Fellas! Better hold on to yourselves, because I’ve got some terrible news for you.
Actually, you’d better NOT hold on to yourselves. Because this is the news, straight from that always 100% reliable news source, the Men’s Rights subreddit:
I wonder if manginal orgasms are still allowed?
“Everyone’s 100% okay with you enjoying yourself by yourself or with other willing parties, so there’s no issue, right?
…
Right?”
Willing parties.
Willing parties.
And herein is the gist of the problem.
Kittehs’ Help: Yeah, makes sense in Fake MRA Worldview, which I think is where I was going, but the possibility remained of it being read the other way and causing offence and upset and suchlike.
I think they are still really upset about the evol feminists objecting to d00dz sticking their dicks in people while those people are asleep.
I certainly read it as MRM Bizarroworld!
thebewilderness – or just the idea of insertee having any say in the matter at all.
Obviously the insertee would be anti male orgasm if they opposed such goings on.
Indeed yes. And we know from NWO that women
deliberately arousing men and refusing them sexexisting is the equivalent of rape, indeed much worse because it’s totally a thing and happens all the time.….so did that actually come from anywhere or did that guys favorite porn site just crash?
@lowquacks
It sure sounds like it. alphabetpal up there sure doesn’t seem to be on topic though, does he? Orgasms don’t seem to have a big part to play in the class struggle.
Well, according to the logic of the dude in question, sexually frustrated dudes are better soldiers… for a revolution, I guess?
The original article is definitely doing the privileged-radical-leftists thing cloudiah and I mentioned above.
Wouldn’t sexually frustrated soldiers be more likely to get distracted and make mistakes?
I mean, look at the Sacred Band of Thebes, actually. One of the most renowned fighting forces of Ancient Greece, and about as far from sexually frustrated as you can get. 😉
@lowquacks
OH! I had no idea what alphabetpal was trying to say. (Even knowing the topic they were supposed to be discussing. I just got “misunderstanding of Dworkin, MacKinnon, argle bargle, soldiers.”
Starla – probably, lol. And after all we know “men’s rights” equal “everything must cater to my boner”.
MorkaisChosen – maybe this doucheberry just read Lysistrata and thought it was history!
) Damn parentheses always wandering away on me.
Check out alphabetpal’s comment history.
@The Kittehs’ Unpaid Help
Why do you hate white men? Basic hygiene!
@kitteh
I know it’s just so random…and I can totally imagine the computer screen flickering off and this guy screaming “THOSE DAMN FEMINISTS!”
I’m a little curious to see what the comments were to this.
Some Gal – curses, you have discovered my secret!
Good to see that Our Libertarian Constitutionalist friend is willing to forego those principles to praise socialist writers if there’s enough woman-hating involved! Seriously, the only thing US-style libertarians had going for them was consistency, and now not even that…
WASHING DETERGENT IS MISANDRY
@cloudiah
Well, what a catch! Racist, homophobic and misogynistic!
I can’t resist sharing this from his comment history:
Saying what Diogenes was getting at with his impossible bullshit. (Still bullshit though.)
The MRM trifecta – what a surprise.
Ah yes, the hair = dirty notion. Or women must be hairless. Or just incompetence. Or (kindest interpretation) spins out a bit about getting hair of any sort in his mouth.