Categories
a voice for men antifeminism cock blockade creepy evil women internal debate men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA paul elam PUA rapey rhymes with roosh sex vaginas

Gold-digging c**ts and over-inflated pussy: An A Voice for Menner “refutes” Roosh

Paul Elam has so far refrained from responding to the halfway-on-the-mark, halfway-completely-ridiculous criticism of the Men’s Rights movement leveled by rapey PUA douchenozzle Roosh that we discussed yesterday. Not even that bit comparing the very serious dudes reading A Voice for Men to silly ladies reading Cosmo was enough to provoke the oh-so-easily provoked Elam. Either he’s gotten very Zen about criticism from PUAs, or he’s spent the last several days punching pillows and muttering under his breath about evil “pussy beggars.”

But some of Elam’s acolytes took it upon themselves to respond for him. My favorite comment is this bait-and-switcher from MrStodern, which starts off with a vaguely reasonable observation before descending into misogynist nonsense.

Apparently feminists love pickup artists, and the only legitimate reason for dudes to have sex with women is to teach them a lesson. Who knew?

179 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CassandraSays
CassandraSays
12 years ago

Wait, feminism isn’t particularly interested in telling men how to get laid, that being outside its core mission and all? Why noooottttt? Why are feminists so meeaaannn? Oh well, guess I’ll just have to keep treating women like shit then. After all, if they’re too wasted to complain then that means I win!

(shorter Eurosabra)

pecunium
12 years ago

No Complaints registered? Then why were you bitching about women who called the cops because you were creeping them out?

Perhaps they just don’t register them with you… what with the gaslighting and all. Heck, you might be trying to gaslight us, even now.

MrStodern
MrStodern
12 years ago

“Apparently feminists love pickup artists, and the only legitimate reason for dudes to have sex with women is to teach them a lesson. Who knew?”

Actually what I wrote was the implication that NOT having sex with gold-diggers (not women period) might just inspire a bit of learning on their part. I freely admit that I may be wrong about that.

A number of other people here seem to have misinterpreted what I wrote, and quite frankly, I’m not terribly surprised.

Sofia van der Linde
Sofia van der Linde
9 years ago

I do agree with him that people who do not want commitment should simply have sex with one another. Tricking someone into thinking you are looking for a relationship when you are not is simply wrong.

A pity this MrStodern cannot be pragmatic all the way and simply ditch misogyny.

1 6 7 8