So when I was poking around on Roosh’s Return of Kings blog the other day I ran across a guest post from someone calling himself Samseau accusing feminists of using racism to exploit men – that is, of expertly manipulating men of different races to fight one another instead of standing firm against the evil feminists and their evil agenda.
The post, while purporting to be somehow “above” the issue of race, is a muddled mess full of “white men have it worst” nonsense like this:
[R]acial infighting between American men wouldn’t be so bad if it weren’t for the political consequences.
Women, if you haven’t noticed, do not fight with each other over racial conflicts. They might get angry over the past, but they are able to resolve all issues by agreeing on a scapegoat: the white man. Colored women will gladly forgive their white sisters, since, after all, it was the white man who oppressed women and minorities.
White men are the big, bad, evil masters, and as such, all females of different colors can agree to put aside their differences in order to bring the white man down.
Yes, he did indeed use the term “colored women.” Oh, but there’s more.
The election results show that decades of brainwashing young American boys has been an unqualified success. Rather than have boys be loyal to their gender, boys have instead been trained to be loyal to their race.
Little non-white boys at the tender age of 9 years are fed lies about how white male oppressors created their poor living conditions, while white boys are taught that they need to correct the injustices of their forefathers lest they be guilty with the indelible sin of white privilege. Female teachers use the appropriate shaming tactics on these young minds to imprint the intended desire for conflict.
All according to plan.
And more:
Men are pawns in the race game. Thus while American women feed themselves government largesse, jobs, university degrees, their husband’s money, and child support money, American men fight each other over table scraps.
But my favorite thing about this article is the little graph that Mr. Samseau made up to illustrate the REAL issues men face today.
Yep. Race is the least important issue, while “getting laid” is number one.
It’s a pretty revealing little chart, huh?
The comment section for the article – wade into this swamp at your own peril – is (predictably enough) filled with angry racists trying to explain why race really does matter. Others, meanwhile, seem upset that all this racism is getting in the way of the regular woman-bashing. Still others suggest that men of all races needed to understand the “root cause” of all our “multicultural problems.” That being … teh Jews.
My favorite comment of the bunch, though, has to be this, from Caliente, combining an astounding ignorance of history with some half-digested evo psych:
Btw the reason why there are practically no racist women is simple.
Males of mammals are territorial.
They naturally base they identity from bottom up: family,tribe,nation,race.And naturally react negative to males of different “tribe”.
Females at the same time are receptive to have sex with any males as long as they are alpha enough.
In 19 century whites fucked all the black women because they were alpha and they had recourses,just look at Brasil.Nowadays a feminist will be cheating on her white beta herbling with some black fitness coach because that is how her brain assumes alphaness.
Wow.
Glad we got that all settled!
The Gulag Door-Keepers is MY new band.
I’ll open for both of you! My new band is Antisocial for the Good of Society. =D
“understanding privilege and intersectionality would be too much to ask”.
Yes it is very difficult for me to understand that that kind of crap is being taught in universities in United Stated, I’ve never seen a French scholar have the boldness to say “a white feminist cannot condemn a black-on-white rape as a hate crime because white privilege and intersectionality”, because French leftists are still thinking with the Marxist theories and we can say anything we want about Marxist, that’s still something logical based on something more solid than “institutional racism/sexism” which existence is only proved by the massive use of its word in the “some-victim-group studies” workshops.
It would be regrettable that the French universities allow a room for that kind of non-sense, there would be less room for real intellectual thinking and philosophical debate, but that’s OK as the goals of my yet non-existent non-victim group is not to forbid people to believe and claim that they are victim of a threat that don’t exist but to allow a room for people who want to publicly claim that they are not victims and forbid others to use them for any totalitarian purpose and to try to prevent victim groups from creating totalitarian laws and measures.
I don’t claim to be a a “privilege-denying upper middle class white, straight, cis-man”, as it has been suggested, I am a French Algerian, straight, cis-man, from a “neighborhood”, like we say politely in our country who desire to be a upper middle class non-victim man, but if I can only remain a lower class non-victim man that’s OK.
I don’t pretend that I’m special, I prefer to think that I’m not, and my yet non-existent group will have for main purpose to gather people like me.
Hate speech, refusal of victimhood, live and let live. No one’s with me?
Yeah, let’s just disregard the effect of misogynistic speech on the perpetuation of sexist cultural norms. Clearly that doesn’t matter.
Also, one can be easily outraged and not be authoritarian. Quite a few people are like that. And being offended for the right reason is never a bad thing. In particular, it’s reasonable to be offened by someone being a misogynist asshole.
It is our absurd fear of vulnerablity that is making this society so shitty, so yeah, I think I’d rather just tell you to fuck off. I’ll live and let live, but only if the others who live aren’t assholes. If that’s the case, then I’ll call them out on their assholery without reservation.
We’re too busy with band practice and also with being decent human beings.
““a white feminist cannot condemn a black-on-white rape as a hate crime because white privilege and intersectionality””
^ Plus de la merde, monsieur?
My band doesn’t have a name. It’s a yet non-existent non-victim group.
Yes, let’s group together a lot of deluded privileged people who believe in victim blaming. For the best of mankind future. Amen.
You know what, you can just ignore my previous response to you if you want. This paragraph really shows me how biased and ignorant you are in matters of social justice. There’s no reason to argue with you. Nothing good can come out of it.
The best that can be said of this guy is that, given the language barrier, I don’t think any of us really know what the fuck he’s on about. For all I know, he’s trying to recommend us a barbecue joint in San Antonio.
I think he’s being very clear despite the fact that his English is a bit strange.
For all I know, he’s trying to recommend us a barbecue joint in San Antonio.
You think he’d recommend something non-French? :p
@mxe354
“I’ll live and let live, but only if the others who live aren’t assholes.”
My belief is that we can improve society by trolling easily offended people to permit a better acceptance of speech assholery and remove the stick in the ass of a lot of people.
That’s you who own a “absurd fear of vulnerability” because you think that misogynist speech have a effect “on the perpetuation of sexist cultural norms.”
I will not cut my dick and enter in a monastery because some scholar feminist says that the only thing I can do with what by the grace of nature I hold between my legs is rape women and world will be better without me, I will laugh at her or ignore her.
The only problem is when she calls to innocent people being jailed.
Hate speech is fun, hate speech is good for the wealth of a democratic city.
What we have to remove is the fear for a little bit of healthy chaos.
Hate speech is fun!
Yay!
And not at all an excuse for violence against the marginalized! Sweet!
..you have an interesting relationship with reality.
It’s quite clear what FrenchBro is saying. Possibly this is because having grown up around his British equivalents and then living in Texas for a while I speak fluent Reactionary Assholish.
“Plus de la merde, monsieur?”
Dagrabbit, this sentence is wrong, totally, deeply, outrageously wrong.
If you continues massacring our beloved superior language, I create a hate group advocating for the colonization of the United States in order to make you learn a little bit of French grammar so you stop massacring our beloved superior language.
Or we can respect others as human beings of equal worth and refrain from being bigoted assholes who perpetuate various forms of social oppression in order to be assholes. It’s not that fucking hard.
We can engender an anti-authoritarian ethos without being bigots.
Nope, you can’t turn my own argument against me, as cool as it might make you look. You are the one who has that fear because you can’t accept the fact that victims exist and that some groups are more vulnerable than others.
That you can’t even see how speaking like a misogynist perpetuates misogynist attitudes is astounding.
This doesn’t merit a single intelligent response. All you’re doing here is showing that you have no idea what most feminist scholars are like.
Dude, you started it by murdering our language. Don’t like it both ways? Well, go figure.
I guess some kinds of speech ARE too much for you.
He’s got to be a Poe, right? Next he’s going to tell us he’s wearing a beret and eating a baguette.
No one except the most radical of radical feminists would think this. You think we’re all radfems? Read the site header? Run it through the translation software of your choice, dipshit.
Fuck you, toolshed.
@Cassandra
Since he’s French Algerian, I’d say he’s more Herman Cain than Newt Gingrich.
While staring out a window looking at the Eiffel Tower.
Maybe this will make him go away.
Troll harder, monsieur de la merde.
(By this point I’m sure it’s clear that I want to be talking about anything other than what he’s actually saying.)