There are a lot of hair-raisingly reactionary dudes on The Spearhead, but perhaps none quite so hair-raising as the prolific commenter who calls himself Darryl X. Here are some of his pearls of wisdom, taken from a recent Spearhead thread. (Many of his comments in the thread were devoted to a sort of mini-vendetta against another Spearhead commenter, Andie, who had committed the crime of commenting while female; I’ve cut out most of that to focus on Darryl’s more timeless thoughts.) Fair warning: This is extreme stuff, even by Spearhead standards.
Since the solution for the past forty-four years was to kill and impoverish and exile and imprison men and steal their kids, I’d say sending women to live in a cave is a generous trade.
All women are feminists because all women (without a single exception) have benefited excessively from the legal, political, social and financial machine that feminists have created. And those benefits have all come at the expense of the lives and livelihoods of tens of millions of men and children (in the US alone). When all my financial resources and children which women stole have been returned to me and all women are living on the street to pay for it only then will there be fairness.
Feminism is a hate movement. It is a campaign of hate against men and children. And all women are evil until feminism has been destroyed and every women pays back repairations with interest. …
This is a war. And it will end only one way. The complete utter destruction of feminism and the women who participated in it and/or who sat by passively at let it happen. I have absolutely no sympathy and will demonstrate no mercy for any woman until I and other men have been compensated and women and feminists have been punished for their egregious crimes against humanity (preferably with death sentences). This is a war that women started and it will not end until every one of them has paid. …
Why Andie Must Pay for the Crimes of All Women
She’s a woman. She benefited from feminism more than any man. Even if she represents 20% of women who are not psychopaths, she must be compelled to take an active part in the destruction of feminists and feminism. … She must pay for her complicity … The consequences of her failure to stop feminism must be greater than the retaliation by feminists. Otherwise, there will be no incentive for women to help men. This is a war. If you aren’t fighting feminism and feminists, then you are helping them. Stopping feminism is fundamental to maintaining civilization.
Women are herd animals. … Women are much easier to control and manipulate than boys … Boys have to be drugged. Girls come pre-drugged.
Women have choices. If they want rights and privileages, then they must have responsibilities. Presently, women vote. But they are not held accountable for the consequences of their choices when they vote. Most men have no choices. If they want to live. Women are not women today. They are whores. Big difference.
Women and feminists are opportunists. They are … looking for someone else at whom to point fingers of blame and cast aspersions and pick up the tab as they now understand that responsible men have nothing left to steal. They’re just looking for the next host on which to parasitize.
We’re Still Hunting the Mammoth to Feed You
[M]ost of the taxes that men are currently paying fund the excessive lifestyles of women … [M]en do all the work and women do little or nothing.
I have been actively fighting feminism for more than thirty years. I have racked up quite a list of those who have made the mistake of getting in my cross-hairs. … Many a feminist federal employee and university professor have watched their careers and their lives come apart after picking a fight with me. … I don’t have television or cable or internet and cell phone or land line or refrigerator or microwave. Hunting feminists is my hobby.
Unhappy hunting!
*sprays some troll repellent on the thread, hopes it gets better*
@wrath
Yes. Many women have fought in wars, sometimes dressing up as men to do it because they were forbidden to do so if they presented as women. Also, many more civilian women were killed in wars. Plus, feminism has been trying arduously to get the army to allow women to serve in combat positions.
As for dirty and dangerous jobs? Apart from the aforementioned role as soldiers, women have been miners, farmers, nurses, maids, cleaning women, washer women, etc.
So you’re wrong. On all accounts.
@Some Guy
Encylopedia dramatica? Really?
Careful, emilygoddess, you’ll make their heads explode!
“Got a problem with something an MRA said? You can only criticize it if you also mention a feminist who said something similar! ”
Amen! Hey Some Guy, why don’t you start your own blog where you can talk about the dumb shit radfems say. What’s the matter, afraid you’ll fail? You can’t be any worse than David, after all. According to you he set the bar pretty low, so this should be easy for you.
“And don’t get me started on how ridiculously easy dating is for women (even if they are fat and ugly), whenever a woman complains “where are all the good men”, what she is really saying is where all the Brad Pitts and Zac Effrons or exciting bad boys.”
Seriously? Are you serious? It’s pretty obvious that you don’t know shit about history or women, so fuck right off. Asshole.
Oh right, women always had it so easy, and never worked hard jobs.
Except, you know, when they did.
I wish the trolls would at least mix it up a little, instead of just coming here and dumping their copy pasta that we’ve seen ad infinitum. (Why do all MRAs have such a hate crush on Brad Pitt?)
I give Wrath zero points out of 10.
I give Sticky -4 for being repeatedly boring, and for not updating the blog David generously created for him.
Is there an MRA version of Manboobz where the MRAs expose the extreme misandrist stuff that feminists are saying and with enough material to post daily like Manboobz(and that is because there are only 24 hours in a day and other more joyous things to do) or are they always hanging on the comments from many years ago made by 3 or 4 radical feminists on the radfem hub in an attempt to show that women are obviously worse???
RE: Inurashii
HEY I KNOW YOU! What’re you doing here? (And did we miss you earlier?) I had no idea we had similar online haunts.
Also, this thread has discussions of Jimmie Rodgers (I have a CD of his songs), and kittens. Welp, might as well quit the Internet, everything’s been done now.
Also, wow, some people reaaaalllly don’t know their history. Where are those photos from the child labor forum thread…
–Rogan
Oh no, feel free to get started, I could use a laugh.
“And don’t get me started on how ridiculously easy dating is for women…”
This is a double edged sword. If a woman is successful at dating, it is because women have an advantage. If she is unsuccessful at dating then it’s because she only goes for bad boys or is a slut. And what is the definition of success? Marriage? Commitment? Multiple partners? It’s totally not like different women want different things in their love lives. Yeah….
Hey Rogan, I linked to those child labor photos just above. And yay for Jimmie Rodgers fans!
Brad Pitt and bad boys and women having too easy a time of dating? If the word “princesses” is mentioned I’m going to start suspecting a return visitor has decided to bless us with his presence again.
(Or it could be that they all just sound the same. Maybe there’s a newsletter that they’re copying this boilerplate stuff about Pitt from.)
I’d just like to mention that when my kid ended up in the custody of his father through some pretty dodgy legal manoeuvrings, it was unfair. And so I …
.. paid my child support, on time, every month, because I care about my kid and want to contribute to his upbringing.
When I had to fight for the right to see him through the police and courts, I..
… took the opportunities I could get to hang out with him, and made sure that in between times he got letters and phone calls and presents from me so he’d know that even if he didn’t see me very often, I was thinking about him.
What I didn’t do was go on the internet and suggest that all men should be punished for what this one wanker was doing, while refusing to support my kid because WAH.
And when my kid was old enough so he was listened to, and he asked to come live with me, I..
.. discovered that the cost of raising a kid was more than I’d thought and that the child support I’d paid would not cover half his expenses even though I was paying 18% of a top-tax-bracket income. I’d thought child support was unfairly high. I found out I was wrong. It’s actually mostly too low.
And no, his father isn’t paying a cent now. I cover the lot myself.
Just some perspective. Trolls, this is your cue to tell me I’m making it up and that all men aren’t like that. Top tip: I know. Just you lot are.
Women did all those things. The only difference was that when payday came the father or husband picked up the womans pay because women were not allowed to own anything up to and including their labor.
Tatjna,
Whaaaaaaat? You are a woman and you lost custody? Why didn’t you just sit in the street and cry until you got your child back? Does not compute. Does not compute.
Biting Beaver? Srsly? A woman who was hounded and pursued by MRAs hell bent on killing her and kidnapping her son because she said something that pissed them off?
You already showed us who you are, Slimy Schtick, but thanks for confirming it yet again.
@Fembot Well I did try to get my vagina to mind-control the entire court system into performing my bidding, but oddly enough that didn’t work. Maybe it needs new batteries?
@Tatjna
I always stick the batteries in in the wrong direction. Gotta make sure to line up the plusses and minuses correctly.
Sigh, you wait and wait for the trolls to come for a little batting practice and this is what they bring us? I already know why no one is going to read sticky’s blog- lazy bastard can’t even be bothered to quote from the sites he links. Dude, you have been trolling the perfect model of how to present hate-speech in a post. I’m just going to go out on a limb and say the woman who said she wanted to abort her son was not actually serious, because, well, he’s about 16 years too old for that. If she genuinely wanted to kill him, she would have said ‘I want to kill him’. But if you disagree, just quote her directly in easy to access text on your blog, and use the link as a citation. It’s easy! Then I may read it and, since you are really not trustworthy, I will verify it.
nwoslave, Katz just said she is not impressed by people who claim they predicted things but have no proof. Why did you quote her saying this and then list a bunch of shit you claim to have predicted? If you had addressed any other poster you would have had a greater chance of them giving a shit, but you chose the one who outright said she would not care if you predicted stuff. Ugh.
And wrath- you call that wrath? That was boring as shit! Look, I’m not going to lie, I only kinda skimmed it, but all it was was a regurgitation of some old school mra crap- feminism is evil because it is, women don’t die in war (even though they do), it’s so hard to get laid, try living in a more oppressive country if you want to be more oppressed (um, what does that fix?), and sniff sniff whimper. A serious lack of wrath there, Wrath. Ooh, new user name for you: The Incredible Sulk!
Anyway, trolls, get your shit together, people. That was just sad.
@Tatjna, What a horrible situation, and yet you show such kindness and grace in writing about it. I want to embroider comment that on a sampler and mail it to every MRA who comes here to complain, but … they are kind of impervious to kindness, grace, and reality. Also, I can’t embroider. Anyway, sorry that happened and I am glad that things appear to have worked out for you and your son.
@Timetravellingfool – “Why did you quote her saying this and then list a bunch of shit you claim to have predicted?”
Short answer: because Owly’s a fuckwit.
Gosh, the trolls are boring tonight…and as usual, prove that they live under rocks.
Gotta love the Zac Efron comment. Because there are only shallow women. No shallow men. Oh wait, when a man whines about having it too hard dating, but he’s only willing to consider model-looking women, he’s just acting on his ‘biological imperative’. But when a woman insists she be physically attracted to someone she date, she’s shallow.
Dude. Everyone has the right to not be attracted to people, and not date them. And being looks obsessed is hardly the prerogative of one gender.
You could always troll this douchenozzle if you’re bored
http://governmentsgetgirlfriends.wordpress.com/