Here at Man Boobz, I’ve set it so first-time commenters have their comments sent to moderation so I can decide if they’re sort of people I want to have commenting here on a regular basis. Given the obnoxiousness of some of the people I let through, I imagine some of you might wonder just what it takes to get censored around here. So here, as a public service of sorts, is one recent comment from a first-timer that I didn’t let through.
It’s from someone claiming to be Chris Key, the Australian dude who runs Men’s Rights Online, offering his thoughts on Paul Elam’s recent hate campaign. (I’m pretty sure it really is him.) As you read, you might want to consider the irony of his complaints about the “foul, aggressive language” of the protestors.
Speaking of which TRIGGER WARNING for abusive language.
.
.
.
Is manboobz.com a playground for patients from North America’s most notorious psychiatric ward?
Seriously, the amount of insane drivel on here has the potential to cause any sane person to ask the aforementioned question. The fact that you fuckwits are trying to portray this goofy, hatemongering feminazi as as a “victim” is beyond insane.
The hatemongering feminazis who protested against Farrell were shouting vulgarities and physically blocking all entrances to the building. That’s intimidation and a suppression of free speech, which is a form of violence. Go watch the videos on YouTube if you don’t believe me, and you’ll see that these feminazi dykes and cunts — as well as the mangina losers who were sniffing around for a sympathy fuck — used foul, aggressive language while barricading the entrances so that the men who wanted to attend the meeting could not get inside.
If a bunch of men did that at a women’s conference then you loopy cunts would claim it’s “proof” that MRAs are uncivilised and violent. Anyone who has a shred of credibility and objectivity can see that the purpose behind these cunts’ actions was to intimidate and suppress the voices of people they do not agree with. If you dopey cunts think that’s okay then it proves that you’re nothing but a bunch of hatemongering fascists who need to spend a night in a watchhouse, as it’s patently obvious that you’re too deluded, stupid and hateful to learn the art of acting decency any other way.
I find it ironic that you losers claim that MRAs are violent. Do I need to remind you spasticated cunts that feminists are violent murderers who intimidate anyone who doesn’t bow down to them?
Take the case of Erin Pizzey as a prime example of what I’m talking about. The feminazis in England murdered her dog and sent numerous death threats to her family, for no other reason than she publicly stated that the women who came to her women’s shelter — Pizzey set up the first women’s shelter in England — were every bit as violent as the men they accused of attacking them. Poor Erin was exposed to so many threats a well organised group of feminazis that she had to flee the country and resettle in the USA.
Don’t take my word for it, see for yourselves:
http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=a41532d6-d4df-46a2-a784-f6499938f3b0
Pizzey isn’t the first person to experience violence at the hands of feminists. Researchers from the USA experienced something similiar. I think Strauss was one of the victims. Another one was a woman, but I cannot remember her name.
I suppose I’m going to be banned now for speaking the truth, just like you cunts did to gateman. On manboobz.com, only feminist lies and libel directed at MRAS is tolerated by its fat, goofy, unloved owner and its filthy, insane, deceitful, hateful community.
So, there’s that. And there are, alas, many more where that came from.
Also, as far as I can tell, there’s no proof that feminists — or feminazis — killed Pizzey’s dog. This is often asserted as fact, but in the only direct statement from Pizzey on the subject that I’ve been able to find she only says that “one of my dogs was shot on Christmas day on my property.” She insinuates that it was the work of feminists, but does not say so outright, presumably because she does not know for sure. If anyone has any more evidence on the subject I would like to see it.
It goes without saying that whoever did kill Pizzey’s dog, assuming the incident did happen, was and is terrible and wrong. But I’m still not quite sure how this decades-old alleged incident gives MRAs today the license to harass feminists who weren’t even born when it allegedly happened.
Misogynistic, homophobic, and a Grade-A slinger of ass-sourced anecdata. Such a winner.
Wow. You’d think someone who was so opposed to foul, and abusive, language could at the least manage a little creativity.
His use of cunt was more boring than Cristian de Neuvillette calling Cyrano a “big nose”.
So, what is North America’s most notorious psych ward? I’ve been in a psych ward but I want to make sure I’m cool enough to play here.
Oh yeah, Nepenthe, thanks for the reminder! He’s ableist too! What a charmer! And has no idea what free speech means. Wow.
Mmhmm..that’s some good irony!
The story is from the National Post and it’s not about sports teams. As a Canadian, I can tell you that you can safely disregard it.
I wonder if he’d be upset to know that this isn’t a wholly USian populated site? Or that there are a good many Australians who despise idiotic misogynists like him?
Protip: you want to complain about other people being foul-mouthed, don’t use the same word and then top it with the ugliest insult in the language, let alone use it repeatedly. It makes you look not only hypocritical but, y’know, stupid.
And all this shite about freedom of speech … LOL why do so many hate-mongerers talk as if the US constitutional right to free speech (which they don’t understand anyway) applies to any other countries?
*I know, I know, tautology.
This is hilarious considering the same dude as has the following quote posted from his shitty site up on fstdt.com “Only problem with nailing fags to a fence post is it might allow one of their contagious diseases to infect a normal Human. The best thing the government can do is kill them and burn their carcasses. Society needs to be protected from these monsters.”
Anyone who calling for government sponsored genocide should really shut their mouth about hatemongering. Moron.
Rape threats, too. This numpty is the total package.
He likes using the word “goofy”, poor little withered prick..
I guess it’s a detail that all the posts about Elam’s intimidation campaign were clearly condemning the suppression of Farrell’s speech. Ontario seems to have a tradition of banning talks in universities (although I didn’t hear MRAs start a campaign against the people who blocked Ann Coulter from speaking 2 years ago… I guess she’s too misandrist)
But David, even though you clearly wrote that you condemned the actions to stop Farrell from giving his talk, you are a fascist! This guy saw through your deceitful cloak of sanity.
He appears to be deeply offended that these women were going around acting like people demonstrating on their campus and using language and stuff! Shocking! So shocking that he was reduced to using language and stuff his own self, but of course that is totes different cuz he wasn’t trying to violate their free speech rights. Criminy.
I guess if he is from Oz he can be given a pass for not having a clue what the first amendment says. The rest of it is just an example of a sad man overdosing on the delicious chum bucket of outrage.
Also? Canada!
Can someone tell me what a watch house is?
Non-violent social change: You’re doin it rong.
I’ve noticed that calling feminists “fascists” or “Stalinists” is gaining favor over at AVfM. I guess they finally realized that their constant Godwinning was making them objects of ridicule, so they’ve now moved on and instead of invoking Hitler or Nazis they’ll use a totally unrelated term (which they don’t understand, but they know it sounds really bad so it must describe feminists).
Oooohhhh…he “thinks” one of the victims of feminist violence was “Strauss”. That’s factual *snort*, and I’m thinking he refers to Murray Straus, darling of Father’s Rights and author of flawed studies purporting to prove that teh wimmenz are just as violent just as often to teh poor menz (or even MORE so!) than the other way around.
Also, Hellkell, my son just taught me “numpty” recently and I love it 🙂
Brits who hate misogyny, represent!
PS – If you want to complain about other people’s foul language you might want to find a new favorite word, preferably one that doesn’t reference any ladyparts.
@ themisathropicmuse
*gasp!*
I keep forgetting that you can’t reason with people that far gone… I’m too naive. I still hope they will learn the wonders of rational thinking eventually. It’s magical; it actually models reality/facts!
Got it! So we all live in a watch house, psyche ward, but should be put in a watch house to learn …I don’t understand that bit.
@thebewilderness – a watchhouse is a police lock-up where people are held while under temporary arrest.
Feminists are murderers?
I KNEW I was forgetting something!
It’s totally true: you can easily tell by all the people they’ve kinda-sorta tried to murder, an entire two-thirds of whom Chris can even remember.
And they wonder why we think “misandry” is a joke and don’t take them seriously when they call us hateful.
@CassandraSays
*represents*
@Tulgey – damn, what’s the quota of murders for us feminists? I could have trouble working it into my schedule.
I think they can be taught the difference between statistical evidence and anecdotal evidence one day. That will blow their minds.
Example: reading about a women doing something violent to a man isn’t evidence of widespread systematic violence against men by women. Knowing some women who are dating jerks doesn’t mean that it represents all, or even most women (and when men are dating crazy women, it doesn’t mean anything I guess. Or maybe just “another victim of misandry”).