Here at Man Boobz, I’ve set it so first-time commenters have their comments sent to moderation so I can decide if they’re sort of people I want to have commenting here on a regular basis. Given the obnoxiousness of some of the people I let through, I imagine some of you might wonder just what it takes to get censored around here. So here, as a public service of sorts, is one recent comment from a first-timer that I didn’t let through.
It’s from someone claiming to be Chris Key, the Australian dude who runs Men’s Rights Online, offering his thoughts on Paul Elam’s recent hate campaign. (I’m pretty sure it really is him.) As you read, you might want to consider the irony of his complaints about the “foul, aggressive language” of the protestors.
Speaking of which TRIGGER WARNING for abusive language.
.
.
.
Is manboobz.com a playground for patients from North America’s most notorious psychiatric ward?
Seriously, the amount of insane drivel on here has the potential to cause any sane person to ask the aforementioned question. The fact that you fuckwits are trying to portray this goofy, hatemongering feminazi as as a “victim” is beyond insane.
The hatemongering feminazis who protested against Farrell were shouting vulgarities and physically blocking all entrances to the building. That’s intimidation and a suppression of free speech, which is a form of violence. Go watch the videos on YouTube if you don’t believe me, and you’ll see that these feminazi dykes and cunts — as well as the mangina losers who were sniffing around for a sympathy fuck — used foul, aggressive language while barricading the entrances so that the men who wanted to attend the meeting could not get inside.
If a bunch of men did that at a women’s conference then you loopy cunts would claim it’s “proof” that MRAs are uncivilised and violent. Anyone who has a shred of credibility and objectivity can see that the purpose behind these cunts’ actions was to intimidate and suppress the voices of people they do not agree with. If you dopey cunts think that’s okay then it proves that you’re nothing but a bunch of hatemongering fascists who need to spend a night in a watchhouse, as it’s patently obvious that you’re too deluded, stupid and hateful to learn the art of acting decency any other way.
I find it ironic that you losers claim that MRAs are violent. Do I need to remind you spasticated cunts that feminists are violent murderers who intimidate anyone who doesn’t bow down to them?
Take the case of Erin Pizzey as a prime example of what I’m talking about. The feminazis in England murdered her dog and sent numerous death threats to her family, for no other reason than she publicly stated that the women who came to her women’s shelter — Pizzey set up the first women’s shelter in England — were every bit as violent as the men they accused of attacking them. Poor Erin was exposed to so many threats a well organised group of feminazis that she had to flee the country and resettle in the USA.
Don’t take my word for it, see for yourselves:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=a41532d6-d4df-46a2-a784-f6499938f3b0
Pizzey isn’t the first person to experience violence at the hands of feminists. Researchers from the USA experienced something similiar. I think Strauss was one of the victims. Another one was a woman, but I cannot remember her name.
I suppose I’m going to be banned now for speaking the truth, just like you cunts did to gateman. On manboobz.com, only feminist lies and libel directed at MRAS is tolerated by its fat, goofy, unloved owner and its filthy, insane, deceitful, hateful community.
So, there’s that. And there are, alas, many more where that came from.
Also, as far as I can tell, there’s no proof that feminists — or feminazis — killed Pizzey’s dog. This is often asserted as fact, but in the only direct statement from Pizzey on the subject that I’ve been able to find she only says that “one of my dogs was shot on Christmas day on my property.” She insinuates that it was the work of feminists, but does not say so outright, presumably because she does not know for sure. If anyone has any more evidence on the subject I would like to see it.
It goes without saying that whoever did kill Pizzey’s dog, assuming the incident did happen, was and is terrible and wrong. But I’m still not quite sure how this decades-old alleged incident gives MRAs today the license to harass feminists who weren’t even born when it allegedly happened.
@ thebewilderness
We don’t understand the finesse of his statement *because* we live in a psych ward (while being fascist murderers following David as our dictator-mangina).
Searching google for North America’s most notorious psych ward brought up an article about a 911 truther, Anders Brevik, a bunch of closed hospitals, and Key’s repost of this comment on mens-rights.net. I don’t think I’m going to find my answer. *sigh* I’m probably not cool enough.
@Kitteh, the quota system is totally broken. All you have to do is bring in foreskins. (Just like in the Old Testament, that notoriously misandristical work.)
@cloudiah, I’ve heard (read: read on the internets) unconfirmed reports that Warren Farrell started the “Stalinists” thing in some newspaper. They might be picking it up since he’s more on the radar.
This would be commentor is in DESPERATE need of a thesaurus…
I understand perfectly now why I do not understand. Thanks.
I figure he’s using the word murder to reference abortions, but not sure.
@Tulgey, you’re right about that quota system being broken. I mean, how d’you prove you’ve done your share if the bloke had been circumcised? Darned if I’m toting entire willies around all day, even in a box of salt. They take up far too much room in the backpack. I think it should be ears.
Can we start using “frothing” as a word? Like that quote was frothing, for example.
Boy is this a frothing statement. Etc.
@The Kitteh
We have freedom of speech with or without any laws. By being human alone we get rights. The right to own oneself, to think freely, to associate with whomever we want. Law or no law, certain things are human rights.
Yes, let’s talk a little bit about Chris Key and his association with A Voice for Men. He was so proud of this comment that he posted it over there on this thread:
http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/who-is-emma-claire-and-why-is-she-so-hateful/
AVfM readers LOVED the comment. 10 upvotes. 0 downvotes. They like Chris Key over there. His names links directly to MRO where you can easily find Chris spouting the vile quote themisanthropicmuse identified above. In that same thread, in response to a comment saying “There are no ‘good’ fags” Chris replies,
This is right before the quote tmm provided up above.
And as the icing on the (princess) cupcake, his MRO icon is a picture of some boots with the caption “These boots were made for… kicking feminists in the cunt.”
(Screen cap available here.)
THESE ARE YOUR PEOPLE, AVfM. OWN IT.
Source.
Diogenes, that’s not the point. When clowns like these talk about freedom of speech they are specifically referring to the US Constitution, AND misinterpreting it. It’s about government repression, not “I have the freedom to say anything, and nobody is allowed to disagree or argue or use nasty language at me!” It also doesn’t apply in my country or in Canada, whose constitutions are (gasp) not the US’s.
I don’t see them complaining about anyone else’s right to protest, either. I’d have thought that was one of your basic human rights, tied up with the general, broad notion of freedom of speech.
The MRM isn’t interested in human rights. It’s interested in men dominating and hurting women and children and recovering the absolute privilege they’ve lost in some countries, nothing else.
A few more Chris Key quotes from fstdt.com:
RACIST, HOMOPHOBIC, VIOLENT. MEET THE MEN’S RIGHTS MOVEMENT.
Wow. This one makes Owly look like a class act.
So much for AVfM housing the moderate part of the MRM.
I’m so glad Diogenes was here to give his simpleminded precis on human rights. Truly illuminating.
But they are not a hate movement. Nope. Nosirreebob.
@ Cloudiah
Chris Keys: This group of people promote ill-treatment of humans; they must be tortured and executed. You know, to promote a humane, free society.
It’s already a word. I just literally made this face.
No, they don’t hate humans at all. Only women, other races, not-straights …
And I know you were all wondering what he thought of Katherine Heigl after she made that PSA.
Source.
Now, now, Falconer. You can’t expect him to learn basic vocabulary while he’s busy thinking Deep Thoughts Nobody Else Ever Had Before.
I’m interested how he’s found that homosexuality is in any way related to paedophilia (I thought MRAs loved “hebephiles”… would this be a schism?!). Since all studies found no correlation between the two, and in some cases a negative correlation (less instances of paedophilia in the gay community).
Given that his “findings” contradict the entire body of behavioural science, I’m sure he’s on his way to success after he discloses his extensive, secretly peer-reviewed research. He sounds quite fond of the scientific method, and will be delighted to have his study be replicated.
Otherwise that would mean that he just pulled an assertion out of his ass! I can’t wait to read this explosive new research from Dr. Key.
Wow hates Asians, gays, females, “manginas”, the UN etc. if you draw the venn diagram there’s not a lot of humans left. Mind you , I’m not sure he makes it into any human category .
I don’t know anything about Katherin Heigl (and I’m not sure I want to) but does this moron really think only male dogs are desexed? Seriously?
@Yoyo – oh, he’s human, all right. No other species on this planet produces such fucked-up members.
He probably learned it from the conservatives and religious haters of gay people. They equate homosexual and child predator so damn hard.
The number of such ideologues who then turn out to be either gay or a predator is non-zero. But I guess you didn’t need me to tell you that.
@Kitteh’s — Heh. Maybe he can spend a half an hour in his packed schedule at some point and solve Fermat’s Last Theorem.