So when I was poking around on Roosh’s Return of Kings blog the other day I ran across a guest post from someone calling himself Samseau accusing feminists of using racism to exploit men – that is, of expertly manipulating men of different races to fight one another instead of standing firm against the evil feminists and their evil agenda.
The post, while purporting to be somehow “above” the issue of race, is a muddled mess full of “white men have it worst” nonsense like this:
[R]acial infighting between American men wouldn’t be so bad if it weren’t for the political consequences.
Women, if you haven’t noticed, do not fight with each other over racial conflicts. They might get angry over the past, but they are able to resolve all issues by agreeing on a scapegoat: the white man. Colored women will gladly forgive their white sisters, since, after all, it was the white man who oppressed women and minorities.
White men are the big, bad, evil masters, and as such, all females of different colors can agree to put aside their differences in order to bring the white man down.
Yes, he did indeed use the term “colored women.” Oh, but there’s more.
The election results show that decades of brainwashing young American boys has been an unqualified success. Rather than have boys be loyal to their gender, boys have instead been trained to be loyal to their race.
Little non-white boys at the tender age of 9 years are fed lies about how white male oppressors created their poor living conditions, while white boys are taught that they need to correct the injustices of their forefathers lest they be guilty with the indelible sin of white privilege. Female teachers use the appropriate shaming tactics on these young minds to imprint the intended desire for conflict.
All according to plan.
And more:
Men are pawns in the race game. Thus while American women feed themselves government largesse, jobs, university degrees, their husband’s money, and child support money, American men fight each other over table scraps.
But my favorite thing about this article is the little graph that Mr. Samseau made up to illustrate the REAL issues men face today.
Yep. Race is the least important issue, while “getting laid” is number one.
It’s a pretty revealing little chart, huh?
The comment section for the article – wade into this swamp at your own peril – is (predictably enough) filled with angry racists trying to explain why race really does matter. Others, meanwhile, seem upset that all this racism is getting in the way of the regular woman-bashing. Still others suggest that men of all races needed to understand the “root cause” of all our “multicultural problems.” That being … teh Jews.
My favorite comment of the bunch, though, has to be this, from Caliente, combining an astounding ignorance of history with some half-digested evo psych:
Btw the reason why there are practically no racist women is simple.
Males of mammals are territorial.
They naturally base they identity from bottom up: family,tribe,nation,race.And naturally react negative to males of different “tribe”.
Females at the same time are receptive to have sex with any males as long as they are alpha enough.
In 19 century whites fucked all the black women because they were alpha and they had recourses,just look at Brasil.Nowadays a feminist will be cheating on her white beta herbling with some black fitness coach because that is how her brain assumes alphaness.
Wow.
Glad we got that all settled!
but paranoia is not good for blood pressure, try to avoid it in the future.
Sorry, Nous sommes perdus!!!!!!!
Watch out, he’s about to evacuate those bits that trolls always need to evacuate, which is why they troll in the first place.
Seriously, dude, at least go do that in the bathroom or the bedroom. Certain kinds of anti-social behavior often lead to arrest, after all.
Oh no, poor Pierre might run into this twerp!
I think my vote can be assumed to have been cast!
“I think I might actually MISS NWO!”
You too?!
I bet Brz, is from Paris, Parisians have a reputation for being arseholes that is justly deserved.
It is perhaps not hugely well known fact that everyone from outside Paris in France hates them, particularly those in the far South.
Down where my family visits, the Aude has a particular hatred for them which seems to stem in part from the persecution that the Cathars and Albigensians (medieval heretics) suffered from at the hands of the Northern french, though these weren’t all Parisians. The persecution was viewed as having been instigated from Paris.
LBT: Nicolas Chauvin is supposed to have been a soldier in both the armies of the First Republic, the Consulate, and then the Empire. In all of these he was said to have served under Napoleon.
He is the source of the word, chauvinism (i.e. the idea that one group is, by some for of innate worth: in his case being French, superior to all others).
A friend of mine used to have a Parisian room-mate. Obnoxious git, that guy was. Couldn’t take him anywhere without him picking fights with random people.
(I especially resented him doing that with wait staff, since I’d rather not tempt people to spit in my food.)
Sure there is, it’s called “David bans you.”
But if your boundaries are as bad as I think they are, you’ll be back, Socky.
Sorry, Frenchersons, we don’t hate you. We are, at best, slightly amused by you.
Mr. Al? He’s intentional mangling English after being questioned on whether he was intentionally mangling English.
That was my thought. Plus people actually from a place don’t mention it every time they open their mouths.
The only French thing that I have genuine objections to is their pop music. Sorry, but my tolerance ends where “Joe le Taxi” begins.
“Okay, now I KNOW he ain’t French. He gotta be a bonafide Quebecois, with that attitude. (That or a big devotee of Les Immortales.)”
Quebecois? Nahh. Not sprinkled with enough English swear words. =D
There is a certain class of Quebecois* that I deal with for work, that are raging assbags, to a man. I always hope it’ll be different, but nope.
*Our regular Quebecois posters are all awesome to deal with.
“I bet Brz, is from Paris”
Good guess, I know we’re horrible, but we always try to stop being Parisian but that’s so difficult.
Behind every snobbish insulting Parisian, lays a good heart eager to be loved but scared to be rejected, accept us and the love will be return.
But not for the Americans, or at at least the ones who are too American, that’s out of the question, one should always discriminate a little.
Historophilia – the funny thing was, when Mum and I visited Paris in ’89 and ’93, my experience was just the opposite, and we’d been told about the arrogant French, etc. I met two obnoxious people in total: one was the manager of our hotel (and his son soon shut him up) and the other was a railway worker (and as one myself at the time, I knew that was an international phenomenon). Everyone else, from shop assistants to buskers to strangers in the street, was friendly and helpful. It wasn’t because we spoke French, either. We had a smattering of traveller’s French (never did have to ask for le syndicate d’initiative) but they were happy to try their English on us. Mind you, it was probably easier than listening to our attempts at French, lol. But even the people who didn’t speak English were happy to do the pointing and smiling and gesturing stuff when we were trying to communicate.
I’m well aware that my small bit of anecdata doesn’t make a jot of difference, but it’s curious. Perhaps having a miniature of a French king on display made the difference!
Brz: You leavin’ bro? I thought it you were gonna go all out and show us the real gallic trollisme. Instead you are leaving?
Poor show. And here I said the whole, “cheese-eating surrender monkeys” was unjustified (what with a great showing [underrated] in WW1, competent (albeit with a notable lack of comprehension on how to use the best tanks in the world at the time) response to the German Invasion in WW2, and some stellar feats of arms in Indochina and Algeria (misguided though both those efforts were in terms of moral rectitude, and terrible as the political uses of terror against the subject population was in Algiers/Algeria).
But here you are, facing no more than minor mockery (we were just getting warmed up) and you quit the field? Where is the élan of Verdun? The Glory of Agincourt? The brave folly of Crecy? Where is the spirit of Louis XIV (ok, well I know where that spirit is, but it’s neither here nor there to the conversation)? Where is the fire which Charlemagne conferred, and the Capetians nurtured?
Is all of it faded to dust? Are the best days of la belle France lost, because her sons and daughters have not the courage to face Americans?
The shame.
Quite a few feminists are okay with sex work and pornography. And I assure you that the feminists who think otherwise aren’t even close to being puritans.
No.They believe that pornography is harmful because it contributes to a culture that disregards the importance of consent and a culture that views women’s bodies as objects.
The “pure sexuality” these radfems are concerned with is consensual sexuality. They oppose everything that is hostile to consent and perpetuates misogyny. That’s all they oppose. Radfems don’t give a shit about sexual purity because they view the idea of sexual purity as oppressive. And that aversion to the notion of sexual purity is what makes these radfems profoundly different from puritans.
By the way, do you know that these radfems don’t have any problems with pornography that doesn’t contribute to a misogynist pro-rape culture? Yeah, I bet you didn’t know that. And that’s probably because you don’t know shit about the radfem critique of pornography. Radfems only oppose a certain kind of pornography.
Nope. Radfems don’t advocate for the elimination of sexuality in public.
Never.
Resulted in one of the best movies of all time, though.
“Is all of it faded to dust? Are the best days of la belle France lost, because her sons and daughters have not the courage to face Americans?”
Tabernac!! *shakes puny fist of fury*
My time in Paris was great. Everyone was swell (well the doctor was a bit brusque, but how was I to know that 1: specialty clinic were open on a Sunday, 2: I should go to them directly, 3: they close at 1300?).
My french was adequate and no one made me feel they were looking down on me for my mistakes.
Sitting in front of the fire if he has any sense, it’s been snowing for days over There.
Also, I’m Scottish. What about the Auld Alliance, dude? We should be ganging up on the English, not arguing with the Americans!
(Please note that this is not a genuine offer.)
katz: Resulted in one of the best movies of all time, though.
Yes, yes it did. We made people watch it when we were getting ready to deploy.
I somehow suspect this was not a common thing.