Our dear friend over at the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog is worried about filthy sluts. And when he says filthy, he means filthy: these are gals, he tells us, who quite literally “piss and take dumps everywhere but a toilet.”
To see examples of this new breed of sluts, he tells us, we need look no further than reality TV or any woman’s dorm:
There have been plenty of examples from Snooki of MTV’s Jersey Shore pissing outside like a pet to college chicks taking dumps in showers.
He’s also discovered evidence of this new filthy slut epidemic on the reality show Bad Girls Club Mexico, on which, much to his surprise, he recently witnessed one of the aforementioned “bad girls” acting in a manner that was, as they say in Newspeak, doubleplusungood. In one scene, he reports
one of the bad girls really has to piss. She’s in a limo with the other bad girls so she finds a bucket, pulls down her skirt, and pisses into the bucket. Later, when she exits the limo, she gives the piss filled bucket to some guy to deal with.
That last part is a very apt metaphor for how men have to clean up after women. Whether its men building plumbing systems to efficiently deal with waste, or having to deal with a bucket of women’s piss, it’s all the same.
Uh, have you ever visited a nursing home? Nearly 90 percent of direct-care workers, many of whom literally spend their days dealing with piss and shit, are women. Most of them earn less than $20,000 a year; many personal care aides earn only about half that.
Sorry, I didn’t mean to intrude upon this little fantasy of his with some actual, you know, facts. He continues:
Here we have another example of how a toilet is becoming a completely foreign object to women. Eventually, women will have no idea what a toilet is. We’re going to need litter boxes for women in the future. Women litter will be next to kitty litter in the grocery store.
Sorry, dude. The only ladies in my life who need a litter box are these gals here:
In a previous post on the epidemic of filthy sluttiness, Mr. Pro-Male/Anti-feminist Tech worried about encountering some of these dirty women himself:
In the future, this is going to be something I’m going to have to watch with my women. I naturally assumed that any woman I get now or in the future would know how to wash themselves since they are presumably functioning adults. This is no longer an assumption I can make. As soon as this starts being a problem, I’m heading back to being celibate. I’m not a cleanliness freak by a long shot, but this is seriously disgusting, and I don’t want to know what organisms are growing on these filthy sluts. I knew there would get to a point where I would be heading back to celibacy, but I didn’t think it would have to do with women having a lack of hygiene.
Happily, though, the (alleged) increasingly disgusting behavior of today’s women will have one very salutary side-effect: it will help to further the anti-feminist tech revolution.
This will add another reason for guys to use alternatives to women such as porn now and VR sex in the future. All of those “virtual women” know how to wash themselves. If things are going the way of women getting increasingly filthy, then it’s another reason that virtual women will be superior to real women.
Clean? Maybe. Safe? Never. Just wait until you go to the bathroom one morning and find a red ring of death on your penis.
Yeah, actual slaves get punished for speaking out against their masters. I’m still wondering why he’s allowed internet access. Probably because he pays for it with the money he earns at his job. Oh wait…
I’m surprised Owly hasn’t taken that film as an opportunity to go on an OMG JEEWWZZZZ rant (because apparently Jews were involved in the funding/making of it, which sounds like perfect Owlybait).
I guess that would contradict the “respect religion moar you horrible lefties or we’ll beat you up” part though. So we’ll have to wait for more OMG JEEEWWWZZZ until he thinks we’ve forgotten about this post.
I often wonder if it chaps the hide of any of these ‘blue pill/red pill’ dimbulbs that in the movie, the majority of the residents of Zion are, ahem, ‘thugs’, and the women there fly ships and fire missiles and lead squads rather than just making sandwiches all the time.
Oh, but Jesus is Keanu Reeves, so I guess it’s OK.
And the MRA crowd is so hypocritical. In the piece “Fire in the Manosphere” Price writes, “Since they started working on the problems in the 80s, they’ve managed to contain some of the damage and roll back some of the crazier legislation. Take the limits on alimony for example. If it weren’t for these guys, a lot more states would still have punitive alimony laws in place.
Another example is visitation legislation. Women who repeatedly withhold visitation now face penalties that actually have some teeth. Presumed joint legal custody in dozens of states is yet another victory.”
In my early days of trying to comment on their sites, I remember saying the exact same thing, only to be instantly denounced as a vicious lying feminist. But statutes and case law are out there for all to see. The stereotype of the 50’s divorcee, living on bon-bons, getting all the property and money, etc. died long ago in the courts. And they will compare two court cases, claiming that a woman won in one case and a man lost in another, as being proof positive of bias against all men. They don’t look into things like what was going on leading up to the hearing, how the parties behave in court, and what the judge’s personal biases might be (yes, they have them and family court is much more arbitrary than criminal court).
I just completed a tech support gig helping social workers, and they are not exactly a monolithic tower of wisdom, but can be very biased based on lots of factors. I met social workers during my divorce who got a hate-on for me because I’d been a housewife. It can go any which-way. But the MRAers are only capable of seeing what they want to see, so that they can get another rage fix. They seem to feed on that.
Actually most of us who aren’t on r/atheism are generally tolerant of all religions, except for when they stop playing nicely with each other, at that point we like to step in and say “guys, you might want to cut this out”.
Viscaria, those Cookie Monster cupcake/cookie thingies are gorgeous!
Aworld – funny, isn’t it: Owly can’t abide any religion other than his own constipated version of Christianity, but let anyone not of his bigoted ilk breathe a word of criticism and suddenly he’s the Defender of the Faith(s)*.
*with apologies to those who actually have held that title
MrSodern: Vast number? In the words of the greatest movie villain of all time: You exaggerate.
This is true, there are not enough MRAs for any percentage of them to be, in any real sense, vast.
But of those who profess their MRA nature, those who complain about women’s lack of dependence on men (it being their, “natural state”) are legion.
People have given you a lot of very bad ideas about the MRM. That, or you just totally misinterpret everything we say.
Those people would be the MRAs who go on about Thomas Ball, or how the women are in need of being punished when a man isn’t convicted of rape, or…
Kind of hard to misinterpret that.
Girl Writes What. Paul Elam. Angry Harry.
All say that women have too many rights.
Both parents should have rights to their children. And any father who doesn’t help raise his kids, probably didn’t want them in the first place. It should be his right to opt out. Women have the right to do that already. It’s called abortion.
And there is the problem. He ought to be able to opt out… “If he doesn’t want them”. The woman, of course, is required to “opt in”. You are advocating a rights for him, but not for her situation.
Problem is, that is the default assumption when a woman is awarded a job in an occupation that is (or was previously) considered suitable only for men.
I’m waiting for the inevitable story of the time an MRA was rejected for a job they were overqualified for, because they were a straight, white man.
And then, of course, the company went and grabbed a random gay black woman off the street and hired her even though she didn’t know how to do the job.
Happens all the time, you see!
this is kind of rich coming from the dude who flips the fuck out and has to act like a huge baby if anyone says anything even semi-critical of christianity.
Cue owly’s denied a job at PepsiCo story. How does he know that he was denied the job because he is a man? Because they told him so.
Yeah, and if a woman in a predominately male field of work makes a mistake, that proves she wasn’t qualified for the job, just a quota hire. If a man makes the same mistake, it’s because he’s human and making mistakes is normal.
Also, any incentives to try to help women enter predominately male professions do not overcome the extra challenges of trying to break into the good ol’ boy network.
Also: if they have to put in hiring quotas (although I did read this is actually illegal) then it would indicate that the default hiring practices of that industry are discriminatory against the group that are being quota’d.
you read correctly. contra owlslave, SCOTUS has ruled that hiring quotas are not an acceptable way of complying with anti-discrimination law
Yeah, and if a woman in a predominately male field of work makes a mistake, that proves she wasn’t qualified for the job, just a quota hire. If a man makes the same mistake, it’s because he’s human and making mistakes is normal.
Yeah, my dad is like an MRA casestudy, unfortunately, even though he’s generally a really good guy. He was truly fired from his job for doing the right thing (he found out the police department he worked at was corrupt and when he refused to participate in or hide unethical activities, he was forced out and then blacklisted in the field–they would literally show up in person to departments he applied to and lie about the reason he left the job), but instead of doing the logical thing and going, “Wow, the rich old white-guy club has truly fucked me over,” years of bitterness for being out of work turned into, “I would have gotten that job but they gave it to that black guy/woman/etc.” Even when I pointed out that Affirmative Action wasn’t even legal in our state anymore, he would not be budged.
I had hoped that after being hired again and working with very competant women and people of color (I mean, his best friend is black; their friendship is so thick that D. followed my dad from department to department to department over the last decade because he’d rather work with dad than anyone else) would show him how stupid he was being, but he still clings to this affirmative action bullshit. White guy gets angry and throws a temper tantrum at work, well, being a cop is stressful. Woman cries at work and she’s an affirmative action hire and would never have passed the psych exam or gotten promoted if she wasn’t a woman. White guy fucks up (and he works for some truly dumb people; I help out at the station and the stories I could tell…), that individual person is unqualified, but when the hispanic guy at work does something dumb, well, out comes the talk of quotas and PC hiring choices.
It drives me nuts because I love my dad and in other areas he’s a really great, compassionate, intelligent guy. But bitterness and hardship combined with conservative ideology (and the conservative media machine that just kept feeding him lies and more resentment over the years) turned him into someone I don’t even recognize sometimes. It’s sad. And infuriating. But I understand how guys who have been through dreadful divorces and such could turn out the same way…one part bitterness, one part conservative bent, add lies and constant reinforcement of your feelings and beliefs, mix well, and voila: MRA soup.
Is it just me, or does anyone else here find it hard to believe that any professional would ever tell someone “yeah sorry, you didn’t get the gig because we had to hire a way less qualified chick. Quotas man.” Even if that were the case (I’m dubious) any hiring manager worth their salt has to know that saying something like that is colossally fucking stupid. For starters, that’s the kind of shit that can start a law suit. That’s the kind of thing that results in bad publicity and, in extreme cases, I’d be worried it could be the sort of thing that could throw someone unstable over the edge. Hiring managers are supposed to make the hiring process (and not getting hired process) as smooth as possible so as to avoid conflicts and PR nightmares. Plus, hiring managers don’t always necessarily want to just kick people who aren’t right for the particular position they applied for to the curb. Just because you aren’t a good fit for one position in a company doesn’t mean you wouldn’t be better suited for one that may be opening up in the future. Hiring managers know this, and generally don’t want to just dissuade people from applying to future jobs because they weren’t the right fit for one.
Not to mention, it strikes me as rather presumptuous that NWO doesn’t consider other qualifications for the position. Given his temperament on here, NWO strikes me as a supervisor who would be very, VERY difficult to work for. Inconsistent, incoherent and raging are not good qualities to have in someone who needs to lead a team, no matter how good you are at whatever the team does.
It’s not just you.
It’s not just you.
Not in owly’s alternate universe.
Maybe Princess NWOslave is a hiring manager… which explains why in his universe they are all colossally fucking stupid.
LOL, I’m glad. Honestly, IF (huge if there) someone had said something to the effect of “something something, government” it’s probably because at least that was potentially less upsetting than “uh, we really need someone in a supervisory position who can like, SUPERVISE, not just rage at people and talk about how 12 year olds in capris are acting like they’re ‘in heat'”
Ostara, it’s not just you, and forget NWO being a supervisor–I wouldn’t want his attitude on a team of mine.
News: 73-year-old woman raped and beaten in Central Park.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/12/woman-73-sexually-assaulted-in-central-park/?hp&gwh=C9A0F0519BFF3AE0FF39F1CEB6E516C8
I wonder if MRAs will blame it on what she was wearing?
Not only that, Freitag, but she appears to have been raped in retaliation for photographing this same man masturbating in the park only 7 days earlier.
I’ve applied for plenty of jobs that said “women and minorities encouraged to apply” and for which I was marginally, if at all, qualified. I’m guessing they chose someone less because of gender and more because of, you know, qualifications.