Here at Man Boobz, I’ve set it so first-time commenters have their comments sent to moderation so I can decide if they’re sort of people I want to have commenting here on a regular basis. Given the obnoxiousness of some of the people I let through, I imagine some of you might wonder just what it takes to get censored around here. So here, as a public service of sorts, is one recent comment from a first-timer that I didn’t let through.
It’s from someone claiming to be Chris Key, the Australian dude who runs Men’s Rights Online, offering his thoughts on Paul Elam’s recent hate campaign. (I’m pretty sure it really is him.) As you read, you might want to consider the irony of his complaints about the “foul, aggressive language” of the protestors.
Speaking of which TRIGGER WARNING for abusive language.
.
.
.
Is manboobz.com a playground for patients from North America’s most notorious psychiatric ward?
Seriously, the amount of insane drivel on here has the potential to cause any sane person to ask the aforementioned question. The fact that you fuckwits are trying to portray this goofy, hatemongering feminazi as as a “victim” is beyond insane.
The hatemongering feminazis who protested against Farrell were shouting vulgarities and physically blocking all entrances to the building. That’s intimidation and a suppression of free speech, which is a form of violence. Go watch the videos on YouTube if you don’t believe me, and you’ll see that these feminazi dykes and cunts — as well as the mangina losers who were sniffing around for a sympathy fuck — used foul, aggressive language while barricading the entrances so that the men who wanted to attend the meeting could not get inside.
If a bunch of men did that at a women’s conference then you loopy cunts would claim it’s “proof” that MRAs are uncivilised and violent. Anyone who has a shred of credibility and objectivity can see that the purpose behind these cunts’ actions was to intimidate and suppress the voices of people they do not agree with. If you dopey cunts think that’s okay then it proves that you’re nothing but a bunch of hatemongering fascists who need to spend a night in a watchhouse, as it’s patently obvious that you’re too deluded, stupid and hateful to learn the art of acting decency any other way.
I find it ironic that you losers claim that MRAs are violent. Do I need to remind you spasticated cunts that feminists are violent murderers who intimidate anyone who doesn’t bow down to them?
Take the case of Erin Pizzey as a prime example of what I’m talking about. The feminazis in England murdered her dog and sent numerous death threats to her family, for no other reason than she publicly stated that the women who came to her women’s shelter — Pizzey set up the first women’s shelter in England — were every bit as violent as the men they accused of attacking them. Poor Erin was exposed to so many threats a well organised group of feminazis that she had to flee the country and resettle in the USA.
Don’t take my word for it, see for yourselves:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=a41532d6-d4df-46a2-a784-f6499938f3b0
Pizzey isn’t the first person to experience violence at the hands of feminists. Researchers from the USA experienced something similiar. I think Strauss was one of the victims. Another one was a woman, but I cannot remember her name.
I suppose I’m going to be banned now for speaking the truth, just like you cunts did to gateman. On manboobz.com, only feminist lies and libel directed at MRAS is tolerated by its fat, goofy, unloved owner and its filthy, insane, deceitful, hateful community.
So, there’s that. And there are, alas, many more where that came from.
Also, as far as I can tell, there’s no proof that feminists — or feminazis — killed Pizzey’s dog. This is often asserted as fact, but in the only direct statement from Pizzey on the subject that I’ve been able to find she only says that “one of my dogs was shot on Christmas day on my property.” She insinuates that it was the work of feminists, but does not say so outright, presumably because she does not know for sure. If anyone has any more evidence on the subject I would like to see it.
It goes without saying that whoever did kill Pizzey’s dog, assuming the incident did happen, was and is terrible and wrong. But I’m still not quite sure how this decades-old alleged incident gives MRAs today the license to harass feminists who weren’t even born when it allegedly happened.
… Dude.
That is *complete fucking bullshit.*
Fermat’s Last Theorem was proved by Andrew Wiles. More specifically, Andrew Wiles proved the Taniyama-Shimura-Wiles Theorem (formerly Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture), which someone else had previously demonstrated implied FLT.
Thinking for a minute and declaring that “the numbers don’t scale that way” is not a mathematical proof. It’s *true* that the numbers don’t scale that way – we know this precisely because Wiles proved it – but it’s not an obvious fact that you can just state and have accepted.
Mathematicians spent over a century just demonstrating that there are no solutions for the first few integers.
Please, please, please bring some basic knowledge of how mathematical proof works to the table if you want to have this conversation.
Speaking as a recovering mathematician, fuck you. “The numbers don’t scale that way”? Go fuck yourself. See, here’s the thing about mathematics and why you’ll always suck at it. Mathematics doesn’t give a shit about your gut feelings. It doesn’t care about your assumptions, it doesn’t matter what you think is “obvious”. All the pseudo-intellectual wankery in the world won’t get you even the basic properties of the integers, especially if you simply proclaim that it’s obvious or clear or duh or whatever.
Why don’t you show this to your Rebbe, remembering that this is a drastic oversimplification of the incredibly complex mathematics involved in the proof, a beautiful proof that one of the most intelligent people on earth spent 7 years working night and day on, and then tell him to suck on it.
Knock knock
Who’s there?
Some guy who..
OMG you want to beat up men! I knew that women were all like that! You want to knock men around! Vile!
Does Diogenes know there isn’t a prize for Most Boring Troll?
MorkaisChosen, that was a lot nicer… sorry for the meltdown everybody.
Diogenes in a nutshell.
I begin to suspect that he has no idea how to join a conversation.
On the other hand, being a troll, quite likely he has no interest in joining the conversation and is here simply to persuade someone, anyone, to talk with him about him.
Diogynes is basically Mr Al without the profanity-laced meltdowns.
@Nepenthe – meh, don’t worry about it far as I’m concerned. He’s had that coming for a while.
Actually to be fair, Mr Al is wittier.
Nepenthe: MATHS NERD TAGTEAM GO!
Nepenthe: note where I opened with *complete fucking bullshit.* I thought yours was better on grounds of sounding more like you care. 😉
Nepethe: you have nothing to apologize for.
Diogenes: Laws may restrict free speech, but because its a part of human dignity, the laws are null and void, and don’t matter.
If that’s the case then there is no cause for anyone to complain about the people protesting/preventing Farrell from that event. He could talk. He just couldn’t talk there.
No harm was done.
Naïf: Laws may restrict free speech, but because its a part of human dignity, the laws are null and void, and don’t matter.
On a more important level… that’s drivel. It’s logically null. If the laws are “null and void” they can have no effect, ergo Mandela couldn’t be imprisoned.
But they weren’t. They may have been morally wrong, but they were most certainly not void.
I also point you to my list of names. There is a reason I put Paine on that list.
I’ve given blood, sweat and tears to mathematics (well, not that much blood). I’ve dealt with endless shit as a woman in mathematics, from my parents and high school teachers telling me I wasn’t good enough, to my professors ignoring me when I was one of their best students, to my peers and students figuring that, as a lady person, I would barely be able to show them how to prove a derivative, let alone teach them. I love mathematics. It is beautiful and thrilling in ways that my current field will never be, but I had to leave because I couldn’t deal with the shitty social environment and never being good enough for anyone. And to have some dickbag come and piss all over it… *steam shoots out of ears*
I wonder if Diogenes the Fuckwit would think the laws don’t matter if he found himself imprisoned or “disappeared” because of them? Or would he just accept it, him bein’ a grand philosopher and all?
Wow, Nepenthe. I’m the opposite, have no grasp of numbers at all, and find arithmetic (never mind mathematics!) very intimidating. Can I just say how much I’m admiring you at the moment?
Nepenthe: That’s really shitty. 🙁 I’d noticed that all my lecturers are male, and I had a feeling that sort of thing’d be the reason why that is.
Nepenthe: My hat is off to you. As another person who doesn’t get numbers, I admire you.
@MorkaisChosen
*high five*
Yeah. Math program in the top five in the US. Number of female tenured professors: 0. The oldest woman there still wasn’t tenured; they made her do bureaucratic bullshit running the undergrad department though. And my best lecturers were all women, but they were either post-docs or in another departments.
At least I got the best of my tutorial students, since the ones who didn’t flee to the male tutors’ sessions did significantly better than everyone else in the class and left with a good grasp on basic logic, even the “I hate math” girls. *beams*
@Unpaid Help
I wish I could show you how beautiful proof is. I can’t do arithmetic, it takes me forever just to calculate a 20% tip. But why arithmetic works… it’s just… breathtaking.
As far as I can tell the only points behind the endless wanking from Diogynes are a. attention please! and b. if you oversimplify things it makes you feel less simple yourself, thus allowing you to pat yourself on the back. Which is another form of wanking.
Be a dear and do your wanking in private, please.
I’m no mathematician. I might be able to get a handle on it, but the language isn’t one of those which I really grasp. My partners tell me I have the basics of how aspects of math works, but that’s not the same as understanding it; much less being able to prove it (though I did manage to figure out how to make an equilateral triangle with nothing more than a straightedge and compass).
I survived algebra. That’s as far as I’ve really taken math (though I read about it, and can catch glimmers of why calculus works; though the mechanics are gibberish to me).
“It doesn’t scale that way” isn’t proof. It’s a gut feeling. And while it is (so I have it on good authority; being involved with mathematicians) it doesn’t scale that way; people knew that for a long time (though “scale” isn’t really the right word).
What they couldn’t do was prove it.
Nepenthe: if you ever decided to do a “proofs for dummies” blog, I would definitely read it.
I never even figured how to do percentages on a calculator! Thank goodness tax is included in prices already here and tipping isn’t much of a thing. Eating out in the US can be scary that way. 😛