So over on MGTOWforums, the regulars are pondering the age-old question β should these committed women-avoiders deal with their continued desire to stick their penises in the women they’re allegedly avoiding by resorting to prostitutes?
In the midst of a lively discussion on the advantages of βgoing proβ over trying to pick up a βbar hog,β one regular by the nom de internet Xtc sets forth some thoughts that, for a moment at least, seem to transcend the usual MGTOW crudity and bitterness.
βI don’t think it’s really about sex,β he writes. βI think what a lot of people are looking for is love, respect, and intimacy – which you can’t buy.β
Why, that almost seems like an insight!
Alas, in his very next sentence he spoils the moment by returning to the standard MGTOW narrative of female perfidy:
I think what put me off women altogether was the realisation that you’ll NEVER get [love, respect, and intimacy] for real. It’s sad and sobering, but that’s the way it is.
Thinking that the attention of women validates you as a person collapses once you realise they are attracted to the worst qualities in the worst men.
Thinking that the attention of women equals affection, intimacy, or love – collapses once you realise they will leave you in a second if they sense any weakness or if a BBD [bigger better deal] comes along. Then you’ll realise that the meter was running all the time, whether this was clear at the time or not.
Women are like a bitter medicine that you force yourself to swallow because you believe it is doing you good. Once you realise it’s a quack remedy, and the whole thing is a scam, you’re free to spit it out and never partake again.
That leaves you with sex alone, which is really rather easy to come by.
If women really and truly are βattracted to the worst qualities of the worst men,β why arenβt they lining up at these dudesβ front doors?
@inu – “Yes, you’re right” or some variation on that theme. Yeah, even though it should be obvious we’re not going to, and he does seem to read what is written, but comprehend it? Think about it? Mmmf. Dunno about that. The more I see, the more hints about why his girlfriend did eventually bail.
KCUF, should be hearken in the last post, but as everbody knows spelling is mis*.
Bob, I’ve read all the comments here (I was bored at work today) and there’s been something niggling at me, and since you’re back I want to say it:
I think the problem you’re having here (aside from all the other problems) is that you’re clinging to the idea that
peoplewomen just decide to fuck off with no warning because, flighty bitches. Even when your supposed Ur example – your own relationship – has been admitted, by yourself, to have warning signs. You also admit that this was better than you getting married.Now, here’s the thing. I can’t speak for everyone, and I’m not talking about your relationship, but I certainly know a lot of relationships that have ended with one partner (usually male) being absolutely flummoxed as to why, while the person who actually left has, in part, left because their partner was so bloody inattentive that they haven’t glommed on to a single clue that they might be unhappy – these were usually men who cling to the idea that all relationships need are for there to be meals on the table and access to someone lying back and thinking of England three nights a week, and all this talking malarkey is for sissies* (although actually I will talk about your relationship for a second – she talked about wanting to be raptured and you had no clue she might not be thrilled with life? Fuck’s sake man).
If the last paragraph doesn’t make sense, I’ll use a personal example: I was with my ex for five years. We got engaged after four and a half years, and when I left him he was absolutely shell-shocked. Hadn’t seen it coming at all. Didn’t think a single thing had changed – he was right about that, nothing had changed. One night we were coming home from a night out and I got out of the taxi to take some money out to pay for it, then decided I wasn’t going home with him. That was it. Never went back. Even got my friend to go clear my stuff out of the house.
Now I know you think I’m queen bitch at this point, but the reason I left him that night wasn’t because I was ‘immature, flaky or unreliable’, it was because he was an abusive shit who’d treated me like hell for at least three years by that point, and I finally snapped. Best decision I ever made. Not having me at his beck and call (trust me, I was not the immature, flaky or unreliable one in that relationship) or to use as his verbal punching bag or walking wallet meant that he had to sort his shit out, so it benefitted him too (although to be honest with hindsight I couldn’t really give a fuck about that, but one of the reasons I stayed so long and accepted his half-assed proposal was that I literally thought he would die if I wasn’t around).
So while I don’t think you’re advocating for people to stay in loveless relationships, I do think you’re a fucking clod for thinking that every single time a
personwoman shocks a man by leaving him that it’s because she’s a big immature meany-pants and refusing to even entertain other notions. PEOPLE ARE DIFFERENT THERE’S SEVEN BILLION OF US ON THE PLANET YOU CAN’T ASCRIBE ARBITRARY MOTIVATIONS TO THE BEHAVIOUR OF PEOPLE YOU DON’T KNOW.(*I don’t think this is a normal thing for men to think but it was pretty common in the men I’d see coming into the pub I ran and telling me about their (ex-)wives, then hearing the story from the women the next night. Also happened to my mum.)
“KCUF” reminds me of a funny tee shirt I saw the other day, sending up those FCUK ones (can’t abide them) – “FCEK: Irish Connection”
heheheh
I had a feeling Bob’s insistence that his definitions of all things relationship-related being Inviolate Truth had something to do with his personal history. It was that or he was a young guy who had never had reason to question what he absorbed from his parents/teachers about cultural norms and thus insisted they had to be right because God forbid he have to ask himself some hard questions.
Actually it’s probably both, eh? Poor guy.
I never drink alcohol but I just had an awesome 4″ meatball sub for lunch. π
Kittehs, it was this weekend, yes. I had a really good time, but I think that was more to do with the people I was with (one of whom I hadn’t seen for six months) than the actual city, which is a bit of a tourist trap without actually having much to see. Because there wasn’t much to see, we drank a LOT of beers, proper Belgian ones, fruit ones (OMG MANGO BEER) and went to one beer hall which has the largest collection of beers from around the world (over 2000 at last count) in stock, where we drank beers from Belgium, China, Palestine and a few others. It was slightly marred by one of our friends getting really ill on the Saturday night with tonsilitis and spending two hours being searched in Calais on the way back at 3am because our coach picked people up from Amsterdam before it picked us up from Brussels BUT we also all got free hats from one bar and there was the awesomeness from the video below in the main square, which made me think I’d walked into an episode of Doctor Who, so overall I give the weekend a solid C+.
http://youtu.be/lKKfu290a7o
I guess what Bob wants is to be reassured that he is allowed to feel hurt is allowed to feel sad when he is dumped His blaming is not a good or fair way to express these feelings. And yes he’s been told that before in this marathon-thread, but because of his current state of mind, he is not able to understand what he wants to hear.
One of these days I will write a sentence in fewer than four lines, I swear.
(This doesn’t count.)
Bob-Dude: and there hasnβt been something that has fundamentally altered your relationship
There was; on her end.
That’s the real problem… you aren’t granting her agency (same thing with the “no good reason to turn down a proposal” shit you opened with).
She, obviously, thought something had changed. So she didn’t do a great job of sharing that with you. That sucks. She could have done it better.
But that’s the way life goes. Let It Go.
Otherwise, the level of misery you have now is just a downpayment on the emotional wreck you seem to want to make of all your future.
Nobody should bat an eye when the person youβve been seeing for a month or two says βSorry, itβs been nice getting to know you, but I donβt think itβs going to work out.β
Horseshit. Being dumped hurts. The first month is all warm-fuzzies and happy-glow and imagining how glorious the future is gonna be. Having that tossed away hurts. Yo may not have as much invested, you may get over it quicker, but it not trivial.
You need to see a professional; because you don’t seem to have a clue about how things work; not relatioships, nor people in general.
Seriously dude. Get Over Yourself.
Not that you will actually pay attention. I’ve actually put a fair bit of effort into trying to explain things to you (what with personal history, outside sources, relevant questions) and all you do is parrot the same shit: “She just up and left; no reason, no warnings. Didn’t care and Oh!, She done me wrong”.
If you lavished the same attention on her you have given me… she was the one hard done by.
Thank you! I think I’m going to have to try this. It sounds drunkenly delicious.
Oh sweet merciful heavens is this thread still going?
So I think I have the jist of this:
Bob’s fiance for a variety of reasons realized that she didn’t want to get married after they had gotten engaged. And told him so. She stopped speaking to him and he’s hurt.
Bob’s decided all womankind is to blame for this particular woman changing as a person as time went on. He’s angry and vengeful that he can’t force people not to change over time, and thinks it’s a flaw of modern society that human beings are not psychic and don’t know precisely how they will change over time in advance so they can avoid doing things Bob does not appreciate. He feels people (i.e. women) not knowing that their feelings will change at some unknown point in the future constitutes emotional violence and time theft of which he is the victim.
And he expects us all to sympathize with his view that people changing is somehow personally unfair to him and an example of misandry. (Bob also thinks he can’t be a misogynist because he doesn’t actually use the word “misandry” though he implies it like woah.)
He insists that we all are saying things about “blaming men for not wanting to get married and the state of modern relationships” that none of us has said or believes, and uses that to justify his and the entire MRM’s hatred of women.
He uses his anger that his fiance changed her mind to insist that marriage was better back when you couldn’t get out of it because then
people only did it for loveif you changed over time there was nothing you could do but stay married to the guy.Did I miss anything?
Honestly, I think more than anything, Bob needs some Captain Awkward up in this shit.
http://captainawkward.com/2011/11/13/lies-we-tell-ourselves/
I think this part is best:
Emphasis mine. Rejection sucks and people can be sucky. Even if all you said was true (debatable, since you seem to offer varying pictures of what happened and your words suggest you might not be as “of good character” as you might think), what does it matter? Does forcing her into some kind of contract mindset after the end of your relationship have any impact whatsoever on YOUR continued life? Do yourself a favor and forget her. Move on. Join one of those “male subcultures” you think are rightly giving the bird to women and society in general. I promise you, no one here is going to stop you. Get a hobby, a pet, a new motorcycle or a library card and MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIFE.
I promise you, for every woman who has a change of heart and breaks some man’s heart (since Bob is only concerned with the heterosexual romances – btw Bob, erasure IS a form of homophobia), there is a man who has done the exact same thing to a woman. This shit happens to people and it sucks and is hard but it is not the end of the world and it does not mark the need for some kind of moral imperative for people to behave a certain way that YOU deem acceptable. You have mentioned you think both men and women do this, yet you only seem focused on women who bail on serious relationships. You cite no actual statistics, but link to articles and talk about books and your experience as if personal anecdata marks some sort of growing phenomenon.
In regards to it not being “so bad” and “why did she stay if it was so bad?” – dude, you can’t know how bad it was. You might never know how bad it was. Because you are not her and if she doesn’t tell you, that is her right and you have to deal with it. And speaking from my perspective, it WAS “so bad”. I stayed available for an “on again, off again” guy in college who was moody, manipulative, and was basically on again, off again with me so he could hook up with other girls at parties. It was bad. It was real damn bad. But I stayed because he said he didn’t know what he’d do without me and he had suicidal tendencies. I didn’t want to break his heart (or possibly trigger a suicide). It was bad when I was in a LDR with a guy who seemed to have no actual plans ever to try to see me or move closer. We talked about it, but never actually decided on anything and whenever he would talk about coming up he would always talk in vague terms or when he would actually make plans, he would bail at the last minute. I stayed for three years because he said he was sooooo in love with me, I didn’t want to break his heart. I am willing to bet my bottom dollar that both men thought they treated me exceptionally well and couldn’t understand why I broke it off with them (and to be fair, the LDR was immensely supportive and wonderful to chat with). But both did things that hurt me, that made the relationship unworkable for me, but I stayed and I did try to work things out and I did try to explain when things were wrong until I finally couldn’t take it anymore. And for the record, “if it was so bad, why did she stay?” logic is very very much in line with abuser’s lobby DV apologia. No, maybe you weren’t an abusive asshole to your ex, but you’ll understand why, when you use the same language as the abuser lobby (and claim to agree with much of the MRM, which is basically shorthand for abuser lobby anyway), why many folks here might be inherently distrustful of your word. Because many of the words you have used (unwittingly or not) are inherently in contempt of consent and autonomy. And very very inherently distrustful of women being able to asses their own reality, which IS misogynist.
You talk about how horrible it is for people breaking people’s hearts (women in particular) but don’t seem to realize that the fear of hurting someone can be a HUGE part of the reason why so many women stay, even if it is, “so bad”. And that pressure to stay, that pressure to “not be a bitch” to not “break his heart” (that ultimately can cause more pain in the end), because, come on, it’s not “sooooo bad” does NOT come from feminists or computers or women’s advancement in the workplace or any of the things we have now that our grandparents didn’t have. It comes from the same culture that tried to keep women out of the workplace and bemoans how horrible it is that women don’t need men in order to live their lives. It comes from people telling women not to be horrible heartbreaking bitches and people telling women they’re getting close to their expiry date so they’d better start getting less choosy. If you want people to be more straightforward and forthright, pressuring people to either stay or go is not going to help with that.
And more to the point, it’s not like you can really mandate some sort of straightforwardness clause in the laws of dating because there are no laws of dating and thank the fucking lord for that. You cannot mandate that the dating people of the world behave in a way YOU deem acceptable because the only person in life you can control is yourself (at best, you’ll get some people who will flip you off and tell you to mind your own damn beeswax) and it won’t solve all the dating problems anyway. People are complex and weird and frustrating and delightful and funny and annoying and obtuse and blunt (sometimes all at once) and different things work for different people. The best you can do is tell people to be themselves and use their words and hope for the best. (which, again, is NOT something that was terribly encouraged back in “the good ol’ days” of our grandparents).
And even if there were official dating laws passed by the dating congress and signed off on by the department of dating, and even if you could get your “stay or go! No time thieving or emotional terrorism!” mandate made a law, what then? Would you really feel safe and secure giving your heart to someone else? Would it really help you move on? Would it really give you the closure you feel you need? I suspect it wouldn’t. And not just because then you’d wonder if people were only with you because of the damn straightforwardness clause instead of because they really loved you. It’s because 9 times out of 10 the best two things that heal a broken heart are 1) not dwelling and 2) time. So you aren’t ready for dating yet? That’s cool. Lots of people aren’t. Take some time for yourself. Read some new books, learn a new skill, join a new club. You seem to think there’s this limit on when and where you can’t find love, but there really isn’t. I promise you, the less you freak out about “time wasters” and finding “twu wuv NAO” the more likely you are to heal. And the more you heal, the easier it will be for you to fall in love again, if in fact, future you decides that that’s what you want (and it’s totally ok if you don’t).
Guess what whining on feminist blogs about time wasters and how much better things were back in the good ol’ days only to explode in a mess of uncomfortable (and unasked for, might I add) oversharing is? Dwelling. STOP IT. Stop it right now. Get lost. Whining to a bunch of strangers (who were a hell of a lot nicer in a lot of ways than they had to be) about your ex who done you wrong is NOT HELPING you to get over it.
Thank god this thread has booze in it!
I know right? I’m counting the remaining hours of the workday — my BFF/ex-gf and I are headed to Tavern to have fat appetizers and a pitcher of neon booze.
I value in myself the ability to enjoy tiki-inspired alchemy as well as classic cocktails.
Now we’ve got this far I’m tempted to just go for the one-thousand. It’s been a while since that happened (think the last time was Steelebutt’s legendary “my English teacher was a misandrist” thread).
Old question but I just remembered the most disgusting drink I ever saw. When I was working in the pub some dude ordered a Baileys, Southern Comfort and lemonade. In the same glass, the monster.
Baileys, Southern Comfort and lemonade – surely the lemonade made the lemonade curdle? Euwww!
Ok, this lurgy is making my brain curdle. I meant that the Baileys would curdle.
Thinking about it, I think I have some caramel Baileys in the kitchen ….
Are we talking american lemonade (lemon juice, sugar, water) or UK lemonade (citrus soda)? b/c the latter might not curdle, but the former absolutely would.
Like a cement mixer, but without the self-awareness. π
Yes, it was UK lemonade, and oh boy it curdled. It looked like that scummy slush you get in gutters the day after it snows.
uuugggggh. I was sort of hoping that the fact that UK lemonade is more like soda would save the baileys. No such luck.
Ugh.
So if we play this thread backward (like the old joke about country music), will Bob finally go away?
The most disgusting drink ever: a dirty vanilla vodka martini. Bartender grabbed the wrong thing in a rush, hilarity ensued.
Inurashii, you didn’t have to clean the glass. *thousand yard stare*
thenatfantastic: When I was younger, I worked in an ice cream shop/restaurant that was connected to a bar. Early in the season, some asshole bartender tossed a bunch of empty beer bottles/cans into a random storage closet. They weren’t found until fucking August. It was… an experience I’d rather forget.
thenatfantastic – glad you had fun on your weekend! Sucks about someone getting sick, though. π
And that drink sounds appalling … bleaaargh.