Categories
antifeminism are these guys 12 years old? creep-shaming creepy drama drama kings grandiosity irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA oppressed men pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles playing the victim reddit shit that never happened ShitRedditSays straw feminists

Reddit Creepsplosion, Part Eleventy Billion and Two [UPDATED]

There’s drama on Reddit again, with a veritable army of Redditors rising up in righteous indignation to fight off those evil man-haters who’ve challenged their ineffable right to free speech to post creepy and intrusive and possibly illegal pictures of women and girls.

I don’t have the energy to catalogue the whole murky mess so let me just point out a few of the key events here, all of which have inspired multiple mega-threads full of sound and fury and lots of misinformation.

1) Reddit user Violentacrez, the founder of r/jailbait and r/picsofdeadkids and countless other skeezy subreddits, deleted his account after learning that Adrian Chen of Gawker was working on a story about him that might include his real name.

On Reddit, where bullshit travels at the speed of light, Redditors convinced themselves that Violentacrez, who took pride in being Reddit’s “creepy uncle,” was being “blackmailed” by either Chen or ShitRedditSays, conceptualized by most Redditors as some sort of collective supervillain not unlike Star Trek’s Borg. (On the Men’s Rights subreddit, moderator Ignatiusloyola, a major purveyor of misinformation on the current controversies, even suggested that I might somehow be mixed up in all of this, which is of course not the case. ) Violentacrez has come forth to say that Chen was not in fact blackmailing him in any way.

Naturally, Redditors have risen up to defend the honor of Mr. Acrez, who despite because of his incredible skeeziness was a beloved figure amongst the Reddit masses. Indeed, the moderators of a number of popular subreddits – including r/politics and, of course, r/mensrights – have banded together to ban Gawker and Jezebel and all related sites from their alleged free-speech zones.

A few links if you want to explore this further:

Redditors Stand Up to Gawker to Protect Child Pornography (AtlanticWire)

[Mod Post] A tribute to Violentacrez, who was doxxed and was being threatened in real life, and an important message to ALL subscribers (please upvote this self post) (NSFW subreddit thread; unreliable information within)

2) The CreepShots subreddit, devoted to surreptitiously taken pictures of attractive young women (and possibly a few men), has vanished, apparently either banned by Reddit’s admins or taken down by the subreddit’s moderator after someone threatened to expose his name.

But this was not the only attempt to creep-shame the creepshotters:  A tumblr blog called Predditors posted the personal information of 20 or so Redditors who were active posters in r/creephots; all the info was gleaned from other Reddit postings of theirs. (Most of this information has since been scrubbed from the site.)

Naturally all this has inspired much indignation amongst Redditors, who are seemingly unaware of the irony inherent in their indignation about the invasion of privacy of those who ran and/or enthusiastically participated in a subreddit explicitly devoted to photographic invasions of privacy. (I don’t support revealing the personal info of these people, but at the same time I’m having a little trouble working up any sympathy for them.)

Rumors have spread on Reddit that one Redditor was physically attacked after being exposed as a CreepShot regular, but the only source of information on this is a user with the Reddit handle of POTATO_IN_MY_ANUS, so let’s just say that this is unconfirmed for now.

Links:

How to Shut Down Reddit’s CreepShots Once and for All: Name Names (Jezebel)

Internet Wars Over Women’s Bodies (Forbes)

The Internet War Over Creeps on Reddit (AtlanticWire)

/r/creepshots mod blackmailed into shutting down the sub a.k.a. The Admins Sure Doxxed The Ball On This One (ShitRedditSays thread)

r/creepshots has been removed due to doxxing of the main mod (SubredditDrama thread)

So it begins. Creepshots member beaten up following the Jezebel article which doxxed 20 Redditors (SubredditDrama thread)

There are naturally many more threads on the various aspects of all this on SubredditDrama right now.

Naturally, the good people of Men’s Rights have some thoughts on all this, many of them based on things that aren’t true.

/r/Creepshots and /r/violentacrez taken over by SRS by blackmailing with doxxing info. Apparently r/MensRights is next. (NOTE from DF: Nothing in this headline is true.)

Update on ViolentAcrez/Gawker/Adrian Chen/CreepShots (Substantially more accurate than the previous thread.)

Why does SRS feel the need to fuck with everyone? (Assorted SRS vilification based mostly on misinformation.)

Can the recent doxxing events be seen as an act of terrorism against this (or any) subreddit?

I’ll update this post with more info as necessary.

EDITED TO ADD: Here’s a giant list of links to media coverage of all this.

EDITED AGAIN: Chen’s article has been published on Gawker.

Meanwhile, the now-infamous Redditor POTATO_IN_MY_ANUS, the source of much of the dubious information discussed above, has been banned from Reddit; more importantly, he has been caught doctoring a screenshot of a conversation between him and a Reddit admin explaining why he’s being banned. So pretty much all of his claims, including the one about a creepshotter getting beaten up, are now suspect.

Also, here’s a screenshot that purports to be from Violentacrez explaining why he left Reddit.

 

324 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
clairedammit
clairedammit
12 years ago

Pecunium, nwo has never responded to me, either. What the fuck is up with that?

Tulgey Logger
Tulgey Logger
12 years ago

A man takes a picture of a random woman and puts it online. He is bad.
A woman takes a piture of a random man and puts it online. She is empowered.

Why do you assume tubecrush is about women submitting pictures of men, Owly? I’ve only looked at a couple pages of photos there, but the only picture/description I saw that could be construed as highly sexualized was submitted by a man. Male names are all over those submissions.

pecunium
12 years ago

clairedammit: He has a habit of making direct challenges… then never dealing with the responses.

I guess he thinks, “to ask the question is to answer it”. No need to actually wait for/deal with the replies.

Tulgey Logger
Tulgey Logger
12 years ago

If a man takes a picture of a woman who is out in public and it’s considered lewd, than the woman is the one being lewd. Do you know how infantile women sound when they complain that a picture taken of them in public is lewd, pornographic or inappropriate. Women are the ones dressed like that, so they’re the ones being lewd, pornographic and inappropriate. And if it’s girls under 18 dressed like that, how does that make them victims?

Look. Go outside, its a nice fall evening. look around at the men, we’ll call them civilized grown up people. When you notice that all the men are fully dressed, nice loose fitting clothing and pretty much just their hands and faces aren’t covered. Now you go dress like that. Now, when a picture is taken like in tube crush, you won’t be embarrassed for looking like a stripper in public. And then you’ll be just like a big girl.

If you think you’ll be embarrassed to be caught on camera for dressing like a stripper in public, then don’t dress like a stripper in public.

Dear Owly, lewdness is how you act, not how you dress. It’s quite possible to be lewd about someone who’s all covered up and acting in a completely non-sexual way. Plus, r/Creepshots was not primarily about posting pictures of women and girls who were dressed like strippers or acting lewd, it was about posting candid pictures that were “sexy” to others for reasons entirely separate from how the subject was acting. It was about fetishizing the non-consent of the women and girls in the pictures.

I mean, I don’t know what stripclubs you go to, Owly, but I haven’t heard of any where the strippers wear sunday dresses and sit in the park and just happen to show their underpants to patrons who are gazing at them through telephoto lenses.

princessbonbon
12 years ago

I just read that Gawker article.

I am so livid I could hit someone. How dare you asshole Violentacrez.whine about being exposed. HOW THE FUCK DARE YOU?!

That you would complain about your own family possibly being harmed when you never even FUCKING THOUGHT ABOUT YOUR VICTIMS shows that you are slime. Just utter slime. FUCK YOU.

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

NWO, if you could read, you’d see that no one here is in favor of taking pictures and posting them without consent. But you live in opposite land or some shit.

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

Violentacrez is old enough to know better and can get fucked. Being voted “most important Redditor of the year” sounds like the equivalent of winning a shit eating contest.

OF FUCKING COURSE this asshole lives in TX. I cannot wait to bug out of this dugout.

whataboutthemoonz
12 years ago

I like how the mod of JAILBAIT reddit says “I’ll really miss posting porn”.

PORN. OF TEENAGE GIRLS.

P. S. I’m gonna throw NWOslave on my lawn and see if the grass turns green.

cloudiah
12 years ago

Anybody need a pug?

princessbonbon
12 years ago

Yes I needed a pug. And if there was a pug and sloth AND baby hedgehog…I would be exploded with cute.

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

AVENGER PUGS! That was hilarious, thank you.

thebewilderness
12 years ago

When a perp takes an illegal picture and posts it that is wrong (been illegal in the US since 2003)
When a person takes a picture of a perp in the act of committing a crime and posts it that is not wrong

See, that wasn’t hard. Even owl shit can follow along.

cloudiah
12 years ago

How about a beagle, for good measure?

Tulgey Logger
Tulgey Logger
12 years ago

That was the best dogshaming ever.

Too bad it’s ¡vile misandry!

QuickQuestion
QuickQuestion
12 years ago

Fun fact:

r/feminism is on the list of r/banGawker.

http://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAreTheFeminists/comments/11cls2/rfeminism_moderators_ban_linking_to_gawker_users/

It’s mostly because the r/feminism mods hate SRS, though.

Tulgey Logger
Tulgey Logger
12 years ago

Reddit: where feminism is for dudes.

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

QuickQuestion: not surprising seeing as r/feminism is Bizzaro Feminism where it runs by dudes who have zero idea about anything. Did your fun fact have a point?

whataboutthemoonz
12 years ago

Fun fact: r/feminism is run by people who are not feminists.

I think.

Leeloo Dallas Multipass

“One college, any college. Go ahead. Find me one stinking college where 1 in 4 women are sexually assaulted. One ipso facto will be, you can’t just up and say 99% of women don’t report.”

I bet I can prove that the weather bureau is lying about the annual precipation, too. Go ahead and prove me wrong! One ipso facto: rain doesn’t count.

lauralot89
12 years ago

NWO’s incoherent as ever, and the subject matter of this post is making me ill, so I’m just going to jump on the “fun Youtube videos” bandwagon. Now with more Tommy Wiseau!

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

Give me the link to the number of students and the number of assaults. And it better damn well add up to 1 in 4. If you can’t do that then it’s a LIE.

AS IF you could do the math. You failed in the paragraph after that.

clairedammit
clairedammit
12 years ago

Find me one stinking college where 1 in 4 women are sexually assaulted.

This is more nwo reading comprehension fail. The actual static is One in Four college women report surviving rape (15 percent) or attempted rape (12 percent) since their fourteenth birthday..

And nwo, I’m sure the colleges surveyed are listed in the study referenced on the site. Here, find this on one of your public library’s databases: , K. A. et al. “Results From the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey.” Journal of American College Health 46 (1997): 55-66.

clairedammit
clairedammit
12 years ago

Oh wait, a word fell off, that should be Douglas, K. A. et al. “Results From the 1995 National College Health Risk Behavior Survey.” Journal of American College Health 46 (1997): 55-66

clairedammit
clairedammit
12 years ago

Lauralot, we have an annoying neighbor named Mark and we all say “Oh hi Mark!” just like Tommy Wiseau in the roof scene (as we scuttle away).

cloudiah
12 years ago

I’m really not sure about how to quantify one ipso facto as a unit of measurement. Maybe…

4 a prioris = 1 ipso facto
10 ipso factos = 1 Carthago delenda est
10 Carthago delenda ests = 1 post coitum

All weights and equivalents determined by the Owly regulatory department of Weights & Measures, and supported by NISO standards.

1 6 7 8 9 10 13