Leave it to the Men’s Rightsers to come up with an even more ingeniously loopy explanation for Romney’s defeat than even Karl Rove has managed to come up with. According to the anonymous blogger behind the Christian Men’s Defense Network blog, on the far-right fringe of the already pretty fringey Men’s Rights movement, the thing that brought Romney down was “the slut vote.”
Let’s let Mr. Christian Men’s Defense Network explain:
[T]he Democrats tried to make this election about a single issue:
The right to slut.
Or more precisely, the right to slut without the responsibility of consequences. The famous “gender gap” isn’t really a gap based on gender. The right overwhelmingly wins older and married women.
But, alas, these fine, moral, married ladies are increasingly being challenged by younger, sluttier single gals.
[M]arried women constitute an ever-decreasing share of the female population. Women want to delay marriage as long as possible so they can “have it all,” and usually “have it all” means “have as much hot alpha sex as possible without any consequences.” And thus, less married women and more sluts
And so, Mr. CMDN concludes,
The “gender gap” should more accurately be called the slut vote.
In order to understand the Democrats’ evil (and successful) strategy to win over the slut vote, Mr. CMDN explains, we need to understand how they won over blacks. And yes, his explanation is racist as fuck:
Democrats have won the black vote because the black community is dominated by illegitimacy, and the Democrats are willing to subsidize and support that illegitimacy (as well as provide access to cheap abortions) so as to take away from sluts the consequences of their actions. Consequently, young black people grow up on the dole and not only never realize there might be something wrong with that, but eventually come to believe that’s the way it should be. The Democrats have won the black vote by first “empowering” single black mothers.
But now, you see, this kind of “illegitimacy” is spreading amongst white – or at least white sluts.
This is now beginning to happen in white suburbia, except unlike women in the urban black community, white suburban sluts start from a place of relative wealth and privilege (daddy’s little princess). Thus, food stamps–and increased rewards for having illegitimate kids while on food stamps–don’t (yet) appeal to them.
So instead Obama appealed to rich white sluts by forcing someone else (the Catholic church, in this case) to pay for their birth control, and by scaring them about alleged threats to their ability to take advantage of Planned Parenthood’s services (Planned Parenthood being conveniently located in the minority part of town, of course, so as to provide anonymity to visiting white girls whose white girl friends never go over there–except to visit Planned Parenthood themselves).
All the Democrats had to do to win over these slutty white gals was to frighten them a little:
One thing one has to remember about women, especially slutty ones: They usually don’t make decisions based on reason. So all the Obama administration had to do was scare them that Mitt Romney was going to take away their birth control and their access to abortion. The fear for them is that, without birth control and abortion, they might actually get pregnant and have to give birth. That is scary not simply because of the economic burden of having a child (since, hey, they can get all kinds of cash and prizes if that happens), but because if that happened then everyone would know they’re sluts, and their image as daddy’s pure little snowflake princess goes out the window.
Having just told us that “the “gender gap” should more accurately be called the slut vote,” Mr. CMDN now tells us that there’s more to the gender gap than mere sluttiness.
[T]he desire to slut it up isn’t the only factor in the gender gap. America has a fiscal problem primarily because women want free stuff without ever having to work. America is over-regulated because women don’t want to have to compete in the free market. America has profound moral problems in part because the rationalization hamster makes it impossible for 54% of the American electorate to ever admit a moral shortcoming.
However, this election cycle shows that the Slut Vote is real, and Republicans lose because they discount the existence of original sin in women. Abortion is often called the “third rail of American politics,” but in truth, the third rail is a woman’s right to slut (with cash and prizes).
One thing one has to remember about MRAs, especially shitty ones: The world they live in bears only a passing resemblance to reality.
And apparently, Mr. CMDN can only take so much reality: he took his blog private after this post of his was mentioned on Jezebel, which is why I had to link to the Google cached version rather than the blog itself.
wow, those comments…
It wasn’t bad enough that they were talking about Southamerican politics, wothout knowing the difference between our countries… Now, they’re saying they’d like to go back to the middle ages!
I don’t know why am I shocked, these guys being what they are, but I am. 🙁
Why is it twelve years of brainwashing, though? He’s only been around for four! And if she’s eighteen then wouldn’t she have been brainwashed for eighteen years? AAAAAAAAAAH
I mean, you could make a case re: the Obama/murderer thing (drones and wars and all) but they didn’t exactly strike me as pacifists. >.>
I guess Lena Dunham’s brainwashing started in 2012 when she was 14 years old. Sure, that makes sense.
Wha?
Nononono, they think he’s awful because he hasn’t killed enough people in war.
It’s. Um. The death of the white man? Or something. I don’t know. I’m not that far down the rabbit hole. I mean, I don’t have enough red pill.
And twelve years? I have no clue.
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3rpu1p/
@ Nobinayamu – Yeah, it’s funny, but some people actually buy into this stuff. Karl Rove spent the entire campaign using the same words as Democrats (“trickle down government”, “war on women”, etc.) to dilute their meaning.
One thing that doesn’t seem to occur to many republicans is that most liberals don’t want “free stuff” for themselves. They believe everyone (even wingnuts) should have a safety net in case of emergency. Funny, the large entitlements given to married families with children is not “free stuff” in their comfy reality.
What’s interesting is to see many double down on their post-factual ideas now that reality caught up to them.
That paragraph there can be shortened with “I am a racist.”
public schooling = 12 yrs?
I don’t know if that’s what they mean, though. humor is def not these asshats’ first language…
I bet the twelve years is referring to public education, which is actually thirteen years (k-12). So even if I’m right, they’re still wrong.
Unless they were trying to imply that all women are dropouts…
This may not be as fringe-y an opinion as it seems…
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/11/09/why_did_romney_lose_fox_news_blames_single_women.html
He does not know that “I Will Follow Him” is just a song…and one from the 60s at that?
Okay, so the twelve years is public education probably. Who is the mass murderer in question? I’m trying to figure out if this is a reference to Heartiste’s “women all get boners for serial killers” theory. (Because no men have ever wanted to have sex with a murderer.)
Princess Bonbon: New rule– people who want to write comments about how mentally superior they are must also be capable of grasping how the Shift key works.
…The Catholic Church is paying for everyone’s birth control?
Believe me, MaudeLL, I’m laughing but I’m also paying attention. Rove is still Rove. There will be another set of elections in two years and I’m sure he’ll be carrying his new definition of “voter suppression” all over the country while he infects congressional races.
I am not a bit surprised.
Re the Obama mass murderer thing, my first thought was that they referred to the wars he’s waging, but after thinking about it for five seconds I realised they’re totally not pacifists, so it’s probably the fact that he’s PRO CHOICE and therefore indirectly KILLS BABIES GALORE!
Source.
re: doubling down, I’d like to ask these guys if there’s any kind of evidence that could change their world views. Because if not, then who’s really talking to the rationalization hamster, eh?
Also, the pro-life thing = such a crock of bull. Obama just did more to cut the actual rate of abortions in this country than they ever were going to–Obamacare says readily accessible BC for all.
Not that abortion is a bad thing… but if they were actually true to the principles they say they’re true to, they’d be forced to be for Obamacare. That they aren’t? Reveals just how obvious their hypocrisy is.
seriously, and if the beef is with money, accessible birth control saves everybody money. there is no logical reason to oppose it.
Richard Feynman was known for his minimal contributions to physics. After all, getting laid all the time quickly sapped his motivational energy.
I am okay with that rule.
*runs for office nationally to get it codified into law.*
I think this dude is negging my country.
@Zanana
Their reason is ‘SLUTS AND WHORES MUST BE REFORMED WITH BABIES’*. But many people don’t agree with that, so they have to cover it up with money and ‘think of the foetii!’
* Sometimes ‘reformed with babies’ is ‘punished with babies’. IDK, I’m on birth control.
“You know, a lot of people say that such a wealthy modern country going without a national health care system is a costly disgrace, but I really dig countries where getting sick is potentially a life catastrophe.”
@Tulgey, Suddenly you became so much more attractive!
David’s old pal nugganu.