Merry Christmas, to everyone who celebrates it. To everyone else, Happy Tuesday!
After you’ve finished off your Christmas and/or Tuesday dinner, please nominate your favorite troll(s) for Man Boobz’ Second Annual Troll of the Year competition!
Also, there’s no reason why we can’t have more than one category for the troll awards. Suggest some inventive categories! Most Persistent, perhaps?
Pecunium the Tedious: I have been placed on moderation to prevent me from eviscerating your comments in real time; it allows you the last word. Very clever. Furthermore, frankly, I am surprised the Boobz King let my comment through.
Is Steelpole defending why he isn’t a troll or why he’s better at trolling than everyone else? Either way, I definitely want to read it. Remember, Steelie, if you annoy us, you’re trollin’.
And you can always post your defense on your blog!
I suppose many of them see themselves as Flame Warriors for the cause rather than trolls.
Just one of their many fails per day.
He’s probably scared he’d look desperate if he asked vyle feminists to read his blog for context …
Are you rehearsing your acceptance speech, Steelie-poo?
Don’t you love how he calls it a registry? Does he think we’ve set up RegisterTroll.com?
(OOOH go on Dave, do it, do it!)
Steelpole, like all trolls who have socked because we didn’t take their first handles seriously, doesn’t understand the concept of looking desperate.
Pecunium
Notice how I didn’t say that.
I guess I should write it out more formally. I hope I can be forgiven for not knowing the alt+ for all the terms.
All A’s are B’s All trolls here are misogynists
X = A Diogenes The Cynic is a troll
Therefore Therefore
X=B Diogenes The Cynic is a misogynist.
P→Q
(The conditional proposition)
P┌Q
The problem is that I am not a misogynist. Thats the logic fail. The conditional proposition is wrong.
Can we have a Best Poster contest and the winner gets added to the Man Boobz store?
^Talk about stiff competition!
Dumbass, you’ve made misogynistic statements and assumptions all over the place and flatly refused to even think about the problems with them when they’re pointed out to you. So yes, whether you believe it or not, you are a misogynist. You’re not one of the rabid variety – nobody’s saying you are – but you need to take a good look at your beliefs and LISTEN when people point out the problems with them. You speak from a very male-privileged position and really don’t get it. Misogyny isn’t one-size-fits-all any more than feminism is, so don’t come the “I’m not a misogynist!” cries when your history here says otherwise.
*is dead now*
Diogenes; I’ve just read the responses to your comment; and I am appalled. I hope you do not take anyone here at Boobzland seriously; they are a collective of groupthinking misandrists; enforcers of the feminist status quo. Male privilege, as Unpaid Help evokes (tedious… they have the same three buzzwords) doesn’t exist.
And this:
Thus saying the exact opposite of what he means! Oh gods, he’s a shoo-in for the Andrea Dworkin Language Prize at the very least.
Perfect, just perfect. A Poe would be dead of envy.
PS shouldn’t Steele have his own category of Mangled Metaphors in the glossary? “To toe the dogma” is priceless. I haven’t seen such gems since my first boss used to come out with stuff like “biting at straws”.
Unpaid Help, you dolt, “to toe the dogma” clearly implies to challenge the dogma; that is, to question the misandrist assumptions that underpin, foundationally, the Manboobz apparatus. Typical Boobzland dishonesty.
I tried to toe my dogma. It bit me.
Animal cruelty! :O
So does “toe the line” mean to challenge the line? So confused!
It must do!
You can try to be the Inception of trolling… but you’re no Inception.
Pompous, tedious, pointless, overestimates his own relevance and intelligence by a factor of about 10 billion – sounds like Inception to me…
PS shouldn’t Steele have his own category of Mangled Metaphors in the glossary?
Indeed, furthermore, thus and besides, he is quite the jester’s fool.
Now he kicks dogs too? Criminy!
No snark at sexists today, but is that a Louis Wain postcard? <3
So wait, Steele’s been let through mod to defend himself against charges of Worst Abuser of English and he attempts to defend himself with these gems?
First and foremost, that is not how semi-colons work. Second, ellipsis in your parenthetical is either excessively long, or proof you lost your train of thought.
I repeat — that is not how semi-colons work. Also, kiki’s right, to “toe the line” means to conform to the standard. So then “to toe the dogma” or “implies [a] challense to the dogma”? Which were you going for there? They’re directly contradictory, so please pick one.
Last, but certainly not least —
For the love of all things holy! Stop butchering the semi-colon, what did it ever do to you?!
In summary, you’ve just offered proof that you are, in fact, the Worst Abuser of English; you attempted to defend against that charge, and instead supported it, nicely done. (This is how a semi-colon works, you could replace it with a period and the clauses would function as separate sentences. Please stop using them as random thought separators, that’s what commas are for.)