So when I was poking around on Roosh’s Return of Kings blog the other day I ran across a guest post from someone calling himself Samseau accusing feminists of using racism to exploit men – that is, of expertly manipulating men of different races to fight one another instead of standing firm against the evil feminists and their evil agenda.
The post, while purporting to be somehow “above” the issue of race, is a muddled mess full of “white men have it worst” nonsense like this:
[R]acial infighting between American men wouldn’t be so bad if it weren’t for the political consequences.
Women, if you haven’t noticed, do not fight with each other over racial conflicts. They might get angry over the past, but they are able to resolve all issues by agreeing on a scapegoat: the white man. Colored women will gladly forgive their white sisters, since, after all, it was the white man who oppressed women and minorities.
White men are the big, bad, evil masters, and as such, all females of different colors can agree to put aside their differences in order to bring the white man down.
Yes, he did indeed use the term “colored women.” Oh, but there’s more.
The election results show that decades of brainwashing young American boys has been an unqualified success. Rather than have boys be loyal to their gender, boys have instead been trained to be loyal to their race.
Little non-white boys at the tender age of 9 years are fed lies about how white male oppressors created their poor living conditions, while white boys are taught that they need to correct the injustices of their forefathers lest they be guilty with the indelible sin of white privilege. Female teachers use the appropriate shaming tactics on these young minds to imprint the intended desire for conflict.
All according to plan.
And more:
Men are pawns in the race game. Thus while American women feed themselves government largesse, jobs, university degrees, their husband’s money, and child support money, American men fight each other over table scraps.
But my favorite thing about this article is the little graph that Mr. Samseau made up to illustrate the REAL issues men face today.
Yep. Race is the least important issue, while “getting laid” is number one.
It’s a pretty revealing little chart, huh?
The comment section for the article – wade into this swamp at your own peril – is (predictably enough) filled with angry racists trying to explain why race really does matter. Others, meanwhile, seem upset that all this racism is getting in the way of the regular woman-bashing. Still others suggest that men of all races needed to understand the “root cause” of all our “multicultural problems.” That being … teh Jews.
My favorite comment of the bunch, though, has to be this, from Caliente, combining an astounding ignorance of history with some half-digested evo psych:
Btw the reason why there are practically no racist women is simple.
Males of mammals are territorial.
They naturally base they identity from bottom up: family,tribe,nation,race.And naturally react negative to males of different “tribe”.
Females at the same time are receptive to have sex with any males as long as they are alpha enough.
In 19 century whites fucked all the black women because they were alpha and they had recourses,just look at Brasil.Nowadays a feminist will be cheating on her white beta herbling with some black fitness coach because that is how her brain assumes alphaness.
Wow.
Glad we got that all settled!
Agreed Katz, plus the whole anti-American obsession. That’s a another common French stereotype that I’ve never encountered in reality.
It’s like he thought, “I’ll pretend to be French! But I won’t talk about cheese and garlic! That would be too obvious! I’m going to be much more subtle than that and play into stereotypes that even educated people think are true!”.
No man, you just basically created a parody of a Frenchman that middle class people wirh houses in the south of france would laugh at, rather than a stereotype that someone who once went on a day trip to Calais would laugh at.
You want real French stereotypes that are actually true? Let me talk to you about French driving (indicators, what are indicators?) and the French habit of shutting up shop (including those that sell food) for lunch every day, about “Fermi la Lundi”, about the fact that people in the countryside still wear mullets and that their clothes shops love nothing better than to take styles that are popular in the UK and then add embellishment for no apparent reason.
Oh and textured wall paper, they love that. And door handles that skin your knuckles when you open and close them.
I’m trying to figure out what mental process gets you to put “hate speech” and “live and let live” on the same list. Because those are literally opposites.
And the greatly fanciable little wretch Louis Renault! 🙂
Katz, what movie is that? It sounds interesting, I’m always on the look out for good films that I haven’t seen.
Ooh, somewhere a conservative is getting his panties in a twist over that. “You’re introducing doubt as to the inherent moral rectitude of military action into the minds of these soldiers! And there’s, like, no Americans in this whole movie!”
Random movie that was quite good – The White Ribbon, It’s Austrian.
I may have been born in the UK but as a half-Latvian, half-Irish, anti-State violence, anti-monarchist who doesn’t believe in borders… I’m sitting this one out.
I will continue to drink their tea and beer, and eat their breakfasts though.
Historophilia: The Battle of Algiers.
And it didn’t win a single Oscar. Admittedly, A Man for All Seasons was released the same year.
I’m English (mostly) and from Norfolk. I have but one word to contribute.
“Nelson” :p
And here I was thinking of Casablanca! 😀
I love that movie. The ululating!
A Savage War of Peace is a good book about the war in Algeria too, if anyone is interested.
Katz, that’s definitely next on my “to watch” list.
Is “I’m Algerian but I totally support French colonialism” the new “I am totally and for real a woman, and now I’m going to talk about how excited I was to see another girl’s bra in the laundry room”?
The Quebecois thing was a joke, I swear. Like katz said, my money is on brz’s nationality being firmly Trollandian.
The soundtrack is absolutely brilliant.
@mxe354
“By the way, do you know that these radfems don’t have any problems with pornography that doesn’t contribute to a misogynist pro-rape culture? Yeah, I bet you didn’t know that. And that’s probably because you don’t know shit about the radfem critique of pornography. Radfems only oppose a certain kind of pornography.”
Yeah I know the story, “we don’t condemn pornography we condemn objectification of women and images that contribute to rape culture”, but in facts they condemn pornography as a whole.
“Quite a few feminists are okay with sex work and pornography.”
I know, we had in France the example of Marcela Iacub and Christine Millet and guess what they had been vigorously criticized by feminists for having both said things that could contribute to rape culture : Christine Millet said that a rape is a sexual intercourse imposed by physical threat, nothing more and the first have said that we had invented a “police theory of women’s liberation”.
They are not from the same type of feminism, they are the feminists it is possible to discuss with because their don’t have for secret desire the need to throw innocent people in jail.
Non-puritan feminists are cool, they can be if they want in my not yet formed non-victim group if they want.
But I can see that a non-puritan feminist who don’t want to put innocent people in jail are always feminists who don’t believe in the “rape culture” and who don’t oppose nor pornography nor prostitution.
Now he’s mixing up his French and his Italian ESL tics.
(I’ve never seen a French person say “a sexual intercourse”.)
Sorry dear, the conversation has moved on. If you’d like to join in, you may discuss either The Battle of Algiers or the many reasons you are obviously not French.
I’m also taking suggestions for the Netflix list.
His faux-ESL keeps slipping all over the place. How’s the student laundry these days, Mr Al?
Just read that to Himself and he did a very French eye-roll. 😀
Doesn’t Pell claim to be based in Cambridge, too? The claims of superiority certainly fit his MO…
I will translate the words of Marcela Iacub, you might find some intellectual material to put yourself in question a little bit :
“[To the eyes of the feminists] this old punishing machine is the royal way to inverse the relations of force in the society. That’s how we rely the punishments of ones with the emancipation of others, that the prison become the center of all the political utopias of this movement and that we confound the emancipation of women with the police function, or instead that we create a police theory of the emancipation of women”.
Quoted in this article :
http://leplus.nouvelobs.com/contribution/322237-viol-l-emancipation-des-femmes-ne-passe-pas-forcement-par-la-justice.html
(You can also find if you want a comment of mine in the comments’ section)
I don’t think it’s MRAL; didn’t we have a foreign-language troll earlier? Someone who was really really bad at actually speaking the language?
Could be Pell. The appeal to his own authority, certainly.
Too many big words to be Pell, I think.