Paul Elam, head misogynist at A Voice for Men, is mad at the ladies again, his wrath provoked this time by an overheard conversation in a local coffeeshop between two women talking about recycling, and how the world would be a greener place if women were in charge.
Elam seems to take deep personal offense at any suggestion that men aren’t the absolute best at every single fucking thing, so he quickly scurried off to his computer to bash out a 1500-word screed that began with him insulting the women as bobbleheaded “latte lappers who were more likely than not completely clueless about how a single thing on the planet with a moving part works,” moved into high gear with some not altogether wrong (if rather trite and woman-blamey) critiques of the diamond and fur industries, and wound up with a stern warning that WOMEN ARE DESTROY9ING THE EARTH WITH ALL THEIR SPENDY SPENDING!!1!!!
So let’s just skip ahead to that part, shall we?
Take it away, Paul:
The thing that drives the bulk of pollution, wars, white collar criminality, cruelty to animals, human slavery and the like is consumerism. Consumerism, especially the market of unnecessary, embarrassingly vain and useless goods, is a woman’s world. It is primarily the consumption of fashion, via cosmetics, plastic surgery, excessive clothing, jewelry and other vanity items. Women drive a world of pain and damage to the planet. And men, to their shame, do the heavy lifting to get it done.
Ah, damn you ladies! God damn you all to hell!
The so-called Planet of the Apes was Earth all along!
Oh, wait. Sorry. SPOILER ALERT.
But Paul, don’t men buy a lot of expensive useless crap, too?
I mean, I just did about a minute of Googling and found a goddamn fishing rod that’ll set you back $4600.
I cannot think of a single item consumed by men en masse, with high social acceptance, that does not also have utilitarian value. e.g. leather items come from food source animals.
Oh, I see. You can use a $4600 fishing rod to catch $4600 fish. My bad.
Essentially it is not that much different from Native Americans using buffalo hide as well as the meat.
Yeah, he really did just say that.
And many of the things men do consume that might appear on the surface to be excessive are things that women size up and measure them by in the process of sexual selection.
Ah, and these men are utterly helpless before these greedy, earth-destroying women and their evil feminine allure.
Most money is still earned by men.
This is true. In part because of that whole wage gap thing you MRAs don’t believe in.
Most money is actually spent by and on women, mostly on consequence-ridden products whose only use is to bolster their egos. That is about as green as a fucking oil spill.
The sex driving the world’s ridiculous over consumption, and therefore decimation of everything, is not men. In fact, women’s level of over consumption is so outrageous that they cannot even maintain it with their own resources. It takes both sexes to feed the excessive appetite of the one.
Ah, but that’s not quite true. Or really true at all. For one thing, while women may spend more than men, that’s in part because women still tend to do more of the shopping for things like, you know, groceries. They’re not spending all this money on themselves.
And women may not really be spending as much as you think. It’s often said that women are responsible for about 80% of consumer spending. But if you ever start trying to track down the source of that oft-quoted statistic, as I did while writing this post, you’ll discover that … there really doesn’t seem to be one. It’s one of these things that’s assumed to be true simply because it’s repeated so often – especially by people claiming to know how to market to women. The Wall Street Journal’s Carl Bialik looked into this 80% claim last year and found that
In addition to having murky origins, the number appears to be wrong. Several recent surveys suggest that men have nearly equal say on spending, and that when men and women live together, both participate in spending decisions. In a survey conducted last year of nearly 4,000 Americans 16 and older by Futures Co., a London consulting firm, just 37% of women said they have primary responsibility for shopping decisions in their household, while 85% said they have primary or shared responsibility. The respective figures for men were similar: 31% and 84%.
Let’s return from the land of reality to plunge again into the tempestuous torrent of Paul Elam’s testosterone tantrum. (See! I can write as crappily as Paul Elam if I really try!)
If we wanted to save the environment, be less cruel to animals, have less wars, less slavery and less forced labor of children then the best first step we can take is to start raising girls to get over their vanity and their entitlement. We would also do well to teach our boys to assist in the process.
Elam followed up this soul-stirring call to SAVE TEH PLANET with a post castigating male truck drivers for being too nice to lady truck drivers. No, really.
If you’re interested in learning more about saving our green planet, and even if you’re not, I suggest you take a look at the trailer for the excellent if unclassifiable Korean film called, naturally, Save the Green Planet.
“Essentially it is not that much different from Native Americans using
buffalomammoth hide as well as the meat.”FTFY. (Now I’m gonna go read the thread.)
I made all our towels from fleece. I raised the sheep myself, from lambs born from wild sheep that I hunted down on foot and wrestled into submission with my bare hands. Then I threw the sheep in the nearest river, scrubbed them down with soap I made by boiling wood ash and lye together, and blow-dried them with my own breath.
Then I sharpened a rock on my teeth (or maybe it was the other way round?), sheared the sheep, and combed, carded, spun, and wove the resulting wool on tools I made for this purpose from fallen twigs I found on the forest floor. None of this nasty cutting-down-live-trees eco-genocide for me!
You don’t want to know how I make scented fucking candles.
I love how advertising (all media, really) pushes the idea over and over and over that the most important thing about a woman is how she looks, and then men bitch that we’re shallow for caring how we look. Jesus. And if these guys really think all women are frivolous with money, they should spend some time on mommy blogs and read about all the ways to use coupons for groceries, cook cheap meals, make your own Xmas presents, etc., etc. For the record, I’m the cheap (oops, frugal) one in my relationship and I stretch those dollars like crazy. My boyfriend is the one with all the bikes and bike gear, computers (2 desktops, MacBook, 2 Mac Minis, plus several he doesn’t use any more), tablets (iPad and Nexus), fancy phone, and all the rest of it.
Yeah… I clicked through and read around a bit. Deeply stupid.
Here’s a cute doggie for titianblue. Let me see if I can find some kitties…
That is a dog of character. And called Bob … now why am I suddenly thinking Blackadder?
@sthlivingincolor
You aren’t shallow for caring how you look, but you are shallow if you care about how other women look, unless you’re a lesbian, in which case it makes perfect sense.
@ Amused
By your own confession, you have “your” room in your husband’s house.
Wow, excellent reading comprehension, and such a sweet interpretation of a family. My husband doesn’t have a house. Neither do I. Our FAMILY has a house, which I have transformed into a home, quite without the delightful effects of throw cushions (or scented candles, alas!).
Let me guess. Single?
Hmm, wannabe rapist’s boner + broken glass … or even just paper cuts. And landing on a Lego while leaping around screeching.
Not kitties, but owls are cute, right?
Because I have a frivolous mind, I can’t help wondering what Mr Elam was drinking in that coffee shop. Not latte presumably, given his scorn for latte drinkers? Or was that the problem? Is women drinking latte misandry cos it’s a dude’s drink?
Whatever he was drinking, it was good and right and the correct thing to drink. Whatever the women were drinking was icky and full of cootie juice.
This holds even if they were all drinking the exact same thing.
P.S. MRA dudes, you can’t demand that women stop buying stuff while also demanding that they go back to being 1950s housewives. Buying stuff was a 1950s housewife’s whole job.
So are all the men who spend time telling women how we should look shallow? The ones who don’t think women have a right to exist unless we meet their notions of fuckability?
>.< My first html muck up. I guess this means I'm a real manboobzer now or something? Anyway, pic-
OWLS!
Yes! You have passed the ultimate manboobz test, palmedfire! 😀
@jsmugbitch
Any towels at all? All one colour?
No, no, Kitteh, it’s not shallow to judge people you want to fuck based on their attractiveness. It’s only shallow to judge people you don’t want to fuck based on their attractiveness.
OMFG OWLS!
It’s true. I didn’t want to fuck my beau until I saw his Lego Death Star.
I found this yesterday, it’s sort of slow to get going but the sounds coupled with the eyes closing when scritched got me right in the cute spot.
^sounds somehow raunchier than I intended
Those owls are the cutest! And I say this as someone with a cat perched on their shoulder.
I see that Grumbles is still made of fail.
No cushions! Aren’t you aware that men need extra cushioning for their posteriors? Your lack of cushions is the vilest misandry, JB!
When you start responding with substance, you’ll get substance back. For now, though, you have earned only mockery.
But when women spend money on makeup and stuff, that’s totally frivolous, amirite?
+1