So when I was poking around on Roosh’s Return of Kings blog the other day I ran across a guest post from someone calling himself Samseau accusing feminists of using racism to exploit men – that is, of expertly manipulating men of different races to fight one another instead of standing firm against the evil feminists and their evil agenda.
The post, while purporting to be somehow “above” the issue of race, is a muddled mess full of “white men have it worst” nonsense like this:
[R]acial infighting between American men wouldn’t be so bad if it weren’t for the political consequences.
Women, if you haven’t noticed, do not fight with each other over racial conflicts. They might get angry over the past, but they are able to resolve all issues by agreeing on a scapegoat: the white man. Colored women will gladly forgive their white sisters, since, after all, it was the white man who oppressed women and minorities.
White men are the big, bad, evil masters, and as such, all females of different colors can agree to put aside their differences in order to bring the white man down.
Yes, he did indeed use the term “colored women.” Oh, but there’s more.
The election results show that decades of brainwashing young American boys has been an unqualified success. Rather than have boys be loyal to their gender, boys have instead been trained to be loyal to their race.
Little non-white boys at the tender age of 9 years are fed lies about how white male oppressors created their poor living conditions, while white boys are taught that they need to correct the injustices of their forefathers lest they be guilty with the indelible sin of white privilege. Female teachers use the appropriate shaming tactics on these young minds to imprint the intended desire for conflict.
All according to plan.
And more:
Men are pawns in the race game. Thus while American women feed themselves government largesse, jobs, university degrees, their husband’s money, and child support money, American men fight each other over table scraps.
But my favorite thing about this article is the little graph that Mr. Samseau made up to illustrate the REAL issues men face today.
Yep. Race is the least important issue, while “getting laid” is number one.
It’s a pretty revealing little chart, huh?
The comment section for the article – wade into this swamp at your own peril – is (predictably enough) filled with angry racists trying to explain why race really does matter. Others, meanwhile, seem upset that all this racism is getting in the way of the regular woman-bashing. Still others suggest that men of all races needed to understand the “root cause” of all our “multicultural problems.” That being … teh Jews.
My favorite comment of the bunch, though, has to be this, from Caliente, combining an astounding ignorance of history with some half-digested evo psych:
Btw the reason why there are practically no racist women is simple.
Males of mammals are territorial.
They naturally base they identity from bottom up: family,tribe,nation,race.And naturally react negative to males of different “tribe”.
Females at the same time are receptive to have sex with any males as long as they are alpha enough.
In 19 century whites fucked all the black women because they were alpha and they had recourses,just look at Brasil.Nowadays a feminist will be cheating on her white beta herbling with some black fitness coach because that is how her brain assumes alphaness.
Wow.
Glad we got that all settled!
I understand it. It’s bog-standard apologia for rape, it’s just in french (and yes, I went to the link and read the whole piece).
You aren’t original. And you can show any number of people your passport. If it makes you feel better. But all that is immaterial. You aren’t convincing me. Your errors are inconsistent. If we assume that you are as you claim, a student in a university in Boston… I can’t see you doing well if this is the level of ability you normally display.
Combined with your idea that because you say it, it has to be taken as true (even though you admit you may be lying, and you don’t care), and your pathetic claim that anti-social behavior is the way to make the earthly paradise, while complaining that you are oppressed by people who have a different way of trying to change the way people interact (which you say is both impossible, and your final aim).
Even if you are french (though I’d lay odds against it at this point), you are a fraud.
Tell me, oh french fount of feminist familiarity; what is the general opinion of french feminists on having children?
And two of his comments later, he hasn’t noticed yet.
@pecunium
You see, you really have a problem with logical thinking.
When I reply to someone who says “rape is not sexuality, it’s power” and I respond “rape is sexuality”, you say, it’s rape-apologia.
That doesn’t make sense, if I say “zoophily is sexuality”, I don’t approve men banging their dog.
It’s a statement.
And I suggested that people who are horrified by this, that rape is in a mean time a sexual act and a crime, are people who don’t fight rape, but who fight the ambivalence of sexuality, that sexuality can be something both good and bad.
They are the people who think that ethos and eros can be completely separated with the help of police sticks.
And If I exaggerate, because I’m a little bit passionate, I would say that this is these kind of people who build gulags.
Then you’re more passionate than French. (Come on guys, you want him to go wave his passport in the street, don’t you?)
@Katz
That would probably don’t resolve the situation as I think – on a thought based on having seen a hundred grocery store clerks looking at my passport with blank eyes – that most American aren’t able anyway to understand that this is a French passport.
I think the only thing I can do about it is to mourn the recognition of my frenchness in this country.
I think I’m more French than you are, sonny Jim, and I have to go back to Normans in Scotland to get a possible influx of French blood along with the Norse.
I truly don’t believe he is French. I think he took some French in high school, and likes to wear berets.
You conflated the idea that rape is a sexual act as well as an act of power. That’s an apologia. Saying that being against rape is being against, “the ambivalence of sexuality” is apologia.
I notice in that first paragraph, the one with the complex subjects you aren’t full of clumsy grammar.
Again, you are a fraud.
The Normans were norsemen – they were Vikings who came to France. That’s literally what ‘Norman’ means. [/former history student]
My surname is Anglicised French, does that score me any points? (It’s also rare, so I’m not posting it for reasons.)
Hey, I knit berets! Does that make me extra-specially French?
CWS – yup, that’s why I mentioned a possible French influx along with the Norse: I’m assuming that if my Menzies ancestry means actual Normans somewhere, they’d be Norse with possible French thrown in, just because of geography.
Of course knowing my luck it was some little local nobody who took on his lord’s name. 😛
(Menzies derives from de Menieres. It’s not my surname.)
That would probably don’t resolve the situation as I think – on a thought based on having seen a hundred grocery store clerks looking at my passport with blank eyes – that most American aren’t able anyway to understand that this is a French passport.
What? I mean it’s got the words, “Passport” and France on it. In English, as well as French.
They may not be immediately aware of what it is, but then again when I use non Calif. ID in Tenn, or Ont. I got double takes too.
Why, pray tell, are you in the habit of flashing your passport at grocery clerks? Is it common on the internet for people do doubt you?
I suspect Brz walks around looking like this.
I’d ask to see his passport too.
cloudiah – nah, it’d be easier to take that guy seriously.
Plus the red beret is cute.
My passport’s in English and French, and it’s a British passport. I think most EU passports are bilingual.
I guess if he’s a student it could be a way of obtaining alcohol. (I recently tallied up all the occasions on which I got severely drunk, and only one of them did not involve my parents giving me booze… [/mild derail])
The ICAO guidelines for passports state that they should be bilingual; in the native language and either French, or English, or both.
So most passports have French on them.
US Passports are in both English and French.
@cloudiah
I’ve never wore a beret in my life but I have one thing in common with this man : my facial pilosity is unfortunately very abundant. I’ve always wanted to have a mustache but to my disappointment, if I want one, I would have to wear also a fake mustache.
@Creative Writing Student
My passport is also bilingual but for some reason it often confuses CVS clercks (that’s true that the english writing is really small…)
If he’s a student, on a one year term abroad and he’s shown it to “hundreds of glassy-eyed grocery clerks” in Boston, that’s not for booze. Mass has packet stores, generally. Since no company is allowed to have more than five off-premise sales locations, nor more than two in any city, the places which go to the effort of getting a license are fewer than in places like New York, New Jersey, Tenn. etc.
A grocery store can get a license, but even places which have large sales of alcohol in other states (e.g. costco, TJs) have much less in Mass.
Of course that’s assuming he has a French passport at all, let alone that he’s shown it to anyone in Boston. Store clerks wherever he is probably go glassy-eyed because he’s a tedious idiot.
But CVS in Harvard Square is one of the five locales they are using an off-premises license.
Not a grocery, but if he’s that fond of drink it might explain the lack of consistency in his “bad englishes”.
Ha, more drunk postng from Monsieur Al, eh? 😀
Ah, I forgot the US wasn’t like the UK where I could walk to the local petrol station and buy alcohol if necessary.
(I only just realised the disturbing implications of that…)
CWS: Depend on where you are. In Calif. there are gas stations which have their own label of wine.