL issues men face today.
Yep. Race is the least important issue, while “getting laid” is number one.
It’s a pretty revealing little chart, huh?
The comment section for the article – wade into this swamp at your own peril – is (predictably enough) filled with angry racists trying to explain why race really does matter. Others, meanwhile, seem upset that all this racism is getting in the way of the regular woman-bashing. Still others suggest that men of all races needed to understand the “root cause” of all our “multicultural problems.” That being … teh Jews.
My favorite comment of the bunch, though, has to be this, from Caliente, combining an astounding ignorance of history with some half-digested evo psych:
Btw the reason why there are practically no racist women is simple.
Males of mammals are territorial.
They naturally base they identity from bottom up: family,tribe,nation,race.And naturally react negative to males of different “tribe”.
Females at the same time are receptive to have sex with any males as long as they are alpha enough.
In 19 century whites fucked all the black women because they were alpha and they had recourses,just look at Brasil.Nowadays a feminist will be cheating on her white beta herbling with some black fitness coach because that is how her brain assumes alphaness.
Wow.
Glad we got that all settled!
… Chateau de Murco ’93?
Brz is totally answering the “what if Br__n were pretending to be French” question.
Answer: insufferable and dull either way.
@pecunium
It might be for cigarettes, but only if he’s flashing it at CVS locations outside of Boston, like in Cambridge.
(Yes, I am a metro Boston smoker.)
A French smoker? Surely not!
I know someone who banned smoking at court
::does non-smoker preen::
Brz: “evacuate frustration”? Jesus, man, you should refrain from accusing anyone of “massacring French” as long as you produce pearls like that.
“are you in the habit of flashing your passport at grocery clerks? Is it common on the internet for people do doubt you?”
I don’t know, I think that’s something of the internet, the paranoia, the suspicion, conspiracies theories, etc,… Maybe it’s even more present in the American side of internet because American are more paranoid and have a bad sense for irony (this little conversation is a good example, as a lot of what I said has been taken far way too seriously, which is both funny and depressing).
I am in the habit of flashing my passport at grocery clerks, I do it almost every time I buy fags. But I think I’ll quit smoking soon because I perpetuate the denigration of masculinity every time I keep sucking a metaphorical penis to the point of burning it completely. I’ll try to give my part in ending this “penis burning culture”.
By the way, good night guys. Glad to have shared some love with you. Take care and enjoy.
And “give my part” is the only ESL-ism in that entire post. Not even going to touch “buy fags.” Is that meaning even in the dictionary anymore?
Well that’s a new one, smoking denigrates masculinity?! Seriously, of all that half-witted, hair-brained bullshit ideas…wow.
Anyways, Brz? Irony, it doesn’t mean what you think it means. Where you going for sarcasm perhaps?
katz — idk, I do, frequently, hear it as “well, if they said fag to mean cigarette, that’s okay” thing. As in, Americans definitely think Brits still call cigarettes fags.
“By the way, do you know that these radfems don’t have any problems with pornography that doesn’t contribute to a misogynist pro-rape culture? Yeah, I bet you didn’t know that. And that’s probably because you don’t know shit about the radfem critique of pornography. Radfems only oppose a certain kind of pornography.”
Yeah I know the story, “we don’t condemn pornography we condemn objectification of women and images that contribute to rape culture”, but in facts they condemn pornography as a whole.
How about you actually read the work of those radfems before you make ridiculous statements like that?
Yes, saying that it’s only rape if a physical threat is involved is bullshit that contributes to rape culture.
Uh, most feminists I know who support pornography and prostitution are the same ones who believe in rape culture.
Please stop acting like you understand all feminists. You don’t.
RE: Brz
But I think I’ll quit smoking soon because I perpetuate the denigration of masculinity every time I keep sucking a metaphorical penis to the point of burning it completely.
Okay, I admit it, he’s getting so absurd it’s funny.
Hon, that ain’t how you suck a penis. And if you’re slobbering that much on your cigarettes, I’m sorry for them.
Oh god, I fucked up the quotes AGAIN. v_v
But nobody actually calls them that, do they? I mean, there’s no source Frenchersons could have learned English from that would have taught that as the correct word? (He’s also buying American cigarettes, which say, you know, “cigarettes.”)
To add an even weirder Britisism – at British boarding schools there’s often a tradition where first year students are expected to run around after and do favors for students who’re in their final year (so a 12 year old and a 17 year old). At my school this consisted of waking the older person up with a cup of tea and turning on the radiator in their room before they got up, running errands for them, etc. The term for the junior in this relationship? “Fag”.
katz — American ESL wouldn’t, no. But I can’t speak for other sources.
mxe — happens to he best of us!
Cassandra & LBT — *dies laughing, twice*
RE: Argenti
I don’t even have to mentally replace the words with ‘hibbity hoo’ now! We’ve got smoking as some Freudian misandry.
Which is exactly why the Marlboro man was such a gay icon for a bit. Gay men secretly fantasize about their junk being set on fire and stuck in people’s mouths. I am such a bad gay man.
Imagine 12 year old me, who’d grown up around Americans.
Older student – How would you feel about being my fag?
Me – Excuse me?
Older student – I’d give you chocolate sometimes.
Me – (Wonders if she should call her mom)
Also since I already knew the more standard Brit meaning part of my brain was going, wait, you want to light me on fire? I don’t think that 12 year olds generally contain very much nicotine.
Lol! “No, no, you misunderstand, you just have to bring me tea and turn on the heater, maybe pick up the mail sometimes! And I’ll pay in candy!”
LBT — thanks, idk if you’re trying to kill me by laughter, or with the thought of burning dangly bits (and pubes and holy fuck would that smell horrendous)
That’s horrible, I was trying to be cool and integrated and everything (I mean not the French arrogant everyone expect me to be) by saying “fags” and that’s taken against me!
We can’t say neither “can I bum you a butt?”, I find it very “street-wise” to say it but I never dare as I’m always afraid that with my French accent I will transform it into something like “mhmmh your but” which would be very inappropriate.
Good night guys.
“Which is exactly why the Marlboro man was such a gay icon for a bit. Gay men secretly fantasize about their junk being set on fire and stuck in people’s mouths. I am such a bad gay man.”
Ohhhh, THAT’S where the term “flaming homosexual” comes from! From cigarettes! Why didn’t I see this before? =P
See, trollersons isn’t even trying. He’s just been goofing off since “pulled it out of my ass.”
A bit reminiscent of Pell in saying things that no one could possibly buy, nobody buying them, and then doubling down and getting even more ridiculous, but definitely someone else.
katz — yeah I doubt it’s Pell but the smell of used socks is strong.